Discovery Logo
Sign In
Search
Paper
Search Paper
Pricing Sign In
  • My Feed iconMy Feed
  • Search Papers iconSearch Papers
  • Library iconLibrary
  • Explore iconExplore
  • Ask R Discovery iconAsk R Discovery Star Left icon
  • Literature Review iconLiterature Review NEW
  • Chat PDF iconChat PDF Star Left icon
  • Citation Generator iconCitation Generator
  • Chrome Extension iconChrome Extension
    External link
  • Use on ChatGPT iconUse on ChatGPT
    External link
  • iOS App iconiOS App
    External link
  • Android App iconAndroid App
    External link
  • Contact Us iconContact Us
    External link
  • Paperpal iconPaperpal
    External link
  • Mind the Graph iconMind the Graph
    External link
  • Journal Finder iconJournal Finder
    External link
Discovery Logo menuClose menu
  • My Feed iconMy Feed
  • Search Papers iconSearch Papers
  • Library iconLibrary
  • Explore iconExplore
  • Ask R Discovery iconAsk R Discovery Star Left icon
  • Literature Review iconLiterature Review NEW
  • Chat PDF iconChat PDF Star Left icon
  • Citation Generator iconCitation Generator
  • Chrome Extension iconChrome Extension
    External link
  • Use on ChatGPT iconUse on ChatGPT
    External link
  • iOS App iconiOS App
    External link
  • Android App iconAndroid App
    External link
  • Contact Us iconContact Us
    External link
  • Paperpal iconPaperpal
    External link
  • Mind the Graph iconMind the Graph
    External link
  • Journal Finder iconJournal Finder
    External link

Related Topics

  • Free Fibula Flap
  • Free Fibula Flap
  • Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap
  • Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap
  • Microvascular Free Flap
  • Microvascular Free Flap
  • Osteocutaneous Flap
  • Osteocutaneous Flap
  • Osteocutaneous Fibula
  • Osteocutaneous Fibula
  • Osteomyocutaneous Flap
  • Osteomyocutaneous Flap
  • Microvascular Flap
  • Microvascular Flap

Articles published on Fibula flap

Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
1878 Search results
Sort by
Recency
  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1007/s12663-026-02965-2
Fate of Free Fibula Flap Used for Mandibular Reconstruction in Paediatric Population: Effect on Growth, Function, Symmetry—A Systematic Review
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
  • Aditi Vora + 5 more

Fate of Free Fibula Flap Used for Mandibular Reconstruction in Paediatric Population: Effect on Growth, Function, Symmetry—A Systematic Review

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.12.030
Optimizing outcomes in pediatric microvascular mandibular reconstruction: A 23-year institutional experience.
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
  • Theodor B Lenz + 9 more

Optimizing outcomes in pediatric microvascular mandibular reconstruction: A 23-year institutional experience.

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ijom.2026.02.021
Clinical information regarding the fibula flap gained from digital subtraction angiography useful for flap elevation.
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • R Schulte + 4 more

Clinical information regarding the fibula flap gained from digital subtraction angiography useful for flap elevation.

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.jormas.2026.102763
AI-augmented mixed reality for 3D visualization of perforator vessels: A feasibility study in fibular flap surgery.
  • Feb 19, 2026
  • Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Yixiu Liu + 6 more

AI-augmented mixed reality for 3D visualization of perforator vessels: A feasibility study in fibular flap surgery.

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1002/ohn.70179
Jaw-in-a Day: Process Improvement and Outcomes.
  • Feb 19, 2026
  • Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • Cristina Benites + 7 more

Describe the evolving institutional experience with Jaw-in-a-Day reconstruction and evaluate the functional, oncologic, and surgical outcomes of an efficient and reproducible model that can be used for both benign and malignant cases. Retrospective case series. Tertiary academic referral center and an affiliated private practice. A retrospective review of Jaw-in-a-Day reconstructions performed between January 2023 and January 2024 was conducted. All patients undergoing fibula or scapula free flap reconstruction with immediate dental implantation and provisional prosthesis were included. Operative times and prosthetic workflows were compared by prosthesis capture method (in situ vs at the head) and team composition (single vs integrated two-surgeon teams). Outcomes measured were operative time, flap and implant survival, perioperative complications, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores, and prosthesis use. 33 patients (median age 66; range 13-83) underwent Jaw-in-a-Day reconstruction, 20 malignant disease cases, and 13 benign or traumatic cases. Fibula free flaps were used in 32 cases and scapula in one. Median operative time was 12h19m. Prosthesis capture in situ trended toward shorter operative and prosthetic times but did not reach significance. The two-surgeon approach significantly reduced operative time by 4h24m (P < .001) and prosthodontic time by 2 hours (P = .01). All flaps survived. Implant survival was 97%, with three failures in 2 patients. At 12 months, 32 patients used definitive prostheses and median FOIS was 7. The Jaw-in-a-Day surgical approach is feasible for benign and malignant reconstruction with high flap and implant survival. Early institutional adoption shows a learning curve, but efficiency improves with process refinements, particularly a two-surgeon workflow.

