Eosinophilic Disease Research Articles

Barriers to Timely Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Barriers to Timely Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: Case series and review of the literature

Abstract
 Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) is caused by the uncontrolled proliferation of eosinophils generally associated with conditions such as allergic reactions or parasitic infections. This syndrome is characterized by excessive eosinophil production (>1500/mm3) that persists for more than six months and cannot be explained by secondary causes. HES symptoms can affect different body organs, and usually, nonspecific symptoms include fever, malaise, fatigue, rash, shortness of breath, and myalgia.
 HES is a rare disease with multiorgan involvement, including the skin, joints, kidneys, vascular system, gastrointestinal tract, cardiac and pulmonary systems. The main feature of this disease is that overproduced eosinophils accumulate in organs and cause organ damage. Cardiac involvement plays a critical role in determining morbidity and mortality, and cardiac and large vessel thrombosis with severe clinical manifestations can also be observed.
 Treatment aims to reduce the absolute eosinophil count, improve symptoms, and prevent disease progression. Pharmacologic therapy aims to maintain targeted eosinophil levels below 1.5 x 10^9/L (1500 cells/mcL) to reduce the symptoms of eosinophilic disease and prevent organ damage. Furthermore, indications for emergency treatment should be rapidly assessed and initiated promptly in appropriate patients.
 This paper will discuss the diagnosis, clinical manifestations, treatment modalities, and management challenges of HES in detail through two rare case examples.

Clinical practices and adherence to guidelines for eosinophilic esophagitis: A European survey

BackgroundWe aimed to assess the clinical practices and adherence to guidelines for adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) patients in Europe. MethodsA cross-sectional web survey containing 23 questions was distributed to members of the European Consortium for Eosinophilic Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract (EUREOS) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and digestive endoscopists (AIGO). We conducted a subgroup analysis to assess the impact of EoE expertise and practice setting on clinical practices. Results228 physicians from 18 European countries participated. Adherence to guidelines varied from 72% to 98.6%. 83.4% of total respondents obtained ≥ 6 esophageal biopsies in suspected EoE. 42% of total respondents, 82.5% of EoE experts (vs. non-experts 33%; P < 0.0001), and 55% of academics (vs. 29.1 non-academics; P < 0.0001) routinely used the EREFS score. Regarding first-line therapy, 82.9% of total respondents prescribed proton pump inhibitors, 41.6% topical steroids, 20.6% elimination diets, and 9.2% combination therapies. Only 72% of respondents used symptoms and endoscopy with <15 Eosinophils/HPF to define treatment response. 21.5% of all respondents did not prescribe maintenance therapies and 12.7% discontinued therapy before response evaluation endoscopy. ConclusionOur findings revealed significant heterogeneity in practice patterns and suboptimal adherence to EoE guidelines across Europe. Expertise in EoE and working in an academic hospital positively influenced clinical practices and adherence to guidelines.

P571 The Effect of NLRX1 Activation on Eosinophils in Ulcerative Colitis and Inflammation: Translational Learnings Across Diseases and from Mouse to Human

