Endpoint Of In-hospital Death Research Articles

Effect of Noninvasive Airway Management of Comatose Patients With Acute Poisoning

Tracheal intubation is recommended for coma patients and those with severe brain injury, but its use in patients with decreased levels of consciousness from acute poisoning is uncertain. To determine the effect of intubation withholding vs routine practice on clinical outcomes of comatose patients with acute poisoning and a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9. This was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in 20 emergency departments and 1 intensive care unit (ICU) that included comatose patients with suspected acute poisoning and a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9 in France between May 16, 2021, and April 12, 2023, and followed up until May 12, 2023. Patients were randomized to undergo conservative airway strategy of intubation withholding vs routine practice. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite end point of in-hospital death, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay. Key secondary outcomes included adverse events resulting from intubation as well as pneumonia within 48 hours. Among the 225 included patients (mean age, 33 years; 38% female), 116 were in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with respective proportions of intubations of 16% and 58%. No patients died during the in-hospital stay. There was a significant clinical benefit for the primary end point in the intervention group, with a win ratio of 1.85 (95% CI, 1.33 to 2.58). In the intervention group, there was a lower proportion with any adverse event (6% vs 14.7%; absolute risk difference, 8.6% [95% CI, -16.6% to -0.7%]) compared with the control group, and pneumonia occurred in 8 (6.9%) and 16 (14.7%) patients, respectively (absolute risk difference, -7.8% [95% CI, -15.9% to 0.3%]). Among comatose patients with suspected acute poisoning, a conservative strategy of withholding intubation was associated with a greater clinical benefit for the composite end point of in-hospital death, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04653597.

Association of statin use with outcomes of patients admitted with COVID-19: an analysis of electronic health records using superlearner

ImportanceStatin use prior to hospitalization for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is hypothesized to improve inpatient outcomes including mortality, but prior findings from large observational studies have been inconsistent, due in part to confounding. Recent advances in statistics, including incorporation of machine learning techniques into augmented inverse probability weighting with targeted maximum likelihood estimation, address baseline covariate imbalance while maximizing statistical efficiency.ObjectiveTo estimate the association of antecedent statin use with progression to severe inpatient outcomes among patients admitted for COVD-19.Design, setting and participantsWe retrospectively analyzed electronic health records (EHR) from individuals ≥ 40-years-old who were admitted between March 2020 and September 2022 for ≥ 24 h and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 30 days before to 7 days after admission.ExposureAntecedent statin use—statin prescription ≥ 30 days prior to COVID-19 admission.Main outcomeComposite end point of in-hospital death, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.ResultsOf 15,524 eligible COVID-19 patients, 4412 (20%) were antecedent statin users. Compared with non-users, statin users were older (72.9 (SD: 12.6) versus 65.6 (SD: 14.5) years) and more likely to be male (54% vs. 51%), White (76% vs. 71%), and have ≥ 1 medical comorbidity (99% vs. 86%). Unadjusted analysis demonstrated that a lower proportion of antecedent users experienced the composite outcome (14.8% vs 19.3%), ICU admission (13.9% vs 18.3%), intubation (5.1% vs 8.3%) and inpatient deaths (4.4% vs 5.2%) compared with non-users. Risk differences adjusted for labs and demographics were estimated using augmented inverse probability weighting with targeted maximum likelihood estimation using Super Learner. Statin users still had lower rates of the composite outcome (adjusted risk difference: − 3.4%; 95% CI: − 4.6% to − 2.1%), ICU admissions (− 3.3%; − 4.5% to − 2.1%), and intubation (− 1.9%; − 2.8% to − 1.0%) but comparable inpatient deaths (0.6%; − 1.3% to 0.1%).Conclusions and relevanceAfter controlling for confounding using doubly robust methods, antecedent statin use was associated with minimally lower risk of severe COVID-19-related outcomes, ICU admission and intubation, however, we were not able to corroborate a statin-associated mortality benefit.

The Utility of Handheld Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound inPredicting Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients With COVID-19.

