Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) will be enriched for germline mutations (GLMs), particularly in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, but its distinction from sporadic pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 111 resected PCs, including 13 patients with FPC (11.8%) and 98 with non-FPC (88.2%). Whole-exome sequencing targeted 151 cancer-related genes, with parallel gene expression profiling. GLMs were assessed by ClinVar and in silico tools. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, COSMIC signatures, immune deconvolution, and survival were compared. Patients with FPC and non-FPC were comparable in age, sex, tumor stage, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. ClinVar-annotated GLMs were found in 2/13 patients with FPC (15.4%) and 4/98 patients with non-FPC (4.1%). FPC cases more often carried pancreatitis-associated variants (SPINK1, CFTR), whereas non-FPC included HRR-related variants (PALB2, FANCG). When potentially pathogenic HRR-related variants were considered together, prevalence was similar (23.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.380). HRD scores did not differ (median 22 vs. 19, p = 0.591), and high HRD scores (≥ 42) were observed only in two non-FPC cases, including one with PALB2. Differential expression analysis revealed no significant differences after false discovery rate correction. Multivariate analysis indicated that FPC status was not an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.73, p = 0.084). Transcriptomic profiles and HRD status were similar between patients with FPC and patients with non-FPC. A spectrum of GLMs was observed in both groups, suggesting that hereditary risk variants are not exclusive to FPC and underscoring the importance of germline testing in all patients with PC.

ASO Author Reflections: Genomic Features of Familial and Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer.

Individuals with increased familial or genetic risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) may be recommended to undergo regular PC surveillance. Genetic counselors are often involved in discussions about PC surveillance for high‐risk individuals (HRIs); however, barriers to HRIs' participation in PC surveillance are not well characterized. This study aimed to identify reasons that HRIs cease, defer, or do not commence recommended PC surveillance through telephone interviews. Participants either had prior annual PC surveillance with no surveillance completion in ≥2 years, had a ≥2‐year period without surveillance completion, or had not completed an initial surveillance imaging study 3 months after it was ordered. Fifty telephone interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. Twenty interviewees had familial PC (34.5%) and 38 (65.5%) had a pathogenic variant associated with increased PC risk, with BRCA2 being the most common (N = 15, 25.9%). Interviewees were 74.1% women and 93.1% White with a median age of 63.0 years. Logistical barriers (N = 11, 34.4%), different healthcare professional recommendations (N = 9, 28.1%), other health issues (N = 8, 25.0%), and difficulty recalling surveillance recommendations (N = 8, 25.0%) were the top reasons for ceasing or deferring PC surveillance. Difficulty recalling surveillance recommendations (N = 5, 27.8%), cost (N = 4, 22.2%), and invasiveness of procedures (N = 4, 22.2%) were the top reasons for not commencing PC surveillance. Other reasons included the COVID‐19 pandemic, moving from the service delivery area, cost, concerns about imaging studies, nonmedical life events, and fear. Several barriers identified in this study were consistent with barriers faced in screening for other more common cancers. These results demonstrate the need for targeted strategies to reduce PC surveillance barriers for HRIs. Furthermore, given that HRIs face multiple barriers to PC surveillance, it is important that cancer genetics professionals familiarize themselves with these barriers to reduce their impact and to facilitate recommended PC surveillance among HRIs.

The Clinical Significance of Extrapancreatic Incidental Findings Detected During Pancreas Surveillance

Conditions at risk of pancreatic cancer: The radiology perspective.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the deadliest types of cancer globally. While early detection helps avert adverse outcomes, screening is only recommended for individuals at high risk, specifically those with familial and/or genetic predispositions. The objectives of this study are to systematically review primary studies on the cost-effectiveness of PC screening and to identify the critical factors that influence cost-effectiveness. This systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Economic evaluation studies on PC screening were identified from searches on the SCOPUS and PubMed databases. The quality of reporting of the selected articles was assessed according to CHEERS 2022. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers conducted the title-abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction to select relevant articles. The authors' consensus was used to settle disagreements. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, measured by cost per quality-adjusted life year and cost per life year saved. Nine studies were selected for the final review. Most studies demonstrated that one-time screening for PC among high-risk individuals was cost-effective compared with no screening, while others found annual screening to also be cost-effective. High-risk was generally defined as having a >5% lifetime risk of PC and included individuals with either familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) or genetic susceptibility syndromes such as Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, hereditary non-polypoid colorectal cancer syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and BRCA2 mutations. Individuals with new-onset diabetes (NOD) were also considered high-risk. Screening using mainly endoscopic ultrasound was cost-effective among FPC individuals and those with genetic syndromes. Risk-based screening was also cost-effective among patients with NOD. Screening for PC is cost-effective among selected high-risk individuals. However, cost-effectiveness depends on epidemiological factors, cost, the diagnostic performance of screening tools, and the overall design of studies.

