Eye Lens Radiation Exposure Research Articles

Evaluation of X-ray protective goggles in mitigating eye lens radiation exposure during radiopharmaceutical handling and patient care in nuclear medicine.

The aim of this study is to estimate eye lens exposure dose when handling radiopharmaceuticals and interacting with patients receiving radiopharmaceuticals, and to verify the usefulness of X-ray protective goggles in mitigating such radiation exposure using phantoms. To evaluate radiation exposure during the handling of radiopharmaceuticals, we employed a fluorescent glass dosimeter to measure the radiation doses associated with 99mTc, 123I, 131I, 111In, and 18F at distances of 30 cm and 60 cm, followed by calculation of the 3 mm dose equivalent rate (3DER). We then estimated the dose reduction rates for various scenarios, including the use of syringe shields and X-ray protective goggles with lead equivalences of 0.07, 0.15, 0.75, and 0.88 mmPb, as well as their combined application. X-ray protective goggles with lead equivalence of 0.75 mmPb outperformed those with 0.07 mmPb and 0.15 mmPb, for all radionuclides and at both source distances. X-ray protective goggles with 0.88 mmPb outperformed those with 0.75 mmPb during handling of 131I and 111In at a distance of 30 cm. In the remaining scenarios, X-ray protective goggles with 0.88 mmPb resulted in marginal reductions or no discernible additional effects. The overall shielding effect of X-ray protective goggles was less pronounced for 131I and 18F, but the combined use of a syringe shield with X-ray protective goggles with 0.75 or 0.88 mmPb improved the dose reduction rate for all scenarios. In simulating patient care, X-ray protective goggles with 0.88 mmPb demonstrated a dose reduction effect of approximately 50% or more. X-ray protective goggles could reduce the 3DER for the eye lens, and were more effective when combined with a syringe shield. It is valid to use a lead equivalence of 0.88 mmPb to fully harness the protective capabilities of X-ray shielding goggles when dealing with all five types of nuclides in clinical settings.

Direct radiation exposure of the eye lenses in cranial computed tomography and exposure reduction through radiographer training

IntroductionIonizing radiation can cause increased opacity of the lens and later lead to radiation-induced cataract.Therefore, the eye lens should be positioned outside of the direct radiation beam in cranial computed tomography (CCT). If this is not possible, protective measures must be taken, which includes the use of external lens protectors. In this study we assess whether direct radiation exposure of the eyes in CCT can be reduced by trained radiographers and whether the use of eye lens protectors improves after training. MethodsFirst, we evaluated 763 non-enhanced CCT regarding direct radiation exposure of eyeballs and eye lenses and usage of lens shielding. Afterwards, we trained radiographers to avoid radiation exposure of the eyes by head adjustment and protectors and assessed the improvements in a subsequent study of 678 CCT. We tried to identify factors that influenced radiation exposure of the eye lens. ResultsAfter training, frequency of radiation exposure of lenses was significantly reduced by 5.9% (220/763 patients in pre- vs. 155/678 patients in post-training group, p = 0.01). The use of external lens protectors significantly increased after training by 9.8% (37/763 patients in pre- vs. 99/678 patients in post-training group, p < 0.001). The absence of tiltable headrest was a risk factor for increased eye lens radiation exposure in the pre-training group. The presence of cervical spine immobilizer was associated with more frequent radiation exposure of the lenses in the pre- and post-training group. ConclusionsRadiographer training and the use of tiltable headrest lead to reduction of radiation exposure to the eye lens. Implications for practiceRadiographer training is an effective method to reduce eye lens exposure in CCT. The usage of tiltable headrest minimizes the radiation exposure of the lenses.

