Endpoint Of Disease-free Survival Research Articles

Adjuvant Nivolumab in High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Expanded Efficacy From CheckMate 274.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.CheckMate 274 is a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial of adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) at high risk of recurrence after radical resection. The primary end points of disease-free survival (DFS) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% populations were met. We report results at an extended median follow-up of 36.1 months in the ITT population. In addition, we report interim overall survival (OS) data for the first time and an exploratory analysis among patients with bladder primary tumors (muscle-invasive bladder cancer [MIBC]). Consistent DFS benefit with nivolumab versus placebo was observed in both the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86]) and PD-L1 ≥1% (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.72]) patients. The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.96) in the ITT population and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86) in the PD-L1 ≥1 population. Continuous benefit in nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival was also observed in both patient populations. The exploratory analysis of patients with MIBC also showed continued efficacy benefits, irrespective of PD-L1 status. No new safety signals were reported. Overall, these results further support adjuvant nivolumab as a standard of care for high-risk MIUC after radical resection.

Impact of post-hepatectomy biliary leaks on long-term survival in different liver tumors: A single institute experience.

A postoperative biliary leak is one of the most morbid complications occurring after a liver resection, the long-term impact of which remains unknown. Retrospective analysis of consecutive liver resections performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021. Primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between patients with and without a bile leak, stratifying for tumor type. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and differences between them were analyzed using the log-rank test. In toto, 862 patients were analyzed, and included 306 (35.5%) hepatocellular carcinomas, 212 (24.6%) metastatic colorectal cancers, and 111 (12.9%) cholangiocarcinomas (69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 42 hilar cholangiocarcinomas). Occurrence of a bile leak was associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (median DFS 9.9 months vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.013), and further analysis was restricted to this cohort. A Cox regression performed for factors associated with DFS detriment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma showed that apart from node positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.482, p = 0.033) and margin positivity (HR: 2.65, p = 0.021), development of a bile leak was independently associated with worsening DFS on both univariate and multiple regression analyses (HR: 1.896, p = 0.033). Post-hepatectomy biliary leaks are associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, but not in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods to mitigate this survival detriment need to be explored.

A-BRAVE trial: A phase III randomized trial with avelumab in early triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or at high risk after primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

LBA500 Background: Prognosis of pts with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is still poor and new effective treatments are needed. TNBC is the most immunogenic BC subtype, and this may account for sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The A-BRAVE trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of avelumab, an anti PD-L1 antibody, as adjuvant treatment for pts with early TNBC at high risk. Methods: This is a phase III, multicentric, randomized adjuvant study comparing 1 year of treatment with the anti PD-L1 avelumab vs observation for TNBC pts considered at high risk of relapse. Pts were enrolled after they completed standard treatment with curative intent including surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. High risk was defined as: 1) invasive residual disease (breast and/or nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Stratum A), 2) >pN2/any pT, pN1/pT2, or pN0/pT3 after primary surgery (Stratum B). Pts were randomly assigned (1:1, balanced for strata A and B) to Avelumab 10 mg/kg I.V. q2w for 1 year or observation. Co-primary endpoints were disease free survival (DFS) in the total population and in Stratum A. 474 pts were needed to detect, in the total population, an improvement from 60% to 73.6% 3-year DFS rate (HR 0.6; 90% power, 1-sided test, alfa 2%). 172 DFS events were required to perform the event-driven analysis. Assuming a proportion of 70-80% pts enrolled in Stratum A, the expected power to detect an HR 0.6 at alpha allocated in this subgroup is 70-79%. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Results: From June 2016 to October 2020, 477 pts were randomly assigned from 64 Italian and 6 UK centers. 11 pts (3 avelumab, 8 control) withdrew consent immediately after randomisation and are excluded from further analyses. 378 pts entered Stratum A (83%), of whom 99 (57 avelumab, 42 control) received further chemotherapy after surgery prior to enrollment in the trial. Efficacy results for the two co-primary DFS endpoints and the secondary OS endpoints are reported in the table. Conclusions: One year adjuvant avelumab versus control does not significantly improve DFS in high-risk TNBC patients. Nevertheless, the secondary enpoind OS was significanlty improved with avelumab vs control. RFS and DMFS will also be reported. A centralised collection of tumor tissue, plasma and feces has been performed and will allow a number of correlative studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02926196 . [Table: see text]

Prediction of survival after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a retrospective analysis.

