Endocrine Therapy For Premenopausal Women Research Articles

Social Characteristics and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer.

Social characteristics, including cohabitation/marital status and socioeconomic position (SEP)-education level, employment status, and income-influence breast cancer prognosis. We investigated the impact of these social characteristics on adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) from treatment initiation to 5 years after diagnosis. We assembled a nationwide, population-based cohort of premenopausal women diagnosed in Denmark with stage I-III, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer during 2002-2011. We ascertained prediagnostic social characteristics from national registries. AET adherence was based on information from the Danish Breast Cancer Group and operationalized as (1) adherence trajectories (from group-based trajectory modeling) and (2) early discontinuation. We computed odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% CI to estimate the association of cohabitation and SEP with AET adherence using multinomial and logistic regression models adjusted according to directed acyclic graphs. Among 4,353 patients, we identified three adherence trajectories-high adherence (57%), slow decline (36%), and rapid decline (6.9%). Compared with cohabiting women, those living alone had higher ORs of slow (1.26 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.46]) or rapid decline (1.66 [95% CI, 1.27 to 2.18]) versus high adherence. The corresponding ORs for women not working versus employed women were 1.22 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.45) and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.38). For early discontinuation (17%), the ORs were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.78) for living alone and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.78) for women not working. Adherence to AET was lower among women living alone or unemployed than cohabiting or employed women, respectively. These women may benefit from support programs to enhance AET adherence.

A phase III trial evaluating addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression + endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) and oncotype recurrence score (RS) ≤25 (OFSET): NRG-BR009.

TPS612 Background: The TAILORx and RxPONDER trials demonstrated that RS identifies many postmenopausal pts with node-neg and node-pos BC and RS ≤25, who do not benefit from addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET). Both trials also showed that certain subsets of premenopausal pts (node-neg/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-neg/RS 21-25, and node-pos/RS ≤25) benefited from adding ACT to ET. Most premenopausal pts in these trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2- BC in the SOFT/TEXT trials, many questioned whether all or part of the observed ACT benefit in the TAILORx/RxPONDER trials may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this question, we developed OFSET, a phase III, multicenter clinical trial comparing OFS+ET v ACT+OFS+ET. Methods: We hypothesize that addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR+/HER2- tumors, and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival, overall survival, distant recurrence-free interval, breast cancer-free interval, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Pts must be node-neg with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS ≤25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 v pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 v ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT+OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Choice is per investigator discretion; tamoxifen is allowed if AI is not tolerated or if OFS is incomplete. Radiotherapy will be administered per investigator discretion per protocol guidelines. The HRQOL substudy will assess differences in severe menopausal symptoms, measured by the FACT ESS-19 score between arms, as well as increased pain severity (PROMIS). Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. Accrual of 3,960 pts is anticipated to be completed in 7 yrs, 7 mos. Per NSABP B-28 and RxPONDER data, 5yr IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on TAILORx data, 5yr IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ~95%. Assuming 56% of pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, and a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET v OFS+ET, with one-sided α of 0.025 and 80% power, will require 380 IBCFS events, expected to occur~11 yrs after study initiation. OFSET was activated Aug 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05879926 .

Abstract PO2-19-02: NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET)

