Methods.– Design: prospective before/after study. Population.– Sixty-four workers (37 males, mean age 42.4 8.8 years) with 187.9 148.7 days mean duration of sick leave during the preceding 24 months. Intervention.– Fifteen one-hour physiotherapy sessions, delivered in the community by private practice physiotherapists; 5 one-day session, in a rehabilitation center providing coordination by a physiatrist, contact with the occupational physician, advice by an occupational therapist and a psychologist, group interaction, on a 5-week period. Outcome measures.– Spine strength and flexibility, pain, psychological impact, quality of life, self assessment of ability to work. Results.– Among the patients, 87.5% have attended the scheduled physiotherapy sessions and 70.3% the multidisciplinary one day sessions. All parameters were significantly improved at the end of the program (P < 0.05). Finger-floor distance: 11.3 versus 17.6 cm; Sorensen test: 80.5 versus 60.6 sec; Ito test: 79.8 versus 53.4 sec. Pain: 42 versus 52 mm on the AVS. Quality of life DALLAS: 43.3 versus 59.2; work/leisure DALLAS: 42.6 versus 60,8; anxiety/depression DALLAS: 30,3 versus 41,3; social behavior DALLAS: 26,9 versus 32.2. HAD: 13.2 versus 15.7. FABQ: 35.1 versus 43.0. Physical SF36: 39.4 versus 34.7; mental SF36: 46.0 versus 41.4. The proportion of patients feeling able to work has significantly increased (28.3% versus 63.3%; P < 0.0001). Overall cost of the program for the social insurance system: 1532 s/patient. Discussion.– This program, mixing community based and rehabilitation center based services is both feasible, efficient on the short term, and cheaper than full time out-patient programs. Comparison to other programs could show that multidisciplinarity rather than intensity is the key component to success and can be achieved at an acceptable cost.
Read full abstract