Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

Clinical Significance of Undetectable High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I in Thai Individuals with Low Cardiovascular Risk

Background: The long-term prognosis in individuals who have undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI) is poorly defined in those with low cardiovascular risk. We aimed to examine whether individuals with undetectable hs-TnI have better cardiovascular outcomes in the low-cardiovascular-risk population. Methods: Data from a low-cardiovascular-risk population (<7.5%) with no established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were derived from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand 2007–09 survey. Hs-TnI was measured using the Abbott ARCHITECT STAT assay. We categorised hs-TnI levels into undetectable hs-TnI, low hs-TnI and intermediate and higher hs-TnI by sex-specific cut-off. The low-cardiovascular-risk population was classified into extremely low risk (<5%) and low risk (5–7.5%). Data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were collected until 31 December 2019. Survival analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Results: A total of 3,442 participants were eligible. Mean age was 43.6 years; 65.5% were male. Hs-TnI was detected in 79.8% (median hs-TnI 2.6 ng/l). During a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 52 events (1.5%) of MACE and 60 events (1.7%) of all-cause mortality occurred. After adjusting for conventional risk factors, an increasing level of hs-TnI was significantly associated with the incidence of MACE (HR 1.03; 95% CI [1.02–1.04]; p<0.001). Compared with the intermediate and higher hs-TnI group, the undetectable hs-TnI group and low hs-TnI group, respectively, had 79% and 52% lower incidences of MACE (HR 0.21; 95% CI [0.05–0.79] and HR 0.48; 95% CI [0.23–1.00]), p for trend 0.04. In subgroup analysis, the incidence of MACE remained higher in individuals with either extremely low or low CV risk with detectable hs-TnI compared with those undetectable hs-TnI (P for interaction 0.83). Conclusion: Among individuals with low cardiovascular risk, hs-TnI testing can provide risk prognostication. Undetectable hs-TnI could serve as a negative risk marker for adverse cardiovascular events.

Abstract 4133830: Uncovering the Gaps: Analyzing Prescribing Patterns of Combination Therapy with SGLT2-inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM)

Introduction: Combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) reduces major cardiovascular events (MACE) and improves HbA1c, blood pressure, weight, and renal disease progression. The European Society of Cardiology recommends this therapy for ASCVD and T2DM, independent of HbA1c. This study evaluates prescribing patterns in the Internal Medicine Residency Clinics for patients with ASCVD and T2DM. Aims: To investigate demographic and social determinants of health (SDOH) influencing the prescription of combination therapy versus no therapy in an outpatient population and identify factors affecting prescribing patterns and guideline adherence. Methods: We reviewed 828 electronic records of T2DM and ASCVD patients from March 2024. Patients were grouped into combination therapy (SGLT2i and GLP1RA) and no therapy groups. Data on demographics (Table 1) and SDOH (Table 2) were analyzed. Patients on monotherapy or those who did not complete the SDOH questionnaire were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics. Welch’s t-test compared continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests compared categorical variables. Analyses were done with SAS 9.4 with significance at 0.05. Results: Age significantly differed between groups (t = 4.56, p < .05), with older patients less likely to receive therapy. Sex was also significant (p < .05); more females were in the no therapy group. No significant association was found between SDOH and combination therapy (p > .05). Conclusion: Over 90% of patients with T2DM and ASCVD were not on optimal medical therapy to reduce MACE, with nearly half on no medications. This highlights the need for increased awareness and targeted interventions to improve outcomes. Future research will explore insurance status and physician awareness to address prescription discrepancies. Limitations: Patients with a GFR <30 are precluded from SGLT2i usage but were not excluded from this study.

2024 Recommendations on the Optimal Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Following Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP).