Abstract Background: Identifying pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) has been a major research focus over the past 20 years. Development and clinical application of genomic classifiers such as the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) has contributed to the biologic understanding of BC and has refined pt selection for ACT. The TAILORx and RxPONDER clinical trials demonstrated that RS identifies many postmenopausal pts with node-negative and node-positive BC and RS < 25, who do not benefit from the addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET). However, both trials also showed that certain subsets of premenopausal pts (node-negative/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-negative/RS 21-25, and node-positive/RS < 25) benefited from the addition of ACT to ET. Most premenopausal pts in these two trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC in the SOFT and TEXT trials, many questioned whether all or part of the observed ACT benefit in the TAILORx/RxPONDER trials may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this question, OFSET is a Phase III, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the addition of ACT to OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET alone. Methods: We hypothesize that the addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors, and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Eligible pts must be node-negative with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS < 25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 vs pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 vs ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT followed by OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor per investigator discretion, but tamoxifen is allowed if pts do not tolerate the AI or if OFS is incomplete. Radiation therapy will be administered per investigator discretion according to protocol guidelines. The HRQOL sub-study will assess differences in severe menopausal symptoms, measured by the FACT ESS-19 score, between the arms, as well as increased pain severity (PROMIS) during ACT+OFS+ET compared to OFS+ET. Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. The accrual of 3,960 pts is anticipated to be completed in seven years and seven mos. Based on data from NSABP B-28 and RxPONDER, the 5-year IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on data from TAILORx, the 5-year IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ~95%. Assuming 56% of the pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET, with one-sided alpha of 0.025 and 80% power will require 380 IBCFS events, which are expected to occur ~11 years after study initiation. The OFSET study is expected to be activated in the third quarter of 2023. Current accrual (06-19-2023) is 0/3,960 Support: U10CA180868, U10CA180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067. NCT05879926. Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Gong Tang, Shannon Puhalla, Sandra Swain, Patricia Ganz, N. Lynn Henry, Reena Cecchini, Sonya Reid, Priya Rastogi, Charles Geyer, Julia White, Amy Clark, Tufia Haddad, Gregory Vidal, Norman Wolmark. NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-02.

Abstract PO1-01-12: A retrospective cohort study on the effect of adding adjuvant ovarian function suppression to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with T1-T2 tumor hormone-positive breast cancer on survival and disease recurrence

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer in women and is the leading cause of cancer death. Young women diagnosed with breast cancer are at higher rates of adverse outcomes in terms of survival and recurrence. Hormone sensitive breast cancer is the commonest subtype of breast cancer in this group. To date, the standard adjuvant treatment is endocrine therapy for both pre and post-menopausal women. Recent published studies have recommended adding ovarian function therapy to premenopausal women who are at high risk of recurrence. In this study we evaluated the impact of adding adjuvant ovarian function suppression for premenopausal women with small (T1 and T2) hormone receptor positive node negative breast cancer who did not receive any form of chemotherapy on overall survival and disease-free recurrence. Methods: We performed a retrospective study where we evaluated the electronic medical records of 4431 premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer in Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea. All the analyzed patients were operated from the period of January 2006 till December 2019. The inclusion criteria were age of 55 and below, T1 and T2 tumors with N0 disease who received selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM - Tamoxifen) and didn’t receive neo or adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared patients who received SERM (Tam Only) only to patients who received SERM and ovarian function suppression (Tam + OFS) medications. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was mortality and disease-free survival (DFS). We used chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. The p-value was set as p< 0.05 as statistically significant. Kaplan Meier curve and log rank test were used to analyze the data for overall survival, disease-free survival and mortality. We performed an additional subgroup analysis adjusted to age, tumor size, Ki67%, progesterone receptor, HER2 status and type of operation. Results: There was equal distribution of cases between tamoxifen only group and tamoxifen + OFS group (2121 versus 2310 respectively). The median age in each group was 45 years of age. Tumor size of ≤0.5cm was the commonest in the tamoxifen only group whereas tamoxifen + OFS group had majority of cases with tumor size of 1 - 2cm. Both groups had a Ki-67% of 10-20%. Histologic grade of 2 and nuclear grade of 2 were most commonly representative in the comparing groups. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most common histological subtype (93-94%) and invasive lobular carcinoma accounted for 5-6% of cases. Regarding immunohistochemistry results, 91-93% of patients were progesterone receptor positive and 68-73% were HER2 negative. The majority underwent breast conserving surgery compared to mastectomy. We have also looked at the pattern of prescribing OFS treatment in the Tamoxifen + OFS group regarding the length of treatment. Nearly 80% of patients received OFS treatment for a period of 1-2 years whereas only 5.2% received < 1 year and 1.8% >2years. After adjusting to age, tumor size, Ki67%, PR receptor and HER2 status, the result was only significant for higher risk of DFS in the TAM + OFS group in Ki67 < 20%. The OFS+TAM had more DFS and mortality events compared to TAM only group. However, the only significant result was the overall survival favoring tamoxifen only group with a p-value of 0.039 and HR of 1.05-7.99. Conclusion: Adding ovarian function suppression to tamoxifen in premenopausal hormone positive node negative T1-T2 tumors didn’t show any benefit in terms of disease-free interval and overall survival. Further studies are advised to assess the benefit of adding ovarian function suppression to this group of patients Table 1: baseline characteristics of Table 2: Disease Free Survival Subgroup Analysis Citation Format: Sarah Al Safi, Hee Jeong Kim, Seonok Kim, Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Il-Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Byung Ho Son. A retrospective cohort study on the effect of adding adjuvant ovarian function suppression to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with T1-T2 tumor hormone-positive breast cancer on survival and disease recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-12.

