848 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE been discussed before. Consequendy, there is no conclusion to this interesting but disorganized and disconnected body of material. Lindy Biggs Dr. Biggs is associate professor of history at Auburn University and author of The Rational Factory: Architecture, Technology, and Work in the Age ofMass Production (Balti more: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996). Industrieller Maschinenbau im 19. Jahrhundert: Werkstattpraxis und Ent wicklung spanabhebender Werkzeugmaschinen im deutschen Maschinen bau, 1870-1914. By Volker Benad-Wagenhoff. Stuttgart: Verlag fur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik, 1993. Pp. xiv+438; illustrations, appendices, notes, bibliography, index. DM58.00 (cloth). Maschinen fur die Massenfertigung: Die Entwicklung der Drehautomaten bis zumEnde des Ersten Weltkrieges. ByJurgen Ruby. Stuttgart: Verlag fur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik, 1995. Pp. 218; illustrations, figures, notes, bibliography, index. DM60.00 (cloth). Both of these books concentrate on precision machine tools, the heart and soul of mass production. In a brief preface toJurgen Ru by’s work, Ulrich Wengenroth rightly points out that American and German scholars alike have concentrated on the evolution of the assembly line while paying only scant attention to the automation of machine tools that made possible the substitution of technology for manual labor. Ruby and Volker Benad-Wagenhoff set out to ad dress the development of these hidden machines. Both succeed to some extent. Benad-Wagenhoff sets out the more ambitious project. He ad dresses the entire German machine-tool industry from roughly 1870 to 1914, a period of continual change and growth. He criticizes past historians for concentrating too much on great machines and their great inventors. And he is equally critical of social science ap proaches that ignore machine functions and production in the his tory of technology. Most likely he aims this criticism at the “social construction of technology” school, recently under attack by histori ans such as David Hounshell for explaining “everything and noth ing” and philosophers of technology such as Langdon Winner for being “conservative.” Benad-Wagenhoff promises a timely and am bitious program to reconstruct what he calls “technological human interaction” (p. 2), the assertion and arbitration of human volition in the medium of the factory hall. His use of secondary literature here is poor. As examples of “socio logical approaches” the book cites two histories of the machine-tool TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 849 industry from the 1960s. In fact, the author seldom consults litera ture more recent than the early 1980s, often no more recent than the 1920s and 1930s (e.g., the work of Conrad MatschoG), and he ignores international scholarship completely. His detailed descrip tions bog down in the very format the introduction warns against: one machine follows the next in a parade of invention, spiced only with particular detail about how workers operated their tools. “When the work was finished,” Benad-Wagenhofftells us ofthe drill press, “he [the machinist] turned offthe machine, cleaned the work piece of lubrication and cooling agents and shavings; he loosed the press elements and took the piece from the machine” (p. 155). Is this, then, all that the middle way between the social construction of technological systems and internalist history of invention has to offer? Benad-Wagenhoff’s most interesting conclusions do not stem from his theoretical program but from the book’s analysis of massproduction technique. Benad-Wagenhoffdates a major transition in the metalworking trades beginning around 1895 with the advent of high-speed, precision machine tools. He emphasizes the precision rather than the speed. Contrary to popular conceptions of mass pro duction, steam-powered, belt-driven tools could already turn out parts quickly in great numbers, but factories still had to rely upon lengthy and complicated fitting stages in production. New machines around 1895 drove “the human hand from fitting work” (p. 361). The book also notes that machine tools tended toward greater complexity, flexibility, and universality, not toward the single-pur pose tools most often associated with the heyday of classic modern production. Only industries with huge markets for uniform products could profit from the higher throughput that specialized machine tools offered. “The application of special machines, then, . . . says something about the conditions of [product] demand but nothing about the modernization of...
Read full abstract