Campaigns leading up to elections are often carried out by various political parties. However, there are rules that must be obeyed when campaigning, one of the rules is that it is not permissible to campaign using educational facilities as stated in Article 280 paragraph 1 letter h of the Election Law. Recently, there was a Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding a request for legal uncertainty regarding the Explanation of Article 280 paragraph (1) letter h of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This legal uncertainty is caused by a contradiction between norms and explanations, giving rise to chaos in the field. The method used in this research is normative juridical by conducting a literature study. The data used is secondary data, which is data that already exists. The conclusion of this article is that prohibiting campaigning in educational settings is not part of limiting the human rights of every election participant. Where the Court still maintains the provisions of Article 280 paragraph (1) letter h regarding the prohibition of campaigning through government facilities, places of worship and places of education by interpreting exceptions as still necessary and included in the body of Law no.7 of 2017 as a separate norm. The aim of the court to unite the exception provisions in the body of Article 280 paragraph (1) letter h is to create legal certainty in law enforcement for election violations.