Abstract ED01-01: Optimizing endocrine therapy in premenopausal women

Abstract Premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer are candidates for adjuvant endocrine therapy and have several treatment options. The clinical team should assess an individual woman’s risk of recurrence, estimate benefits from specific endocrine manipulations, and consider co-morbidities, adverse event profile and host factors. Risk stratification strategies including clinic-pathologic features, genomic assays and composite scores can guide recommendations regarding type and duration of endocrine therapy, in particular in node-negative disease. Adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 to 10 years significantly reduces breast cancer recurrence and death. Premenopausal women who are at high risk of recurrence benefit from ovarian function suppression (OFS) with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years. Those include women with high-risk clinico-pathological features and younger age, and for whom chemotherapy is commonly recommended. There are currently no available data regarding the use of extended OFS beyond 5 years. Newer data support the addition of CDK 4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in women with high-risk disease. Endocrine therpay is associated with frequent bothersome and few significant side effects that can negatively impact quality of life and adherence to treatment. Clinicians must carefully weigh the benefits associated with specific endocrine therapies, and possible short- and long-term side effects to individualize therapy, and to consider interventions to enhance adherence. Citation Format: V. Stearns. Optimizing endocrine therapy in premenopausal women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr ED01-01.

Survival Outcomes in Premenopausal Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

The disparate prognostic implications between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) have been demonstrated. However, information on premenopausal patients remains insufficient. To examine long-term survival outcomes of ILC and IDC in premenopausal patients using national databases. This cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR), and Asan Medical Center Research (AMCR) databases to identify premenopausal patients with stage I to III ILC or IDC between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2015. The median follow-up time was 90 (IQR, 40-151) months in the SEER database, 94 (IQR, 65-131) months in the KBCR database, and 120 (IQR, 86-164) months in the AMCR database. Data were analyzed from January 1 to May 31, 2023. The primary outcome was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), which was analyzed according to histological type, and the annual hazard rate was evaluated. Survival rates were analyzed using a log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-varying coefficients. Multivariable analysis was performed by adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment factors. A total of 225 938 women diagnosed with IDC or ILC and younger than 50 years were identified. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 42.7 (5.3) years in the SEER database, 41.8 (5.5) years in the KBCR database, and 41.8 (5.5) years in the AMCR database. In terms of race (available for the SEER database only), 12.4% of patients were Black, 76.1% were White, 11.0% were of other race (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander), and 0.5% were of unknown race). Patients with ILC had better BCSS in the first 10 years after diagnosis than those with IDC (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.78] in the SEER database, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.91-1.58] in the KBCR database, and 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86] in the AMCR database), although BCSS was worse after year 10 (HRs, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.59-2.02] in the SEER database, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.32-5.88] in the KBCR database, and 2.23 [95% CI, 1.04-4.79] in the AMCR database). Similar trends were observed for hormone receptor-positive tumors (HRs, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.37-1.75] in the SEER database, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.10] in the KBCR database, and 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98-4.60] in the AMCR database). Considering the annual hazard model of BCSS, IDC events tended to decline steadily after peaking 5 years before diagnosis. However, the annual peak event of BCSS was observed 5 years after diagnosis for ILC, which subsequently remained constant. These findings suggest that premenopausal women with ILC have worse BCSS estimates than those with IDC, which can be attributed to a higher late recurrence rate of ILC than that of IDC. Histological subtypes should be considered when determining the type and duration of endocrine therapy in premenopausal women.

