Esophageal Body Dysmotility Research Articles

Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

There is insufficient data about esophageal body dysmotility in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) and inadequate response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment. This study aimed to assess esophageal motility disorder and reflux parameters among these patients by high-resolution manometry (HRM) and intraluminal impedance and pH (MII‐pH) monitoring after stopping PPI therapy. A retrospective study was conducted among 100 RGERD patients admitted to Taleghani Hospital (Tehran, Iran) for one year. More than half of them were males (55%). Their mean age was 47.10±6.92, and 50% of patients had ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Middle, distal, and proximal esophageal pressure (MEP, DEP, and PEP), lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure (LESP), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal contractile integral (DCI), large breaks, upper esophageal sphincter basal pressure (UESP), and LES length (LESL) in IEM patients were significantly lower than the patients with normal esophageal motility (P<0.001). Furthermore, there were more patients in the IEM group with long-term and abnormal weakly acid reflux compared with the non-IEM group (P<0.05). It seems that the evaluation of reflux parameters and esophageal motility could lead to additional insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of RGERD. Nevertheless, further studies are suggested to evaluate the effects of esophageal motility disorders among RGERD patients.

505 SURPRISING LACK OF CORRELATION BETWEEN INTEGRATED RELAXATION PRESSURE LEVEL AND SYMPTOM SEVERITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA

Abstract With high resolution manometry (HRM), achalasia is defined as an elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and the absence of normal esophageal peristalsis. Since achalasia symptoms are attributed in part to incomplete LES relaxation, IRP values might be expected to directly correlate with symptom severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between IRP values and symptom severity assessed by the Eckardt score in patients with achalasia. Methods We searched the database of our Center for Esophageal Diseases for patients who had HRM showing achalasia (IRP > 15 mmHg and absent peristalsis) between May 2017 and August 2019. All patients with achalasia seen in our Center routinely complete the Eckardt score questionnaire evaluating the severity of achalasia symptoms in each of four categories (dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation and weight loss). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between median IRP and Eckardt score; an R2 value >0.5 was considered clinically meaningful. Results We identified 91 subjects with achalasia (mean age 62.9 ± 16.5 years; 39 men, 52 women; 27 Type 1, 28 Type 2, 36 Type 3). We found no clinically meaningful correlation between median IRP and the total Eckardt score (R2 = 0.043) (Figure 1). Furthermore, we found no clinically meaningful correlation between median IRP and any individual component of the Eckardt score (dysphagia R2 = 0.008, chest pain R2 = 0.001, regurgitation R2 = 0.035, weight loss R2 = 0.049). Finally, in subgroup analyses we found no clinically meaningful correlation between median IRP and Eckardt scores (total or any of its individual components) for any of the 3 achalasia subtypes. Conclusion We found no clinically meaningful correlation between IRP and total Eckardt score, or between IRP and any individual component of the Eckardt score for patients with achalasia of any type. This suggests that once the IRP value exceeds 15 mmHg, further elevations in IRP have little effect on symptoms, and that factors other than IRP such as esophageal body dysmotility and hypersensitivity might contribute to symptom perception in achalasia.

The role of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of upper gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) affects the upper gastrointestinal (GI) system in 90% of patients. High-resolution manometry (HRM) assesses esophageal dysmotility, but its role in diagnosis and follow-up remains unclear. The objectives of this systematic review were to investigate the role of HRM in the assessment of SSc-associated upper GI involvement and to evaluate the correlation between HRM abnormalities and clinical characteristics and the effects of therapeutic interventions on HRM findings. Fifteen articles were included. Most (11/15) studies were of very good or good quality. Most studies assessed correlations between esophageal symptoms and esophageal dysmotility. Two studies assessed the effectiveness of buspirone and reported HRM findings. Studies assessing upper GI symptoms using validated questionnaires, such as the University of California Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 or Gastrointestinal Symptoms Severity Index score, found an association between absent contractility on HRM and upper GI symptoms, but even asymptomatic patients often have esophageal body dysmotility on HRM. Esophageal dysmotility positively correlates with the presence of interstitial lung disease on high-resolution computed tomography and reduced diffusion capacity (< 0.8 of predicted value). Trials investigating the effect of buspirone demonstrate both increased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and reduced upper GI symptoms. Most studies report on limited patient numbers and retrospective data. Potential bias was minimized using quality appraisal. HRM findings correlate to upper GI symptoms when assessed by validated questionnaires and can detect response to therapy in buspirone trials. Esophageal body dysmotility on HRM positively correlates with the presence of interstitial lung disease. KEY POINTS: • Esophageal body dysmotility on HRM correlates with presence of ILD. • HRM findings seem to correspond to clinical symptom alleviation in interventional trials, but data are still limited. • At present HRM, a procedure with a high negative burden to the patient, offers little to no role in the therapeutic strategy.

