Facial Acne Scars Research Articles

Effectiveness and safety of the modified multiple mode procedures versus traditional multiple mode procedures on treating facial atrophic acne scars: a propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.

Multiple mode procedures (MMP) of fractional CO2 laser provide higher efficacy and shorter downtime in treating acne scars, compared to traditional fractional CO2 laser therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified MMP integrated with fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR), ultra-pulse CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in treating acne scars. A retrospective analysis of 162 acne scar patients treated with MMP or modified MMP was conducted. Acne scars were evaluated using the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné (ECCA) grading scale, modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS), and Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Baseline variables were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM) to improve the comparability of treatment effectiveness and safety between groups. Among 162 patients with facial acne scars, 68 were treated with modified MMP and 94 with traditional MMP. After PSM, both groups had 55 patients with comparable baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The ECCA score decreased more significantly in the modified MMP group (60%±11%) than in the MMP group (45%±16.6%, P < 0.001). The modified MMP group also had higher mMSS color score (2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.005), greater reduction in pore size and skin laxity (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative erythema duration (22.2 ± 4.0 vs. 31.3 ± 3.7 days, P < 0.001), but higher pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS: 6.7 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Modified MMP is more effective than traditional MMP in treating acne scars, especially for patients with large pores and skin laxity.

Dual-Plane Treatment With Highly Concentrated Hybrid Cooperative Complexes of Hyaluronans for Facial Atrophic Acne Scars.

Managing patients with acne scars remains an important challenge, as scarring negatively affects psychosocial wellbeing. Hyaluronic acid (HA) cross-linked fillers have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability for the correction of acne scars but are limited by their reduced biological activity and low concentrations. This study investigated the efficacy and safety on scars of a high-concentration (4.5%) HA-based filler with hybrid cooperative complexes (HCC) of high-molecular-weight and low-molecular-weight HA. Participants received treatment twice; the first was provided at baseline (T0) and the second after 4 weeks (T1). Data were collected at T1 and after 4 months (T2) by photographs and instrumental evaluation of the skin. The study population included 28 patients. Improvements in the mean Goodman and Baron grade were significant across time points T0 and T1 (12% improvement; p = .0002) and T0 and T2 (31% improvement; p < .0001). Instrumental evaluation of the skin surface demonstrated a 20% reduction in the average deepness of acne scars after 4 months (p < .0001). No serious adverse events were reported during the study procedure. Highly concentrated (4.5%) HCC appears to be an effective option for the correction of facial acne scars.

A comparative study of 70% glycolic acid and 30% trichloroacetic acid peel in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars: A split-face study.

Medium-depth peels are dynamic tools when used as part of office procedures for the treatment of acne scars. Most of the available literature on chemical peels focuses on their role in skin rejuvenation and hyperpigmentation. There is a paucity of well-conducted studies that have compared peels in the treatment of acne scars in Asian patients. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of 70% glycolic acid (GA) and 30% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) chemical peels in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars. A longitudinal, right-left study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and side effects of 70% GA and 30% TCA in 30 patients with acne scars. A total of four peeling sessions were performed every 4 weeks. Evaluation of the response was done using Goodman and Baron's quantitative global acne scarring grading system (GBASG), physician visual analog scale (VAS), and patient VAS at baseline and 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Relevant statistical tests were employed to study the effectiveness of both TCA and GA peels. Significant reduction was noted in mean GBASG scores on both sides at 8, 12, and 16 compared to baseline score (P = 0.000). Mean GBASG scores decreased from 12.67 ± 3.19 to 8.97 ± 2.73 on the 70% GA side while that on the 30% TCA side reduced from 13.20 ± 3.56 to 6.83 ± 2.60 (P = 0.003). The results were much better on the TCA peel side as compared to GA peel as per physician VAS (P = 0.000) and patient VAS (P = 0.000). Side effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and acne were seen on both sides while dryness and crusting were more common on the TCA peel side. A 30% TCA peel is efficacious and well-tolerated for mild-to-moderate acne scars. About 70% GA peel is an effective alternative to TCA peel, especially for patients not tolerating TCA or requiring lesser downtime.