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Risk Stratification in a Real-World Setting

BackgroundOvarian function suppression (OFS) and hormone therapy (HT) represent an adjuvant option in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer (HR+EBC). The SOFT-TEXT trials showed improved outcomes upon receiving aromatase inhibitors (AIs)/OFS. MethodsIn order to estimate the magnitude of absolute improvements, we conducted a retrospective study applying composite risk (CR) to 237 premenopausal HR+EBC patients. ResultsOverall, 119 of these received tamoxifen (T)/OFS and 118 received AIs/OFS. The median age was 45 years (ys). After a median follow up of 65 months, recurrence was 6.7% in T patients and 10.2% in AI ones. CR (cutoff: 2.67) and ET duration (five-year cutoff) was found to have a significant impact on DFS. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) at 5 ys amounted to 82.9% for a CR>2.67 and 95% with CR</=2.67 (p 0.0046). Five-year IDFS was 98.3% in patients who had completed 5-year HT compared to 54.6% of those who had stopped before 5 years (P < .0001). Excluding patients who had discontinued therapy due to disease relapse, IDFS difference at 5 years remained statistically significant (p=0.03) between the two groups, with an iDFS rate of 86.5% at 5 years in the second group. Adverse events of different grades were reported in 116 and 112 patients in the T/OFS group and the AIs/OFS, respectively. Early discontinuation due to toxicity was 3.8%. Seven patients (19.4%) discontinued therapy due to pregnancy desire (6 in the T group, 1 in the AI one); of these, one patient relapsed. ConclusionIn a real-world setting, treatment options for premenopausal patients who are candidates for HT and OFS should take risk status into account. Therefore, every effort should be made to maintain patient adherence to treatment in order to manage toxicities and improve outcomes.

Real-world impact of TAILORx on chemotherapy use and SOFT/TEXT on ovarian function suppression uptake in a population based-cohort of women 40 years and under with HR-positive, HER2-negative, axillary lymph node negative breast cancer.

534 Background: Gene expression profiling (GEP) testing is prognostic for distant recurrence risk in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-), axillary lymph node negative (LN-) breast cancer (BC). The TAILORx trial generated prospective evidence demonstrating the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) is also predictive of chemotherapy (CT) benefit. The literature suggests that GEP testing reduces adjuvant CT prescription and is cost-effective. In the same era, the SOFT/TEXT trials demonstrated disease-free survival benefit for the addition of ovarian function suppression (OFS) to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women. Real-world uptake and impact of these advances in the management of HR+, HER2-, LN- BC in young women may be limited due to complex reasons. This retrospective study evaluated GEP and CT use post TAILORx and OFS use post SOFT/TEXT in women 40 years old or younger diagnosed with HR+, HER2-, LN BC from 2011 to 2020 in Alberta, Canada. Methods: Clinical variables were retrieved from the Alberta Health Services Cancer Care Breast Data Mart and through review of the electronic medical record. GEP testing and CT use were compared between 3 cohorts of women defined by diagnosis: pre RS funding/pre TAILORx (before April 2014), post RS funding/pre TAILORx (April 2014-May 2018), post TAILORx (June 2018 and beyond). OFS use was compared between 2 cohorts of women defined by diagnosis pre- and post SOFT/TEXT (May 2015). In subgroup analyses, we compared CT use by GEP status and RS category and OFS use by CT status. Results: Among the 291 women identified, GEP testing increased by 37% post GEP funding (pre 2% vs. post 39%; P = &lt; .0001) and by additional 15% post TAILORx (pre 39% vs. post 54%; P &lt; .0001) whereas overall CT use declined by 15% post GEP funding (pre 85% vs. post 70%; P = .01) and by additional 16% post TAILORx (pre 70% vs. post 54%; P = .01). Although not significant, OFS use increased by 8% post SOFT/TEXT (pre 13% vs. post 21%; P = .08). In subgroup analyses, post TAILORx was associated with a significant reduction in CT use of 19.5% in non-GEP tested women (pre 85% vs. post 65% P = .01) and non-significant increase in CT use of 6% in RS tested women (pre 40% vs. post 46%; P = .61) mainly driven by high mid range RS 21-25 and lower high range RS 26-30. There was no significant change in OFS use in non-CT treated women post SOFT/TEXT (Pre 5.3% vs. Post 8%, P = .68) whereas OFS use increased by 15% in women treated with CT post SOFT/TEXT (pre 15% vs. post 30%; P = .01). Conclusions: Public GEP funding and TAILORx led to widespread adoption of GEP and real-world decline in CT use in women 40 years of age or younger diagnosed with HR+, HER2-, LN- BC in Alberta. SOFT/TEXT led to real-world incline in OFS use in those treated with CT but adoption remained suboptimal.

