Familial Clustering Of Gastric Cancer Research Articles

Family-based exome sequencing combined with linkage analyses identifies rare susceptibility variants of MUC4 for gastric cancer.

Genome-wide association studies of gastric cancer (GC) cases have revealed common gastric cancer susceptibility loci with low effect size. We investigated rare variants with high effect size via whole-exome sequencing (WES) of subjects with familial clustering of gastric cancer. WES of DNAs from the blood of 19 gastric cancer patients and 36 unaffected family members from 14 families with two or more gastric cancer patients were tested. Linkage analysis combined with association tests were performed using Pedigree Variant Annotation, Analysis, and Search Tool (pVAAST) software. Based on the logarithm of odds (LOD) and permutation-based composite likelihood ratio test (CLRT) from pVAAST, MUC4 was identified as a predisposing gene (LOD P-value = 1.9×10-5; permutation-based P-value of CLRT ≤ 9.9×10-9). In a larger cohort consisting of 597 GC patients and 9,759 healthy controls genotyped with SNP array, we discovered common variants in MUC4 regions (rs148735556, rs11717039, and rs547775645) significantly associated with GC supporting the association of MUC4 with gastric cancer. And the MUC4 variants were found in higher frequency in The Cancer Genome Atlas Study (TCGA) germline samples of patients with multiple cancer types. Immunohistochemistry indicated that MUC4 was downregulated in the noncancerous gastric mucosa of subjects with MUC4 germline missense variants, suggesting that loss of the protective function of MUC4 predisposes an individual to gastric cancer. Rare variants in MUC4 can be novel gastric cancer susceptibility loci in Koreans possessing the familial clustering of gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer and family history.

Gastric cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Identifying individuals at high risk is important for surveillance and prevention of gastric cancer. Having first-degree relatives diagnosed with gastric cancer is a strong and consistent risk factor for gastric cancer, but the pathogenic mechanisms behind this familial aggregation are unclear. Against this background, we reviewed the risk factors for gastric cancer in those with a first-degree relative with gastric cancer, and the possible causes for familial clustering of gastric cancer including bacterial factors, inherited genetic susceptibility, environmental factors or a combination thereof. Among individuals with a family history, current or past Helicobacter pylori infection, having two or more first-degree affected relatives or female gender was associated with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer. To date, no specific single nucleotide polymorphism has been shown to be associated with familial clustering of gastric cancer. H. pylori eradication is the most important strategy for preventing gastric cancer in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, particularly those in their 20s and 30s. Early H. pylori eradication could prevent the progression to intestinal metaplasia and reduce the synergistic effect on gastric carcinogenesis in individuals with both H. pylori infection and a family history. Endoscopic surveillance is also expected to benefit individuals with a family history. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and optimal time point for endoscopy in this population. Moreover, genome-wide association studies that incorporate environmental and dietary factors on a ‘big data’ basis will increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of gastric cancer.

Hereditary Gastric Cancer: Review of Literature

Summary Worldwide, gastric cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer, with a high morbidity and mortality. Both environmental and genetic factors have a role in the aetiology of gastric cancer. Familial clustering of gastric cancer is seen in 10-15% of cases, and approximately 3% of gastric cancer cases arise in the setting of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer ( HDGC). In families with HDGC, gastric cancer presents at relatively young age. Germline mutations in the CDH1 gene are the major cause of HDGC and are identified in approximately 25-40% of families which fulfill strict criteria. Prophylactic gastrectomy is the only option to prevent gastric cancer in individuals with a CDH1 mutation. However, in the majority of families with multiple cases of gastric cancer no germline genetic abnormality can be identified and therefore preventative measures are not available, except for general lifestyle advice. Future research should focus on identifying new genetic predisposing factors for all types of familial gastric cancer.

Familial gastric cancer: detection of a hereditary cause helps to understand its etiology

Worldwide, gastric cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer, with a high morbidity and mortality. Several environmental factors predispose to the development of gastric cancer, such as Helicobacter pylori infection, diet and smoking. Familial clustering of gastric cancer is seen in 10% of cases, and approximately 3% of gastric cancer cases arise in the setting of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). In families with HDGC, gastric cancer presents at relatively young age. Germline mutations in the CDH1 gene are the major cause of HDGC and are identified in approximately 25-50% of families which fulfill strict criteria. Prophylactic gastrectomy is the only option to prevent gastric cancer in individuals with a CDH1 mutation. However, in the majority of families with multiple cases of gastric cancer no germline genetic abnormality can be identified and therefore preventive measures are not available, except for general lifestyle advice. Future research should focus on identifying new genetic predisposing factors for all types of familial gastric cancer.

Gene expression in response to ionizing radiation and family history of gastric cancer

Genes and molecular pathways involved in familial clustering of gastric cancer have not yet been identified. The purpose of the present study was to investigate gene expression changes in response to a cellular stress, and its link with a positive family history for this neoplasia. To this aim leukocytes of healthy first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients and controls were challenged in vitro with ionizing radiation and gene expression evaluated 4 h later on microarrays with 1,800 cancer-related genes. Eight genes, mainly involved in signal transduction and cell cycle regulation, were differentially expressed in healthy relatives of gastric cancer cases. Functional class scoring by Gene Ontology classification highlighted two G-protein related pathways, implicated in the proliferation of neoplastic tissue, which were differentially expressed in healthy subjects with positive family history of gastric cancer. The relative expression of 84 genes related to these pathways was examined using the SYBR green-based quantitative real-time PCR. The results confirmed the indication of an involvement of G-protein coupled receptor pathways in GC familiarity provided by microarray analysis. This study indicates a possible association between familiarity for gastric cancer and altered transcriptional response to ionizing radiation.