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine if the response to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and may act as a potential surrogate endpoint for disease free survival and overall survival. Eight hundred seventy-eight patients from five centers were analyzed. There were 304 women and 574 men; the median age was 64.7 years. 77.6% and 22.4% of patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy, resulting in a pathological complete response in 7.3%. T-downstaging and N-downstaging occurred in 50.5% and 37% of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. In patients with T-downstaging, the 10-year DFS and 10-year OS were 64.8% and 66.8% compared to 37.1% and 45.9% in patients without T-downstaging. N-downstaging resulted in 10-year DFS and 10-year OS in 56.2% and 62.5% compared to 47.3% and 52.3% without N-downstaging. Based on routinely evaluated clinical parameters, an absolute risk prediction calculator was generated for 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival. T-downstaging and N-downstaging after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy resulted in better DFS and OS compared to patients without response. Based on clinical parameters, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS can be predicted using a prediction calculator.

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy and adjuvant tislelizumab in early-stage resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the Notable-HCC phase 1b trial

Notable-HCC (NCT05185531) is a phase 1b trial, aiming to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in early-stage resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Twenty patients with HCC of BCLC stage 0-A received 3×\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\ imes $$\\end{document} Gy SBRT and two cycles of tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody before the curative HCC resection. Primary endpoints were the surgery delay, radiographic and pathological tumor response after the neoadjuvant therapy, safety and tolerability. During the neoadjuvant therapy, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 1-2 occurred in all 20 patients (100%), eight patients (40%) had grade 3 TRAEs, no grade 4 to 5 TRAE occurred, and all resolved without corticosteroids treatment. Per mRECIST, the objective response rate was 63.2% (12/19), with 3 complete response; the disease control rate was 100%. Two (10.5%) patients achieved complete pathological response. No surgery delay occurred. The neoadjuvant therapy did not increase the surgical difficulty or the incidence of complications. Secondary endpoints of disease-free survival and overall survival were not mature at the time of the analysis. Our pilot trial shows that neoadjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1 + SBRT is safe and promotes tumor responses in early-stage resectable HCC.

AMBASSADOR Alliance A031501: Phase III randomized adjuvant study of pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive and locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) vs observation.

LBA531 Background: Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) is an aggressive disease with high relapse rates. Neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care in patients (pts) who are cisplatin (Cis)-eligible. However, many pts are Cis-ineligible or have persistent muscle-invasive disease after NAC and surgery. We evaluated pembrolizumab (Pembro) as adjuvant therapy in pts with high-risk MIUC following surgical resection. Methods: The AMBASSADOR study is an open-label, randomized, phase III trial that enrolled pts with histologically confirmed MIUC of the bladder, upper tract, or urethra who (1) had ≥ pT2 and/or pN+ or margins+ at surgery (radical cystectomy, nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, or ureterectomy) following NAC or (2) ≥ pT3 and/or pN+ or margins+ at surgery without NAC and were either Cis-ineligible or declined adjuvant Cis-based therapy. Pts were registered ≥4 to 16 weeks after surgery and randomized 1:1 to receive Pembro 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or observation (Obs). Randomization was stratified by pathologic stage, centrally tested PD-L1 status, and prior NAC. The dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with a target sample size of 739 pts and required 387 DFS and 320 OS events for final analysis. Secondary objectives included evaluation of DFS and OS in PD-L1-positive and -negative pts and assessing safety. Here we present the interim DFS and OS results. Results: Between 09/2017 and 08/2021 a total of 702 pts were randomized prior to early closure due to US FDA approval of nivolumab for MIUC pts: 354 pts to Pembro and 348 pts to Obs; 13.0% vs 21.6% withdrew from study without event in the Pembro vs Obs arms, respectively. 74 pts (21%) in the Obs arm received an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Median follow-up was 22.3 months (mos) for DFS and 36.9 mos for OS. The DFS endpoint (based on 319 events needed for interim analysis) crossed the efficacy boundary. Median DFS was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.8‒not evaluable (NE)) with Pembro and 14.0 months (95% CI 9.7‒20.20) with Obs (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69 [95% CI 0.55–0.87]; p=0.0013). At the interim analysis (n = 257 events), median OS was 50.9 months (95% CI 43.9‒NE) with Pembro and 55.8 months (95% CI 53.3‒NE) with Obs (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.76–1.26]; p=0.88). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 48.4% and 31.8% of pts in the Pembro and Obs arms, respectively. Conclusions: Adjuvant Pembro demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs Obs for high-risk MIUC pts after radical surgery. The OS endpoint may have been impacted by pts on the Obs arm receiving a checkpoint inhibitor. Pembro was tolerable with no new safety signals. These results support adjuvant Pembro as a new therapeutic option for pts with MIUC with high risk for recurrence. Additional follow-up is ongoing for the final DFS/OS, PD-L1 subgroups, and ctDNA analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT03244384 .

Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus radiation versus durvalumab alone in stages I–III non-small cell lung cancer: survival outcomes and molecular correlates of a randomized phase II trial

We previously reported the results of a randomized phase II trial (NCT02904954) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with either two preoperative cycles of the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab alone or combined with immunomodulatory doses of stereotactic radiation (DRT). The trial met its primary endpoint of major pathological response, which was significantly higher following DRT with no new safety signals. Here, we report on the prespecified secondary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) regardless of treatment assignment and the prespecified exploratory analysis of DFS in each arm of the trial. DFS at 2 and 3 years across patients in both arms of the trial were 73% (95% CI: 62.1–84.5) and 65% (95% CI: 52.5–76.9) respectively. For the exploratory endpoint of DFS in each arm of the trial, three-year DFS was 63% (95% CI: 46.0–80.4) in the durvalumab monotherapy arm compared to 67% (95% CI: 49.6–83.4) in the dual therapy arm. In addition, we report post hoc exploratory analysis of progression-free survival as well as molecular correlates of response and recurrence through high-plex immunophenotyping of sequentially collected peripheral blood and gene expression profiles from resected tumors in both treatment arms. Together, our results contribute to the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant treatment regimens for NSCLC and identify easily measurable potential biomarkers of response and recurrence.

Treatment of Internal Mammary Nodes is Associated With Improved Overall Survival in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

The role of internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) as a component of regional nodal radiotherapy is a controversial issue in breast radiation oncology with conflicting results presented in recent landmark trials. We thus created a meta-analysis of available data to better ascertain the potential benefit of IMNI. We hypothesize that with the increased power available within a meta-analysis, IMNI will prove to improve overall survival (OS) in breast cancer. Literature search was conducted for prospective studies comparing IMNI to no IMNI. Primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included local recurrence, regional recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer mortality (BCM), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), grade 2+ skin toxicity, cardiac events, and pneumonitis events. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor location (medial/central vs. lateral), and nodal status (pN+ vs. pN0). Fixed-effect model was used if there was no heterogeneity, random-effects model otherwise. Four studies with a total of 5258 patients (IMNI: n=2592; control: n=2666) were included in the study. Pooled results showed IMNI significantly improved OS for all-comers (hazard ratio [HR]=0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.97; P =0.008), as well as subgroups of pN+ with medial/central tumor location (HR=0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.96; P =0.01) and pN+ with lateral tumor location (HR=0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.99; P =0.04). There was no significant difference in OS for subgroups of pN0 and medial/central tumor location. There was no difference in local recurrence, but regional recurrence was significantly improved ( P =0.04). Endpoints of DFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99 P =0.03), BCM (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98, P =0.03), and DMFS (HR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; P =0.02) were all improved with IMNI. Grade 2+ skin toxicity, cardiac events and pneumonitis events were not significantly different between patient in the IMNI and no IMNI groups. Inclusion of IMN irradiation improves OS, DFS, BCM, and DMFS in breast cancer. Largest effect on OS was noted in the subgroup of patients with pN+ and medial/central tumor location.