IntroductionPancreatic cancer is a devastating disease and one of the top causes of cancer death worldwide. Over 30% of cases are potentially avoidable, and while screening for this disease should...

Pancreatic cancer.

In Japan, 5 years have passed since the initiation of precision cancer medicine, and recent data accumulation in familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) and hereditary pancreatic cancer is outstanding. Multigene germline panel tests (MGPTs) have revealed that 7%-18% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) harbor pathogenic germline variants (PGVs), almost equal to the levels of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and colorectal cancers, with a higher incidence in FPC (14%-26%). The majority of PGVs seen in PC patients are clinically actionable and associated with homologous recombination (HR) pathways (6%-10%, particularly BRCA1/2 in 5%-6%), and the clinical guidelines recommend or propose genetic testing for all PC patients. Consensus guidelines have been established for most of the hereditary syndromes associated with PC risks, and surveillances of the pancreas and other at-risk organs are recommended for PGV carriers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is the commonest hereditary cancer syndrome that has moderately increasing life-time risks of PC (3%-7% in Western countries); however, recent Japanese research demonstrated a higher risk level (BRCA1: 16%, BRCA2: 14%). Moreover, recent evidence has suggested a risk linkage between PC and ovarian cancer in HBOC pedigrees. High scores of homologous recombination deficiency suggest biallelic dysfunction of BRCA or other HR-related genes, and the likely effectiveness of platinum agents and PARP inhibitors against PCs. Remote counseling and testing are possible option in the future genetic medicine. As PC ranks in the second commonest target of precision cancer medicine in Japan, we must treat the patients and manage their at-risk relatives efficiently.

A program of recruiting families with hereditary pancreatic cancer and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome as high-risk individuals for pancreatic cancer surveillance using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has proven effective, resulting in the improvement of early detection rates and life expectancy. Given this, recent guidelines recommend pancreatic surveillance for patients with familial pancreatic cancer and pathological variants of ten genes, including BRCA1/2. In April 2021, our hospital established the HBOC Center, which is operated by nine departments, including obstetrics and gynecology, breast surgery, pancreatology, urology, medical genetics, dermatology, psychiatry and neurology, and oncology. Currently, MRCP or EUS is performed once or twice a year in 63 cases with pathogenic variants in 54 families. Although 4 cases (6.3%) revealed pancreatic microcysts or branched intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, no sign of pancreatic cancer was detected. Since January 2021, the germline BRCA1/2 test for companion diagnosis of pancreatic cancer has been covered by insurance, improving the accessibility of genetic testing among patients with pancreatic cancer. However, the BRCA1/2 positivity rate remains low at 1.3%, and its indication for use is very limited. The implementation of genetic testing, including BRCA1/2 analysis, is necessary for the prevention and early detection of pancreatic cancer in high-risk families.

Preliminary results of the PROPH-ITA study: genetic background of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Families At Risk for Pancreatic Cancer (IRFARPC)

The Spanish Familial Pancreatic Cancer Registry (PANGENFAM): Follow-up of high risk individuals.

Several studies suggest that new-onset diabetes mellitus is an early manifestation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therefore, the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium recommends glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) monitoring in high-risk individuals (HRIs) undergoing surveillance. However, evidence that such monitoring improves PDAC detection is lacking. Our aim was to investigate the association between serum glucose and HbA1c values and the development of PDAC in HRIs undergoing surveillance. Participants were recruited from the familial pancreatic cancer surveillance cohort, which follows hereditary predisposed HRIs yearly by magnetic resonance imaging and/or endoscopic ultrasound and blood sampling. Those who underwent fasting glucose and/or HbA1c monitoring at least once were eligible candidates. Four hundred four HRIs met the inclusion criteria. During a median follow-up of 41 months (range 14-120), 9 individuals developed PDAC and 4 (without PDAC) were diagnosed with new-onset diabetes mellitus. Glucose levels ranged from 3.4 to 10.7 mmol/L (mean 5.6 ± 0.7) and HbA1c levels from 25 to 68 mmol/mol (mean 37.7 ± 4.1). The mean values did not differ significantly between PDAC cases and controls. The percentage of individuals with at least one elevated value were comparable between PDAC cases and controls for glucose (33% and 27%, P = 0.707) and HbA1c (22% and 14%, P = 0.623). No consistent glucose or HbA1c trends over time suggested a correlation with PDAC development. In this HRI surveillance cohort, measuring glucose and HbA1c values did not contribute to PDAC detection. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to determine the final role of glucose and HbA1c monitoring in PDAC surveillance.