Microneedling with Topical Insulin Versus Microneedling with Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid for Atrophic Post-Acne Scars: A Split-Face Study.

Post-acne scars are a prevalent cosmetic complaint that usually require multi-modality treatment to achieve accepted results. The target of this research was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of microneedling with topical insulin versus microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in atrophic post-acne scar treatment. The current comparative split-face research included 30 patients with atrophic facial acne scars. Each patient received six sessions of microneedling with topical insulin on one side of the face and microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid on the other side. Sessions were done three weeks apart, and digital photographs were taken before and three months after the last treatment session. Goodman and Baron qualitative and quantitative grading system was used to evaluate the improvement across both sides of the face, along with patient satisfaction. Three months after the last session, a statistically significant improvement in qualitative acne scar grading on both sides of the face (P < 0.001) was reported, with non-significant difference between the two sides (P = 0.864). Moreover, the mean percentage of improvement in quantitative acne scar grading was 49.18 ± 13.22 on the insulin side and 47.72 ± 15.08 on the hyaluronic acid side, with non-significant difference between the two sides after treatment (P = 0.235). Both microneedling with topical insulin and with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid achieved comparable significant improvement of atrophic post-acne scars.

Impact of 30% supramolecular salicylic acid combined with ultra-pulse carbon dioxide fractional laser therapy on facial atrophic acne scars

Objective: To assess the impact of 30% supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) combined with ultra-pulse carbon dioxide (CO2) fractional laser therapy on facial atrophic acne scars. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with atrophic acne scars treated from June 2020 to June 2022. The patients were divided into the combination group (SSA combined with ultra-pulse CO2 fractional laser therapy) and the laser group (ultra-pulse CO2 fractional laser therapy alone). Four treatment sessions were conducted for each group. Follow-up visits were performed every 2 months after each treatment and included assessments of the Échelle d'Évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné (ECCA) score, effective rate, and visual analogue scale score. Results: The combination and laser groups comprised 72 and 61 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in sex, age, or baseline ECCA score between the two groups. The effective rate (95.8% vs. 67.2%, P &lt; 0.001) was higher and the pain scores (during and after the intervention) were lower in the combination group than in the laser group (P &lt; 0.001). The severity of erythema, edema, and crusting was milder in the combination group (P &lt; 0.001). The proportion of highly satisfied patients was higher (73.6% vs. 31.2%, P &lt; 0.001) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index showed greater improvement (0.15 ± 0.40 vs. 1.39 ± 1.53, P &lt; 0.001) in the combination group than in the laser group. Conclusion: The combination of ultra-pulse CO2 fractional laser therapy and 30% supramolecular SSA had improved efficacy in treating facial atrophic acne scars without increasing pain or inducing adverse reactions.

Subcision with and without suction for acne scars: a split-faced, rater-blinded randomized control trial.

