Bodies Of Executive Power Research Articles

LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CRIMINOLOGICAL MONITORING BY THE NATIONAL POLICE OF UKRAINE

The relevance of the article is that at the beginning of the study of the legal framework for criminological monitoring by the National Police of Ukraine, it should be noted that no legal act regulating police activities contains a definition of criminological monitoring, although the concept of monitoring is used, in particular in monitoring operational environment. The article examines the current state of monitoring by the police. Based on the research, the range of problematic issues related to police monitoring is outlined, and ways to solve them are suggested. No legal act regulating the activities of the police contains a definition of criminological monitoring, although the concept of monitoring is used, in particular in the aspect of monitoring the operational situation. The National Police of Ukraine is the central body of executive power that serves society by ensuring the protection of human rights and freedoms, combating crime, maintaining public safety and order. The main tasks of the national police are: ensuring public safety and order; protection of human rights and freedoms, as well as the interests of society and the state; crime prevention; providing, within the limits specified by law, assistance services to persons who, for personal, economic, social reasons or as a result of emergencies, need such assistance. In the Law of Ukraine “On the National Police” “monitoring” is not used by the legislator, although in some way the monitoring powers are reflected in the content of Art. 25 “Powers of the police in the field of information and analytical support”. Thus, the police carry out information and analytical activities solely to exercise their powers under the law. The concept of “criminological monitoring” is a broader concept than “monitoring of a criminogenic situation (situation)”. These concepts are close, but not identical, they differ in terms of content (monitoring of the operational situation includes observation, measurement and evaluation not only of certain criminal phenomena, but also other emergencies and offenses) and purpose.

Корупційні ризики у сфері земельних відносин та напрями їх мінімізації

The purpose of the article is to identify corruption risks in the field of land relations, identify specific factors confirming the existence of a corruption component in agricultural land use to create a system of preventive measures and establish regulatory fuses, limit corruption influence on land transactions and protect human rights. Research methods. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: analysis and synthesis (to determine the sources of corruption schemes in the field of land relations); correlation analysis (to establish the relationship between corruption and land use concentration); empirical (on the study of the consequences of corruption offenses in the field of land relations) and abstract-logical (to summarize the conclusions and formulate proposals). Research results. Identification of the main sources of corruption schemes in the field of agricultural land use contributes to the development of effective methods to combat these offenses. According to research by foreign scholars, the system of preventing abuse of office and obtaining illegal benefits by officials at all levels of government is built through: overcoming the monopoly, as the exclusive right of government agencies to carry out and control land transactions; clear legislative regulation of mechanisms of purchase and sale and other transactions with agricultural land; introduction of mechanisms of publicity, transparency and information openness in the land market. Disclosure of intentions to conduct land transactions, opening of operations, dissemination of information on approved agreements will reduce the interest of corrupt officials and protect legal actions. In addition to the types of corruption in the field of agricultural land use identified by the NACP, specific factors are outlined that confirm the existence of a corruption component, including: 1) conclusion of large land agreements (concentration of land use); 2) investment flows into land assets from offshore zones; 3) discretionary powers of a single body of executive power in the field of disposal of agricultural land. The establishment of regulatory safeguards on additional to generally accepted factors of corruption will limit the corrupt impact on land transactions and protect the rights of low-income people, small landholdings and other types of socio-economic exclusion. Scientific novelty сonsists in substantiating the need to single out large land agreements (concentration of land use) as transactions with significant corruption risk, when developing mechanisms to combat corruption at the national level. Practical significance. Addendum to the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2021-2025 in terms of identifying key issues in the field of land relations by developing a special mechanism for concluding large agreements (land use concentration) with mandatory verification of sources of funds, verification of information on ultimate beneficial owners and verification of corporate structure permanent monitoring of the impact of concentrated land use on the observance of the rights of the local population and preservation of the environment will become an effective preventive anti-corruption measure in the field of land relations. Figs.: 3. Refs.: 27.