Esophageal Body Motility for Clinical Assessment in Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.

Background/AimsLittle data exists about esophageal body dysmotility and reflux patterns in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) patients off therapy. We aimed to evaluate effects of esophageal body dysmotility on reflux parameters in RGERD patients by combining impedance-pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the impedance-pH data and HRM metrics in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Impedance-pH monitoring and manometric data were compared between 2 groups: ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and normal motility.ResultsForty-eight patients (30 males, mean age 54.5 years) were included (16 erosive esophagitis, 24 non-erosive reflux disease, and 8 functional heartburn), amongst which 24 subjects showed IEM, and others had normal motility. Number of patients who had a large break in the IEM group was significantly higher than that of normal motility patients. IEM group had more patients with weakly acid reflux and long term acid reflux than the normal group (P = 0.008, P = 0.004, respectively). There was no statistical difference in baseine impedance levels from z4 to z6 between the 2 groups (2911 ± 1160 Ω vs 3604 ± 1232 Ω, 2766 ± 1254 Ω vs 3752 ± 1439 Ω, 2349 ± 1131 Ω vs 3038 ± 1254 Ω, all P > 0.05). Acid exposure time, numbers of long term acid reflux and weakly acid reflux showed strong negative correlation with esophageal body motility and/or lower esophageal sphincter function.ConclusionsIEM was associated more with acid exposure, abnormal weakly acid reflux, and long term acid reflux in RGERD patients. These data suggested the role of esophageal body dysmotility in the pathophysiological mechanisms of RGERD patients.

Trastornos motores y endoscópicos en sujetos obesos asintomáticos

IntroductionObesity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux. The aim of this prospective study was to compare endoscopic and manometric findings in asymptomatic obese patients and compare it to non-obese individuals. Material and methodsA prospective, comparative study was conducted with 56 obese patients without GERD symptoms and index DeMeester reflux < 14.7 were compared to 30 asymptomatic no-obese individuals. Resultsthe presence of hiatal hernia and esophagitis was more frequent in the group of obese patients (hiatal hernia GI 28%, GI GII 10%; p<0.05) (esophagitis GI 8.9%, GII 0%). The lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower in obese subjects (GI 7.18 ± 3.78, GII 12.84 ± 4.82; p<0.05). We identified a strong association between obesity and esophageal body dysmotility (OR=7; CI 95%=2.73-22.88). In conclusion, obese patients show increased frequency of hiatal hernia and esophagitis, as well as decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure even when they are asymptomatic for reflux. There is a strong association between esophageal body dysmotility and obesity

Role of the lower esophageal sphincter on esophageal acid exposure – a review of over 2000 patients