BackgroundStrict isolation precautions limit formal echocardiography use in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Information on the importance of handheld focused ultrasound for cardiac evaluation in these patients is scarce. This study investigated the utility of a handheld echocardiography device in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in diagnosing cardiac pathologies and predicting the composite end point of in-hospital death, mechanical ventilation, shock, and acute decompensated heart failure.MethodsFrom April 28 through July 27, 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 underwent evaluation with the use of handheld ultrasound (Vscan Extend with Dual Probe; GE Healthcare) within 48 hours of admission. The patients were divided into 2 groups: “normal” and “abnormal” echocardiogram, as defined by biventricular systolic dysfunction/enlargement or moderate/severe valvular regurgitation/stenosis.ResultsAmong 102 patients, 26 (25.5%) had abnormal echocardiograms. They were older with more comorbidities and more severe presenting symptoms compared with the group with normal echocardiograms. The prevalences of the composite outcome among low- and high-risk patients (oxygen saturation < 94%) were 3.1% and 27.1%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an abnormal echocardiogram at presentation was independently associated with the composite end point (odds ratio 6.19, 95% confidence interval 1.50-25.57; P = 0.012).ConclusionsAn abnormal echocardiogram in COVID-19 infection settings is associated with a higher burden of medical comorbidities and independently predicts major adverse end points. Handheld focused echocardiography can be used as an important “rule-out” tool among high-risk patients with COVID-19 and should be integrated into their routine admission evaluation. However, its routine use among low-risk patients is not recommended.

Brain natriuretic peptide in acute myocardial infarction: a marker of cardio-renal interaction.

Cardiac and renal functions are major independent predictors of outcomes in both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). As B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) seems to be a major mediator in the cross-talk between heart and kidneys, we aimed at evaluating its capacity to reflect cardiac and renal function in patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. We measured BNP plasma levels at hospital admission in 619 patients with STEMI (n = 346) and NSTEMI (n = 273), grouped according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; > or ≤40%) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; > or ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m). Median BNP values were 82 (38-186), 121 (40-342), 219 (80-685), and 474 (124-1263) pg/ml in patients with normal LVEF and eGFR (n = 347), with LVEF 40% or less and eGFR higher than 60 ml/min/1.73 m (n = 120), with LVEF higher than 40% and eGFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m or less (n = 86), and with combined LVEF and eGFR reductions (n = 66), respectively (P < 0.0001). At general linear model, both LVEF higher than 40% (P < 0.0001) and eGFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m or less (P < 0.0001) independently predicted BNP values. At multivariable analysis, BNP, LVEF 40% or less, and eGFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m or less were found to be independent predictors of the combined end point of in-hospital death, cardiogenic shock, need for renal replacement therapy, or mechanical ventilation (P = 0.003; P < 0.0001; P = 0.01, respectively). BNP plasma levels are closely related to LVEF and eGFR at hospital admission, in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Future studies should investigate whether BNP levels can summarize in a single parameter the prognostic information provided separately by cardiac and renal dysfunction.

Efficacy of an Early Invasive Strategy After Fibrinolysis in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Relative to the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease

BackgroundA strategy of early transfer for coronary angiography and intervention is superior to a standard approach of delayed coronary angiography after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). STEMI patients with lesions in noninfarct-related arteries have a worse prognosis compared with patients with single vessel disease. This study aimed to assess whether the benefits of an early invasive strategy differ in patients with single vessel and multivessel disease. MethodsThe Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) randomized STEMI patients receiving fibrinolysis to a strategy of early transfer and coronary angiography vs a standard approach. In this post hoc analysis, we stratified 992 patients into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of multivessel disease. We compared the 2 groups in terms of baseline characteristics, in-hospital management, and patient outcomes, and tested for treatment heterogeneity. ResultsMultivessel disease was present in 369 (37%) patients. Patients with multivessel disease had a greater rate of the primary composite end point of in-hospital death, recurrence of infarction, recurrent ischemia, shock, or heart failure at 30 days (18.2% vs 10.8%; P < 0.001). An early invasive strategy was efficacious in both groups for the primary outcome. In multivariable analysis adjusting for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, there was no significant treatment heterogeneity (all P interaction > 0.40) for the primary end point, or death/recurrence of infarction at 6 months and 1 year. ConclusionsMultivessel disease is present in a significant proportion of STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis and is associated with worse outcomes. A strategy of early transfer and coronary intervention after fibrinolysis was beneficial regardless of the presence or absence of multivessel disease.