ALGORITHM OF ACTIONS OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIALS OF THE SES DURING STATE SUPERVISION (CONTROL)

Introduction. The concept of the SES stipulates that officials exercising state supervision (control) are obliged to detect and prevent violations of fire and technogenic safety requirements established by law [14]. Іn such situations, he bears full responsibility for violation of the requirements of fire, technogenic safety established by the legislation.Purpose. To propose an algorithm of actions of authorized officials during state supervision (control) in the field of technogenic and fire safety during the practical implementation of the provisions of the Civil Protection Code of Ukraine (further- the CZU Code) and the Law of Ukraine "On Basic Principles of State Supervision (Control)" Dated April 5, 2007 (further- Memorandum № 877).Methods. Analysis of existing regulations governing the implementation of state supervision (control) in the field of tech-nogenic and fire safety and its practical implementation by authorized officials of the SESResults. Ways to improve the activities of state supervision (control) in the field of fire and technogenic safety and the powers of officials to implement it are considered. The main directions of implementation of preventive measures by state supervision bodies are given. The necessity of using a new approach to the state management of fire, technogenic safety and civil protection is highlighted.
 Conclusion. Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine "On approval of the Instruction on registration of materials on administrative offences and recognition as invalid of some orders of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine" from 27.07.2016 № 725 should be supplemented with a clause on the interaction of article 185-14КУпАП. "Creation of obstacles in the activity of authorized officials of the central body of executive power, which implements the state policy on state supervision (control) in the field of fire and technogenic safety, related to conducting inspections".

SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

The article deals with the study of scientific activity as an object of public administration. Attention is paid to the retrospective of legal regulation: 1) the subject of the central executive body, which competence includes the sphere of scientific activity and / or the sphere of science; 2) the sphere of scientific activity and / or the sphere of science as objects of legal regulation. It was found that the concept of «field of science» is not defined at the legislative level in Ukraine, and in the case of mentioning this concept in previous editions of relevant legislation, it was meaningfully about scientific activity. It is substantiated the thesis, that regardless of how the central body of executive power, which subject is scientific activity, was named, the qualitative and meaningful content of its competence in the field of science cannot be detailed solely through the provisions of scientific activity. It is determined that the sphere of science and the sphere of scientific activity are interconnected; the concept of «scientific activity» a priori reflects the procedural aspect, as a kind of social activity; the content of public administration in the field of science should relate to the choice of meaningful research guidelines, priorities for scientific research and compliance with globalization, and public administration in the field of science – to ensure proper ordering and creating conditions for intellectual creativity aimed at gaining new knowledge and (or) search for ways to apply them. It is established that scientific activity as an object of public administration is an integral formation, which structurally consists of such elements as: a) social relations with regards to scientific activities (for example, determining the order of functioning of scientific institutions); b) public relations with regards to the creation of conditions for improving the effectiveness of scientific research and the use of their results to ensure the development of all spheres of public life (for example, protection of intellectual property rights to scientific results); c) public relations with regards to the creation of conditions for conducting scientific activities (for example, ensuring the status of subjects of scientific activity).

Role and significance of collegiality and unity of command as a principle of organization and activity of executive authorities in Russia

This article is devoted to the analysis of the problems of implementing such a principle of organization and activity of executive authorities in the Russian Federation as collegiality and unity of command. The authors identified the main shortcomings and imbalance in the implementation of the principle of collegiality and unity of command as the main organizational and legal forms of activity of executive authorities in modern conditions, and also developed proposals to eradicate imbalances in the work of collective and single-executive bodies of executive power.

Организация публичной власти в субъектах Российской Федерации: реформирование или совершенствование?

The introduction of the principle of unity of public authority has led to the development of a new federal law «On the general principles of the public authority organization in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation». In this regard, the author set the goal: to determine how the provisions of this law change the system and status of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. When considering these issues a wide range of methods was used, including the method of analysis, comparison, logical, deduction and generalization. As a result of the study the features of the state power system of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were identified, the main of which, in our view, is the attribution of the highest official to the mandatory bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; the consistency of existing models of state power organization of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was outlined. In this case, due to a different legal technique and the allocation of provisions on the highest official in a separate chapter of the law, there is a certain confusion with the definition of his position in the system of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author supports the provisions of the law on the inclusion of the highest official of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation among the mandatory in the system of public authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and justifies the need to include provisions on it in the chapter on executive power bodies.