Estimation of Eye Lens Dose during the Handling of Radiopharmaceuticals and Using X-ray Protective Goggles for Dose Reduction in Nuclear Medicine

The purposes of this study were to estimate the eye lens dose during the handling of radiopharmaceuticals and to validate the requirement of X-ray protective goggles in nuclear medicine. Simulated eye lens radiation exposure (3-mm dose equivalent rate) was measured using a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RPLD) positioned at distances of 30 and 60 cm from 99mTc, 111In, and 123I radiation sources. Reduction rates were evaluated for the following means of radiation protection: X-ray protective goggles (0.07-, 0.50-, and 0.75-mm lead equivalent), a syringe shield, and a lead glass plate. 3-mm dose equivalent rates without protection were obtained at 6.13±0.13 µSv/min/GBq for 99mTc, 23.08±0.19 µSv/min/GBq for 111In, and 11.07±0.11 µSv/min/GBq for 123I. Reduction rates for each source were over 90% for the syringe shield and the lead glass plate. The 0.75-mm lead equivalent X-ray protective goggles decreased the 3-mm dose equivalent rate by 68.8% for 99mTc, 60.6% for 111In, and 68.1% for 123I. Although the estimated eye lens equivalent dose during the handling of radiopharmaceuticals did not exceed the threshold dose, our results suggest that 0.75-mm lead equivalent X-ray protective goggles are needed to reduce the exposure of the lens while handling 99mTc, 111In, and 123I radiation sources.

Outcome of cataract surgery in children affected by malignancies other than retinoblastoma with eye-lens radiation exposure.

To describe, retrospectively, the visual outcome, feasibility, and safety of cataract surgery in a pediatric population affected by iatrogenic cataract, secondary to systemic oncological treatment for malignancies other than retinoblastoma. Young patients, affected by radiation-induced cataract, who were referred to the San Paolo Ophthalmic Center in Padova between 2010 and 2017, were included in the study. All patients had previously received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy treatment for malignancies, between 2004 and 2013. All medical records of infants who underwent cataract surgery were accurately reviewed. Eighteen eyes out of 11 patients included in the study underwent cataract surgery. The mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 3.6 years. The interval between tumor diagnosis and cataract development was around 3 years. Mean follow-up after surgery was 15.4 ± 6.3 months. All eyes underwent posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, posterior capsulotomy, and anterior vitrectomy in one time surgery. No intraoperative complications were shown. Post-operatively, only one eye received laser capsulotomy due to posterior capsule opacification. At the end of follow up, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 (LogMAR 0) in all eyes and significantly improved (p < 0.01) compared to baseline. Iatrogenic-cataract surgery in pediatric oncological patients is a safe and effective way to improve visual acuity. Posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy at the time of surgery reduce the rate of posterior lens opacification and guarantee an excellent visual acuity in these patients.

Effect of X-ray protective visors on the eye lens dose during ureteroscopy

Eye lens radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures may result in occupational radiation-induced cataracts. We evaluated the eye lens radiation doses and the protective effect of X‑ray protective visors during ureteroscopic procedures. Eye lens doses were measured in front of and behind X‑ray protective visors using eye lens dosemeters during ureteroscopic procedures done by 4different endourologic surgeons within a12-week period. Background radiation dose, simultaneously measured with transport dosemeters, was subtracted. Measured eye lens doses below the detection limit of the eye lens dosemeters were adjusted to the detection limit of 0.028 mSv. Correlating the eye lens doses (ELD) to the dose-area-product (DAP) an ELD/DAP ratio was calculated. Applying this ELD/DAP ratio the potential reduction of the eye lens radiation dose was retrospectively calculated for all ureteroscopic procedures done within one year. Within the 12-week period 76ureteroscopies were done by the 4endourologic surgeons. The accumulated eye lens radiation dose was 0.796 mSv in front of the X‑ray protective visors, and 0.338 mSv behind the X‑ray protective visors. Thus, the eye lens radiation exposure was reduced to at least 42% by using X‑ray protective visors. Considering the 215 documented ureteroscopies in our clinic in the year before starting the study, occupational radiation exposure to the eye lens would have been reduced by X‑ray protective visors from 4.090 to 1.737 mSv. X‑ray protective visors can effectively reduce the radiation exposure to the eye lens during fluoroscopy-guided endourologic procedures and should be used especially by high-volume endourologic surgeons.