A randomized phase 2 non-inferiority trial of (Z)-endoxifen and exemestane + goserelin as neoadjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (EVANGELINE).

TPS633 Background: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) when combined with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor is the standard of care for premenopausal estrogen receptor positive (ER+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) based on SOFT (Francis 2022) and TEXT (Pagani 2022) clinical trials and confirmed in a metanalysis (EBCTCG 2022). However, estrogen deprivation in premenopausal women is associated with significant morbidity and up to 40% of premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC are intolerant of OFS. For these women, tamoxifen monotherapy is the only FDA approved option. Therefore, there is substantial room to improve endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC. (Z)-endoxifen is one of the most active anti-estrogen tamoxifen metabolites, with preclinical data demonstrating superiority to tamoxifen and letrozole in aromatase expressing xenograft models and evidence for antitumor activity in early phase clinical trials in patients with prior progression on endocrine therapy including tamoxifen. In addition to its ability to potently block ERa, (Z)-endoxifen at clinically achievable concentrations inhibits protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1), resulting in downstream AKT inhibition and apoptosis. It is hypothesized that (Z)-endoxifen, when delivered as monotherapy at doses that dually target both ERα and PKCβ1, will potently inhibit BC proliferation while obviating the need for OFS in premenopausal women. If successful, this innovative approach could spare women with endocrine sensitive BC from the side effects of OFS. Methods: To further study (Z)-endoxifen in premenopausal women, a multicenter study in the United States, with possible expansion to other countries was designed (EVANGELINE; NCT05607004). This is a Phase 2, open-label, randomized, neoadjuvant study in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- BC. Subjects are randomized 1:1 to either exemestane plus goserelin or (Z)-endoxifen. The primary objective is to determine whether the endocrine sensitive disease (ESD) rate (defined as Ki-67 ≤ 10% after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy) with (Z)-endoxifen is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin. Subjects will be enrolled with the intent of surgical treatment in the involved breast(s) after completing 6 months of neoadjuvant treatment. Safety, tolerability, response rates and surgical outcomes will be assessed. Disease progression will be monitored throughout study participation. Paired tumor biopsies and blood sampling will allow for a robust biomarker evaluation. Prior to initiating the Treatment Cohort (162 subjects), up to 12 subjects will be enrolled in a pharmacokinetic (PK) Run-in Cohort to identify the optimal dose for the Treatment Cohort. Enrolment in the PK Run-in cohort began in February 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05607004 .

Tamoxifen-Induced Cutaneous Vasculitis—A Rare Case Report with Review of Literature

AbstractTamoxifen is a selective estrogen receptor modulator and forms the mainstay of endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer in both adjuvant and metastatic setting. Common adverse effects are menopausal symptoms with venous thrombosis and endometrial carcinoma being rarer but more sinister complications. Vasculitis is a rarely reported reaction to tamoxifen. We report a case of a 38-year-old woman with locally advanced breast cancer, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant paclitaxel. She was on maintenance tamoxifen and leuprolide for 3 months, when she presented with pruritic bilateral maculopapular rash over all her limbs, legs more than hands. A skin biopsy from the left lower limb confirmed the diagnosis of vasculitis. Tamoxifen was stopped, and patient was switched to letrozole and leuprolide. She was given antihistamines, antibiotics, fusidic acid, vitamin C, and topical steroids. The lesions resolved completely in 1 month after stoppage of tamoxifen. We report this rare side effect of tamoxifen so that oncologists can effectively diagnose and treat this distressing but reversible condition.