Особенности построения систем и структур органов исполнительной власти субъектов Российской Федерации

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the regulatory framework and features of constructing systems and structures for executive authorities in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. It also examines the systematization of region-wide trends and approaches, identifying best practices, distortions, and drawbacks in the institutional framework of the regional executive authorities. In the course of the research, the author found an excessive spread of the typology of regional executive authorities in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, significant variability of regional systems of executive power, a disparate understanding of the essence and role of certain types of executive authorities in the mechanism of public administration. It is noted that the current federal legislation does not provide prerequisites for developing unified systems and structures of regional bodies of executive power, which, in turn, leads to the complication of management processes within the developing unified system of public administration. The author concludes that it is required to establish common approaches to the typology of executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the standards of their organization, as well as to develop a general list of regional executive powers.

Status and powers of village, settlement, city mayors in the system of local self-government of Ukraine

Since the establishment of the institution of village, settlement and city mayors in the system of local self-government of Ukraine,the legal status of these persons has not changed significantly. This indicates that the constitutional model of local self-government,headed by a village, town, city mayor, mainly satisfied society’s demand for stable local self-government. Today, when gradually as aresult of the reform of decentralization and administrative-territorial organization Ukraine has become a country of united territorialcommunities with significant powers locally, the issue of improving local self-government, finding its optimal model and the balanceof powers between key components of its system is gaining momentum relevance.Since the adoption of the Constitution, the system of local self-government of Ukraine has included territorial communities,which carry out local self-government in the manner prescribed by law, both directly and through local governments: village, town, citycouncils and their executive bodies. In the Law of Ukraine “On Local Self-Government in Ukraine” this list was supplemented by themain official of the territorial community – village, settlement, city mayor, who in the system of local self-government was given a“third” place between village, settlement, city council and executive bodies of village, settlement, city council. However, whether suchan intermediate position is occupied by the village, settlement, city mayor in the system of local self-government of Ukraine? After all,village, settlement, and city councils, which include deputies of local councils, as representative bodies of local self-government, areendowed by law with significant exclusive powers. Also, the executive bodies of local self-government are endowed by law with theirown (self-governing) powers and the powers delegated by the state to the bodies of executive power. The village, settlement, city mayordoes not have all these powers. To find an answer to this question by studying the status and powers of the chief official of the territorialcommunity used a system of checks and balances, which is embodied in local government of Ukraine in the principle of distribution ofpowers between representative local governments (councils), village, town, city and executive bodies of local self-government (exe -cutive committees, departments, administrations and other executive bodies created by councils).

Взаимодействие ДПД МВД России с подразделениями правового обеспечения территориальных органов внутренних дел

The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia is one of the main bodies of executive power that implements the law enforcement function of the state. The highest level of the organizational structure of the internal affairs bodies is represented by the Central Office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, which, in the person of its structural divisions, manages and organizes activities in certain service areas, which subsequently oversees. Interaction and assistance by the higher legal unit to the lower legal levels of the law enforcement system allows us to implement the tasks assigned by the state at the highest level. However, at the present time, in this direction, there are a number of features that need additional research and regulatory regulation.

Оптимизация контрольно-надзорных органов исполнительной власти в Российской Федерации

В статье полномочия контрольно-надзорных органов рассматри- вается через призму реформы, осуществляемой в этой части. Изменения, вносимые законодателем в эту сферу общественных отношений направлены на повышение уровня защищенности граждан от противоправных деяний контрольно-надзорных органов, призваны искоренить произвол должностных лиц в этой области. The article examines the powers of control and supervisory bodies through the prism of the reform carried out in this part. The changes introduced by the legislator in this area of public relations are aimed at increasing the level of protec- tion of citizens from the illegal acts of control and supervisory bodies, are designed to eradicate the arbitrariness of officials in this area.