Absence of germline CHK2 mutations in familial gastric cancer.

Recently, the CHK2 gene was identified as being a candidate gene responsible for Li‐Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Gastric cancer is often clustered in families with LFS, so it is possible that germline CHK2 mutation is also present in familial gastric cancer (FGC). We therefore defined the genomic structure of the CHK2 gene, designed intronic primers, and searched for germline CHK2 mutations in 25 FGC cases by polymerase chain reaction‐single strand conformational polymorphism analysis of the entire coding region. In all of the 25 cases, at least two siblings had histories of gastric cancer. There were no FGC cases that showed germline CHK2 mutations. Thus, it was indicated that germline CHK2 mutations do not contribute to the familial clustering of gastric cancer.

Familial gastric cancer: clinicopathological characteristics, RER phenotype and germline p53 and E-cadherin mutations.

Gastric cancer frequently occurs in family members with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and germline E-cadherin mutations were recently identified in a subset of familial gastric cancers. Thus, families with an aggregation of gastric cancers were recruited by reviewing the genealogical trees of 3632 patients with gastric cancer. The criteria for recruiting such families were the following: at least three relatives should have gastric cancer and one of them should be a first degree relative of the other two; at least two successive generations should be affected; in one of the relatives gastric cancer should be diagnosed before age 50. Thirty-one cases (0.9%) fitted all three of these criteria. There were only gastric cancer patients in 18 of the 31 families and there were no families that fitted clinical criteria of HNPCC or LFS. Paraffin-embedded tissues were available in 29 probands and DNA was successfully isolated for molecular analyses in 13 probands. RER phenotype was detected in three (23%) cases, whereas germline p53 mutations were detected in none of 13 cases. A germline E-cadherin mutation was detected in one of three diffuse types and none of 10 intestinal types, however, a mutation resulting in the replacement of Gly by Val was detected in the precursor sequence. Thus, although familial clustering of gastric cancer occurs in approximately 1% of gastric cancer patients, germline mutations of the DNA mismatch repair, p53 and E-cadherin genes do not significantly contribute to such a clustering.

Analysis for microsatellite instability and mutations of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 in familial gastric cancer.

We examined 30 gastric-cancer patients with a varying degree of family history of stomach cancer and/or synchronous gastric tumors for microsatellite instability. We observed microsatellite instability at at least 1 of 8 loci tested in tumors of 14/30 patients; of these 14, 8 had single locus alterations and 6 had alterations at at least half of the 8 loci. Among the patients with microsatellite instability at > or = 4 loci, 3 patients showed a strong familial clustering of gastric cancer. Mutation analysis of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLHl on paired non-tumorous and tumor DNA from 10 patients, 6 with microsatellite instability at > or = 4 loci and 4 with an alteration at one locus, revealed a novel missense mutation, present in the normal and tumor DNA of one patient with microsatellite instability at multiple loci in his tumor. His family history of cancer included one second-degree relative affected with gastric cancer. These data suggest that germline mutations in the hMLHl gene occur in some gastric-cancer patients and that in the majority of cases microsatellite instability in gastric tumors may be due to defects in other genes responsible for DNA replication fidelity than the hMLHl.

Immunohistochemical staining for the p53 protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in familial clustering of gastric cancer.

Purpose of this study was to assess the role of p53 gene and tumor proliferating activity in familial clustering of gastric cancer. Among 344 patients who underwent resections for gastric cancer, 10 patients had two or more gastric cancer-affected, first-degree relatives. We classified them as the group of gastric cancer with family history (FGC). Eighty-seven patients with gastric cancer who had no relatives with any malignant neoplasm were classified as the sporadic group. The paraffin-embedded specimens were stained immuno-histochemically using monoclonal antibodies against the p53 product and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). There was no significant difference in any clinicopathologic factor and the PCNA labeling index between the two groups. Staining for the p53 product was positive in 80% of the FGC group and in 38% of the sporadic group (P < 0.05). Our study suggests that overexpression of p53 protein is one of the familial factors that correlates with carcinogenesis in the stomach.

A CASE OF FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI WITH FAMILIAL CLUSTERING OF GASTRIC CANCER

Familial polyposis coli (FPC) is thought to be genetic tumor syndrome, depend on autosomal dominant transmission and often associated with colorectal cancer. Although gastric polyp is frequently recognized in FPC as a lesion of the alimentary tract except colorectal cancer, it is very rare that gastric cancer occurs in the patients or family members of FPC. We encountered a case of FPC with familial clustering of gastric cancer, and the findings obtained had suggested that FPC due to single gene transmission and cancer prone family syndrome of alimentary tract due to polugene transmission were overlapping partially. In FPC, accordingly, examinaton of the upper gastrointestinal tract as well as colorectal examination is necessary to detect the lesions in the family members.