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1055/a-2803-4714
The Obesity Paradox in Fibular Free-Tissue Reconstruction: Does Higher BMI Improve Outcomes?
  • Feb 18, 2026
  • Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
  • Benjamin Kurnick + 3 more

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is widespread and projected to increase in prevalence by approximately 30% by 2030. This study evaluates the association between body mass index (BMI), perioperative frailty, and postoperative outcomes, including hospital length-of-stay and perioperative complications for patients undergoing fibular free-tissue reconstruction for head and neck defects.We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, encompassing subjects of mandibular malignancy radical excision with free myocutaneous and fibular flap reconstruction between 2012 and 2022. Primary independent variables were BMI and modified frailty index-11 (mFI-11) scores. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were employed to explore the relationship between BMI, frailty, hospital stay, and perioperative complications.A total of 4,808 patients were included (3,082 males, 1,723 females). Within this cohort, 36.5% were normal BMI (18.5-25.0; n = 1,755), 5.3% were underweight (BMI < 18.5; n = 255), and 58.2% were overweight or obese (BMI > 25.0; n = 2,798). A total of 2,288 (47.6%) were robust (mFI = 0), 1,624 (33.8%) prefrail (mFI = 1), and 896 (18.6%) frail (mFI ≥ 2). Perioperative complication risk was 38.4% for normal-weight patients, 55.3% for underweight patients (p < 0.001), and 28.8% for overweight/obese patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that overweight/obese patients had shorter hospital stays (β: -1.0 days, 95% [CI]: -1.5 to -0.5, p < 0.001) compared with normal-weight patients. Normal-weight patient complication rates increased from 26.9% (robust) to 39.0% (frail, p = 0.0003). Conversely, robust patient complication rates were lower in overweight (23.2%) and obese (23.1%) compared with underweight (42.4%). The highest-risk group consisted of underweight, frail patients (56.2%).Underweight BMI and physiologic frailty function as independent yet synergistic risk factors for poor outcomes after free myocutaneous or fibular flap reconstruction following radical mandibular tumor excision. Notably, decreased BMI confers a greater risk than frailty. These findings challenge the obesity paradox and mandate assessing both nutritional status and physiologic reserve for optimal risk stratification.

  • New
  • Research Article
  • 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000259
Combining cryopreserved autografts and vascularized bone flap for craniofacial defect reconstruction in fibrous dysplasia: a case report
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
  • Hamid Reza Fathi + 2 more

Combining cryopreserved autografts and vascularized bone flap for craniofacial defect reconstruction in fibrous dysplasia: a case report

  • Research Article
  • 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000227
Difficult airway management in giant mandibular ameloblastoma: a case report of awake fiberoptic-guided retrograde intubation
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
  • Arthur M Kharisma + 2 more

Difficult airway management in giant mandibular ameloblastoma: a case report of awake fiberoptic-guided retrograde intubation

  • Research Article
  • 10.1186/s12903-026-07826-5
Fibula flap versus soft tissue flap with reconstruction plate for mandibular stage 3 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a retrospective cohort study
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • BMC Oral Health
  • Yuhan Lin + 8 more

Fibula flap versus soft tissue flap with reconstruction plate for mandibular stage 3 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a retrospective cohort study

  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.011
Algorithmic recipient vessel selection for vessel-depleted lower limbs.
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
  • Alex Sorkin + 6 more

Algorithmic recipient vessel selection for vessel-depleted lower limbs.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102584
Artificial intelligence outperforms a nomogram for osteoradionecrosis prognostication following fibula free flap reconstruction in oral cancer patients.
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Dany Y Matar + 9 more

Artificial intelligence outperforms a nomogram for osteoradionecrosis prognostication following fibula free flap reconstruction in oral cancer patients.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1007/s00238-026-02396-9
Use of stock DICOM data of fibular bone for CAD-CAM design in facial reconstruction by free fibula flap
  • Jan 31, 2026
  • European Journal of Plastic Surgery
  • Massimiliano Gilli + 10 more

Use of stock DICOM data of fibular bone for CAD-CAM design in facial reconstruction by free fibula flap

  • Research Article
  • 10.4317/medoral.28000
Outcomes comparison between fibula and DCIA free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery: Implications for donor site selection.
  • Jan 24, 2026
  • Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal
  • M Guerrero-Martín + 4 more