Rapid adoption of drug-eluting stents: Clinical practices and outcomes from the early drug-eluting stent era

We sought to evaluate the early drug-eluting stent (DES) era, characterized by widespread device use. Contemporary clinical practice incorporating more selective DES use can only be assessed by understanding the early DES era. All patients receiving DES during the first 3 waves of the Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) Registry (2004-2006) were evaluated. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization at discharge and death, MI, or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. The composite end point at each time point was compared across waves. Multivariable logistic regression was used for in-hospital outcomes and multivariable Cox regression was used for 1-year end points. Ninety-two percent of EVENT patients received at least one DES. One third of patients were treated for Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) (33.8%), and later waves included lower lesion complexity. Across waves there was more frequent clopidogrel loading, a decrease in heparin and an increase in bivalirudin use (all P < .01). The primary composite end point of in-hospital death, MI or urgent revascularization occurred in 7.2% of patients, and did not differ across waves. Despite remarkably high levels of routine DES usage, the composite end point of death, MI, or TLR at 1 year averaged 13.5% and did not differ across waves. After adjustment, no statistically significant effect of wave on composite bleeding (P = .068) as well as in-hospital TLR (P = .053) was noted. At 1 year, wave was associated with a lower likelihood of TLR in the adjusted model (HR 0.81, P = .03). The high-adoption DES era was associated with favorable outcomes, decreasing bleeding rates and changes in antithrombotic approach.

Anticoagulant Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Received June 2, 2009; accepted November 16, 2009. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most commonly performed invasive therapeutic cardiac procedure and plays an important role in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Since the first description of coronary angioplasty in a human by Gruntzig,1 the technique, equipment, and associated pharmacotherapy have undergone substantial evolution, leading to significant improvements in periprocedural complications.2 In particular, procedural anticoagulant therapy has been the focus of numerous clinical trials, and several options are now available and supported by practice guidelines; each agent has both advantages and disadvantages, and procedural pharmacotherapy continues to be a focus of drug development. The purpose of this review is to summarize the goals of anticoagulant therapy during PCI, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of available agents, and the clinical data surrounding each agent and to identify new agents in development. The goals of pharmacotherapy during PCI are 2-fold: (1) to mitigate the sequelae of iatrogenic plaque rupture from balloon angioplasty or stenting and (2) to reduce the risk of thrombus formation on intravascular PCI equipment. Central to these thrombotic events is thrombin (factor IIa). Iatrogenic damage to the endothelium during PCI leads to increased expression of tissue factor, activation of the coagulation cascade, and formation of activated factor Xa. This ultimately leads to the generation of thrombin, conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin, and thrombus formation.3 In addition to its effects on fibrin, thrombin also directly activates platelets, enhances platelet aggregation, and is proinflammatory.4 Because of its multiple actions in promoting thrombosis, the focus of most anticoagulant agents is thrombin inhibition. Available agents for use include unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH, of which enoxaparin has the largest body of clinical data), the synthetic pentasaccharides (of which fondaparinux has the largest body of clinical data), and the …

Safety and In-Hospital Outcomes of Bivalirudin Use in Dialysis Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Chronic dialysis-dependent patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at a greater risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Bivalirudin has been associated with fewer bleeding complications than unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing PCI in various clinical settings. These studies, however, have systematically excluded patients dependent on chronic dialysis. We sought to assess the safety, bleeding rates, and in-hospital outcomes of bivalirudin use compared to UFH use alone in patients requiring dialysis and undergoing PCI. A retrospective analysis of 396 dialysis-dependent patients undergoing PCI from January 2000 to March 2009 was performed. Patients treated with a dose-adjusted bivalirudin regimen (n = 267) were compared to those treated with UFH alone (n = 129). The primary end point of major bleeding (hematocrit decrease > or = 15%, gastrointestinal or intracerebral bleeding) and the composite end point of in-hospital death, nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization were compared between groups. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups, except for the proportion of men and nonsmokers and body mass index, which were greater in patients treated with bivalirudin. The rate of major bleeding was similar between the bivalirudin and UFH groups (3.4% vs 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.9). The rate of the composite end point (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (1.8% for bivalirudin vs 0.8% for UFH group, p = 0.7). After adjustment, bivalirudin use was not associated with major bleeding (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 4.13, p = 0.7). In conclusion, a dose-adjusted bivalirudin anticoagulation regimen for patients requiring chronic dialysis undergoing PCI seems to be as safe and as effective as UFH use alone. These results do not suggest the superiority of bivalirudin over UFH.

