THE GENERAL ELECTIONS for the Lower House of the Diet, which were held in May I958, provide useful material for a study of Japanese attitudes to foreign policy and to the related questions of rearmament and war. There have been no detailed public opinion polls in these fields for a considerable time and an examination of election issues offers one of the few available statistical methods (albeit a very indirect and inexact one) for judging what Japanese people are thinking in i958 about such crucial problems as their country's alignment with the Western powers, the need to rearm and the use of nuclear weapons. It is generally agreed that foreign policy issues played an unusually important part in the I958 elections. The left-wing opposition (Socialists and Communists) gave more stress than ever to the field of foreign relations; at the same time, the leader of the conservative Liberal-Democratic Party, Mr. Kishi, has, since he first became Prime Minister in February I957, attached the greatest importance to foreign affairs, and his government has done its best to popularize the active policy of economic diplomacy advocated by the Foreign Minister, Mr. Fujiyama. Among the factors that helped to focus attention on foreign policy was the crisis in Japan's relations with China, which came to a head shortly before the elections. As we shall see, the two major parties and the Communists all devoted considerable attention to Sino-Japanese trade and to the vexed problem of policy towards Communist China. Even more important was the fact that both the conservatives and the Socialists tended to avoid controversial domestic issues. There was an extraordinary wide measure of agreement on almost all questions of internal policy that were prominent in the election platforms and speeches. On many of the main domestic issues (including social insurance, help for small and medium business enterprises, tax reduction, government aid to agriculture and fisheries, and the improvement of educational facilities), the two major parties spoke with one voice. At the same time, such moot points as support for constitutional revision or for the control of large business combines were largely avoided. It is significant that in analyzing the election results Mr. Suzuki, the chairman of the Socialist Party, should have mentioned his party's failure to emphasize the differences
Read full abstract