Eye lens radiation exposure in paediatric interventional treatment of retinoblastoma

Retinoblastoma represents 3% of cancers in children under fifteen years of age. The standard paediatric treatment for saving the affected eye is supraselective intra-arterial chemotherapy performed in interventional rooms. In order to address the radiation toxicity due to the angiography, the aim of this study was to determine the typical dose value corresponding to the procedure, estimate the paediatric patients’ eye lens dose and study the relationship between dose indicators and dose to the lens. An automatic dose management software was installed in two interventional rooms to obtain the distribution of the dose indicators kerma-area product and reference-point air kerma, getting a typical value 16 Gy·cm2 and 130 mGy, respectively (n = 35). The eye lens dose estimates were obtained with photoluminescent dosimeters placed on the patient’s eyelids. In the left eye, the entrance surface air kerma was 44.23 ± 2.66 mGy, and 12.72 ± 0.89 mGy in the right eye (n = 10). There was a positive correlation between dose to the lens per procedure and dose indicators, with R2 > 0.65 for both eyes. Based on this information, the threshold for the onset of radiation-induce cataracts (500 mGy) will be exceeded if the treatment is performed for more than 8 sessions.

Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens Through Radiological Imaging Procedures at the Surgical Workplace During Trauma Surgery.

Background: Due to the drastic reduction of the eye lens dose limit from 150 mSv per year to 20 mSv per year since 2018, the prospective investigation of the estimated dose of the eye lens by radiological imaging procedures at the surgical site during trauma surgery in the daily work process was carried out. This was also necessary because, as experience shows, with changes in surgical techniques, there are also changes in the use of radiological procedures, and thus an up-to-date inventory can provide valuable information for the assessment of occupationally induced radiation exposure of surgical personnel under the current conditions. Methods: The eye lens radiation exposure was measured over three months for five trauma surgeons, four hand surgeons and four surgical assistants with personalized LPS-TLD-TD 07 partial body dosimeters Hp (0.07). A reference dosimeter was deposited at the surgery changing room. The dosimeters were sent to the LPS (Landesanstalt für Personendosimetrie und Strahlenschutzausbildung) measuring institute (National Institute for Personal Dosimetry and Radiation Protection Training, Berlin) for evaluation after 3 months. The duration of the operation, occupation (assistant, surgeon, etc.), type of surgery (procedure, diagnosis), designation of the X-ray unit, total duration of radiation exposure per operation and dose area product per operation were recorded. Results: Both the evaluation of the dosimeters by the trauma surgeons and the evaluation of the dosimeters by the hand surgeons and the surgical assistants revealed no significant radiation exposure of the eye lens in comparison to the respective measured reference dosimeters. Conclusions: Despite the drastic reduction of the eye lens dose limit from 150 mSv per year to 20 mSv per year, the limit for orthopedic, trauma and hand surgery operations is well below the limit in this setting.

EYE LENS RADIATION EXPOSURE OF WORKERS DURING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES AND SURGERY.

To evaluates the eye-lens radiation exposure of workers during medical interventional procedures and surgery in a military hospital as well as of the equine veterinarians. The measures represent the exposure in a normal workload schedule of ninety randomly selected workers over a 3-month period, extrapolated to 1 year. The eye-lens dosemeters were placed near the eye closest to the radiation source (Carinou, E., Ferrari, P., Bjelac, O. C., Gingaume, M., Merce, M. S. and O'Connor, U. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review. J. Radiol. Prot. 2015;35(3): R17-R34). Three models of eye-lens dosemeters (Dosilab, Landauer and IRSN) were assessed in term of ergonomics. The annual estimation of eye-lens doses did not reach the annual dose limit of 20 mSv revised by the ICRP, ranged from 0.00 to 18.12 mSv with a mean of 0.96 ± 2.28 mSv. However, these results cannot be representative of a heavy workload or incident situations for which radiation exposure to the eye-lens could exceed this limit. The IRSN dosemeter model was considered the most convenient.

Evaluation of the current status of the eye lens radiation exposure in an Interventional Radiology department.