Abstract PL2: Plenary Lecture 2: Premenopausal ER+ Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal ER+breast cancer had a relatively challenging initial pathway. The earliest trials testing adjuvant ovarian ablation in premenopausal breast cancer were hampered by the lack of ability to test for the relevant target, namely the estrogen receptor (ER). Therefore, trials testing adjuvant ovarian ablation and subsequently ovarian suppression with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) were diluted by the inclusion of women with estrogen receptor negative tumors. The subsequent demonstration of the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy, initially with the CMF regimen, diverted some attention away from adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women, notwithstanding the fact that CMF, initially given for 12 months, resulted in permanent ovarian function suppression in many premenopausal women. Use of adjuvant CMF made it even more challenging to discern the added value of ovarian ablation or suppression. Oral adjuvant endocrine therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen became recommended for postmenopausal women, subsequently refined to only those with ER+ breast cancer, but the value of tamoxifen in premenopausal women was initially considered uncertain. Eventually, 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen became a standard recommendation for premenopausal ER+ early breast cancer, although it took some time for evidence to emerge on the value of adding tamoxifen in women who received chemotherapy. The value of extending adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond 5 years was subsequently studied. More recent randomized premenopausal adjuvant endocrine therapy trials have focused of delineating the value of ovarian function suppression (OFS) added to tamoxifen or to an aromatase inhibitor. There are now a range of options for adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal ER+ breast cancer, and identifying the clinical-pathologic features most appropriate for intensification of adjuvant endocrine therapy can assist with optimizing recommendations for an individual patient. Citation Format: Carlos Arteaga, Prudence Francis. Plenary Lecture 2: Premenopausal ER+ Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PL2.

Abstract OT3-32-01: OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where &amp;gt;50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population. Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) &amp;gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG. Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is &amp;lt; 1%. Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib. Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk Patient characteristics Citation Format: Robert Stein, Andreas Makris, Iain Macpherson, Luke Hughes-Davies, Andrea Marshall, Georgina Dotchin, David A. Cameron, Belinda E. Kiely, Caroline Wilson, Anne Armstrong, Helena M. Earl, Christopher J. Poole, Janice Tsang, Bjørn Naume, Daniel Rea, Hege Ohnstad, Peter S. Hall, Stuart A. McIntosh, Bethany Shinkins, Christopher McCabe, Adrienne Morgan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A. Dunn. OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-32-01.

189 (PB-102) Poster - Ovarian function suppression in early & locally advanced breast cancer: an audit of practice

Background: Tamoxifen has been considered the mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women diagnosed with early and locally advanced breast cancer for many years. However, a long standing debate over the potential benefit of ovarian function suppression (OFS) has resulted in recently updated national clinical guidelines. Trials investigating the use of OFS plus either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) demonstrated improved disease free survival (DFS) and lower recurrence rates in those having had the combination of OFS and hormone therapy.

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Pre-menopausal Women with Hormone Receptor Positive Early-stage Breast Cancer

Purpose: Randomised trials of ovarian function suppression (OFS), with or without an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen, in pre-menopausal women with hormone positive early-stage breast cancer have shown conflicting results [1–3]. Uncertainty about optimal treatment may lead to variable prescribing in clinical practice.

Exploratory analysis of biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes from the study of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

BackgroundPalbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in Young Pearl, a randomized phase ll trial comparing palbociclib + ET versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This exploratory analysis investigated potential biomarkers of palbociclib plus ET on PFS.Patients and methodsOf 178 patients randomized (92 palbociclib plus ET; 86 capecitabine), we performed targeted sequencing (141 patients) and whole transcriptome sequencing (165 patients) using baseline tumor samples to examine genomic alteration in relation to drug response on PFS. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using unstratified Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsPIK3CA (41%) and TP53 (33%) mutations and CCND1 copy number variation (29%) were found most frequently in targeted sequencing of 141 patients. ESR1 mutations were found only in 3.5% of patients of this population. Luminal type showed better prognosis in palbociclib + ET arm but no impact on PFS difference in capecitabine arm. High TMB, TP53 mutation, PTEN loss of function mutation and RB1 pathway alteration showed worse prognosis in palbociclib plus ET arm. Patients with BRCA2 pathogenic mutations showed worse prognosis regardless of PAM50 subtypes. AURKA mutation/amplification, BRIP1/MYC/RAD51C amplification were significantly associated to the patients with short PFS <6 month.ConclusionOf palbociclib plus ET, luminal type showed better prognosis and BRCA2 pathogenic mutation showed worse prognosis regardless luminal/non-luminal type. Further exploration of molecular variables is warranted to determine and validate biomarkers of efficacy and resistance.