Abstract Background Although the precise role of eosinophils in IBD is debated, elevated eosinophils may influence response to therapy and clinical outcomes1. Thus, therapeutic agents which affect both neutrophil and eosinophil recruitment may provide more robust clinical improvement in patients with UC. NLRX1 is an immunometabolic protein which reduces oxidative stress, shifts cellular metabolism, and decreases inflammation in multiple cell types implicated in ulcerative colitis (UC). Studies of NLRX1 agonists (gut-selective NX-13 &amp; systemic LABP-73) in diverse disease models identified novel cellular targets of NLRX1 activation. We compared NLRX1’s effect on eosinophils in 2 disease states, UC and the more prototypical eosinophilic disease, asthma, and evaluated the findings. Methods In the 4-week NX-13 Phase 1b, a double-blind trial of 36 patients with active UC (Total Mayo Score 4-10; Mayo endoscopic subscore 2-3) who were randomly assigned to NX-13 250mg Immediate Release (IR), 500mg IR, 500mg Delayed Release (DR) or Placebo QD for 4 weeks, histology was assessed using the Geboes score by a blinded pathologist2. For allergic asthma models, mice were immunized with ovalbumin or house dust mite followed by antigen challenge concurrent with LABP-73 or vehicle. Cells isolated from the lung were analyzed by flow cytometry using the BD FACS Celesta/Diva. Data are represented as means (standard error). Results In the 1b clinical trial, both the Geboes score and neutrophil subscores were reduced in the IR NX-13 group compared to placebo, consistent with the effects seen in preclinical IBD models. Upon examination, eosinophil infiltration was reduced in both the IR dose cohorts compared to placebo (Fig1A). In the subset of patients with active eosinophil infiltration at baseline (defined as Geboes subscore ≥2A.1), eosinophil reduction was seen in all NX-13 doses (Fig1B). Importantly, a numerically increased clinical response rate (decrease in total Mayo score of ≥3 or ≥30%) was seen in patients that demonstrated effective eosinophil reduction, compared to patients without improvement (75% versus 29%; Fisher’s Exact Test, p=0.08). In two allergic asthma models, NLRX1 activation by LABP-73 significantly reduced the fraction of eosinophils within the lung relative to vehicle control (n=7-8; p&amp;lt; 0.05), confirming NLRX1 activation can regulate eosinophilic inflammation in Th2-mediated responses. Conclusion Neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration were reduced in UC patients treated with the gut selective NLRX1 agonist, NX-13, and was coupled with better clinical outcomes. The effect of NX-13 on eosinophils will be evaluated further in the ongoing phase 2 NEXUS trial in patients with UC. 1 A Mookhoek, et al. JCC (16). 2 L Peyrin-Biroulet, et al. JCC (17) Supp

Monitoring pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis disease activity using an unsedated blind esophageal brushing model: A pilot study.

Recurrent upper endoscopies are essential for monitoring therapy response and disease activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), leading to increased costs, procedural complications, and anesthesia exposure. The aim of this study was to examine an office-based model using serial sedation-free blind esophageal epithelial brushing (BEEB) to monitor therapy response through eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) levels and guide therapy plans in pediatric EoE patients. EoE patients (≤21 years of age) were enrolled in this prospective study. Subjects were placed on dietary, pharmacologic, or combination therapy with the goal of inducing or maintaining remission. To assess response to sequential interventions, subjects underwent sequential sedation-free BEEBs through nasogastric tubesto measure EDN levels. Based on serial brushings, an individual plan of diet, medications, or a combination of both was created for each subject, and a final endoscopy was then performed to validate the accuracy of the individual plans. Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The average peak eosinophil countin patients with active EoE was 58.1 ± 30.8 eosinophils per high-power field and mean EDN level was 165.2 ± 191.3 μg/mL. A total of 42 BEEBs were completed. Individual therapy plans based on sequential BEEB were accurate in 19 out of the 24 patients (79%) and specifically nine out of 10 patients (90%) treated with elimination diets. This study suggests that office-based sedation-free BEEBs can be used to monitor therapy response and disease activity in pediatric EoE patients.

A Comprehensive Global Population-Based Analysis on the Coexistence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

We explored inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) coexistence using a global dataset. Investigating their epidemiology, risks, and impact, we aimed to enhance the understanding of concurrent diagnoses and patient outcomes. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using deidentified patient data from the TriNetX database (2011-2022). We estimated the incidence and prevalence of EoE in patients with IBD, including both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and vice versa. Risks of select immune-mediated conditions and disease complications were compared among patients with EoE, IBD, or concurrent diagnoses. Our results included 174,755 patients with CD; 150,774 patients with UC; and 44,714 patients with EoE. The risk of EoE was significantly higher among patients with CD (prevalence ratio [PR] 11.2) or UC (PR 8.7) compared with individuals without IBD. The risk of IBD was higher in patients with EoE (CD: PR 11.6; UC: PR 9.1) versus those without EoE. A propensity-matched analysis of IBD patients revealed that, when comparing patients with and without EoE, the relative risk of immune-mediated comorbidities was significantly greater for celiac disease, IBD-related inflammatory conditions, eczema and asthma (CD: n = 1896; UC: n = 1231; p < 0.001). Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of EoE and IBD had a higher composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.14, p < 0.005; UC: aHR 1.17, p < 0.01) and lower risk of food bolus impaction (aHR 0.445, p = 0.0011). Simultaneous EoE and IBD increased IBD-related complications risk, needing more treatment (glucocorticoids, biologic therapy, abdominal surgery), while reducing EoE-related issues like food bolus impaction.