Background:Following recent epidemiological studies, which showed tissue reactions from ionizing radiation at significantly lower doses, the 2013/59 EURATOM Directive of 5th December 2013 lowered the limit on the equivalent dose to the eye lens from 150 mSv to 20 mSv per year. Therefore, as a precautionary measure, it is considered appropriate to perform a timely dose monitoring by using specific dosimeters.Objectives:Analysis of the current state of the eye lens exposures during interventional procedures. The survey aimed at assessing the degree of information available to the exposed workers as regards lowering the dose limit in Interventional Radiology departments of some hospitals in Campania (Southern Italy).Methods:The equivalent dose was assessed, over a period of 90 days, using specific Hp dosimeters(3), placed sideways with regard to prescription eye glasses. The level of awareness of the new dose limit among operators was assessed using a questionnaire.Results:The values of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye for the I and II Operators were found to be <150 mSv/year but for the I Operator a value of 54 mSv/year was obtained, ie higher than 20 mSv/year, that is the new limit of the equivalent dose according to 2013/59 EURATOM. The initial results of the questionnaire from 52 exposed workers, of which 46 (88%) were from exposure category A and 6 (12%) from category B, showed a low level of information (19%).Conclusions:The results highlight not only the importance of using specific devices for individual protection but also the importance of the level of training and information the exposed medical staff are given concerning the new regulations.

Eye lens radiation exposure of the medical staff performing interventional urology procedures with an over-couch X-ray tube

The purpose of this work was to estimate the eye lens radiation exposure of the medical staff during interventional urology procedures. The measurements were carried out for six medical staff members performing 33 fluoroscopically-guided procedures. All procedures were performed with the X-ray tube positioned over the couch. The dose equivalents (Hp(0.07)) were measured at the eye level using optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters and at the chest level with OSL dosimeters placed over the protective apron. The ratio of the dose measured close to the eye lens and on the chest was determined. The annual eye lens dose was estimated based on the workload in the service. For the physician and the instrumentalist nurse, the eye to chest dose ratios were 0.9±0.4 and 2.6±1.6 (k = 2), respectively. The average doses per procedure received by the eye lens were 78±24 μSv and 38±18 μSv, respectively. The eye lens dose per DAP was 8.4±17.5 μSv/(Gy·cm2) for the physician and 4.1±8.7 μSv/(Gy·cm2) for the instrumentalist nurse. The results indicate that the eye lens to chest dose ratio greatly varies according to the staff function and that the dose equivalent measured by the personal dosimeter worn on the chest may underestimate the eye lens dose of some medical staff members.

Eye Lens Radiation Exposure in Greek Interventional Cardiology Article.

The lens of the eye is one of the radiosensitive tissues of the human body; if exposed to ionizing radiation can develop radiation-induced cataract at early ages. This study was held in Greece and included 44 Interventional Cardiologists (ICs) and an unexposed to radiation control group of 22 persons. Of the note, 26 ICs and the unexposed individuals underwent special eye examinations. The detected lens opacities were classified according to LOCS III protocol. Additionally, the lens doses of the ICs were measured using eye lens dosemeters. The mean dose to the lenses of the ICs per month was 0.83 ± 0.59 mSv for the left and 0.35 ± 0.38 mSv for the right eye, while the annual doses ranged between 0.7 and 11 mSv. Regarding the lens opacities, the two groups did not differ significantly in the prevalence of either nuclear or cortical lens opacities, whereas four ICs were detected with early stage subcapsular sclerosis. Though no statistically difference was observed in the cohort, the measured doses indicate that the eye doses received from the ICs can be significant. To minimize the radiation-induced risk at the eye lenses, the use of protective equipment and appropriate training on this issue is highly recommended.

