Field Potentials In Auditory Cortex Research Articles

Laminar pattern of sensory-evoked dynamic high-frequency oscillatory activity in the macaque auditory cortex.

High-frequency (>60Hz) neuroelectric signals likely have functional roles distinct from low-frequency (<30Hz) signals. While high-gamma activity (>60Hz) does not simply equate to neuronal spiking, they are highly correlated, having similar information encoding. High-gamma activity is typically considered broadband and poorly phase-locked to sensory stimuli and thus is typically analyzed after transformations into absolute amplitude or spectral power. However, those analyses discard signal polarity, compromising the interpretation of neuroelectric events that are essentially dipolar. In the spectrotemporal profiles of field potentials in auditory cortex, we show high-frequency spectral peaks not phase-locked to sound onset, which follow the broadband peak of phase-locked onset responses. Isolating the signal components comprising the high-frequency peaks reveals narrow-band high-frequency oscillatory events, whose instantaneous frequency changes rapidly from >150 to 60Hz, which may underlie broadband high-frequency spectral peaks in previous reports. The laminar amplitude distributions of the isolated activity had two peak positions, while the laminar phase patterns showed a counterphase relationship between those peaks, indicating the formation of dipoles. Our findings suggest that nonphase-locked HGA arises in part from oscillatory or recurring activity of supragranular-layer neuronal ensembles in auditory cortex.

Laminar neural dynamics of auditory evoked responses: Computational modeling of local field potentials in auditory cortex of non-human primates

Evoked neural responses to sensory stimuli have been extensively investigated in humans and animal models both to enhance our understanding of brain function and to aid in clinical diagnosis of neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Recording and imaging techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), local field potentials (LFPs), and calcium imaging provide complementary information about different aspects of brain activity at different spatial and temporal scales. Modeling and simulations provide a way to integrate these different types of information to clarify underlying neural mechanisms.In this study, we aimed to shed light on the neural dynamics underlying auditory evoked responses by fitting a rate-based model to LFPs recorded via multi-contact electrodes which simultaneously sampled neural activity across cortical laminae. Recordings included neural population responses to best-frequency (BF) and non-BF tones at four representative sites in primary auditory cortex (A1) of awake monkeys. The model considered major neural populations of excitatory, parvalbumin-expressing (PV), and somatostatin-expressing (SOM) neurons across layers 2/3, 4, and 5/6. Unknown parameters, including the connection strength between the populations, were fitted to the data. Our results revealed similar population dynamics, fitted model parameters, predicted equivalent current dipoles (ECD), tuning curves, and lateral inhibition profiles across recording sites and animals, in spite of quite different extracellular current distributions. We found that PV firing rates were higher in BF than in non-BF responses, mainly due to different strengths of tonotopic thalamic input, whereas SOM firing rates were higher in non-BF than in BF responses due to lateral inhibition.In conclusion, we demonstrate the feasibility of the model-fitting approach in identifying the contributions of cell-type specific population activity to stimulus-evoked LFPs across cortical laminae, providing a foundation for further investigations into the dynamics of neural circuits underlying cortical sensory processing.

Primary Generators of Visually Evoked Field Potentials Recorded in the Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Prior studies have reported "local" field potential (LFP) responses to faces in the macaque auditory cortex and have suggested that such face-LFPs may be substrates of audiovisual integration. However, although field potentials (FPs) may reflect the synaptic currents of neurons near the recording electrode, due to the use of a distant reference electrode, they often reflect those of synaptic activity occurring in distant sites as well. Thus, FP recordings within a given brain region (e.g., auditory cortex) may be "contaminated" by activity generated elsewhere in the brain. To determine whether face responses are indeed generated within macaque auditory cortex, we recorded FPs and concomitant multiunit activity with linear array multielectrodes across auditory cortex in three macaques (one female), and applied current source density (CSD) analysis to the laminar FP profile. CSD analysis revealed no appreciable local generator contribution to the visual FP in auditory cortex, although we did note an increase in the amplitude of visual FP with cortical depth, suggesting that their generators are located below auditory cortex. In the underlying inferotemporal cortex, we found polarity inversions of the main visual FP components accompanied by robust CSD responses and large-amplitude multiunit activity. These results indicate that face-evoked FP responses in auditory cortex are not generated locally but are volume-conducted from other face-responsive regions. In broader terms, our results underscore the caution that, unless far-field contamination is removed, LFPs in general may reflect such "far-field" activity, in addition to, or in absence of, local synaptic responses.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Field potentials (FPs) can index neuronal population activity that is not evident in action potentials. However, due to volume conduction, FPs may reflect activity in distant neurons superimposed upon that of neurons close to the recording electrode. This is problematic as the default assumption is that FPs originate from local activity, and thus are termed "local" (LFP). We examine this general problem in the context of previously reported face-evoked FPs in macaque auditory cortex. Our findings suggest that face-FPs are indeed generated in the underlying inferotemporal cortex and volume-conducted to the auditory cortex. The note of caution raised by these findings is of particular importance for studies that seek to assign FP/LFP recordings to specific cortical layers.

Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an important tool for investigating human brain function, but the relationship between the hemodynamically based fMRI signals in the human brain and the underlying neuronal activity is unclear. We recorded single unit activity and local field potentials in auditory cortex of two neurosurgical patients and compared them with the fMRI signals of 11 healthy subjects during presentation of an identical movie segment. The predicted fMRI signals derived from single units and the measured fMRI signals from auditory cortex showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.75, P < 10(-47)). Thus, fMRI signals can provide a reliable measure of the firing rate of human cortical neurons.

Effects of MRF stimulation on the auditory-evoked potential

The effects of mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) stimulation on cortical-evoked potentials was studied in nine cats. The interval between MRF stimulation and delivery of tonal stimuli (i.e., delay) was varied as was the intensity of electrical stimuli at 52 sites in MRF. The effects of MRF stimulation on auditory-evoked potentials were, as in the visual system, time dependent: with a 30 ms delay, the N1 wave (latency 10–15 ms) was usually augmented; with a 25 ms delay, the P2 wave (latency 20–25 ms) was consistently suppressed; with a 5 ms delay, the N2 wave (latency 35–50 ms) was consistently augmented. The most effective stimulation sites were sharply localized within MRF. Stimulation alone at these sites elicited large field potentials in auditory cortex with a peak latency of 30–50 ms and a duration of 80 ms. Stimulation of neighboring sites evoked only marginal changes even with increased current. Pupillary behavior, used as an experimental control, was affected by broader areas within the MRF. [Work supported by NIH.]