NOTCH1 and CREBBP co-mutations negatively affect the benefit of adjuvant therapy in completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC: translational research of phase III IMPACT study.

The phase III IMPACT study (UMIN000044738) compared adjuvant gefitinib with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (cis/vin) in completely resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was not met, we searched for molecular predictors of adjuvant gefitinib efficacy. Of 234 patients enrolled in the IMPACT study, 202 patients were analyzed for 409 cancer-related gene mutations and tumor mutation burden using resected lung cancer specimens. Frequent somatic mutations included tumor protein p53 (TP53; 58.4%), CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3; 11.8%), and NOTCH1 (9.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that NOTCH1 co-mutation was a significant poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in the gefitinib group and cAMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) co-mutation for DFS and OS in the cis/vin group. In patients with NOTCH1 co-mutations, gefitinib group had a shorter OS than cis/vin group (Hazard ratio 5.49, 95% CI 1.07-28.00), with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.039). In patients with CREBBP co-mutations, the gefitinib group had a longer DFS than the cis/vin group, with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.058). In completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, NOTCH1 and CREBBP mutations might predict poor outcome in patients treated with gefitinib and cis/vin, respectively.

A randomized trial of consolidation-targeted adjuvant therapy with encorafenib and cetuximab versus usual care for patients with stage II/III BRAF V600E colon cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A022004.

TPS3641 Background: Patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) BRAF V600E mutant high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer have a substantial risk of recurrence despite standard adjuvant therapy. In patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant colorectal cancer, the combination of the RAF inhibitor encorafenib and the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival compared to standard therapy after at least one prior line of therapy. This study will evaluate if this combination improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected BRAF V600E mutant pMMR/microsatellite stable (MSS) high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer after standard adjuvant therapy. Methods: The study has a seamless phase II/III design, enrolling a maximum of 394 patients. BRAF mutation status can be determined locally or submitted for central testing in trial pre-screening. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to usual surveillance versus 6 months of treatment with encorafenib (300mg oral daily) plus cetuximab (500mg/m2 intravenous every 14 days). Stratification factors are adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX versus CAPOX), duration of adjuvant therapy (3 months versus > 3 months), tumor stage (T4N0 versus T1-3N1 versus T4N1/TanyN2), and ctDNA marker status (detectable versus undetectable) at randomization. Adjuvant therapy must be completed at most 8 weeks prior to registration. For the phase II component, in the ctDNA detectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be ctDNA clearance rate at 6 months, and, in the ctDNA undetectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be 6-month ctDNA recurrence-free survival, where events consist of death, recurrence, or ctDNA positivity. The primary endpoint of the phase III component is DFS, and secondary endpoints are overall survival, adverse events, and alternative DFS calculated from the date of primary resection, rather than date of study randomization. Patient reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE) will be collected and analyzed as an exploratory endpoint, and serial blood banking will support future correlative studies. The trial will proceed to the phase III portion if either of the two endpoints in the phase II cohorts is statistically superior in patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab. The phase III study sample size will provide 80% power at a one-sided α of 0.05 to detect an approximately 10% improvement in the three-year DFS rate, assuming 68% in the control arm. Two interim analyses will be performed for DFS endpoint. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Pfizer, Eli Lilly; Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05710406. Clinical trial information: NCT05710406 .