Therapeutic options for acne scars include subcision and suction with microdermabrasion, but these treatment modalities have not been studied in conjunction. To compare effectiveness of subcision alone versus subcision with suction for the treatment of facial acne scars. Randomized, split-faced, evaluator-blinded control trial. Participants underwent one subcision treatment on both sides of the face followed by 10 sessions of suction to one side. Photographs at baseline, 1-month, and 4-months were assessed. Primary outcome measures were the validated Acne Scar Severity Scale (ASSS) (0 = no acne scarring, 4 = severe), Acne Scar Improvement Grading Scale (ASIGS) (-100to100%), and modified Quantitative Global Scarring Grades (QGSG) (point-based questionnaire instrument), as well as subject preference. Twenty-eight treatment areas and 154 treatments were analyzed. Dermatologist raters found no differences between subcision alone and subcision-suction at 1-month or 4-months. Mean subject-assessed percent improvement for subcision-suction was higher than that for subcision alone at 1-month (37% versus 24%, p = 0.04) but not at 4-months (p = 0.37). Subjects preferred combination therapy to monotherapy at 1-month (50% vs. 21%) and 4-months (43%vs.21%). While blinded raters did not detect significant differences, subjects perceived combination treatment as working more quickly than monotherapy, and preferred combination treatment at all time points.Clinical trial registration NCT01696513 on Clinicaltrials.gov.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections With and Without Microneedling for Managing Atrophic Facial Acne Scars: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Background and aim The majority of acne has the potential to transform into facial scars, which have a physical and psychological effecton the individual. There are plenty of treatment optionsto manage such scars. The aim of this study is to assess the comparative effect of the injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone, with that of the injection of PRP with microneedling, in the reduction of atrophic facial acne scars. Methods A total of 30 participants were included in this study, divided into two groups (n = 15). Patients inGroup I received intradermal injection of PRP only, and Group II included patients receiving intradermal injection of PRP with microneedling. The scar appearance was evaluated at baseline, after one, two, and three months using Goodman Baron's scar scale. The statistics were analysed using the Chi-square and Student's t-tests. Results Patients in the PRP with microneedling group had lower acne scar scores on the Goodman Baron scale compared to those who received only PRP. The acne scores were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) in the second and third months of treatment in Group II. Conclusion The addition of microneedling to PRP has proven to be effective in the reduction of facial acne scars. However, different types of scars require different modalities of treatment, and the final decision lies in the hands of the operator and the requirements of the patients.

Fractional Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Non-Ablative 1410 nm Diode Laser in the Treatment of Acne Scars: A Clinical and Immunohistochemical Study

Background: Effectively managing acne scars while minimizing consequences is still a challenging task. The primary determinant in selecting and continuing therapy for a specific device is stimulating collagen production and dermal remodeling with the fewest possible complications. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and immunohistochemical results of ablative fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser versus fractional non-ablative diode laser for treating facial acne scars. Methods and Materials: Thirty patients with atrophic acne scars were included in a split-face comparative study. Right and left facial sides received three sessions of FCO2 and diode laser, respectively, at one-month intervals. One month after the third session, patients were evaluated using photographs, the Goodman and Baron qualitative and quantitative global scarring grading system, the investigator’s global assessment, and patient satisfaction. A sample was collected from the area that had been treated, and the tissue was examined using hematoxylin and eosin (H–E) staining and immunohistochemistry staining for collagen I. Results: Goodman and Baron global scores showed a statistically significant difference compared to baseline on both sides of the face. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities. Biopsy specimens showed an increased deposition of collagen I by both laser devices, which was validated and described by immunohistochemistry staining. Conclusion: Both FCO2 and fractional non-ablative diode lasers proved their efficacy in treating different types of acne scars. For patients who are interested in no downtime and no complications, fractional non-ablative diode laser is recommended as an efficient alternative modality.

Microneedle fractional radiofrequency associated with drug delivery for facial atrophic acne scars and skin rejuvenation

ABSTRACT Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) has been used to improve photoaging and scars. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MFRF with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) for facial atrophic acne scars and skin rejuvenation by blinded visual evaluation, self-report, and reflective confocal microscopy (RCM). Fifteen subjects were randomized to the MFRF with bFGF group and fifteen to the MFRF group. All subjects underwent three-session therapy and a follow-up period. Significant group differences were in ECCA, global improvement score, satisfaction, and downtime before and after treatment. Combination therapy could be more effective than monotherapy for acne scars and facial rejuvenation. In addition, RCM can be used to observe the changes in skin collagen before and after treatment in evaluating cosmetic efficacy.

Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scarring with Fractional Microplasma Radiofrequency: A Multicentric Experience

BackgroundAtrophic scarring is a severe form-disfiguring sequela of acne, which can lead to negative effect on patients’ life. Fractional microplasma radiofrequency (RF) has emerged as a promising modality, leveraging dermal fibroblast remodeling to enhance aesthetic results for scars and hyperpigmentation. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of high-power fractional microplasma RF for atrophic acne scars, considering patient tolerance to procedural discomfort. MethodsIn this prospective study, 95 Chinese patients with atrophic facial acne scars underwent three sessions of fractional microplasma RF treatment, with assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Patients were categorized based on treatment power: Group A (50-70 W) and Group B (70-85 W). Efficacy was determined by three independent dermatologists using digital photographs and Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné (ECCA) scores, and patient-reported outcomes gauged satisfaction levels. ResultsEighty-six patients completed the study. Significant improvements were observed, with a reduction in ECCA scores from 107.21 to 42.27 (P<0.05), demonstrating notable scar amelioration across both groups, albeit with a superior outcome in Group B. All patients experienced transient side effects such as pain, erythema, and edema, deemed tolerable with no long-term adverse effects reported. The treatment was well-received, with high satisfaction rates, underscoring its efficacy and acceptable safety profile. ConclusionFractional microplasma RF therapy, particularly at higher power settings, is an effective and safe option for treating atrophic acne scars, offering significant aesthetic improvement with manageable discomfort. This modality presents a valuable addition to acne scar management strategies, especially for patients with darker skin tones seeking minimal downtime and reduced risk of hyperpigmentation.

Resurfacing of atrophic facial acne scars with a multimodality CO2 and 1570 nm laser system.

Scarring is one of the most prevalent long-term complications of acne vulgaris and has cosmetic, psychological, and social burdens. Contemporary management programs integrate multiple modalities to best address the multiple factors underlying their development and persistence. This work assessed the impact of sequential multimodal laser therapy on acne scar geometrics and texture. Adult patients (n = 16) with Fitzpatrick skin type II-IV and presenting with facial acne scars, underwent three combination ablative (CO2), and nonablative (1570 nm) laser treatment sessions at two-month intervals. Treatment was delivered using a ProScan Hybrid applicator, with each regimen including illumination with both ablative and a nonablative lasers applied in a grid mode sequence. Scar microtopography was assessed at baseline and 6 months after the last treatment session. At baseline, all patients had both box and rolling scars, while only three had icepick scars. Six months following treatment, mean scar volume improved from 5.7 ± 5.2 mm3 at baseline to 3.1 ± 3.0 mm3 and mean affected area improved from 165.6 ± 134.0 mm2 94.0 ± 80.1 mm2, translating to 47.0 ± 7.9% and 43.2 ± 8.6% reductions from baseline, respectively. Patients were highly satisfied with treatment outcomes, and no serious adverse reactions were documented during the course of treatment or follow-up. Multimodal CO2 and 1570-nm laser treatment improved the surface profilometry of patients with atrophic facial acne scars. Customization of both treatment intervals and laser settings to cosmetic regions, scar profiles and skin phototypes may further enhance treatment outcomes and expand its applicability to additional skin deformities.

Sleep quality correlates with effectiveness of ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars.

Ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser is effective for acne atrophic scars. Whether this effectiveness is affected by sleep quality remains unclear. Aiming to investigate the relationship between sleep quality and postoperative effectiveness, a retrospective clinical study was conducted, enrolling 83 patients with atrophic acne scar. Sleep quality was measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire at 3 months after the end of the first treatment. The ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) scale was used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness before and at 3 months after treatment. The patients were divided into a mild to moderate improvement group and a good to excellent improvement group, based on whether they achieved a 50% ECCA improvement rate. PSQI score was higher in the mild and moderate improvement group than in the good to excellent improvement group (7.6 ± 4.5 vs 3.8 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that both PSQI score (odds ratio = 0.6 [95% CI = 0.5-0.8], p < 0.001) and scar type were correlated with postfractional CO2 laser effectiveness. Pearson correlation analysis suggested that PSQI score was negatively correlated with ECCA decline score (r = -0.6139, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that PSQI score (area under the curve = 0.759) and scar type (area under the curve = 0.737) were all closely correlated with postoperative effectiveness, without statistical difference between their accuracies (p = 0.647). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that both PSQI score and scar type correlated with postoperative effectiveness. Our results demonstrated that sleep quality correlates with the postoperative effectiveness of ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.

Efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency for atrophic acne scars: A real-world clinical study of 126 patients.

To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for facial atrophic acne scars in a real-world setting. The clinical data of patients with atrophic acne scars who had received FMR therapy from February 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The improvement of atrophic acne scars was assessed using the ECCA Grading Scale (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Adverse reactions during FMR treatment were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMR for atrophic acne scars. A total of 126 patients with facial atrophic acne scars were included. A total of 590 FMR treatment sessions were accomplished, with each of 82 patients receiving 4 or more treatment sessions, and 1 receiving a maximum of 14 sessions. All patients showed improvement in symptoms after FMR treatment, with moderate to significant improvement (ECCA score reduction of 26%-100%) in 92 (73.0%) patients. As the number of treatment sessions increased, the ECCA score gradually decreased from an average of 85.6 before to 35.0 after FMR. The average scores for distortion, color, and visual analogue scale (VAS) of mMSS all showed certain reductions. The change in GAIS score indicated improvement after treatment, with minimal improvement in 16 patients (12.7%), good improvement in 57 patients (45.2%), significant improvement in 45 patients (35.7%), and optimal improvement in 8 patients (6.4%). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the long pulse width and the number of FMR treatment sessions were positively associated with clinical efficacy. Compared to the short pulse-width group (200 ms), the longer pulse-width group (300 ms) (odds ratio [OR] = 8.3, p = 0.003) and the even longer pulse-width group (400-500 ms) (OR = 52.6, p < 0.001) demonstrated stronger efficacies. Patients who received more than three treatment sessions had better outcomescompared to those who received three or fewer treatment sessions (OR = 4.0, p = 0.036). All patients experienced posttreatment transient erythema, but no crusting, infection, or blister. Six cases developed grid-like erythema around 1 month posttreatmentand one case experienced hyperpigmentation, both of which resolved within 1-3 months after appropriate management. FMR is a safe and effective treatment modality for improving facial atrophic acne scars, and the number of FMR treatment sessions and pulse width are associated with clinical efficacy.

An Innovative Dual-Wavelength Laser Technique for Atrophic Acne Scar Management: A Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: Acne scars are one of the most disturbing and long-term symptoms of acne vulgaris, having a negative impact on a person's physical, emotional, and social well-being. Aim: the purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and post-treatment outcomes of a dual-wavelength system combining the irradiation of two wavelengths at 10,600 nm and 1540 nm in the management of facial atrophic acne scars. Materials and Methods: Four healthy adult volunteers aged 24-53 years were enrolled. The areas treated were the full face (two patients), cheeks (one patient), and forehead (one patient). A dual-wavelength system (1540 nm and 10,600 nm) was used for this study. Patients underwent 2-4 treatment sessions, and the treatments were performed once every 45-90 days. All possible side effects such as burning sensation, dyschromia, mild to moderate post-treatment erythema, bleeding, itching, edema, and crusting were checked. The index to assess edema and erythema was based on a four-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) and was applied before and at 3-month follow-up (3 MFU) after the last treatment session. In addition, a patient assessment was conducted before treatment and at 3 MFU after the last treatment session. Results: For all patients examined, the edema index was mild, while for the erythema index, 3/4 patients experienced moderate and 1/4 patients experienced mild symptoms. The mean patient downtime was 5.8 ± 0.5 days. Concerning the patient assessment, 2/4 subjects showed excellent improvement, 1/4 patients showed good improvement, and 1/4 patients showed slight improvement. As shown by the photographic assessment, a noticeable improvement in skin texture and a substantial reduction in acne scars were observed at the end of treatment. Conclusions: This dual-wavelength laser technology has the potential to be an interesting and safe approach for acne scar treatment, with a low risk of scarring/hypopigmentation and a shorter healing time.