Expert consensus on the use of systemic glucocorticoids for managing eosinophil-related diseases.

Eosinophil-related diseases represent a group of pathologic conditions with highly heterogeneous clinical presentation and symptoms ranging from mild to critical. Both systemic and localized forms of disease are typically treated with glucocorticoids. The approval of novel biologic therapies targeting the interleukin-5 pathway can help reduce the use of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) in eosinophilic diseases and reduce the risk of SGC-related adverse effects (AEs). In this article, a panel of experts from different medical specialties reviewed current evidence on the use of SGC in two systemic eosinophilic diseases: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with PolyAngiitis (EGPA) and HyperEosinophilic Syndrome (HES); and in two single-organ (respiratory) eosinophilic diseases: Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and Severe Asthma with Eosinophil Phenotype (SA-EP), and contrasted it with their experience in clinical practice. Using nominal group technique, they reached consensus on key aspects related to the dose and tapering of SGC as well as on the initiation of biologics as SGC-sparing agents. Early treatment with biologics could help prevent AEs associated with medium and long-term use of SGC.

Aggregated eosinophils and neutrophils characterize the properties of mucus in chronic rhinosinusitis

BackgroundAirway obstruction caused by viscous mucus is an important pathophysiological characteristic of persistent inflammation, which can result in organ damage. ObjectiveWe investigated the hypothesis that the biophysical characteristics of accumulating granulocytes impact the clinical properties of mucus. MethodsSurgically acquired nasal mucus samples from patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis and neutrophil-dominant, non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis were evaluated in terms of computed tomography density, viscosity, water content, wettability, and protein composition. Isolated human eosinophils and neutrophils were stimulated to induce the formation of extracellular traps, followed by the formation of aggregates. The biophysical properties of the aggregated cells were also examined. ResultsMucus from patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis had significantly higher computed tomography density, viscosity, dry weight, and hydrophobicity compared with mucus from patients with non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis. The levels of eosinophil-specific proteins in mucus correlated with its physical properties. Eosinophil and neutrophil aggregates showed physical and pathological characteristics resembling those of mucus. Co-treatment with deoxyribonuclease and heparin, which slenderizes the structure of eosinophil extracellular traps, efficiently induced reductions in the viscosity and hydrophobicity of both eosinophil aggregates and eosinophilic mucus. ConclusionsThe present study elucidates the pathogenesis of mucus stasis in infiltrated granulocyte aggregates from a novel perspective. These findings may contribute to the development of treatment strategies for eosinophilic airway diseases.

Serum Eosinophilic Cationic Protein as a Useful Noninvasive Marker of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease in Children.

Recently, the prevalence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) has shown an increasing trend worldwide. As the diagnosis of EGID requires invasive endoscopy with biopsy, noninvasive markers for detecting EGID in suspected patients, particularly children, are urgently needed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) beyond peripheral eosinophil counts in pediatric patients with EGID. Overall, 156 children diagnosed with EGID were enrolled and 150 children with functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD) were recruited as controls. All participants underwent endoscopic biopsy in each segment of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and serum ECP measurement, as well as peripheral eosinophil percent and absolute eosinophil count. Comparing EGID (n=156) with FAPD (n=150) patients, serum ECP levels were significantly higher in pediatric patients with EGID than in those with FAPD (25.8±28.6 µg/L vs. 19.5±21.0 µg/L, p=0.007), while there was no significant difference in peripheral eosinophil percent and absolute eosinophil counts between the two groups. Serum ECP levels were correlated with peripheral eosinophil percent (r=0.593, p<0.001) and the absolute eosinophil count (r=0.660, p<0.001). The optimal cutoff value of serum ECP for pediatric EGID was 10.5 µg/mL, with a sensitivity of 69.9% and a specificity of 43.4% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.562. The combination of serum ECP levels and peripheral eosinophil counts, when employed with appropriated thresholds, could serve as a valuable noninvasive biomarker to distinguish between EGID and FAPD in pediatric patients manifesting GI symptoms.

Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis/Mycosis: An Allergic Disease or an Eosinophilic Disease?

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis (ABPA/ABPM) is characterized by increased serum levels of total and fungi-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophilic mucus plugs in the airways. Its classification as either an allergic or eosinophilic disease remains controversial. In the present review, we explored this topic based on three clinical studies that analyzed the clinical characteristics of ABPA/ABPM using a cluster analysis, factor analysis, and comparison between ABPM caused by Schizophyllum commune and ABPA. We also compared therapeutic responses to biologics targeting either IgE (omalizumab) or eosinophils (mepolizumab/benralizumab) to elucidate the role of these components in the pathogenesis of ABPA/ABPM. Based on these analyses, eosinophilic mucus plug formation in the airways is considered a cardinal feature of the development of ABPA/ABPM, whereas IgE responses to fungi are important factors that modulate disease manifestation.

Prevalence and Distribution of Gastric Endoscopy Findings in Non-eosinophilic Esophagitis Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: Influence of Atrophic Gastritis.

Objective The impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric endoscopic findings in non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (non-EoE EGIDs) remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of H. pylori infection on the prevalence and distribution of gastric lesions. Methods The details of 75 patients diagnosed with non-EoE EGIDs were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 56 patients with a definitive diagnosis according to the Japanese criteria (any GI tract; ≥20 eosinophils/high-power field), 25 patients with pathologic gastric eosinophil infiltration (gastric EI; ≥30 eosinophils/high-power field) were investigated in detail. The prevalence and distribution of gastric endoscopy findings were assessed according to the gastric mucosal atrophy status, an indicator of H. pylori infection. Results Erythema (76%) was the most common finding in the gastric EI-positive group, followed by erosions (36%), ulcers (28%), ulcer scars (28%), and edema (24%). None of these lesions differed significantly in frequency between the patients with and without gastric atrophy. When erosions, ulcers, and ulcer scars were unified, they were slightly more common in the gastric bodies of patients with gastric atrophy than those without gastric atrophy; however, no preferential site was found in those without gastric atrophy. We identified six patients with active gastric ulcers, and half had large, deep ulcers with marginal swelling/irregularity. Conclusion Gastric endoscopy findings in non-EoE EGIDs with gastric EI were evenly observed in the stomach, with no specific trend in frequency or distribution depending on atrophic gastritis, an indicator of H. pylori infection. Gastric ulcers in patients with non-EoE EGIDs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic peptic ulcers.

Multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease in a horse

Multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease in a horse

Eosinophilic diseases in otorhinolaryngological practice – what is worth to know about new treatment options

An increased number of eosinophils and eosinophilic inflammation is associated with many diseases, from relatively common, specific to the respiratory tract, such as eosinophilic asthma or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), to rare multi-organ diseases, often with very high eosinophilia, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) or hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is also a disease that is difficult to diagnose and differentiate. Patients with multisystem diseases are at significant risk of disease progression and even mortality due to delayed diagnosis or inadequate treatment. In otorhinolaryngological practice, we most often observe increased eosinophilia in patients with a long-term history of difficult-to-control chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, often with comorbid asthma or hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. Very often, the initial phase of EGPA, many years before the correct diagnosis is made, presents with chronic symptoms of inflammation in the upper and lower respiratory tract. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully analyze the symptoms and expand the diagnostics in patients with increased eosinophilia, although in some cases the differential diagnosis may remain difficult due to overlapping symptoms. It is worth noting that treatment options and response to therapy may vary among individual eosinophilic disorders. Many patients, especially those with HES and EGPA, require oral glucocorticoids for chronic therapy. Cytotoxic or immunomodulatory medications may be needed in cases with severe disease. New biological therapies, such as those targeting interleukin-5 or its receptor, or IL4/IL13 have shown great promise in inflammation control, exacerbations and relapses in patients with asthma, CRSwNP, HES, EGPA and EoE. Such therapies may reduce the side effects associated with long-term use of oral glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, and in patients with CRSwNP they may significantly reduce disease recurrences and the need for subsequent surgery, significantly improving the patients’ quality of life.