Abstract P4-02-16: Prognostic and Predictive Capacity of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in the MA.20 regional radiotherapy trial

Abstract Background: The benefit of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with low burden metastatic axillary disease was established in MA.20 showing that patients randomized to receive adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) plus RNI experienced a significantly better disease free survival (DFS) and distant disease free survival (DDFS) compared to those who received WBI alone and this advantage was maintained in the hormone receptor negative subgroup. Stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have shown prognostic and predictive value in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancers. To date, clinical importance of immune infiltrates as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the context of benefit from RNI has not been shown. Methods: 1064 full-face hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections and formalin fixed paraffin embedded primary tumor blocks assembled into 16 tissue microarrays (TMAs) in quadruplicates linked with clinical data were accessible from the original 1832 patients in the MA.20 trial for this retrospective-prospective translational study conducted according to the REMARK guidelines. sTILs were assessed on scanned images of H&E sections according to the International Immuno-Oncology Working Group method, and on TMAs by CD8 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a validated assay. Biomarkers were scored by pathologists blinded to the clinical data and analyzed as continuous and categorical variables using prespecified median cutpoints. The median follow-up was 9.5 years. Cox proportional regression modelling was used after adjusting for clinicopathological factors and treatments. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for the primary endpoint of DFS and secondary endpoint of DDFS. Predictive value was assessed by the interaction test between the treatment arm and the biomarkers in the full cohort and an IHC defined non-luminal A subgroup. Results: 1035 cases were evaluable for sTILs on H&E sections. Of these 52.6% (n=544) cases with ≥10% sTILs displayed a significant correlation with age < 50 years, grade III, tumor size >2cm, hormone receptor negative status, and non-luminal A subgroup (p < 0.05). Of the 857 evaluable cases on TMAs, CD8+sTILs (≥16) were observed in 49.8% (n=427) cases and showed a significant association with grade III, ER negativity and non-luminal A status (p < 0.05). For the full cohort, H&E sTILs assessed as a continuous parameter, were not prognostic for DFS (HR 0.993; 95% CI 0.984-1.003; p=0.18) but provided prognostic information for DDFS (HR 0.988; 95% CI 0.977-0.999; p=0.04) in multivariate analyses. H&E sTILs did not show predictive value as a continuous variable. Similarly, using the prespecified cutpoint (≥10%), H&E sTILs were neither prognostic nor predictive. Increasing level of CD8+sTILs was associated with significantly improved DFS (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.983-0.998; p=0.02) and DDFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p=0.002) in multivariate analyses. For the full cohort, CD8+sTILs as a continuous variable, showed a significant improvement in DDFS for patients randomized to WBI and RNI (HR 0.979; 95%CI 0.959-0.999; p(interaction) =0.04) compared to WBI alone and a trend (HR 0.977; 95%CI 0.954-1.001; p(interaction) =0.06) for better outcome was observed for the non-luminal A subgroup. CD8+sTILs at the prespecified cutpoint (≥16) were not prognostic or predictive. Conclusions: Pre-treatment tumoral infiltration with stromal lymphocytes provided positive prognostic information for DFS (CD8+sTILs) and DDFS (H&E sTILs and CD8+sTILs) when examined as a continuous variable but failed to do so at prespecified cutpoints. While CD8+sTILs as a continuous variable predicted benefit from RNI, significant prediction results were not seen for prespecified cutpoint or related biomarker H&E sTIL. These results require further validation. Citation Format: Nazia Riaz, Bingshu Chen, Anita Bane, Dongxia Gao, Elisabeth Stovgaard, Zuzana Kos, Samuel Leung, Elahe Shenasa, Wendy Parulekar, Shelley Chambers, Torsten Nielson, Timothy J. Whelan. Prognostic and Predictive Capacity of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in the MA.20 regional radiotherapy trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-16.

CtDNA to Guide Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Ready for Standard of Care?

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has already shown clinically relevant results in early-stage colon cancer patient management. Its prognostic value is by far much stronger than that of the available clinico-pathological biomarkers, therefore, has the potential to personalize the treatment after radical surgery through intensifying or de-intensifying the adjuvant therapy. Further developments and improvements should be pursued by (a) optimizing ctDNA assays and (b) validating its clinical utility in the different stages of this disease. Two main avenues of ctDNA testing are being pursued: tumor-informed vs tumor-agnostic assays. Two main clinical trial designs are under study: ctDNA-based strategy and ctDNA-by-treatment interaction. The former needs large sample sizes to address the main questions of the studies; thus, the target delta benefit may be the main challenge in these trial designs. The latter may be challenged by unavoidable contamination bias. To date, several clinical trials are ongoing worldwide. We believe that this large number of trials may provide an excellent common database for the demonstration of surrogacy of ctDNA for the classical 3-year disease-free survival endpoint. This would mark a huge methodological improvement to speed up new drug testing and development in the adjuvant treatment of this disease.