Donor site selection for bone tissue reconstruction in head and neck surgery has remained a matter of debate since the advent of microsurgical techniques. Both the fibula and the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) free flaps offer specific advantages but also present distinct morbidity profiles that must be considered to provide optimized and personalized reconstructive treatment for each patient. A retrospective morbidity analysis was conducted on 66 osseous free flaps (fibula and DCIA) used for head and neck reconstructive surgery at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital over a 6-year period (2018-2024). Surgical variables, as well as local and systemic complications, were analyzed. Reconstruction with the DCIA free flap was associated with a threefold higher risk of developing systemic infections not related to surgical site (47.37% vs. 21.28%; OR=3.33; 95% CI=1.07-10.41) compared with the fibula free flap. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding free flap failure, surgical site infections, postoperative bleeding, microvascular complications, or donor site morbidity. the DCIA free flap may be associated with a higher risk of systemic infections. Therefore, for patients with predisposing factors for systemic infections, the fibula free flap might represent a safer donor site. These findings could help refine donor site selection and improve individualized planning in head and neck reconstructive surgery.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1097/scs.0000000000012411
Intraoral Anastomosis of Free Fibular Flap for Reconstruction of Maxillofacial Defect.
  • Jan 16, 2026
  • The Journal of craniofacial surgery
  • Shengwei Han + 3 more

Reconstruction of maxillofacial defect is challenging in maxillofacial surgery. Currently, microvascular anastomosis technique is widely used in reconstruction surgery of maxillofacial defects. The neck recipient vessels are used for conventional microvascular anastomosis. This will produce new incision in neck. To avoid the incision in neck, a new technology of anastomosis is revealed, which using the intraoral approach (ITA). Furthermore, ITA technique can also help when the length of vessel pedicle is short and reduce the injury risk of facial nerve. In this paper, we used intraoral anastomosis technique for anterior maxillofacial reconstruction. The defect was reconstructed with free microvascular fibular flap by anastomosis to the facial vessels by ITA technology. The primary aim of the study was to reveal the reliability and outcomes of ITA for maxillofacial defect reconstruction. Our results reveal that ITA is a reliable technique that could avoid additional external incisions in maxillofacial defects.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102705
Reconstruction of mandibular defects using free fibula flaps with a spliced surgical template system.
  • Jan 3, 2026
  • Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Wei Cao + 3 more

Reconstruction of mandibular defects using free fibula flaps with a spliced surgical template system.

  • Research Article
  • 10.22271/27081494.2026.v8.i1a.275
Virtual Surgical Method Using 3d Model in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibular Flap: Original Research
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • International Journal of Case Reports in Surgery
  • Redo Alif Iszar + 2 more

Virtual Surgical Method Using 3d Model in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibular Flap: Original Research

  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.12.294
Combined fibula and anterolateral thigh flap for the reconstruction of complex Oro-mandibular defects
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • Asian Journal of Surgery
  • Shengqian Li + 3 more

Combined fibula and anterolateral thigh flap for the reconstruction of complex Oro-mandibular defects

  • Research Article
  • 10.53045/jprs.2025-0160
Double-Barrel Vascularized Fibula Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction: Clinical Experience and Difficulty in Achieving Dental Implant Placement
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • Itaru Tsuge + 4 more

Double-Barrel Vascularized Fibula Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction: Clinical Experience and Difficulty in Achieving Dental Implant Placement

  • Research Article
  • 10.3389/fonc.2026.1758210
Osteoradionecrosis after mandibular reconstruction: a comparative cohort study on quality of life and complications.
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • Frontiers in oncology
  • Peng Zhang + 3 more

This study aimed to compare longitudinal quality of life (QoL) and surgical outcomes following segmental mandibulectomy and free fibula flap reconstruction among patients with osteoradionecrosis (ORN), malignant disease, and benign conditions. A comparative cohort study was conducted involving 245 patients: 45 with ORN, 160 with malignancy, and 40 with benign disease. Patient-reported QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcomes were 12-month Global Health Status (QLQ-C30) and Pain scores (QLQ-H&N35), analyzed using multivariable linear regression. The secondary outcome was the incidence of major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III), analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. At 12 months, the ORN cohort demonstrated significantly worse QoL outcomes compared to the benign cohort, with a -14.1-point lower Global Health Status (95% CI: -19.5 to -8.7, p<0.001) and a +21.5-point higher Pain score (95% CI: +15.2 to +27.8, p<0.001), after multivariable adjustment. The ORN cohort also had the highest rate of major complications (48.9% vs. 17.5% benign, p<0.001), which remained significant in multivariable analysis (aOR for benign vs. ORN: 0.26, p=0.006). Larger bony defect length and longer operative time were independent predictors of poorer QoL and higher complication risk, while the use of virtual surgical planning was associated with better Global Health Status. Despite successful reconstruction, patients with ORN experience profoundly poorer long-term QoL, persistent pain, and a significantly higher complication burden compared to patients with benign or malignant disease. These findings highlight the unique challenges in ORN management and underscore the need for specialized long-term supportive care.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1055/a-2555-2169
Risk Factors for Flap Loss in Midface Reconstruction with Vascularized Fibular Flap.
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
  • Katsuhiro Ishida + 8 more

