Abstract Introduction: This study compared the diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with that of 18F-fluoro-2-glucose-positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging in assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 202 eligible patients diagnosed with stage II and stage III breast cancer were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Mersin University Faculty of Medicine Hospital from 2019 to 2023. When performing data statistics in a continuous structure, mean and standard deviation, median minimum and maximum values of the features; Frequency and percentage values were used when defining categorical variables. Breast MRI and FDG-PET/CT were evaluated to evaluate response to treatment. After surgery, pathological complete response (pCR) was determined based on the final pathology reports. Tumors were divided according to hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2). As the gold standard treatment response method, evaluation was made according to pathological response status. Diagnostic test statistics, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy statistics, 95% confidance interval values are given. The statistical significance level of the data was taken as p <0.05. IBM SPSS 21 version was used to evaluate the data. Results: The total age was minimum 30, maximum 75, mean age was 50.4±11.2 and median age was 50. At the time of diagnosis, the disease stage was stage 2 in 24.8% of the patients and stage 3 in 75.2%. Histology was Invasive ductal carcinoma in 65.3%, invasive lobular carcinoma in 13.5%, other in 21.2%. Minimum Ki-67 was 3, maximum was 95, average was 31.9±18.8, and median Ki-67 was 30. Hormon receptor status (estrogen or progesteron positivity) was evaluated. While ER (estrogen reseptor) was positive in 59.4% of the patients, PR (progesteron receptor) was positive in 52.5%. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive was 38.1%. HR+HER2- was in 42.7%, HR+,HER2- in 21.1%, HR+,HER2+ was in 17.6%, and triple negative in 18.6%. Grade 1 was in 11.9% of the patients, grade 2 in 43.6%, and grade 3 in 44.6%. When postoperative pathology reports was evaluated, pathological complete response was achieved in 69 of 202 patients(%34.1). When FDG-PET/CT was evaluated determining complete response; Sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 0.83-0.97, p<0.05), Specificity 51% (95% CI: 0.42-0.59, p<0.05), PPV value 48% (95% CI: 0.40-0.57 , p>0.05), and NPV was 91% (95% CI: 0.84-0.97, p<0.05), and the accuracy rate was low and significantly 64% (95% CI: 0.57-0.71, p<0, 05). As a result of these meaningful statistical calculations; FDG-PET/CT diagnostic method was not reliable in terms of specificity and positive predictive value. When magnetic resonance was evaluated, in determining complete response; Sensitivity 72% (95% CI: 0.63-0.82, p<0.05), Specificity 90% (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, p<0.05), PPV(positive predictive value) 78% (95% CI: 0.68-0.88 , p<0.05), and NPV(negative predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 0.80-0.92, p<0.05), and the accuracy rate was high and significantly 85% (95% CI: 0.78-0.89, p<0, 05). As a result of these meaningful statistical calculations; Response to treatment status (complete response/non-response) MRI diagnostic method was reliable and can be used instead of the currently used Gold Standard pathology diagnostic method. Conclusion: Our study showed that breast MRI is superior to PET CT in predicting pathological complete response. This study showed that MRI is very important in evaluating treatment response in patients diagnosed with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Emel Sezer, Halil Çelik, Kadir Eser, Pınar Pelin Özcan, Yüksel Balcı, Ferah Tuncel, Fatma Esra Erdem Palaz, Elif Ertaş. Breast MRI and FDG-PET/CT for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-17.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
822 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Final Pathology Report
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
630 Search results
Sort by Recency