Treatment of Internal Mammary Nodes Associated with Improved Overall Survival in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> The role of internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) as a component of regional nodal radiotherapy is a controversial issue in breast radiation oncology with conflicting results presented in recent landmark trials. We thus created a meta-analysis of available data to better ascertain the potential benefit of IMNI. We hypothesize that with the increased power available within a meta-analysis, IMNI will prove to improve overall survival in breast cancer. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Four studies (DBCG-IMN 2015, Hennequin <i>et al</i> 2013, KROG 2022, and Stemmer <i>et al</i> 2003) with a total of 5,258 patients (IMNI = 2698, No IMNI = 2560) were meta-analyzed with a primary end point of overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were disease free survival (DFS), breast cancer mortality (BCM), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for medial/central tumor location, and pN+ versus pN0 status. Fixed-effect model was used if there was no heterogeneity, random-effects model otherwise. <h3>Results</h3> Pooled results showed IMNI significantly improved OS for all comers (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.97, <i>p</i>=0.01), as well as subgroups of pN+ with medial/central tumor location (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94, <i>p</i>=0.005) and pN+ with lateral tumor location (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.745-0.995, <i>p</i>=0.04). There was no significant difference in OS for subgroups of pN0 and medial/central tumor location. Secondary endpoints of DFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, <i>p</i>=0.03), BCM (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, <i>p</i>=0.01), and DMFS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, <i>p</i>=0.04) were all similarly improved with IMNI. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Inclusion of IMNI to regional nodes improves OS in breast cancer, with the strongest effect noted in pN+ patients with medial/central tumor location.

The 2022 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Use of Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

In KEYNOTE-564, adjuvant pembrolizumab, a PD-1 antibody, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in localised clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with a high risk of relapse. In 2021, the European Association of Urology RCC Guidelines Panel issued a weak recommendation for adjuvant pembrolizumab for high-risk ccRCC as defined by the trial until final overall survival data and results from other trials were available. Meanwhile, the primary DFS endpoints were not met for adjuvant atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor; IMmotion010), adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 914), or perioperative nivolumab (PROSPER). Owing to heterogeneity, a meta-analysis is not recommended. Pembrolizumab remains the only immune checkpoint inhibitor currently recommended in this setting. Overall survival data are immature and biomarkers to predict outcome are lacking. Uncertainty exists and overtreatment is occurring. Treatment decisions should be made with caution and with the involvement of each patient. Patient summaryNew results from three trials of immunotherapy after surgery for kidney cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence showed no improvement with these treatments. These results are in contrast to an earlier study that showed that the antibody pembrolizumab did extend the time before kidney cancer recurrence, even though it is not yet clear if overall survival is longer. Thus, we cautiously recommend pembrolizumab as additional treatment in high-risk kidney cancer after surgery, but patient preference should be carefully considered and the risk of overtreatment should be discussed.

LBA4 Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs placebo (PBO) for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy: Results from the randomized, phase III CheckMate 914 trial