Создание объединенных архивов судов как способ реализации новейших форм работы с архивными документами

The task of creating joint archives of courts is one of the most important promising directions for improving archival records in the courts of the Russian Federation. The most important status of this task is indicated by its adoption by an elected body of the judicial community – the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation. Implementation of the idea of concentrating archival documents in regional departmental centers of information storage on the performed proceedings has a high degree of relevance due to: 1) creation of the necessary conditions for storage of court documents, and, first of all, permanent storage terms; 2) ensuring unification in the management of archival records and proper control system; 3) wide introduction of information technologies in the work with archive storage units documenting the content of the proceedings. This will require the development of additional legal regulations on the basis of their position in the field of security judicial activities. Now interaction bases, as with vessels – sour ces of completing of the joint archival fund (fondoobrazovatel), and with authorized bodies of executive power in territorial subjects of the Russian Federation which by the legislation in these territorial units, are competent of questions of the organization of archiving and also with the relevant state (municipal) archives are not defined.

Problems of providing transport security of Ukraine: regulatory background

Problems of providing transport security of Ukraine: regulatory background

Criminal and legal evaluation of rules of conducting clinical research of medicinal products violations

The article investigates the two legal components of crime that establish criminal liability for violations during clinical research of medicines. They are Art. 141 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which establishes responsibility for conducting clinical trials of medicines without the written consent of the patients or their legal representative, or in cases with minors or legally incapable persons if these actions caused the death of the patient or other grave consequences, and Art. 321-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which in part 1 envisages responsibility for intentional violation of the established procedure of preclinical study, clinical trials of medicines, falsification of their results, as well as violation of the established procedure of state registration of medicines.
 In particular, the article studies the issue of the person under the study (research subject) who is the victim of these crimes. The author notes that there is a disagreement in the regulations concerning the issue of who can be subject of research. In the Law of Ukraine “On Medicines”, such persons are adults, minors, underage persons, persons who are declared incapacitated by the court or whose civil capacity is limited due to mental illnesses. The MoH Decree No. 690 defines subjects of study as legally capable adults, minors, underage persons and incapacitated of persons. The lack of a procedure to include persons with disabilities raises questions about the possibility of involving such persons in clinical trials.
 The objective side of the commission of these two crimes was investigated, the subject of these crimes was identified. Both in Art. 141, and in Art. 321-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the part of conducting clinical research of medicines, the subject is special; it can be a researcher/co-researcher (doctor) or other employee of a medical-prophylactic institution, at the facilities of which - by decision of the central body of executive power which forms and provides implementation of state policy in healthcare - a clinical trial of the medicine is conducted and which is involved in conducting a clinical research.
 The author notes that these two articles can correlate as general and special norm, which differ in the main subject of criminal and legal protection. The author proposed to amend these two articles in order to avoid a double criminal prohibition on one act.

Industry Modernization Based on the Principles of Smart Specialization. Part I. Using the Key Enabling Technologies as a Priority of the EU Industrial Policy

The concept of smart specialization is investigated with emphasis on key components of its successful implementation. Its relation with the concepts of technology, innovation and industrialization is shown through their common goal: to increase the productivity and ensure the sustainable economic growth. An analytical review of the official European documents elaborating the mechanisms for industry modernization and the principles for the new strategy of building the smart, innovative and sustainable industry, to promote competitiveness, creation of hybrid jobs and economic growth, is made. The critical role of key enabling technologies, especially advanced industrial technologies, in modernizing industry and implementing the smart specialization strategy is highlighted. The European Commission initiatives are analyzed, aimed at implementing the programs on competitiveness enhancement in the small and medium business sector, their implementation measures, including ones on constructing statistical tools for monitoring and analysis of generation and use of advanced technologies in the context of technological innovations in the private sector. The methodological approaches to building a new set of statistical indicators are supposed to ensure approvals of political decisions on enhancing competitiveness in the EU industry through launching three specific and related actions: (i) support to the development of cross-regional investment projects in the framework of S3P-Industrial Modernization; (ii) support to the development of European strategic cluster partnerships for cooperating in thematic fields and enhancing the industry’s role; (iii)) support to companies in the manufacturing industry in using advanced industrial technologies, in order to enhance their innovation capacities. It is noted that the program “Government Support to Technological Innovations for Industry Development” has not been launched in Ukraine, in spite of 300,000 UAH appropriated in the Budget – 2018 and the procedure for use of budget funds, created and coordinated with the central executive power bodies, by which the funds had to be allocated in implementing industrial innovation technologies in the private sector, for two purposes: (i) co-funding of project implementation; (ii) partial compensation for interest rates on loans received by manufactures for project implementation. The need to form the Strategy for Smart, Innovative and Sustainable Industry in Ukraine with consideration to directives and best practices of EU and the Ukrainian realities is emphasized.