Molecular characterization of familial pancreatic cancer and biomarkers for early detection

Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) represents a significant yet underexplored area in pancreatic cancer research. Basic research efforts are notably limited, and when present, they are predominantly centered on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations due to the scarcity of other genetic variants associated with FPC, leading to a limited understanding of the broader genetic landscape of FPC. This review examines the current state of FPC research, focusing on the molecular mechanisms driving pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) progression. It highlights the role of homologous recombination (HR) and its therapeutic exploitation via synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors. The review discusses various pre-clinical models of FPC, including conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDOs), patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), as well as new advancements in FPC research.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor 5-year survival rate. PDAC surveillance is recommended in high-risk individuals (HRIs) with strong PDAC family history or a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) in a PDAC susceptibility gene. We aimed to explore a potential correlation between genetic status, extent of family history, pancreatic findings, and surveillance implications in heterogeneous PDAC HRIs. METHODS: from January 2015 up to date, a total of 340 HRIs from 291 families visited our pancreatic cancer high-risk clinic. Surveillance included annual clinic visits, EUS/MRI imaging, genetic and laboratory blood testing. Participants completed a questionnaire that included personal and familial medical history, dietary habits, daily activities with emphasis on smoking habits, alcohol use, and physical activity. RESULTS: Our cohort was divided into 3 groups: familial pancreatic cancer that include individuals with family history of 2 or more first degree family (FDR) with PDAC (FPC; 96 individuals), familial non-FPC, families with at least 2 biological relatives with PDAC and not meeting FPC criteria, (119 individuals), and hereditary pancreatic cancer (PC), individuals with PGV in a PC susceptibility gene and a family member with PDAC carrying the same PGV (124 individuals). The cohort average age at first visit was 54 years with 44% male and 56% female ratio. Seventy percent of the cohort was of Jewish Ashkenazi decent. Genetic testing was performed in several steps, first BRCA1/2 founder mutations was performed in all individuals followed by genetic panels and whole exome sequencing (WES). PGVs were detected in 36.4% of all families. There was no significant difference in the genetic finding between the FPC and non-FPC groups (11% and 9.6% respectively). Of the study cohort 35% were screened by EUS and 8% by MRI/MRCP. Pancreatic lesions detected included 11 cases of new PDAC (3.2%), 69 cystic lesions (20.3%), 43 cases early chronic pancreatitis (12.6%) and 11 cases of main pancreatic duct dilation (3.2%). To better understand the risk of PDAC development in HRIs we recently added a novel cell-free chromatin blood test for early cancer detection (in collaboration with SENSEERA, Israel) and compared it to EUS imaging results. The test provides multidimensional epigenetic information that sheds light on the identity and the transcriptional state of the cells that are dying in the body of the patient. Our preliminary results show nice separation between the healthy control and PC groups. PC HRIs show slight increase in score compared to the general population while individuals with worrisome features show substantial increase compared to HRIs with no EUS findings. DISCUSSION: Surveillance seems effective for detection of early-stage PDAC and precursor lesions. However, screening strategy can be improved by adding newer modalities like chromatin-based tests that might help to further define the risk of cancer development in HRIs. Citation Format: Merav Ben Yehoyada, Erez Scapa, Oren Shibolet, Guy Rosner. Surveillance outcome in individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B025.