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Fortunately, as much as two thirds of this disease's burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that, with respect to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and recent data have strongly emphasised the need for also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (also as fixed dose combinations), and modulators of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran) are additionally very effective approaches to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. In real life, however, clinical practice goals are still not met in a substantial proportion of patients (even in 70%). However, with the options we have available, we should render lipid disorders a rare disease. In April 2021, the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP) published its first position paper on the optimal use of LLT in post-ACS patients, which complemented the existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS, which defined a group of "extremely high-risk" individuals and outlined scenarios where upfront combination therapy should be considered to improve access and adherence to LLT and, consequently, the therapy's effectiveness. These updated recommendations build on the previous work, considering developments in the evidential underpinning of combination LLT, ongoing education on the role of lipid disorder therapy, and changes in the availability of lipid-lowering drugs. Our aim is to provide a guide to address this unmet clinical need, to provide clear practical advice, whilst acknowledging the need for patient-centred care, and accounting for often large differences in the availability of LLTs between countries.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in cardiocerebrovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of global mortality, necessitating effective strategies for prevention and treatment. The cardiovascular disease continuum concept highlights the progression from risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus to advanced stages, including heart failure (HF) and death. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, initially developed to manage diabetes, have emerged as effective therapies across all stages of the cardiovascular disease continuum. Numerous cardiovascular outcome trials demonstrate that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalizations for HF in patients with and without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Notably, SGLT2 inhibitors have shown remarkable benefits in reducing HF risk, even in patients without diabetes, including those with HF and preserved ejection fraction. Furthermore, recent studies in post–myocardial infarction patients suggest potential benefits in reducing hospitalizations for HF. Despite their widespread use, the precise mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors confer cardiovascular protection remain unclear, suggesting the need for further investigation. In conclusion, SGLT2 inhibitors have revolutionized cardiovascular disease management, offering significant therapeutic potential across a broad spectrum of patients, and are expected to play an increasingly prominent role in both the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a Brazilian tertiary hospital population

Abstract Background/Introduction Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are a strong risk marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, as well as of aortic valve calcification and stenosis. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of high Lp(a) levels in patients followed at a tertiary hospital specialized in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In addition, there is scant information about Lp(a) concentrations in Brazilian individuals. Purpose The aim of the study was to describe the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of patients with at least one measure of Lp(a) at a tertiary treatment center for CVD in our city – Brazil. Methods Patients treated at a heart institute had their data extracted between the years 1999 and 2021. Data were obtained through direct electronic extraction of patients' medical records. The patients were categorized according to different Lp(a) cutoff levels (> 50 and < 70, > 70 and < 90, and > 90 mg/dL) and by quartiles. Results Of 4,970 unique patients included in the study, the mean age at baseline was 59.9 years (SD ± 14.5), 2,634 (53%) were male, and the median Lp(a) was 23.2 mg/dL (interquartile range 8.9 - 56.8 mg/dL). In the whole cohort, 460 (9.3%) had Lp(a) > 50 and < 70, 344 (6.9%) > 70 and < 90, 612 (12.3%) > 90 mg/dl and 138 (2.8%) > 150 mg/dL. Established ASCVD was reported in 1,223 (24%) of the individuals, with a progressively higher prevalence across the Lp(a) categories above (31.2%, 33.8%, 34.2%, respectively) (table 1). Moreover, the Lp(a) median (interquartile range) in mg/dL was significantly higher in those with baseline history of ASCVD (31.4 [10.8-71.2] vs 21.2 [8.3-52]), MI (27.8 [10.6-65.9] vs 22.3 [8.5-54.7]) and stroke (24.9 [10-69.5] vs 23.1 [8.9-56.5]), all p < 0.05 (table 2). Lp(a) was also significantly higher among those with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL relative to LDL-C < 100 mg/dl (25.5[9.5-63.2] vs 21.4[8.4 vs 52.2] p < 0.05). Conclusions In this cohort of patients followed at a tertiary center specialized in CVD, approximately a third had Lp(a) levels above 50 mg/dL, a cutoff robustly associated with ASCVD. This finding likely represents an important source of cardiovascular residual risk, particularly in those with established ASCVD, exposing the need of further therapies.

Prediction of 10-year risk for recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in a secondary prevention population: Insights from CHART-2 and Suita studies in the Japanese population