ПРАВОВИЙ СТАТУС СУБ'ЄКТІВ ДЕРЖАВНО-ПРАВОВОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СФЕРИ ФІЗКУЛЬТУРИ І СПОРТУ: ТЕОРЕТИЧНІ ТА КОНСТИТУЦІЙНО-ПРАВОВІ АСПЕКТИ

У статті здійснено ґрунтовний аналіз правового статусу суб’єктів державно-правового регулювання сфери фізичної культури і спорту в Україні. Розкрито його теоретичні особливості, зокрема різноманітні концептуальні підходи до визначення природи й поняття правового статусу суб’єктів права, правовідносин тощо. Приділено увагу різновидам такого статусу, зокрема конституційно-правовому статусу суб’єктів державно-правового регулювання сфери фізичної культури і спорту. На основі ви-вчення складових елементів, а також результатів його реалізації виявлено певні проб-леми в даній сфері, окреслено напрями й шляхи удосконалення такого статусу, від-повідних нормативно-правових засад і практики реалізації.

ACTUAL QUESTIONS OF STATE REGULATION OF FIRE SAFETY IN UKRAINE

In the framework of Ukraine's foreign policy on integration with the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the EU), by pursuing the necessary reforms, our country is gradually and persistently approaching European standards in the field of civil protection. Therefore, the problems of fire safety in Ukraine are of particular relevance. Nowadays, they are interconnected and interdependent with the problems of economic, social, technogenic and environmental danger - unsatisfactory fire situation in our country forces the relevant authorities and organizations to work for the prevention and prevention of fire threats, for the protection of life and health of people, national wealth and the environment.
 The article reveals a number of shortcomings in the fire safety regulation system in Ukraine, in particular, the inconsistency of domestic experience with the standards and norms of the European Union and international bodies, the outdated paradigm of inspection and risk assessment on a scale, excessive pressure of state supervision (control) on entrepreneurs (control) imperfection of the insurance services market, lack of interest of some state bodies of executive power in the state policy of deregulation, low level of responsibility of objects of protection of requirements the gamut of fire safety.

PREVENTION AS AN OBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN SCIENTISTS (ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPILATION METHOD)

