uring the last 10 years or so, there has been a remarkable rise of interest in children’s mental health. This is good news – and we shouldn’t be too shy to celebrate, nor too afraid to dwell on a worry or two lest, in ignoring them, we find the rise begin to fall. Broadly speaking, up until the early 1990s child mental health was pretty much hidden within the preserve of the specialist professional groups. This is not to say that little was going on. A great deal about children was being learned and practised. From Freud onwards, major advances in psychoanalysis, developmental psychology, behavioural and cognitive therapy and family and group therapy were bringing to life our understanding of the minds of children. Of course, much more needed to be known (and still does) but there was undoubtedly an exhilarating sense of inquiry into the nature of children’s mental health problems and family dynamics and into how interventions could be improved to bring about change in people’s troubled lives. What was lacking, however, was any real concerted desire to make these developments known to the wider public. Children’s mental health was simply not a political issue. The fact that it lay at the heart of so many of the prevailing social problems such as crime, drug misuse, teenage pregnancy and homelessness simply didn’t seem to ring a bell. At the time poverty, child welfare and child protection were the key political preoccupations but the concept of child mental health didn’t hit the headlines. If anything, the term carried with it something pejorative – as if it was stigmatising to associate the words ‘child’ and ‘mental health’. What was clearly needed was an effort to make more of a hue and cry about what was known and what was being done – a promotional campaign that would help to make the public more aware. YoungMinds, which I and others formed in the late 1980s, played a major role in taking forward this campaign. Most of us came from within the child guidance movement which in the mid-twentieth century was very involved in D developing multi-disciplinary working. In addition to YoungMinds various similar movements were afoot in the USA and some European countries, and in the UK certain key people proved critical in taking forward the agenda. Virginia Bottomley, for example, secretary of state for health from 1992 to 1995, was a former psychiatric social worker in child guidance clinics in London. Other leading figures at this time were Dr Richard Williams, a consultant child psychiatrist and director of the NHS Health Advisory Service, Dr Bob Jezzard, also a child psychiatrist, employed as a senior adviser in the Department of Health, and Dr Zarrina Kurtz, a public health consultant who had a particular interest in child development and children’s mental health problems. I myself was a child psychotherapist working in child guidance and residential treatment. Together, with one or two others, we joined up almost as if by accident. In effect, we shined as a kind of virtual multi-disciplinary team! We all set about in our own ways to build up and tell the story of the states that children’s minds could get into, of the prevalence of their mental health problems and of the predicament of those who tried to serve them. Most importantly, we brought to much greater light the invaluable findings of Professor Michael Rutter’s and Professor Philip Graham’s epidemiological research in the 1970s. It was, of course, not by chance that the first seminal review of child and adolescent mental health services produced by the Health Advisory Service (1995) was entitled Together We Stand. Let us take just a brief review of what is currently going on. First and foremost, the government now openly acknowledges the existence of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and is committed to investing considerable sums of money in them and also to introducing an infrastructure designed to support a more systematic and forwardmoving programme. All of this is quite unprecedented and I think it is true to say that the national child and adolescent mental health service is not the Cinderella service it once was some 12 or so years ago. It may not yet be in the prince’s arms, and the ugly sisters are still around, but at least it’s in the court!
Read full abstract
Sep 5, 2008
Mathilde Paradis + 3
Open Access