Eosinophilic enteritis: the great mimic

Eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), a subtype of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease, is a rare and complicated inflammatory condition affecting the small intestine. This case report discusses a 42-year-old patient who presented with acute gastrointestinal symptoms including diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Initial laboratory investigations revealed leukocytosis, peripheral eosinophilia, and distinctive imaging findings, prompting further evaluation. Endoscopic evaluation revealed extensive mucosal lesions in the small intestine, with subsequent biopsies confirming eosinophilic infiltration, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of chronic enteritis, probably of an eosinophilic nature. The case highlights the complex differential diagnostic process involved in identifying EoN, which requires a comprehensive understanding of all the clinical and histopathological features of the disease. The efficacy of budesonide therapy is also discussed in the management of EoN and it was evidenced by our patient's positive response to treatment. This case report contributes significant insights into the understanding and management of EoN, providing essential information for the medical community to facilitate accurate diagnosis and tailored therapeutic interventions for individuals experiencing this complex disorder.

Correlation between anxiety and decreased quality of life in patients with non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Mental status such as anxiety and depression in patients with non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (non-EoE EGIDs) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with non-EoE EGIDs had mental disorders and decreased mental-health-related quality of life (QOL) similar to those in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We enrolled patients with non-EoE EGIDs and DGBI visiting the Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, and the measures listed below were compared between the groups. We collected data using the following questionnaires: hospital anxiety and depression scale, and short form (SF)-8 including mental component summary (MCS)-8. We evaluated 21 and 17 patients with non-EoE EGIDs and DGBI, respectively. The anxiety score was not significantly different between the groups. The proportion of patients with possible anxiety was not significantly different between the groups (19.0% vs 33.3%). These results show that patients with non-EoE EGIDs had anxiety that might be equivalent to that of patients with DGBI. The depression score and proportion of patients with possible depression in the non-EoE EGID group tended to be lower than those in the DGBI group. MCS-8 scores were not significantly different between the non-EoE EGID and DGBI groups, which might imply an equivalent decrease in mental-health-related QOL in both groups of patients. In patients with non-EoE EGIDs, the anxiety score had a significant inverse association with the MCS-8 score. Patients with non-EoE EGIDs may have anxiety that correlates with decreased mental-health-related QOL.

Review article: Emerging insights into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterised clinically by gastrointestinal symptoms and histologically by a pathologic increase in eosinophil-predominant inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia. To highlight emerging insights and research efforts into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs, and discuss key remaining knowledge gaps. We selected and reviewed original research, retrospective studies, case series, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses. Standardised nomenclature classifies EGIDs as EoE, eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Incidence and prevalence of EoE are rising, emphasising the need to better understand how environmental risk factors and genetic features interact. Advances in understanding EoE pathophysiology have led to clinical trials of targeted therapy and the approval (in the United States) of dupilumab for EoE. Several therapies that are under investigation hope to satisfy both histologic and clinical targets. For non-EoE EGIDs, efforts are focused on better defining clinical and histopathologic disease determinants and natural history, as well as establishing new therapies. Unmet needs for research are dramatically different for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs. In EoE, non-invasive diagnostic tests, clinicopathologic models that determine the risk of disease progression and therapeutic failure, and novel biologic therapies are emerging. In contrast, in non-EoE EGIDs, epidemiologic trends, diagnostic histopathologic thresholds, and natural history models are still developing for these more rare disorders.