The actual value of the topic. Ukraine is integrating more and more into the European community by transforming national legislation and changing the status of public authorities. The law enforcement system, in particular the National Police, is a litmus test for such changes because of the place it occupies in the system of public authorities and its influence on the state of public life and public order in society.Civil society is beginning to place new demands on the National Police in response to changes in the direction vector of its activities. Previously, it was a state armed body of state power, but today it is emphasized that it is the central body of executive power that serves society. The focus of militarization has been shifted to National Police functioning status in the community. This approach extends the scope of its activities towards civil, unarmed cooperation with citizens. One of the components of this area is the prevention of crime by the police authorities. Therefore, it is important to find a modern understanding of prevention, as well as to take into account the experience of scientific development by scientists from other countries.The status of recent research and publications. Prevention, as an important area of law enforcement system, is a popular subject for scientific development in Ukraine as well as in other countries (Europe, Canada, the USA, etc.). But analysis of scientific developments allows us to see the difference in scientific approaches to disclosing its content.The purpose of the publication is to show the difference in the approaches of domestic and foreign scientists to the phenomenon of preventive activity.The outline of the main material. The section provides examples of publications on crime prevention by domestic and foreign scientists. Orientation of domestic scientists towards theoretical issues is opposed pragmatic and practical problems that arise in the process of preventive activity, and that foreign scientists are trying to solve.Conclusion. The analysis of scientific publications indicates of the different attitude of domestic and foreign scientists to such phenomenon as prevention (avoiding) of crime.Domestic scientists are arguing in the theoretical field, trying to give a clear definition of prevention on the background of a small and incomplete regulatory framework for preventive activities. National science aims to develop a fully theoretical framework for understanding prevention as a function of the law enforcement system, the National Police in particular.For foreign scientists the concepts, types and functions of prevention are given as a priori. They do not pose such a large number of theoretical questions, but try to pose and recommend ways of solving practical, applied, daily problems of crime prevention. But in solving such problems, foreign scientists very often raise important theoretical problems, such as, in fact, the same fear of crime and its prevention. According to the author, the approach of foreign scientists is more correct because they put solution of practical problems of preventive activity on the first place.

Реформування державної служби в рамках проведення реформи державного управління України

Мета статті – проаналізувати нормативно-правове забезпечення реформування державної служби в рамках проведення реформи державного управління України.
 Наукова новизна. Проаналізовано нормативно-правову базу реформування державної служби в рамках проведення реформи державного управління України, що передбачено міжнародними зобов’язаннями України. Дослідження здійснено на основі аналізу комплексу нормативно-правових актів, які були прийняті в Україні, починаючи з 2016 року.
 Висновки. Реформування державної служби в рамках проведення реформи державного управління України, що передбачено міжнародними зобов’язаннями України, регулюється комплексом нормативно-правових актів, які були прийняті в Україні, зокрема: розпорядження КМУ від 24 червня 2016 р. № 474-р. «Деякі питання реформування державного управління України» (щодо схвалення Стратегії реформування державного управління України на період до 2021 року, яка є результатом оновлення Стратегії реформування державного управління на 2016–2020 роки та відповідного плану заходів з її реалізації в редакції розпорядження КМУ від 18 грудня 2018 р. № 1102-р), Закону України «Про державну службу» від 10 грудня 2015 р. № 889-VIII зі змінами, розпорядження КМУ від 27 грудня 2017 р. № 1013 «Про схвалення Концепції оптимізації системи центральних органів виконавчої влади», розпорядження КМУ від 1 грудня 2017 р. № 844-р. «Про схвалення Концепції впровадження інформаційної системи управління людськими ресурсами в державних органах та затвердження плану заходів щодо її реалізації», розпорядження КМУ від 1 грудня 2017 р. № 974-р. «Про схвалення Концепції реформування системи професійного навчання державних службовців, голів місцевих державних адміністрацій, їх перших заступників та заступників, посадових осіб місцевого самоврядування та депутатів місцевих рад», а також змін до законів України «Про Кабінет Міністрів України», «Про центральні органи виконавчої влади» та «Про державну службу».

Improvement of legal bases of the system of central bodies of executive power of Ukraine