Abstract Background Despite the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines advocating risk prediction models for secondary prevention in established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients, such models for Japanese individuals remain limited, owing to their comparatively lower ASCVD risk than Western populations. Given this gap, there is a need to develop tailored risk assessment tools for Japanese ASCVD patients to optimize secondary prevention strategies. Purpose Leveraging data from two large-scale, long-term cardiovascular cohorts in Japan, our aim was to develop and externally validate a 10-year risk model predicting recurrent cardiovascular events among patients with established ASCVD. Methods The CHART-2 and Suita studies, large-scale prospective observational multicenter cohort studies in Japan, served as the primary data sources for this investigation. From the CHART-2 study, which comprised 3,560 patients with a history of coronary artery disease or ischemic stroke, we derived our risk model. External validation was conducted using data from the Suita study, which included 445 patients with similar ASCVD backgrounds. The primary outcome of interest was a composite endpoint encompassing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Variable selection was performed based on clinically relevant factors previously employed in established risk scores (SMART, REACH, and TRS 2°P risk scores). Logistic regression was utilized for model development, and the predictive performance was assessed using the C-index. Results Over a median follow-up of 10.1 years, the derivation cohort experienced 756 cardiovascular events. Patients in the derivation cohort had an average age of 68.9 ± 10.6 years, with 91% and 24% having a history of coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke, respectively. Using logistic regression, the multivariate model revealed a higher recurrent risk associated with several factors including age, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, renal function, number of ASCVD events, atrial fibrillation, lipid levels, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and statin use. A simple risk score based on these predictors demonstrated a >5-fold gradient of 10-year recurrent risk with a C-index of 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.68, Figure). The prediction model was externally validated in the Suita study wit 245 cardiovascular events and a median follow-up of 10.4 years, showing good discriminative ability with a C-index of 0.64 (95% CI 0.60–0.68). Conclusion Our newly developed prediction model offers a valuable tool for identifying individuals at heightened risk of recurrent cardiovascular events over a 10-year period, thereby facilitating more targeted and effective secondary prevention strategies tailored to the unique characteristics of Japanese ASCVD patients.

Lipid Control and Medical Costs Among Patients With and Without Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Followed in a Brazilian Private Healthcare System.

There is limited real-world data of lipid control and healthcare costs among patients with and without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) in Latin America. A retrospective cohort study including patients with LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) assessment from 2015 to 2017 was performed in a health insurance database. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and laboratory data were collected, and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were used to identify a subcohort of patients with ASCVD (secondary prevention) and assess the proportion of these patients with LDL-C controlled. Lipid control among patients without ASCVD (primary prevention) and healthcare costs in one year in the overall population were also assessed. From the 17,434 patients selected, 5,208 (29.8%) had ASCVD. The mean age of these patients in secondary prevention was 68.9 (±12.3) years and 47.8% were male patients. LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was identified in 19.1% of the ASCVD population and only 4.1% had an LDL-C < 50 mg/dL. LDL control was worse in women compared to men (13.1% vs. 25.7%; P < 0.01). The average cost in one year was 3,591 American dollars (USD) per patient in primary prevention compared to 8,210 dollars per year for patients in secondary prevention (P < 0.01). While outpatient costs accounted for 59.8% of the total cost in the primary prevention group, the main cost of the secondary prevention population was related to hospital costs (54.1%). Despite the favorable evidence for intensive cholesterol reduction, the evaluation of large real-world database with more than 17,000 individuals showed that the targets of guideline recommendations have not yet been adequately incorporated into clinical practice. Average annual cost per patient in secondary prevention is more than twice compared to primary prevention. Hospital expenses account for most of the cost in the secondary prevention group, while outpatient costs predominate in primary prevention.

Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV.

Effective lipid management is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Western lipid guidelines may not apply to Indian subjects because of the vast differences in cardiovascular (CV) disease epidemiology. To overcome this challenge, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) in 2016 proposed an ASCVD risk stratification algorithm. The appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for various risk groups were proposed, with an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL recommended for the first time globally for patients in the very high-risk group. Subsequently, in 2020, an extreme risk group was added because of observations that patients with more severe or extensive ASCVD, along with multiple risk factors and comorbidities, had increased rates of adverse CV events and could benefit from more intensive LDL-C lowering. The extreme risk group was subdivided into categories A and B, with LDL-C targets as low as 30 mg/dL or lower. The availability of further evidence regarding the significance of novel risk factors and the availability of new LDL-C lowering therapies necessitated refining the ASCVD risk assessment algorithm, defining LDL-C targets for subjects with these risk factors, and incorporating recommendations for attaining very low LDL-C levels in a defined, select group of patients. Accordingly, the LAI expert group recently published the Consensus Statement IV, which is a comprehensive document addressing several key issues about risk stratification and dyslipidemia management in Indian subjects. LDL-C and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are not only primary and co-primary targets for lipid-lowering therapy but also risk factors for ASCVD risk stratification. Apolipoprotein B is a secondary target. The risk assessment algorithm has been updated to incorporate several nonconventional yet relevant CV risk factors. Additionally, the role of subclinical atherosclerosis has been highlighted. The CV risk due to subclinical atherosclerosis has been considered equivalent to that of established ASCVD, and hence, similar LDL-C targets have been recommended. Furthermore, a new risk category-extreme risk group category C has been added for the small subgroup of patients who continue to experience ASCVD sequelae despite achieving LDL-C levels of 30 mg/dL or lower. An ultralow LDL-C target (10-15 mg/dL) has been recommended along with optimal control of risk factors and guideline-directed management of comorbidities. Dyslipidemia management should be effective with sustained LDL-C lowering. In high-risk situations (e.g., acute coronary syndrome), the LDL-C target should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within the first 2 weeks. The present document summarizes the key messages from the LAI Consensus Statement IV.