Effect of ultrasound-guided epidermal growth factor injection combined with carbon dioxide laser on treatment of facial acne scars

Effect of ultrasound-guided epidermal growth factor injection combined with carbon dioxide laser on treatment of facial acne scars

Efficacy of fractional CO2 laser therapy combined with hyaluronic acid dressing for treating facial atrophic acne scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The present work aimed to systematically identify the efficacy and safety of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser plus hyaluronic acid (HA) dressing in dealing with facial atrophic acne scars. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning fractional CO2 laser in combination with HA dressing for treating atrophic acne scars were screened in 8 electronic databases (containing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang, Sinomed as well as VIP). Besides, for the purpose of evaluating the risk of bias of the enrolled RCTs, the Cochrane Collaboration tool was adopted. Statistical analysis was completed using Revman5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software. Meanwhile, the quality of evidence was assessed by the GRADE system. Finally, 6 studies involving 623 patients were enrolled. According to the findings in this study, compared with fractional CO2 laser alone, fractional CO2 laser therapy combined with HA dressing reduced the scores of ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading scale (MD=-3.37,95% CI [-5.03, -1.70], P<0.0001), shortened the time of crust formation (MD=-0.42,95% CI [-0.80, -0.04], P=0.03) and the time of crust removal(MD=-1.31,95% CI [-1.67, -0.95], P<0.00001), enhanced patient satisfaction (RR=1.85, 95% CI [1.44, 2.38], P<0.00001). All the reported adverse events including hyperpigmentation, erythema, edema, mild itching, and slight burning pain were controllable. In addition, fractional CO2 laser combined with HA dressing therapy had a lower incidence of hyperpigmentation than fractional CO2 laser alone (RR=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.61], P<0.0001). The level of evidence for outcomes was classified to be low to moderate. According to our findings, fractional CO2 laser combined with HA dressing is efficacious and safe option for facial atrophic acne scars. Nevertheless, more high-quality trials are required for further verification in the future.

"Multiple Mode Procedures" of Ultra-Pulse Fractional CO2 Laser: A Novel Treatment Modality of Facial Atrophic Acne Scars.

Fractional CO2 laser is therapeutic for acne atrophic scar, but its effect usually is limited after multiple sessions, with occasional adverse reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new modality combining ultra-pulse CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser (multiple mode procedures [MMP]) in the treatment of acne atrophic scars. From December 2017 to January 2023, a total of 103 patients with facial acne atrophic scars treated with MMP technique were retrospectively analyzed. MMP was performed for 1-4 sessions with an interval of approximately three months. Based on photographs taken before and after treatment, overall atrophic scar improvement was assessed according to the ECCA grading scale, the modified Manchester Scar Scale and the 4-point Global Assessment Scale (GAS). The safety was evaluated by the degree of pain during treatment and postoperative adverse reactions. All the 103 patients received treatment and completed follow-up, with an average of two sessions. The mean ECCA score decreased from 162.7 to 93.1 with statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The mean GAS score increased by an average of 2.3 ± 0.9. The GAS improvement more evident for "boxcar" atrophic scars (2.7 ± 0.8) than for "rolling" (2.3 ± 0.8) and "icepick" scars (1.7 ± 0.8) (p < 0.001). The average improvement scores for color, distortion and texture were 2.0 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 0.9 and 2.3 ± 0.8, respectively. The mean pain score during treatment was 3.9 ± 0.8, and the mean duration of erythema was 30.7 ± 3.5 days. Only three patients developed hyperpigmentation at the treated site within a few months. Ultra-pulse CO2 fractional laser MMP technique can effectively improve the condition of facial atrophic acne scars with limited adverse reactions.

Clinical evaluation of needle-free electronic pneumatic hyaluronic acid injection treatment for facial atrophic acne scars: A prospective, randomized comparative trial.