Introduction. By this time the ministry has not yet become central bodies of executive power (CEB), whose leading function is the formation of State policy. The type chosen for another CEB does not always correspond to the features performed by this organ. It is difficult to separate the "functions in the implementation of State policy" from "some functions for implementing State Policy". The law does not define "public policy". This negatively affects the functioning of the CEB system. The aim of the article. The purpose of the article is analysis of existing problems in organization and activity of the system of the CEB and scientific substantiation of ways of their solution. Results. The term "ministry" means a kind of CEB has two main features: 1) The ministry responsible for the development of State policy; 2) The ministry is headed by a member of the government-a politician and not a government official. The main purpose of the executive power-solving body of social problems; Task – A set of measures that are derived from the main goal and subject to resolution to achieve it, specify the main purpose of the activity of the Authority; The function is activity related to obtaining a clearly defined final result which directly reflects the goal achievement and tasks of the executive authority. As for the optimal number of ministries in Ukraine, we believe that the decisive should be that all directions of the State policy are in the sphere of influence of the government, their unjustified chopping or consolidation between the ministries, as well as the chosen The number of ministries allowed to implement program of CMU. Along with the agencies, services and inspections should allocate another category of "other" CEBs, which neither in the form nor on the functional orientation do not belong to services, agencies, inspections. State policy-enshrined in the Constitution and laws of Ukraine, other acts of legislation the rules of operation and strategic objectives of the State and their due directions of activity of the State, approved by the decisions of the competent bodies of State power. Conclusions. The basis for the reform of the existing system of COIS proposed to put a division of functions in the formation of State policy and functions for the implementation of State policy. The CMU should provide for the formation and implementation of State policy. Ministry – to form State policy and ensure its implementation. Other CEBs – implement State policy. The legislation should define the meaning of the term "public policy". The tasks and functions of ministries shall be clearly defined. The type of each other CEB (service, Agency, inspection) shall comply with the legally fixed features for it.

DESIGN OF EUROREGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM - "GROWTH POLE" OF PERIPHERAL ECONOMIC AREA

Topicality. The topicality of the research is determined by the important role of innovative forms of cross- border cooperation in improving competitiveness of peripheral boundary regions, reducing of regional differentiation between cross border and internal regions, on one hand, and immaturity of theoretical and methodological aspects of studying the cross-border cooperation mechanisms, on the other. The reforming of the system controlling of the regional development involves the implementation of new quality of the regional strategy the aim of which is both to ensure the modernization of the country’s economy and to carry out complex and balanced development of peripheral (boundary) regions.Aim and tasks. The aim of the article under consideration is to offer theoretical and methodological provisions and practical propositions to justify the improvement tools of project planning of the European regional innovative systems with Ukraine as a participant of cross-border cooperation under the conditions of EU enlargement by means of creating transnational cluster systems – network industrial integration institutions – which have become the poles of economical growth and competitiveness of peripheral economic area. The task is to work out the theoretical provisions and methodological principles of strategic planning to create and develop cross-border cluster systems in different sectors of economy taking into consideration their potential role as the systems that are able to fulfil purposes and to tackle problems with a focus on solving the task of modernization of Ukrainian peripheral regions’ economic system.Research results. The objects of strategic planning are cross-border cluster systems looked upon as territorially located socially economic systems formed by a group of independent economic agents from the both sides of the border, by the organizations of bodies of executive power of the countries-actors of the European region and civil society. They consistently interact with each other by means of information, service, human and funds exchange and provide extra efficiency as compared with other, not systematically organized objects. Cross-border cluster systems can become the centers of regional development: investments promotion, diffusion of innovations, creation of human capital of new quality, standard of business relations, development of adequate institutions geared to address the task of the country’s economy modernization. For good reason, to raise the level of innovative economy of a peripheral region it is necessary to integrate educational and scientific infrastructure with power structures and with business environment to increase the layer of development on innovative enterprises. Universities should develop cooperation with the industry, use new approaches in academic research reflecting the needs of regional firms and assisting in strengthening their central role in EU regional innovative system development.Conclusion. Formation of EU regional innovative system considerably transforms the priority of the main siting factors which changes the functions of periphery territory. The latter is transforming from physical basis – the material (resource) production factors siting – into the environment to develop human capital, innovations and providing self-development of EU region. The new postmodern reality includes postindustrial manufacturing together with network building of periphery economic area suggesting the transplantation of the institutions by means of self-organization of hybrid network clusters over the administrative boundaries which become the “growth poles”, factors of uniting and free circulation of funds in European regions. On the way towards the entry into the European Union it is necessary to generalize experience of cross-border cooperation as the previous and complementary phase of integration in regional terms. To form the complete and effective development policy of cross-border cooperation with the active participation of Ukrainian peripheral regions it is necessary to work out theoretical and methodological background of the quasi-integration of economic agents within the boundary of European regions and to justify new forms and mechanisms of its deepening with the benefit of cross-border cluster systems concept.