Three lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics associated with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) are, LES pressure = 6 mmHg, abdominal length (AL) <1 cm and overall length (OL) <2 cm. The objective of this study was to validate this relationship and evaluate the extent of impact various LES characteristics have on the degree of distal esophageal acid exposure. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent esophageal manometry and pH studies at Creighton University Medical Center between 1984 and 2008. Patients with esophageal body dysmotility, prior foregut surgery, missing data, no documented symptoms or no pH study, were excluded. Study subjects were categorized as follows: (1) normal LES (N-LES): patients with LES pressure of 6-26 mmHg, AL = 1.0 cm and OL = 2 cm; (2) incompetent LES (Inc-LES): patients with LES pressure <6.0 mmHg orAL <1 cm or OL <2 cm; and (3) hypertensive LES (HTN-LES): patients with LES pressure >26.0 mmHg with AL = 1 cm and OL = 2 cm. The DeMeester score was used to compare differences in acid exposure between different groups. Two thousand and twenty patients satisfied study criteria. Distal esophageal acid exposure as reflected by the DeMeester score in patients with Inc-LES (median=20.05) was significantly higher than in patients with an N-LES (median=9.5), which in turn was significantly higher than in patients with an HTN-LES. Increasing LES pressure and AL provided protection against acid exposure in a graded fashion. Increasing number of inadequate LES characteristics were associated with an increase both in the percentage of patients with abnormal DeMeester score and the degree of acid exposure. LES pressure (=6 mmHg) and AL (<1 cm) are associated with increased lower esophageal acid exposure, and need to be addressed for definitive management of GERD.

Esophageal dysmotility associated with systemic sclerosis: a high-resolution manometry study

Esophageal involvement occurs in about 80% of patients with systemic sclerosis, with a marked diminution of peristaltic pressures in the distal two-thirds of the esophagus. Our aims were to more fully characterize esophageal motility disorders in systemic sclerosis using high-resolution manometry (HRM) and to determine predictive factors of esophageal involvement. Fifty-one patients (46 females) with systemic sclerosis were included in this retrospective study. Esophageal motility was characterized with HRM. The demographic data, esophageal symptoms, presence of other organ involvement, and autoantibody profile (anti-Scl70 antibodies [Scl70], anticentromere antibodies [ACA]) were recorded for all patients. Esophageal body dysmotility was present in 33 patients (67.3%) and was associated with hypotensive esophagogastric junction in 27 patients (55.1%). The velocity of proximal contractions was higher in patients with esophageal body dysmotility compared to patients with normal peristalsis (median 10.8 cm/s vs. 5.5, P = 0.04). The amplitude of middle esophageal contraction but not of distal esophageal contraction was reduced in patients with hypoperistalsis. Diffuse esophageal skin involvement, presence of Scl70 and absence of ACA were associated with esophageal involvement. Esophageal symptoms encountered in 87.5% of patients were not predictive of esophageal dysmotility. This HRM series confirms the high prevalence of esophageal body dysmotility in systemic sclerosis. Diffuse skin involvement, positive Scl70 and negative ACA, but not esophageal symptoms, may predict esophageal body dysmotility.

The establishment of the esophageal function in patients with cervical inlet patch

Although the pathogenesis of cervical inlet patch (CIP) -heterotopic gastric mucosal island in the proximal esophagus- is not fully understood, most authors consider it as a congenital abnormality, whereas others surmise it to be related to proximal gastroesophageal reflux. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the esophageal function and the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with CIP. Patients, Methods: 18 consecutive patients (M/F 11/7, mean age: 45.7 ys.) with endoscopic evidence of CIP were prospectively studied. Esophageal symptom analysis, 24h simultaneous Bilitec and 2ch pH-monitoring, esophageal manometry, and video barium esophagography (VBE) were carried out in 15/18 patients. Functional tests could not be done in 2 men with severe peptic esophageal stricture and in a woman with Zenker's diverticulum. Results: The histological evaluation showed cardia and/or oxynthic mucosa in all patients, with Schaffer's glands in 3 and pancreas acinar metaplasia in 2 cases. Low grade dysplasia was present in 1 patient. Erosive esophagitis was present in 9 patients. At the gastroesophageal junction columnar cardia/oxynthic metaplasia was found in 4, and intestinal metaplasia in 1 patient. Typical reflux symptoms were commonly observed (13/18). The 24h 2ch pH-monitoring detected abnormal acid reflux in the distal esophagus in 7/15 patients. Proximal reflux was established in 4/15 cases. Signs of acid secretion in the mucosal patches were not seen. Biliary reflux was occurred in 5/15 patients. Esophageal manometry showed low distal esophageal sphincter pressure in 7, prolonged relaxation in 9, and esophageal body dysmotility in 10 cases. On VBE signs of reflux were observed in 5 patients, 3 of them were proximal. Conclusions: The low prevalence of proximal gastroesophageal reflux may support the hypothesis that CIP is rather a congenital, than an acquired abnormality. On the other hand, it is more likely for these patients to have GERD and Barrett's esophagus, than it is expected on the basis of epidemiologic studies.

Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER) Is Highly Prevalent in Asymptomatic Patients Awaiting Lung Transplantation

Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER) Is Highly Prevalent in Asymptomatic Patients Awaiting Lung Transplantation Kalyani Maganti, Connie Wigen, Lorinda Dollison, Juan C. Garcia Background: Bronchiolitis obliterans and its clinical correlate bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome are a major cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Aspiration secondary to GER has been postulated to be a contributing factor. GER has also been shown to worsen following lung transplantation. Preoperative recognition would help anticipate management in these patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence of GER in 14 consecutive end-stage lung disease patients being evaluated for lung transplantation. 12 had dual-channel esophageal 24-hour pH while 1 patient had BRAVO capsule testing. 13 patients underwent esophageal manometry. Results: Among the 14 patients, indications for lung transplant were as following: 6 emphysema, 3 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 1 cystic fibrosis, 1 pulmonary hypertension, and 1 alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency. 12 patients were asymptomatic for GER on presentation while 2 had heartburn. The lower esophageal sphincter was hypotensive in 9 (76%) patients with a mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure of 9.5 mm Hg. 4 (30%) had esophageal body dysmotility. Among those 2 had low amplitudes with ineffective esophageal motility, likely secondary to GER as evidenced by abnormal pH study, and 2 had nutcracker esophagus, one of whom had a positive DeMeester score. The overall DeMeester score was above normal in 9 (69%) patients with a mean score of 64.4 (normal !14.72). 7 (53%) were noted to have abnormal proximal acid exposure with a mean of 8.3% (normal !1.3% exposure). 9 (69%) had abnormal distal acid exposure with a mean of 18.4% (normal !4% exposure). Conclusions: GER is highly prevalent in end-stage lung disease patients and can be clinically silent. We conclude that all patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation, irrespective of symptoms, should be routinely investigated for GER in view of its possible contribution to allograft dysfunction.

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in End-Stage Lung Disease Candidates for Lung Transplant

Aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux has been postulated to be a contributing factor in bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. It is not clear whether gastroesophageal reflux is a preexisting condition or secondary to intraoperative vagal injury or drug-induced prolonged gastric emptying. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux was examined in 78 consecutive end-stage lung disease patients assessed for lung transplantation: emphysema, 21; cystic fibrosis, 5; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 26; scleroderma, 10; and miscellaneous diseases, 16. All underwent esophageal manometry. Two-channel esophageal 24-hour pH testing was completed in 76 patients. Gastric emptying studies were conducted in 36 patients. Typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were documented in 63% of patients. The lower esophageal sphincter was hypotensive in 72% of patients, and 33% had esophageal body dysmotility. Prolonged gastric emptying was documented in 44%, and 38% had abnormal pH testing. The overall DeMeester score was above normal in 32% of patients, and 20% had abnormal proximal pH probe readings. Gastroesophageal reflux is highly prevalent in end-stage lung disease patients who are candidates for lung transplantation. Further investigation is needed to study the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux after lung transplantation and its contribution to chronic allograft dysfunction.

Effectiveness of esophageal manometry in predicting the outcome of children with primary GER after floppy Nissen-Rossetti wrap

