Abstract The most common and preferred method of evaluating liquefaction potential is using simplified method based on Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow counts. However, there are conditions where the application of SPTs are limited or simply not feasible. When these conditions arise, alternative methods, such as in situ shear-wave velocity (VS ) measurement, may be applied. In situ VS measurement can be conducted using several different methods, such as crosshole, downhole, suspension logger, seismic cone, spectral or multichannel analysis of surface waves, and surface reflection or refraction. Compared with other VS measurement methods, the use of near-surface seismic refraction tomography for liquefaction evaluation is still limited at best. Hence, this study aims to use a series of seismic refraction tomography data to assess the liquefaction potential at Yogyakarta – Bawen toll road in Magelang, Central Java. VS values were derived from seismic refraction tomographies at four sites. Bore log data and index properties from laboratory tests were also used for the evaluation. The liquefaction factor of safety (FS) were calculated using VS -based simplified method and the liquefaction potential were expressed with the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI). Liquefaction potential evaluations using SPT blow counts were also calculated for comparison purpose. The study finds that both VS -based and SPT-based evaluations reached the same conclusion: sites A to C are potentially liquefiable, while site D is non-liquefiable. But, evaluation with VS found to be more conservative than with SPT. Findings from this study suggest that the use of near-surface seismic refraction tomography for liquefaction potential evaluation may be justified in certain conditions, such as in a preliminary investigation.
Read full abstract