Eosinophil Involvement Outside the Esophagus in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders, characterized clinically by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and histologically by eosinophil-predominant infiltration in ≥1 GI tract segment.1 A recent, international consensus by 91 experts proposed a new framework for EGID nomenclature to establish updated terms, designations, and conventions.2 Although this framework offers a standardized starting point for the field, debate is ongoing regarding the appropriate terminology for cases involving multiple areas, such as "non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) EGID and EoE" or "non-EoE EGID with esophageal involvement (EI)." Notably, in a survey of these experts, 61% agreed with the later term "non-EoE EGID with EI," because EoE is isolated to the esophagus by current diagnostic criteria.3 However, limited molecular and pathogenic data exist to support the distinction. Furthermore, disease burden of symptoms and comorbidities generally is higher in non-EoE EGIDs than EoE.4 Presently, there is no screen to predict non-EoE EGID concomitance in EoE; therefore, decision-making to further explore other GI segment involvement is clinically challenging. We aimed to answer 2 fundamental questions in the field (Figure1A): Is there a shared or distinct pathogenesis between patients with isolated EoE and non-EoE EGIDs with EI as assessed by patient characteristics and molecular profiles? Can we predict concomitant non-EoE EGIDs when EoE exists? Herein, we report a similar molecular signature between EoE and EI and a potential predictive model to identify concomitant non-EoE EGIDs in patients with EoE.

Role of peripheral and tissue eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID), and functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD) present with nonspecific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms clinically and also have some similarities in pathogeneses associated with eosinophils. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the role of eosinophils in IBD compared to EGID and FAPD by investigating eosinophils in peripheral blood and GI tissue and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). Pediatric patients with chronic GI symptoms who underwent endoscopic biopsies were enrolled. Complete blood cell counts, inflammatory markers, immunoglobulin E (IgE), serum ECP levels, and endoscopic and histopathologic findings were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 387 patients were included: 179 with EGID, 107 with IBDs, and 82 with FAPD. Peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC), total IgE, and serum ECP were significantly higher in both IBD and EGID than in FAPD (all p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were noted among the three groups in tissue eosinophil counts in each segment of GI tract except for the esophagus (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in tissue eosinophil counts in the ascending, sigmoid colon, and rectum between EGID and IBD (p < 0.05). Peripheral and tissue eosinophils in the stomach and duodenum revealed positive correlation in both EGID and IBD (both p < 0.001). Elevated eosinophil-related markers, as well as increased tissue eosinophilic infiltration in the affected areas of the GI tract in both IBD and EGID compared to FAPD, suggest that eosinophils might play a common important role in the pathogeneses of both diseases.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with increased risk of later inflammatory bowel disease in a nationwide Swedish population cohort.

Earlier studies on the possible association between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been contradictory. Patients with biopsy-verified EoE diagnosed between 1990 and 2017 in Sweden (n=1587) were age- and sex-matched with up to five general population reference individuals (n=7808). EoE was defined using pathology reports from all 28 pathology centers in Sweden (the ESPRESSO study). Multivariate Cox regression then estimated hazard ratios for future IBD. IBD was defined based on the international classification of disease codes and histopathology codes. In secondary analyses, sibling comparators were used to further reduce potential familial confounding. Additionally, we performed logistic regression examining earlier IBD in EoE. During follow-up until 2020, 16 (0.01%) EoE patients and 21 (0.003%) general population reference individuals diagnosed with IBD, corresponding to a 3.5-fold increased risk of future IBD (aHR=3.56; 95% CI 1.79-7.11). EoE was linked to Crohn's disease (aHR=3.39 [95% CI 1.02-9.60]) but not to ulcerative colitis (aHR=1.37; 95% CI 0.38-4.86). Compared to their siblings, patients with EoE were at a 2.48-fold increased risk of IBD (aHR=2.48; 95% CI 0.92-6.70). Earlier IBD was 15 times more likely in EoE patients than in matched reference individuals (odds ratio, 15.39; 95% CI 7.68-33.59). In this nationwide cohort study, EoE was associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of later IBD diagnosis. This risk increase may be due to shared genetic or early environmental risk factors, but also surveillance bias could play a role.

Barriers to Timely Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Although eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis, have been described over the past 2 to 3 decades, barriers to diagnosis and treatment are common and compounded by issues related to social determinants of health, race, ethnicity, and access to care. These barriers contribute to delays in diagnosis, resulting in persistent inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, which can have significant consequences, including fibrostenotic complications in adults, failure to thrive in children, and decreased quality of life in all affected patients. In this commentary, we summarize gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, highlight barriers to diagnosis, discuss potential approaches based on best practices in other atopic and chronic gastrointestinal diseases, and provide recommendations for reducing barriers to timely diagnosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in underserved populations.