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) can result in many postoperative problems because of an incorrect indication or an unsuitable fundoplication. Many preoperative tests have been suggested to perform a "tailored fundoplication," but there is no clear evidence as to which is the best. The aim of our study was to define the effectiveness of esophageal manometry in predicting the outcome of children who need fundoplication because of refractory primary gastroesophageal reflux. Thirty-two children were included in the study. Patients with gastroenterologic and respiratory symptoms numbered 10 (31%) and 22 (69%), respectively. The preoperative motility pattern was (1) inappropriate relaxations alone in nine patients (28%) and associated with esophageal body dysmotility in one patients (3%); (2) low-pressure lower esophageal sphincter (LES), alone in 13 patients (41%) and associated with body dysmotility in eight (25%). Motility pattern of the esophageal body was abnormal in nine children. Manometric anomalies were absent only in one case. Low pressure of the LES associated with atypical esophageal motility disorders was significantly higher in the gastroenterological group and in the older patients. Low pressure of the LES associated with good esophageal activity was significantly higher in the respiratory group and in the patients younger than 24 months. There was no correlation between motility pattern and outcome, and no statistically significant differences were found between pressure values at the different levels and symptoms, outcome, and age groups. Esophageal manometry is not mandatory to predict the outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication for refractory primary GER treatment.

Management of epiphrenic diverticula

Epiphrenic diverticula are very rarely seen and are often associated with achalasia, esophageal body dysmotility, and a high resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different treatment options for patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Patients with an epiphrenic diverticulum were divided into two treatment groups: surgical and nonsurgical. Retrospective chart review was performed, and a symptom questionnaire was created. There were six patients in the nonsurgical group and 11 patients in the surgical group. The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Ten patients had a laparoscopic operation performed. One patient was operated on thoracoscopically and had to be converted to a thoracotomy. Two diverticula were inverted with good results. There was one postoperative esophageal leak where no myotomy was added. An empyema developed in another patient at 4 weeks after surgery. One patient, in whom no antireflux procedure was performed, reported postoperative heartburn. Patients in the nonsurgical group had smaller diverticula, were not good candidates for surgery, or were asymptomatic. Esophageal diverticula are very rarely seen. Asymptomatic patients may not require therapy. If surgery is performed and the diverticulum is large, it should be removed. The laparoscopic approach is the surgical treatment of choice. A long myotomy and an antireflux procedure should be added to avoid esophageal leakage at the line of repair and gastroesophageal reflux.

Complete fundoplication has similar long-term results in patients with and without esophageal body dysmotility.

Partial fundoplication is advocated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with poor esophageal body function. We hypothesized that a complete floppy wrap may be just as safe in patients with poor esophageal motility. A retrospective, case-control study was performed on patients who underwent a complete fundoplication and had poor esophageal motility. Study patients were matched with controls with normal esophageal body pressures according to sex, age, and duration of reflux symptoms. Patients were followed up and interviewed using a modified symptom and life quality questionnaire. Twenty-two patients and 22 matched controls underwent a complete fundoplication. The mean esophageal body pressure was 42.1 and 87.5 mmHg in the study and control groups, respectively (p <0.05). Average time to resolution of dysphagia was 10.1 weeks in the study group and 12 weeks in the control group. All patients but 1 (control) graded their life quality improvement as good to excellent. Our data suggest that a 360 degrees fundoplication has similar long-term results regardless of esophageal body motility. We suggest that a partial fundoplication may be reserved for patients with severe esophageal body dysfunction. The role of manometry in the preoperative workup should be reassesed: it may be mandatory only in patients with preoperative dysphagia or when achalasia is suspected.

The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter

This study defines the entity of the hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HLES) and its treatment, including surgical implications. Esophageal manometry was performed on 1,300 patients. Of these, 53 (4%) had HLES with resting pressure > 26.5 mm Hg, defined as the upper limit of normal resting LES pressure. Thirty-two of these patients had 24-hour esophageal pH studies. The response to treatment was assessed. Fourteen patients (26%) with HLES had achalasia. Of the remaining 39 (74%), 25 had an isolated HLES with normal esophageal body motility, 5 had a nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (NEMD), 4 were post-Nissen fundoplication, 3 had a nutcracker esophagus, and 2 had diffuse esophageal spasm (DES). Nineteen percent of HLES patients had gastroesophageal reflux on pH studies. Eighty-two percent of HLES patients responded well to symptom-directed medical therapy. Two patients with esophageal body dysmotility responded well to an esophageal myotomy with a partial fundoplication. Patients with the HLES form a heterogeneous group. Gastroesophageal reflux in HLES patients is not uncommon. Patients with HLES respond well to medical therapy. Carefully selected patients require surgery.