Efficacy of the Different Statins and Combination Therapies With Non-Statin Agents on Serum Lipid Profiles in a Cohort With Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in a Single Centre

Efficacy of the Different Statins and Combination Therapies With Non-Statin Agents on Serum Lipid Profiles in a Cohort With Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in a Single Centre

Association between long-term statin use and cataract surgery: a nationwide study on 505 105 cataract surgery patients

AimsTo assess the association between statin use and cataract surgery according to different statin treatment durations in patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles.Methods and resultsWe performed a nested case–control study...

Ten-Year Risk Equations for Incident Heart Failure in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Populations.

Ten-year risk equations for incident heart failure (HF) are available for the general population, but not for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which is highly prevalent in HF cohorts. This study aimed to develop and validate 10-year risk equations for incident HF in patients with known ASCVD. Ten-year risk equations for incident HF were developed using the United Kingdom Biobank cohort (recruitment 2006-2010) including participants with established ASCVD but free from HF at baseline. Model performance was validated using the Australian Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute Biobank cohort (recruitment 2000-2011) and compared with the performance of general population risk models. Incident HF occurred in 13.7% of the development cohort (n=31 446, median 63 years, 35% women, follow-up 10.7±2.7 years) and in 21.3% of the validation cohort (n=1659, median age 65 years, 25% women, follow-up 9.4±3.7 years). Predictors of HF included in the sex-specific models were age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure (treated or untreated), glucose (treated or untreated), cholesterol, smoking status, QRS duration, kidney disease, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. ASCVD-HF equations had good discrimination and calibration in development and validation cohorts, with superior performance to general population risk equations. ASCVD-specific 10-year risk equations for HF outperform general population risk models in individuals with established ASCVD. The ASCVD-HF equations can be calculated from readily available clinical data and could facilitate screening and preventative treatment decisions in this high-risk group.

Houston Methodist cardiovascular learning health system (CVD-LHS) registry: Methods for development and implementation of an automated electronic medical record-based registry using an informatics framework approach

ObjectivesTo investigate the potential value and feasibility of creating a listing system-wide registry of patients with at-risk and established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) within a large healthcare system using automated data extraction methods to systematically identify burden, determinants, and the spectrum of at-risk patients to inform population health management. Additionally, the Houston Methodist Cardiovascular Disease Learning Health System (HM CVD-LHS) registry intends to create high-quality data-driven analytical insights to assess, track, and promote cardiovascular research and care. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multi-center, cohort analysis of adult patients who were seen in the outpatient settings of a large healthcare system between June 2016 - December 2022 to create an EMR-based registry. A common framework was developed to automatically extract clinical data from the EMR and then integrate it with the social determinants of health information retrieved from external sources. Microsoft's SQL Server Management Studio was used for creating multiple Extract-Transform-Load scripts and stored procedures for collecting, cleaning, storing, monitoring, reviewing, auto-updating, validating, and reporting the data based on the registry goals. ResultsA real-time, programmatically deidentified, auto-updated EMR-based HM CVD-LHS registry was developed with ∼450 variables stored in multiple tables each containing information related to patient's demographics, encounters, diagnoses, vitals, labs, medication use, and comorbidities. Out of 1,171,768 adult individuals in the registry, 113,022 (9.6%) ASCVD patients were identified between June 2016 and December 2022 (mean age was 69.2 ± 12.2 years, with 55% Men and 15% Black individuals). Further, multi-level groupings of patients with laboratory test results and medication use have been analyzed for evaluating the outcomes of interest. ConclusionsHM CVD-LHS registry database was developed successfully providing the listing registry of patients with established ASCVD and those at risk. This approach empowers knowledge inference and provides support for efforts to move away from manual patient chart abstraction by suggesting that a common registry framework with a concurrent design of data collection tools and reporting rapidly extracting useful structured clinical data from EMRs for creating patient or specialty population registries.

SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Cardiovascular Disease

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, initially designed for type 2 diabetes management, have exhibited consistent efficacy across the cardiovascular disease continuum. Their benefits are experienced by patients with cardiovascular risk factors, those with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and even individuals suffering from heart failure (HF). Notably, SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in preventing and managing HF, positioning them as essential primary therapies for HF patients irrespective of their diabetic status. They have emerged as a uniquely effective treatment for HF with preserved ejection fraction, filling a therapeutic gap that previously existed in this population. These cardiovascular benefits are not limited to diabetic patients, indicating a broader potential for SGLT2 inhibitors in cardiovascular care. Their expanded indications suggest a pivotal role in both the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. However, while clinical outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitors are promising, the precise mechanism underlying their cardiovascular protection remains unclear. Further research is warranted to elucidate these mechanisms, potentially unveiling new therapeutic avenues and facilitating the development of novel drugs.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Elderly: An Analysis of Clinical Profile and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Burden from the Hellas-FH Registry.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carries a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As the population ages, the age-related influence on clinical characteristics and outcomes becomes increasingly pertinent. This cross-sectional analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry aims to explore potential differences in clinical characteristics, treatment, ASCVD, and goal achievement between those younger and older than 65 years with FH. A total of 2273 adults with heterozygous FH (51.4% males) were studied. Elderly FH patients (n = 349) had a higher prevalence of ASCVD risk factors, such as hypertension (52.1% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.05) and type 2 diabetes (16.9% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.05), compared to younger patients (n = 1924). They also had a higher prevalence of established ASCVD (38.4% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001), particularly CAD (33.0% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for major ASCVD risk factors. Elderly patients were more frequently and intensively receiving lipid-lowering treatment than younger ones. Although post-treatment LDL-C levels were lower in elderly than younger patients (125 vs. 146 mg/dL, p < 0.05), both groups had similar attainment of the LDL-C target (3.7% vs. 3.0%). Elderly FH patients have a higher prevalence of ASCVD, particularly CAD. Despite more aggressive treatment, the achievement of LDL-C targets remains very poor. These results emphasize the importance of early FH diagnosis and treatment in reducing ASCVD.

Effects of finerenone and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo assess the effects of finerenone and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the relative cardiovascular benefits in patients with or without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for different outcomes with these classes of drugs.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes were the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death (MACE); hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); and a composite of renal outcomes. The results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsIn total, we identified 11 trials and 73,927 participants, 13,847 (18.7%) in finerenone trials and 60,080 (81.3%) in GLP1-RA trials. Finerenone reduced the risk of MACE by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79–0.95; P = 0.003), while GLP1-RA reduced the risk in a similar magnitude by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83–0.92; P < 0.001). For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of MACE was restricted to approximately 14% in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82–0.90; P < 0.001), whereas no effect was observed in patients without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85–1.02; P = 0.12). GLP1-RA reduced myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death more than finerenone (which appeared to have no effect). Only finerenone was beneficial for reducing the risk of HHF (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66–0.92; P = 0.003). Both finerenone (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92; P < 0.001) and GLP1-RA (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76–0.86; P < 0.001) reduced the risk of kidney disease progression, including macroalbuminuria, and finerenone was superior to GLP1-RA in delaying deterioration of kidney function.ConclusionsFinerenone and GLP1-RA lead to a risk reduction in MACE to a similar degree in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of progression of kidney disease was also in a similar magnitude in patients with T2DM, whereas only finerenone had a significant protective effect against HHF. Treatment decisions for patients with T2DM should consider the clinical benefit profiles of each drug.