CheckMate 914 (NCT03138512) is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, 2-part trial evaluating NIVO+IPI vs PBO (part A) or NIVO monotherapy vs NIVO+IPI vs PBO (part B) in mutually exclusive patients (pts) with localized RCC at high risk of post-nephrectomy relapse. We report the primary analysis for part A of this trial. CheckMate 914 key inclusion criteria: radical or partial nephrectomy with negative surgical margins > 4 and ≤ 12 weeks before randomization; predominant clear cell histology; pathological TNM stage T2a (grade [G] 3 or 4) N0M0, T2b (any G) N0M0, T3 (any G) N0M0, T4 (any G) N0M0, or any T (any G) N1M0; and no clinical/radiological evidence of residual disease or distant metastases. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg Q2W (× 12 doses) + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W (× 4 doses) or equivalent PBO for 24 weeks or until disease recurrence/unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors: TNM stage and type of nephrectomy. Primary endpoint: disease-free survival (DFS) per blinded independent central review; secondary endpoints include overall survival and safety. 816 pts were randomized to NIVO+IPI (n = 405) vs PBO (n = 411). With 37.0 months of median follow-up (range, 15.4–58.0), the primary efficacy endpoint of DFS was not met (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.71–1.19; P = 0.5347). Median DFS was not reached with NIVO+IPI and 50.7 months with PBO; DFS probabilities at 24 months were 76.4% and 74.0%, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) treatment duration was 5.1 (2.8, 5.3) months and 5.1 (5.1, 5.3) months, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 88.9% vs 56.8% of pts treated with NIVO+IPI vs PBO; grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were reported in 28.5% vs 2.0%, respectively. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of NIVO+IPI in 29.0% of pts and of PBO in 1.0% of pts. The CheckMate 914 trial of NIVO+IPI vs PBO in pts with localized RCC at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy did not meet the primary endpoint of DFS. Safety of NIVO+IPI was consistent with its known profile in advanced RCC, although the rate of discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs was higher with adjuvant NIVO+IPI vs PBO in this trial.

414P Long-term follow-up of the randomized trial of the conventional technique versus the no-touch isolation technique for primary tumor resection in patients with colon cancer ( JCOG1006)

The no-touch isolation technique (No Touch) aims to reduce cancer cells from the primary tumor site to the liver and other organs by preceding ligation of blood vessels that feed the primary tumor. We conducted a phase III trial (JCOG1006) to confirm the superiority of No Touch in patients with cT3/T4 colon cancer, with a primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS). The planned primary analysis at 3 years after the last patient-in failed to confirm the superiority of No Touch compared with conventional technique (Conventional). The present study aimed to compare No Touch and Conventional using long-term follow-up data with 6 years after the last patient-in. Eligibility criteria included histologically proven colon cancer; tumor located in the cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid or rectosigmoid colon; clinical T3 or T4, N0-2, M0; patients aged 20-80 years. Patients were randomized preoperatively to either Conventional arm or No Touch arm. Operation was performed by open surgery. Patients with pathological stage III received adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine. Planned sample size was 850 to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.732 in DFS with one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%. A total of 853 patients were randomized (Conventional: 427, No Touch: 426) between January 2011 and November 2015. The 6-year DFS were 70.3% and 69.4% in the Conventional arm and No Touch arm, respectively. The HR was 1.030(95% CI 0.813-1.304); therefore, the superiority of No Touch was not confirmed (p=0.60). The 6-year overall survival (OS), 6-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and 6-year liver-relapse-free survival (LRFS) are shown in the table.Table: 414PConventional (95% CI)No touch (95% CI)HR (95% CI)6-year DFS70.3% (65.7-74.4%)69.4% (64.8-73.6%)1.030 (0.813-1.304)6-year OS89.4% (86.0-92.0%)86.6% (82.9-89.5%)1.276 (0.902-1.807)6-year RFS78.9% (74.7-82.5%)75.0% (70.6-78.8%)1.209 (0.920-1.589)6-year LRFS85.1% (81.2-88.2%)80.2% (76.0-83.8%)1.311 (0.961-1.787) Open table in a new tab Long-term follow-up data did not support superiority of No Touch compared with Conventional in the patents with stage II and III colon cancer.

