Atrial magnetic resonance imaging and endocardial voltage mapping are clinical tools for assessing atrial fibrosis. Both techniques have been reported to predict arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. However, it is not known how the predictive value of these techniques compare. To compare the predictive value of atrial MRI and atrial voltage mapping for predicting arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Consecutive patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation ablation with prior atrial magnetic resonance imaging and high-density voltage mapping were included. Atrial magnetic resonance imaging and voltage maps were quantified using open source software (Cemrgapp, (www.cemrg.com) and OpenEP (www.openep.io), respectively). Clinical follow-up occurred over a median of 574 days using ECG and Holter monitoring. Paired magnetic resonance imaging and voltage mapping was performed in 122 patients. Linear regression demonstrated increasing low voltage area (<0.5mV) was associated with age, CHADS2VASc score and left atrial volume. However, cox proportional hazards assessment showed that atrial LGE (>3.3SD above the blood pool mean) was a significant predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR 1.04, i.e. risk of recurrence increased by 4% for each 1% increase in fibrosis, p = 0.01), where-as low voltage area was not (<0.5mV). Atrial LGE, but not low voltage area was significantly associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. However, low voltage area was closely related to common clinical comorbidities associated with atrial fibrillation.
Read full abstract