Coronary artery calcium score as independent risk factor of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Aim: To prove an independence of CAC score comparatively to conventional risk factors such as age, and dyslipidemia especially in patients under forty years of age. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four asymptomatic adult patients with no prior established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus or severe comorbidities, except of complex clinical examination, underwent CT scan with evaluation of coronary artery calcium score. Results: The average total cholesterol level in the group was (5.62±1.02) mmol/l, indicating the presence of dyslipidemia. The average HDL level was (1.26±0.24) mmol/l, suggesting an average risk of atherosclerosis. The average LDL levels were within the borderline range at (3.63±1.01) mmol/l. The average triglyceride level was within the safe range at (1.93±1.08) mmol/l. The atherogenicity coefficient indicated a moderate risk of atherosclerosis with an average value of 3.64±1.31. The average coronary artery calcium score was 56.71±143.85, indicating minor plaques and a moderate risk of coronary artery disease. Correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between age and the CAC score (r=0.1, p>0.05). However, reliable direct correlation of weak strength was found between the CAC score and LDL level (r=0.35, p<0.05). Direct correlations of weak strength were also observed between age and the levels of total cholesterol, LDL and the atherogenicity coefficient (r=0.43, 0.49, 0.42 respectively, p<0.05). Conclusions: Coronary artery calcium score is a valuable screening tool for identifying potential obstructive coronary artery disease, not only for individuals aged forty and above, but also for younger asymptomatic patients.

Cardiovascular risk in elderly persons without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Abstract Introduction Age is the dominant driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk of almost all individuals ≥70 years exceeds conventional risk thresholds. Treatment of risk factors should be considered taking ASCVD risk modifiers, including frailty, lifetime treatment benefit, comorbidities, polypharmacy, socio-economic status, and patient preferences into account. Aim Because of problems with risk prediction in the elderly most ASCVD risk scores do not function well, so there is limited ability to quantify ASCVD risk in persons 70 years of age or older. Therefore, we sought out to estimate ASCVD risk in apparently healthy elderly persons. Methods We enrolled 253 apparently healthy elderly persons ≥70 years without established ASCVD. The Systemic Coronary Risk Estimation 2 - Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) score was used to estimate the 10-year risk of ASCVD. A 10-year risk ≥15% was generally considered ‘very high risk’, and 7.5% to &amp;lt;15% was considered ‘high risk’. Based on age study population was divided into four groups: (1) 70–74 years (N=61), (2) 75–79 years (N=73), 80–84 (N=76), and (4) 85-89 years (N=43). Results The median 10-year ASCVD risk in the entire cohort was 23% (17%–32%). There was no person with low ASCVD risk (&amp;lt;7.5%). 41 out of 253 persons (16.2%) were high-risk and 212 (83.8%) were very high-risk. The number of persons at very high risk of ASCVD increased dramatically with age. Roughly, almost all persons aged ≥75 years were deemed very high risk (Table 1). Multimorbidity defined as the presence of two or more chronic conditions and polypharmacy defined as the use of at least 5 medications were highly prevalent in all four study groups. Hypertension was the most prevalent condition – roughly eight in 10 persons had hypertension. The rate of overweight/obese patients was higher in younger persons. This fact was further reflected by the body composition of study participants and the rate of malnutrition (Table 1). Age ≥75 years was highly predictive for identifying persons at very high risk for ASCVD with a C-statistics of 0.92 (positive predictive value 99%, negative predictive value 53%; P&amp;lt;0.001) (Figure 1). Conclusions Older people without established ASCVD are a heterogeneous group. Most of them were found to be at very high risk of ASCVD. Age and high blood pressure were the dominant drivers of that risk. In addition, ASCVD risk modifiers such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and malnutrition were highly prevalent. These findings have important clinical and public health and individualized decisions regarding preventative and therapeutic strategies for elderly persons are needed.Table 1Baseline characteristicsFigure 1.ROC analysis

FRI085 Lipid Lowering Therapy Deficits In Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention In A Large Cohort From Eight Busy Clinics In Greece Over 12 Years