Eye lens radiation exposure in greek interventional cardiology personnel

Introduction The exposure of the radiosensitive eye lenses to ionizing radiation can lead to radiation-induced cataract, which is usually detected earlier than the age-related cataract. Purpose In the framework of the study, measurements of the eye lens doses of Interventional Cardiologists (ICs) were performed. An attempt was made to calculate retrospectively their eye lens doses and compare them with the probability for radiation-induced cataract. Materials and methods The study included ICs from different health centers of Athens and unexposed workers. Each participant underwent two clinical eye examinations and the detected lens opacities (nuclear, cortical or posterior subcapsular) were classified according to LOCS III protocol. Moreover, the lens doses of the ICs were measured using special designed eye dosemeters. Results 43 ICs (mean age = 48.8 ± 6.7 years) and 22 unexposed workers (mean age = 48.2 ± 5.0 years) participated at the study. The mean dose to the eye lenses of the ICs per month was 0.74 ± 0.53 mSv, while the maximum annual dose was calculated 28 mSv/yr, much higher than the occupational annual dose limit of 20 mSv/yr. Regarding the lens opacities, the two groups did not differ significantly in the prevalence of either nuclear or cortical lens opacities, whereas 4 ICs where detected with early stage subcapsular sclerosis. Conclusion Though no statistically significant difference was observed in the cohort, the measured doses and the cumulative ones indicate that the ICs receive high eye lens doses. In order to minimize the radiation induced risk at the eye lenses, the use of radioprotective equipment and appropriate training on this issue is highly recommended.

Risk of eye lens radiation exposure for members of the public.

In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reviewed its recommendation concerning the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens, lowering it to 20 mSv in a year, for occupational exposure in planned exposure situations. The ICRP's statement does not contain any explicit recommendations regarding the organ dose limit for the eye lens for public exposure. For the moment, no change is proposed. But, to be coherent in the overall approach, the current equivalent limit for the public might be lowered. A similar yardstick than in the former recommendation may be used, that is to say a reduction of 10 times lower than that for occupational exposure. In this context, additional data on potential scenarios for public exposure of the eye lens are necessary. This paper, mainly based on a literature study, aims to provide, as far as possible, an exhaustive list of the situations in which members of the public can be exposed at the level of the eye lens. Once these situations have been defined, some calculations, made to assess the associated doses to the eye lens, are presented. This literature study did not reveal any current situations where members of the public would receive significant radiation doses to the eye lens. Indeed, the situations in which the dose to the eye lens might reach around 1 mSv per year for the public are extremely rare.

Eye lens radiation exposure to interventional cardiologists: a retrospective assessment of cumulativedoses

Radiation dose to the eye lens is a crucial issue for interventional cardiologists (ICs) who are exposed during the procedures they perform. This paper presents a retrospective assessment of the cumulative eye lens doses of ICs enrolled in the O'CLOC study for Occupational Cataracts and Lens Opacities in interventional Cardiology. Information on the workload in the catheterisation laboratory, radiation protection equipment, eye lens dose per procedure and dose reduction factors associated with eye-protective equipment were considered. For the 129 ICs at an average age of 51 who had worked for an average period of 22 years, the estimated cumulative eye lens dose ranged from 25 mSv to more than 1600 mSv; the mean ± SD was 423 ± 359 mSv. After several years of practice, without eye protection, ICs may exceed the new ICRP lifetime eye dose threshold of 500 mSv and be at high risk of developing early radiation-induced cataracts. Radiation protection equipment can reduce these doses and should be used routinely.

Eye lens radiation exposure and repeated head CT scans: A problem to keep in mind

The deterministic character of radiation-induced cataract is being called into question, raising the possibility of a risk in patients, especially children, exposed to ionizing radiation in case of repeated head CT-scans. This study aims to estimate the eye lens doses of a pediatric population exposed to repeated head CTs and to assess the feasibility of an epidemiological study. Children treated for a cholesteatoma, who had had at least one CT-scan of the middle ear before their tenth birthday, were included. Radiation exposure has been assessed from medical records and telephone interviews. Out of the 39 subjects contacted, 32 accepted to participate. A total of 76 CT-scans were retrieved from medical records. At the time of the interview (mean age: 16 years), the mean number of CT per child was 3. Cumulative mean effective and eye lens doses were 1.7mSv and 168mGy, respectively. A relatively high lens radiation dose was observed in children exposed to repeated CT-scans. Due to that exposure and despite the difficulties met when trying to reach patients' families, a large scale epidemiological study should be performed in order to assess the risk of radiation-induced cataracts associated with repeated head CT.