Survival outcomes in a prospective randomized multicenter Phase III trial comparing patients undergoing anatomical segmentectomy versus standard lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer up to 2 cm

ObjectivesThe oncological equivalence of anatomical segmentectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Primary aim of this study was survival outcomes in combination with improved quality of life after segmentectomy compared with lobectomy in patients with pathological stage Ia NSCLC (up to 2 cm, 7th edition) Materials and MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of segmentectomy to lobectomy in regard to prognosis (trial No. DRKS00004897). Patients were randomized to undergo either segmentectomy or lobectomy and followed up for 5-years survival and tumor recurrence. The 5-year hazard ratio comparing lobectomy with segmentectomy was required to remain above 0.5. ResultsBetween October 2013 and June 2016, 108 patients with verified or suspected NSCLC up to 2 cm diameter were enrolled; 54 were assigned to lobectomy and 54 (1 drop-out) to segmentectomy. In-hospital and 90 days mortality was 0% in both groups. Overall survival at 5 years was 86.52% in the lobectomy compared to 78.21% in the segmentectomy group (HR = 0.61, (95% CI 0.23–1.66), p-value of non-inferiority test, p-ni = 0.687). Disease free survival was 77.29% for the lobectomy and 77.96% for the segmentectomy patients (HR = 1.50, (95% CI 0.60–3.76), p-ni = 0.019). At a median follow-up of 5 years, no differences were noted in either the locoregional or distant recurrent disease in both groups (9.4% vs 7.4%, p-ni = 0.506). ConclusionOverall survival, locoregional and distant recurrences was not significantly difference for patients undergoing either segmentectomy or lobectomy for stage Ia NSCLC. The targeted non-inferiority of segmentectomy to lobectomy could not be proven for primary endpoint overall survival, but was significant for the secondary endpoint of disease free survival.

Adjuvant pembrolizumab for postnephrectomy renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Expanded efficacy analyses from KEYNOTE-564.

4512 Background: The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study (NCT03142334) met its primary end point of disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized RCC who are at increased risk for recurrence. Extended follow-up (30-month median follow-up) continued to support the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab. We describe additional efficacy analyses of time to first subsequent drug treatment or any-cause death (TFST) and time from randomization to progression on next line of therapy or any-cause death (PFS2). Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed clear cell RCC, with intermediate-high or high risk for recurrence (pT2, grade 4 or sarcomatoid, N0, M0; or pT3-4, any grade, N0 M0; or pT any stage, any grade, N+ M0) after nephrectomy, or after nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions (M1 NED), were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV or placebo Q3W for up to 17 cycles (̃1 y). Exploratory analyses of TFST and PFS2 were conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TFST and PFS2. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox regression model. Results: Of 994 patients, 496 were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to placebo. Median time from randomization to the data cutoff date (June 14, 2021) was 30.1 months (range, 20.8-47.5). Overall, 67 patients (13.5%) in the pembrolizumab group and 99 patients (19.9%) in the placebo group received ≥1 line of subsequent anticancer drug therapy. Of patients who received ≥1 line of subsequent drug therapy, most in the pembrolizumab group (90.0% [60/67]) and placebo group (85.9% [85/99]) received a VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy; 23.9% of patients (16/67) in the pembrolizumab group and 59.6% (59/99) in the placebo group received an anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agent. Seventy-seven TFST events were observed in the pembrolizumab group; 110, in the placebo group. Compared with placebo, adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab delayed TFST (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90; medians not reached). A total of 108 PFS2 events were observed, 40 (8.1%; 12 death events and 28 progression events) in the pembrolizumab group and 68 (13.7%; 14 death events and 54 progression events) in the placebo group. PFS2 was also delayed with pembrolizumab compared with placebo (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85; medians not reached). Conclusions: Treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab reduced risk for TFST and PFS2 compared with placebo. Results of this exploratory analyses suggest sustained clinical benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab and support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy as standard of care for patients with localized RCC at increased risk for recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT03142334.

Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for disease-free survival and overall survival in regulatory neoadjuvant trials of early stage breast cancer.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, and...

2O IMpower010: Biomarkers of disease-free survival (DFS) in a phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) vs best supportive care (BSC) after adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB-IIIA NSCLC

IMpower010 met its primary DFS endpoint in PD-L1 TC ≥1% (SP263) stage II-IIIA NSCLC patients (pts) and all stage II-IIIA NSCLC pts (Felip, Lancet 2021). We report exploratory DFS outcomes by additional PD-L1 subgroups and EGFR/ALK status; we also assessed ctDNA status as a potential biomarker in this setting.