Correlation between work productivity loss and EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 domains from the MONALEESA-7 trial of premenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Background:The phase III MONALEESA-7 trial (NCT02278120) assessed ribociclib + endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET in premenopausal women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). The relationship between work productivity loss (WPL) and domains of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer (BC)-specific module (QLQ-BR23) has not been explored in ABC. In this post hoc analysis (data cutoff, November 30, 2018), we assessed the correlation between the WPL component of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH) questionnaire and EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 domains.Methods:We analyzed EORTC and WPAI:GH data from 329 patients in both treatment arms of MONALEESA-7 who were employed during the trial. Separate univariable mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) regression models were fitted for each domain, with WPL as dependent variable and each EORTC domain score as a single fixed-effect covariate. Linear and quadratic relationships were considered based on the Akaike information criterion. Next, two separate multivariable MMRM regression models were fitted with WPL a dependent variable and all QLQ-C30/BR23 domain scores as fixed-effect covariates. The strength of correlation between WPL and EORTC domains was assessed in terms of minimally important differences for the QLQ-C30/BR23 modules.Results:Our univariable analysis showed that greater WPL was statistically significantly associated with lower levels of overall quality of life (QoL) and other functional domains and with higher levels of all symptomatic domains of the QLQ-C30/BR23 modules. Our multivariable analysis determined that this correlation was primarily driven by changes in QoL; physical, role, social, and future perspective domains; and BC-specific symptomatic domains.Conclusion:This analysis determined the QoL domains that correlate with WPL in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. These results may inform prognostic tools to identify and characterize patients with greater risk for WPL and help design interventional strategies to minimize WPL.

Optimal Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women: A Pragmatic Approach to Unanswered Questions.

Recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among premenopausal women in many higher-income countries. Among premenopausal women, those diagnosed under age 40 years experience inferior long-term outcomes, particularly in the setting of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative disease. In addition to more advanced disease presentation and/or less favorable disease biology, suboptimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) has emerged as an important driver of this age-related disparity. Historically, young women have been excluded from treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), attained low rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea, and exhibited low adherence to ET. Recently, several studies have demonstrated treatment with ovarian function suppression (OFS) during the first 5 years postdiagnosis to be associated with improvements in breast cancer recurrence and mortality, with additional benefits achieved from pairing OFS with an AI. As the first 5 years of ET for premenopausal women has been transformed, extended ET, administered in years 5-10 postdiagnosis, has also become more common. However, the only studies of extending ET in premenopausal women have tested an additional 5 years of tamoxifen following an initial 5 years of tamoxifen and studies of AIs in the second 5 years have been limited to postmenopausal women. Herein, we review available data concerning potential benefits and risks to be considered when counseling premenopausal women on extended ET, including the continuation of OFS. We offer a pragmatic framework to support decision making given the current body of knowledge and call out the need for additional research into this issue.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer: Patient adherence and physician prescribing practices in Mexico

BackgroundIn resource-constrained settings, data regarding breast cancer patients' adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) and physicians’ prescribing practices is limited. This study aims to decrease this knowledge gap in a real-world clinical practice. MethodsPremenopausal women with stage 0-III hormone-sensitive breast cancer and receiving adjuvant ET during the past 1–5 years were identified in three Mexican referral centers. Participants' self-reported ET compliance, clinicopathologic characteristics, ET-related knowledge and beliefs, experienced adverse effects, social support, and patient-physician relationships were evaluated. Physician ET prescribing practices were compared with the gold standard according to international and national guidelines to assess clinicians’ adherence to standard-of-care prescription. ResultsIn total, 95/132 (72%) and 35/132 (27%) participants reported complete and acceptable adherence, respectively. Incomplete adherence was mainly attributed to forgetfulness, adverse effects, and unwillingness to take ET. Being employed/studying (p = 0.042), worrying about long-term ET use (p = 0.031), and experiencing >7 ET-related symptoms (p = 0.018) were associated with incomplete adherence. Guideline-endorsed regimens were prescribed in 84/132 (64%) patients, while the rest should have undergone ovarian function suppression (OFS) but instead received tamoxifen monotherapy. ConclusionsPremenopausal Mexican women self-report remarkably high rates of adequate ET adherence. However, a considerable proportion misses ≥1 doses/month, usually because of forgetfulness. Notably, only 64% receive standard-of-care ET due to suboptimal prescription of OFS. Interventions that remind patients to take their ET, refine physicians’ knowledge on the importance of OFS in high-risk patients, and increase access to OFS could prove pivotal to enhance optimal ET implementation and adherence, which could translate into improved patient outcomes.