Midface reconstruction should address both functional and cosmetic aspects. The vascularized fibular osteomyocutaneous flap (VFOF) is a promising first choice because of its numerous advantages in this type of reconstruction.This study aimed to investigate the causes of VFOF failure during midface reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent midface defect reconstruction using VFOF from August 2011 to May 2022 at a single center. The primary outcome variable was VFOF loss within 30 days, and secondary outcomes included late complications related to VFOF occurring at least 6 months postoperatively.A total of 62 patients underwent VFOF reconstruction for midface defects. The VFOF technique was primarily used in 56 (90.3%) patients for initial reconstruction. according to the Brown and Shaw classification, most reconstructions were performed for Class III (77.4%) and Class b (83.6%) defects. Skin paddles of the VFOF were used in 51 (82.3%) patients, and a double flap technique utilizing the fibular was employed in 24 (38.7%) patients. VFOF failure occurred in 10 (16.1%) patients. Prognostic factors associated with VFOF failure included sex (p = 0.01) and maxillary Brown and Shaw classification (horizontal; p = 0.01). Long-term follow-up of 47 patients revealed late complications in 11 (23.4%) patients, and diabetes mellitus was identified as a significant risk factor (p < 0.01).The VFOF is suitable for midface defect reconstruction; however, proper placement of the fibular bone, avoiding pedicle vessel kinking, ensuring tension-free vascular anastomosis during surgery, considering the use of an additional flap in addition to the fibula flap for large defects, and diligent postoperative nasal care are essential.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Popular topics

  • Latest Artificial Intelligence papers
  • Latest Nursing papers
  • Latest Psychology Research papers
  • Latest Sociology Research papers
  • Latest Business Research papers
  • Latest Marketing Research papers
  • Latest Social Research papers
  • Latest Education Research papers
  • Latest Accounting Research papers
  • Latest Mental Health papers
  • Latest Economics papers
  • Latest Education Research papers
  • Latest Climate Change Research papers
  • Latest Mathematics Research papers

Most cited papers

  • Most cited Artificial Intelligence papers
  • Most cited Nursing papers
  • Most cited Psychology Research papers
  • Most cited Sociology Research papers
  • Most cited Business Research papers
  • Most cited Marketing Research papers
  • Most cited Social Research papers
  • Most cited Education Research papers
  • Most cited Accounting Research papers
  • Most cited Mental Health papers
  • Most cited Economics papers
  • Most cited Education Research papers
  • Most cited Climate Change Research papers
  • Most cited Mathematics Research papers

Latest papers from journals

  • Scientific Reports latest papers
  • PLOS ONE latest papers
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology latest papers
  • Nature Communications latest papers
  • BMC Geriatrics latest papers
  • Science of The Total Environment latest papers
  • Medical Physics latest papers
  • Cureus latest papers
  • Cancer Research latest papers
  • Chemosphere latest papers
  • International Journal of Advanced Research in Science latest papers
  • Communication and Technology latest papers

Latest papers from institutions

  • Latest research from French National Centre for Scientific Research
  • Latest research from Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Latest research from Harvard University
  • Latest research from University of Toronto
  • Latest research from University of Michigan
  • Latest research from University College London
  • Latest research from Stanford University
  • Latest research from The University of Tokyo
  • Latest research from Johns Hopkins University
  • Latest research from University of Washington
  • Latest research from University of Oxford
  • Latest research from University of Cambridge

Popular Collections

  • Research on Reduced Inequalities
  • Research on No Poverty
  • Research on Gender Equality
  • Research on Peace Justice & Strong Institutions
  • Research on Affordable & Clean Energy
  • Research on Quality Education
  • Research on Clean Water & Sanitation
  • Research on COVID-19
  • Research on Monkeypox
  • Research on Medical Specialties
  • Research on Climate Justice
Discovery logo
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram

Download the FREE App

  • Play store Link
  • App store Link
  • Scan QR code to download FREE App

    Scan to download FREE App

  • Google PlayApp Store
FacebookTwitterTwitterInstagram
  • Universities & Institutions
  • Publishers
  • R Discovery PrimeNew
  • Ask R Discovery
  • Blog
  • Accessibility
  • Topics
  • Journals
  • Open Access Papers
  • Year-wise Publications
  • Recently published papers
  • Pre prints
  • Questions
  • FAQs
  • Contact us
Lead the way for us

Your insights are needed to transform us into a better research content provider for researchers.

Share your feedback here.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyCookies PolicyTerms of UseCareers