Acne scars are common but difficult to treat, and an effective new treatment strategy is desired. This prospective, split-face randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of needle-free electronic pneumatic hyaluronic acid injection (EPI-HA) treatment for acne scars. Thirty Japanese subjects with moderate to severe facial atrophic acne scars underwent EPI-HA treatment on a randomized side of their face. Three treatment sessions were carried out at 1-month intervals, and the subjects were followed-up for 3 months after the final treatment. Three months after the final treatment, 48.3% of treated sides met the criteria for success, compared with 0% for the control sides (P < 0.0001). Rolling type scars were much improved compared with boxcar types and icepick types. Satisfaction (or better) was reported by 55.2% of subjects at the 3-month follow-up after the final treatment, which was similar to the physicians' assessment. Three-dimensional in vivo imaging analysis detected significant difference in scar reductions between the treated and control sides in the mean scar area, scar depth, and maximum depth of the biggest scar at 1 and 3 months after the final treatment (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, EPI-HA treatment significantly improved rolling facial atrophic acne scars in our Japanese subjects, with minimal side effects.

Investigating the Efficacy of Modified Lipoaspirate Grafting to Improve the Appearance of Atrophic Acne Scars: A Pilot Study.

Processed lipoaspirate grafting describes several techniques theorized to leverage the inflammatory and regenerative capacities of mechanically processed adipocytes to rejuvenate and correct skin pathology. Although lipoaspirate grafting is typically leveraged to fill visible defects such as depressed scars and dermal lines, additional fat processing allows grafts to stimulate mechanisms of wound healing, including the promotion of fibroblast activation, neovascularization, and neocollagenesis. This study intends to assess the efficacy and tolerability of processed lipoaspirate grafting monotherapy to improve the clinical appearance of atrophic acne scars. Patients underwent a single autologous processed lipoaspirate grafting procedure at the site of atrophic acne scars. Objective and subjective scar analysis was performed at 3 and 6 months posttreatment. Scars were assessed with standard photography, topographic analysis, and noninvasive skin measurements. In addition, microbiopsies were obtained before and after treatment to assess histological or genetic changes. Clinical improvement was assessed with patient and clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales (GAIS) and blinded photographic evaluation. Ten patients between ages 18 and 60 completed the study. Clinical evaluation demonstrated that fat grafting improved the appearance of atrophic acne scars. Clinician GAIS and patient GAIS scores showed clinical improvement at both 3- and 6-month follow-up compared with baseline (P < .05). Blinded clinician GAIS scores also showed statistically significant improvement when clinicians compared clinical photographs taken at 6-month follow-up to baseline (P < .0001). The attenuation coefficient increased at 6-month follow-up, suggesting collagen remodeling and reorganization over the study period. Patients experienced anticipated posttreatment symptoms including transient erythema and edema; however, no unexpected adverse events were reported. Micronized lipoaspirate injection is a viable and effective option to improve the appearance of facial acne scarring. Favorable improvements in atrophic acne scarring were captured by objective analysis of skin ultrastructure as well as improvement in subjective assessments of scarring.

Surgical Subcision for Acne Scars: A Review of Instrumentation.

Subcision is a surgical technique for managing atrophic acne scars. Over time, new instruments have emerged to increase the efficiency, efficacy, and safety of the subcision procedure, including sharp, blunt, and energy-assisted devices. To review the instrumentation used for the subcision of acne scars and to provide clinicians with practical information regarding the selection of instrumentation, with a focus on advantages and disadvantages. A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted for articles from January 2000 to June 2022 describing the use of subcision alone for the management of acne scarring. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the included articles. A total of 417 patients from 17 articles were included; 155 patients underwent sharp subcision, 235 patients underwent blunt subcision, and 27 patients underwent energy-assisted subcision. The main indication for subcision was atrophic facial acne scars. Subcision using sharp, blunt, and energy-assisted instruments were all effective in treating atrophic acne scars. Adverse effects common to all subcision methods included erythema and edema. Subcision is a safe and effective modality for the revision of selected acne scars and is a valuable skill set for dermatologists who perform scar revision to master.