Trends in use of ovarian suppression (OS) for premenopausal patients with early-stage hormone positive breast cancer and Intermediate Risk (IR) Oncotype Recurrence Scores (RS) from 2006-2020: A retrospective database analysis.

e12522 Background: Oncotype RS is a 21-gene assay used to predict the risk of recurrence and benefit from chemotherapy in early-stage, hormone positive (HR+), node-negative breast cancer (BC). The TAILORx trial showed that many patients with RS&lt;25 can avoid chemotherapy and the small absolute benefit may be due to chemotherapy-induced menopause in premenopausal patients. The SOFT-TEXT trials found that premenopausal women have higher rates of freedom from recurrence and 8-year survival when receiving OS with endocrine therapy (ET). These studies suggest that premenopausal women with IR RS (16-25) benefit from aggressive ET with OS but trends in OS use have not been adequately studied. We predict that OS use has increased in premenopausal patients over time. Methods: We identified 87 premenopausal patients with early-stage, HR+ BC with IR Oncotype RS (16-25) who were treated with ET between 2006-2020 at our large NYC academic cancer center. The Cochran-Armitage test was used for trends in the proportions of patients receiving OS and chemotherapy over time. The log-rank test was used to compare distributions of recurrence rates between RS groups. Results: Median age was 46 years and median RS was 19. Overall, 23 (26%) patients received chemotherapy and 30 (34%) received OS (via leuprolide, goserelin or surgical oophorectomy) with ET. 55 (63%) received tamoxifen alone, 10 (11%) tamoxifen + OS, and 20 (23%) aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS. Between 2006-2010, 2 (17%) patients received OS and 2 (17%) received chemotherapy compared to 9 (24%) and 12 (32%) between 2011-2015, and 19 (51%) and 9 (24%) between 2016-2020, respectively (Table). There was a significant increasing proportion of patients receiving OS; p=0.0064, but no significant trend in chemotherapy receipt; p=0.8910. There were 8 (9%) patients that recurred, with a borderline significant difference in secondary invasive breast event rates in patients receiving tamoxifen alone (8, 15%) compared to those on tamoxifen + OS or AI + OS (0, 0%), (p=0.0520). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates based on chemotherapy receipt (p=0.1868) or RS group 16-20 vs 21-25 (p= 0.1836). Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in the use of OS with ET in premenopausal women with IR RS in our study population. This study shows how the results of the SOFT-TEXT trial have been adapted into current practice. Future studies are needed to evaluate real-world recurrence rates with the use of increased OS and whether chemotherapy rates have decreased over time.[Table: see text]

First-line Treatment with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Hormone-receptor-positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

BackgroundWe conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis incorporating recent phase III clinical trial (MONALEESA-7) data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib (RIB) as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) from the United States healthcare payer perspective. In addition, because RIB has not been marketed in China, we identified the range of drug costs for which RIB could be considered cost effective from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. Patients and MethodsA Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding RIB to endocrine therapy over a lifetime. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Costs data were obtained from United States and Chinese official websites, and we determined the potential price for RIB in China based on its price in the United States. The main outcomes of this study were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). ResultsThe model projected that mean outcome was better with RIB and endocrine combined (3.83366 QALYs) than with endocrine therapy alone (2.71203 QALYs). In the United States, RIB and endocrine therapy cost an additional $604,960.06, resulting in an ICER of $539,357.95/QALY compared with endocrine monotherapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that, in China, the projected mean outcomes were better for RIB and endocrine therapy (6.37 QALYs) than for endocrine monotherapy (2.71 QALYs). The corresponding incremental costs were $224,731.88943. Thus, the ICER comparing RIB and endocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone represented a $61,454.96/QALY gain. ConclusionAdditional use of RIB is estimated to not be cost effective as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC in the United States. A value-based price for the cost of RIB is less than $31.74/200 mg for China.