Abstract Introduction. A bleak prognosis of Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is largely due to late diagnosis and highly accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tests are urgently needed to improve patients’ survival. Our group has previously reported on urinary biomarker panel, comprising of LYVE1, REG1B and TFF1 (1-2), which distinguished controls from PDAC stages I-II with AUC 0.936 and sensitivity/specificity (SN/SP)>85%. We constructed the logistic regression based algorithm for interpretation of the data, PancRISK (3), which enables the stratification of high- risk patients into those with ‘average’ or ‘elevated’ risk of developing PDAC. Recently, we showed that our panel combined with CA19-9 can detect PDAC up to 2 years before clinical diagnosis (4). Aim. Here, we report on the design and interim analysis of the UroPanc Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04449406), which aims to evaluate the accuracy of the urinary biomarker panel and the affiliated PancRISK. We plan to recruit two cohorts: the first one comprises asymptomatic individuals that have high risk of developing PDAC due to familial history and genetic syndroms - these will be recruited through the EUropean Registry Of familial PAncreatic Cancer and hereditary pancreatitis (EUROPAC) (PI: Prof W Greenhalf and team, Liverpool, UK). The second cohort comprises patients with symptoms suggestive of PDAC – such patients are recruited at gastrointestinal clinics at University College London Hospitals (UCLH, PI: Prof S Pereira and team), and The Royal London Hospital (PI: Dr P Wilson).Methods. The urinary proteins are assayed by commercially available ELISAs. Plasma CA19-9 is measured at The Doctors Laboratory in London, UK using Cobas601E, Roche platform. The statistical analysis and accuracy of the test is measured by c-statistics, SN/SP and positive/negative predictive value. The results are compared to imaging and histopathology records (where available). Human factor and budget impact analysis of the future inclusion of the urine test into the diagnostic and surveillance pathways for PDAC patients is ongoing (PI: Dr M Z Ni and the team, Imperial College London, UK). Results and conclusions. At present, 1067 patients have been recruited, and urine samples from 825 patients have been assayed. An interim analysis has shown promising results with SP of 91% and SN of 86%, and accuracy of cancer detection of 90%. Combined with the health economic analysis, we currently work towards the future implementation of this test into clinical practice, with the potential to significantly improve the current diagnostic pathway for individuals at risk of pancreatic cancer. 1. Radon, TP, et al. Clin Cancer Res, 2015; 21:3512-21. 2. Debernardi, S, et al. PLOSMed, 17(12); e1003489. 3. Blyuss, O, et al. Br J Cancer, 2020; 122:692-6. 4. Debernardi, S, et al. Int J Cancer, 2023; 152:769–80. Citation Format: Silvana Debernardi, Evelyn Kurotova, Nurshad Ali, Mariam Mahamood, Ismita Chhetri, Steve Pereira, Patrick Wilson, Bill Greenhalf, Melody Z Ni, Oleg Blyuss, Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic. UroPanc: A large prospective observational study for validation of urinary biomarker test for the earlier detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B018.

Familial pancreatic cancer registry and surveillance study for the early detection of pancreatic cancer

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) has brought significant physical, psychological and economic burdens on the patients and their families due to its early onset, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and increased recurrence risk. To explore the current research status and emerging hotspots of PJS. Studies on PJS published during 1994-2023 were gathered based on Web of Science Core Collection. Additionally, a case of PJS-induced intestinal intussusception, successfully treated with endoscopic methods despite three laparotomies, was highlighted. Comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis were conducted with VOSviewer, R and CiteSpace. Altogether 1760 studies were identified, indicating a steady increase in the publication number. The United States had the highest influence, whereas the University of Helsinki emerged as the leading institution, and Aaltonen LA from the University of Helsinki was the most prolific author. Cancer Research, Oncogene and Endoscopy were the top three journals based on H-index. Keyword burst direction analysis revealed that "cancer risk", "management", "surveillance" and "familial pancreatic cancer" were the potential hotspots for investigation. Additionally, "early detection", "capsule endoscopy", "clinical management", "double-balloon endoscopy", "familial pancreatic cancer" and "molecular genetic basis" were identified as the key clusters of co-cited references. Endoscopic polypectomy remained effective on resolving intestinal intussusception in patients who underwent three previous laparotomies. In the last three decades, global publications related to PJS show a steadily increasing trend in number. Endoscopic management is currently a research hotspot.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic yield of pancreatic cancer screening in individuals at risk (IAR) from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families with respect to the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants predisposing to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).DesignIn a 20 years period, IAR from FPC families were enrolled in a prospective screening program of the national case collection for FPC of Germany, including magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The diagnostic yield was analyzed regarding significant pancreatic lesions such as PDAC, high‐grade pancreatic‐intraepithelial‐neoplasia (PanIN3) and intraductal‐papillary‐mucinous‐neoplasia (IPMN) with high‐grade dysplasia. Screening results were compared between carriers of pathogenic variants and variant‐negative IAR.Results337 IAR, including 74 (22%) variant‐carriers and 263 IAR of variant‐negative FPC families (mean age 49; standard deviation [SD] + 8.9) were followed 64 (SD + 55) months. IAR underwent 5.1 (SD + 3.9) screening visits with 1733 MRI (5.1,SD + 3.9 per IAR) and 728 EUS (2.2,SD + 1.7 per IAR). In 12 (4%) cases, significant pancreatic lesions were detected, including 4 PDAC, 3 PanIN3 and 5 high‐grade IPMN. Three of 4 IAR with PDAC died after a mean of 27 months postoperatively, and one IAR is alive without evidence of disease after 31 months. The diagnostic yield for significant lesions was 13.5% (10/74) for variant carriers compared to 0.8% (2/263) for IAR of variant‐negative FPC families (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a negative variant status was almost always accompanied by the absence of a significant lesion over time with a negative predictive value of 99.2% (95% CI 97.3%–99.9%).ConclusionThe diagnostic yield seems to justify PDAC screening in IAR of FPC‐families with pathogenic germline variants in PDAC predisposing genes, not in IAR of variant‐negative families.