Introduction: There is still room for discussion, from the point of view of pancreatic fistula (PF) prevention, how to dissect pancreas and treat pancreatic stump in distal pancreatectomy (DP). Standardization of DP is favorable. Aims: Here we discuss on standardization of DP by reviewing our own cases. Patients & methods: Ninety-four patients who underwent DP in our hospital betweenMay 2000 and September 2013were involved. According to usage of automatic suture devices (ASD), we defined four terms mentioned below. PF incidence was compared among these 4 terms; Term 1: each operator chose in his preference whether using ASD or by handsewing (HS), Term 2: no usage of ASD, Term 3: basically usage of ASD, Term 4: standardization of ASD usage. Standardization is as follows; Usage of ASD, Soft and gradual compression of pancreas parenchyma, Gradual firing of ASD, No additional suture for the cut end. Results: In Term 1, PF incidence in ASD group (n1⁄429)was 58.6%, whereas 25% in HS group (n1⁄48). In Term 2, all cases were classified into HS group (n1⁄48), and PF incidence was 43.5%. In Term 3, PF incidence in ASD group (n1⁄415)was46.7%,whereas 25% inHSgroup (n1⁄44). InTerm4, all inASDgroup (n1⁄415), PF incidence decreased lower to 13.3%. There was no significance on which type of ASD was the best from the point of view of PF incidence. Conclusion:When dividing pancreas in DP, we standardize to use ASD, with soft compression of the pancreas parenchyma and gradual firing.
Read full abstract