Abstract Disclosure: R.D. Paparodis: None. I. Androulakis: None. D.P. Askitis: None. I. Perogamvros: None. N. Angelopoulos: None. A. Rizoulis: None. S. Livadas: None. A. Boniakos: None. Background: The increasing availability of aggressive lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) worldwide is expected to produce a significant decline in cholesterol concentrations worldwide and a more successful attainment of LDL lowering goals (LLGs), especially in those who need them most: patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Aims: To assess the long-term changes in the rate of attainment of LGs according to the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines nationwide, with the use of different LLTs during 12 consecutive years. Methods: We reviewed the charts of all patients initially seen between 2010-2022 who returned for care follow up at our 8 busy Endocrinology clinics, located in 6 cities in Greece, between Sep-1-2022 and Nov-30-2022. We enrolled those with recorded diagnosis of ASCVD [coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or carotid stenosis &amp;gt;50% (CS)] prior to our initial visit. For the present work, we reviewed data on tobacco use, intake of LLTs, and LDL-cholesterol concentrations as recorded during our initial clinic visit. We excluded all patients referred to our clinics for lipids management. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Means are compared with Kruskal Wallis test and p&amp;lt;0.05 is deemed significant. Results: We enrolled n=890 consecutive patients, age 63.9 ± 11.4 years, n=339 were women (38.1%), n=529 (59.4%) had diabetes, n=672 (75.5%) had hypertensions and all had ≥1 forms of established ASCVD: n=630 with CAD, n=279 with CS and n=151 with PAD. Out of these, n=144 (16.2%) were on no LLTs, n=334 (37.5%) continued to smoke, n=381 (42.8%) were on guidelines-based appropriate LLT strategy, n=248 (27.9%) reached LLGs and n=318 (35.7%) fulfilled the year-specific guidelines requirements. Of note is, that this rate dropped to 2.4-20.4% in the years 2019-2022. The likelihood of achieving LDL goals was not statistically significantly different among patients with different forms of ASCVD (p=0.42). Overall, the mean LDL was 88.2 ± 32.1mg/dl, and was not different between patients with different forms of ASCVD (p=0.75). Mean LDL concentrations have only started to drop between 2020-2022 as compared to 2019 (p&amp;lt;0.001), but are not different compared to those seen in the years 2010-2018. The mean LDL dropped to 82.3 ± 30.5mg/dl in 2022 as compared to 102.2 ± 38.8mg/dl in 2019. Conclusions: Our study reveals a large care gap in patients with established ASCVD, which did not seem to improve significantly over the past 12 years, despite the excellent availability of aggressive LLT strategies in Greece. Intervention studies are urgently needed to enhance adherence to updated international guidelines and reduce the extremely high ASCVD risk in this fragile population. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Effect of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone on left ventricular function in patients with type two diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease without established cardiovascular disease: a randomized single-blind clinical trial

BackgroundNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complex metabolic disorder that increases the risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an indicator of left ventricular (LV) mechanics and can detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction. We compared the effects of pioglitazone and empagliflozin on GLS in patients with T2DM and NAFLD without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.MethodsThis study was a 24-week randomized, single-blind, and parallel-group (1: 1 ratio) clinical trial. Seventy-three participants with T2DM (being treated with metformin) and NAFLD but without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) were randomized to empagliflozin or pioglitazone. Liver steatosis and fibrosis were measured using transient elastography, and GLS was measured by echocardiography. The primary endpoint was the change in GLS from baseline to week 24. Secondary end points include changes in controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and Liver stiffness measure (LSM).ResultsIn this study, GLS improved by 1.56 ± 2.34% (P < 0.01) in the pioglitazone group and 1.06 ± 1.83% (P < 0.01) in the empagliflozin group without a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.31). At baseline, GLS was inversely associated with the severity of liver fibrosis: r = − 0.311, P = 0.007. LSM in the pioglitazone and empagliflozin group [(-0.73 ± 1.59) and (-1.11 ± 1.33)] kpa (P < 0.01) decreased significantly. It was without substantial difference between the two groups (P = 0.26). Empagliflozin and pioglitazone both improved controlled attenuation parameter. The improvement was more critical in the empagliflozin group: -48.22 + 35.02 dB/m vs. -25.67 + 41.50 dB/m, P = 0.01.ConclusionSubclinical cardiac dysfunction is highly important in patients with T2DM and with NAFLD. Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone improve LV mechanics and fibrosis in patients without established ASCVD. This has a prognostic importance on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with T2DM. Moreover, empagliflozin ameliorates liver steatosis more effectively them pioglitazone. This study can serve as a start point hypothesis for the future. Further studies are needed to explore the concept in larger populations.Trial registration: This trial was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): “A Comparison between the Effect of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone on Echocardiographic Indices in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease” IRCT20190122042450N5, 29 November 2020. https://www.irct.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20190122042450N5.

Predictive value of metabolic profiling in cardiovascular risk scores: analysis of 75 000 adults in UK Biobank

BackgroundMetabolic profiling (the extensive measurement of circulating metabolites across multiple biological pathways) is increasingly employed in clinical care. However, there is little evidence on the benefit of metabolic profiling as...