The Nazi Genocide of Roma: Reassessment and Commemoration, edited by Anton Weiss-Wendt. New York & Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2013. 284 pp. $120.00 US (cloth), $34.95 US (paper). An earlier book edited by Anton Weiss-Wendt was Murder Without Hatred: Estonians and Holocaust (Syracuse, 2009), but he omits H-word from title under review here, referring instead to Romani Genocide. This was considered move; there are still number of Holocaust scholars who acknowledge that fate of Romani victims constituted genocide, but who balk at including them Holocaust. And there are some too who deny that their treatment even qualified as genocide. Guenther Lewy claimed that the various deportations of Gypsies to East and their deadly consequences do not constitute acts of genocide (The Nazi Persecution of Gypsies, Oxford, 2000, p. 223). Steven Katz denied that Romanies were victims of genocide: in comparison to ruthless, monolithic, meta-political, genocidal design of Nazism vis-a-vis Jews, nothing similar ... existed case of Gypsies ... In end, it was Jews and Jews alone who were victims of total genocidal onslaught both intent and practice at hands of Nazi murderers (Quantity and interpretation: Issues comparative historical analysis of Holocaust, Remembering for Future, Oxford, 1988, p. 213). And Yehuda Bauer argued that for Nazis, Roma were only minor irritant (Anatomy of Auschwitz Death Camp, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1994, p. 446). Weiss-Wendt makes it clear that [t]he new archival evidence presented this anthology confirms earlier findings that placed victimization of Roma within definition of genocide--a confirmation rather than reassessment (p. 1). This theme unites collection of chapters Weiss-Wendt has assembled. Each presents new interpretations of, and sometimes new material for, growing body of research on Romani Holocaust historiography. The related question, whether Romanies were targeted for racial reasons, denied for so long by Federal Republic of Germany's judiciary connection with reparation for survivors--is also addressed chapter by Gilad Margalit. That it needed to be addressed at all when Nazi documentation abounds with references to Romani race reflects impotence of Romani voice during years following 1945. Roma are still not speaking for themselves loudly enough to be heard. The number of Romani intellectuals investigating fate of Romanies Holocaust remains small, surely accounting part for slow progress bringing it to world attention. While lack of Romani scholars is certainly factor, another is discussed by Slawomir Kapralski, who calls false (p. 236) position made by its main proponent Michael Stewart who argues that there is a general lack of interest matters past among Roma, (p. 579)--some kind of (genetic? cultural?) Romani selective memory at work that sets Holocaust to one side. In addressing commemoration that forms part of book's title Kapralski makes it clear that there are fact number of memorials to Romani victims throughout Europe. …