Worsening renal function in children hospitalized with decompensated heart failure: Evidence for a pediatric cardiorenal syndrome?*

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of renal insufficiency in children hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure and whether worsening renal function is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. Prospective observational cohort study. Single-center children's hospital. All pediatric patients from birth to age 21 yrs admitted to our institution with acute decompensated heart failure from October 2003 to October 2005. None. Acute decompensated heart failure was defined as new-onset or acute exacerbation of heart failure signs or symptoms requiring hospitalization and inpatient treatment. We required that heart failure be attributable to ventricular dysfunction only. Worsening renal function was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by > or = 0.3 mg/dL during hospitalization. Sixty-three patients (35 male, 28 female) comprised 73 patient hospitalizations. Median age at admission was 10 yrs (range 0.1-20.3 yrs). Median serum creatinine at admission was 0.6 mg/dL (range 0.2-3.5 mg/dL), and median creatinine clearance was 103 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range 22-431 mL/min/1.73 m2). Serum creatinine increased during 60 of 73 (82%) patient hospitalizations (median increase 0.2 mg/dL, range 0.1-2.7 mg/dL), and worsening renal function occurred in 35 of 73 (48%) patient hospitalizations. Clinical variables associated with worsening renal function included admission serum creatinine (p = .009) and blood urea nitrogen (p = .04) and, during hospitalization, continuous infusions of dopamine (p = .028) or nesiritide (p = .007). Worsening renal function was independently associated with the combined end point of in-hospital death or need for mechanical circulatory support (adjusted odds ratio 10.2; 95% confidence interval 1.7-61.2, p = .011). Worsening renal function was also associated with longer observed length of stay (33 +/- 30 days vs. 18 +/- 25 days, p < .03). These data suggest that an important cardiorenal interaction occurs in children hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. Renal function commonly worsens in such patients and is associated with prolonged hospitalization and in-hospital death or the need for mechanical circulatory assistance.

Abstract 3049: Clinical Outcomes after Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients on Clopidogrel: Are the Risks Tangible or Anecdotal?

PURPOSE : Clopidogrel is indicated in acute and chronic coronary syndromes and often administered prior to angiography. These patients are often sent subsequently for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, where potential increase in bleeding risk must be balanced with risk of ongoing ischemia if CABG delayed. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that patients undergoing urgent CABG who received clopidogrel, versus those who did not, have worse bleeding outcomes and early mortality. METHODS : We reviewed 451 consecutive patients (04/2005–12/2006) who underwent urgent CABG at our institution: 262 never received clopidogrel pre-CABG, 189 received clopidogrel &lt;5 days prior. The latter all received intraoperative antifibrinolytics. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death, massive transfusion (&gt;10U PRBC) or massive blood loss (&gt;2L chest-tube loss/24 hrs). RESULTS : Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. Prior MI (71% vs 46%), NYHA class 3– 4 (94% vs 81%) and prior PCI (22% vs 13%) were higher in the clopidogrel group (p&lt;0.05). Cross-clamp time was statistically higher in the clopidogrel group (97±30 vs 90±28 min, p=0.02); cardiopulmonary bypass and total operative times were similar. There was no difference in the primary endpoint of in-hospital death or massive bleeding indices (clopidogrel: 7% vs no clopidogrel: 6%, p=0.9). Death, bleeding indices, renal failure, post-op MI and stroke, were no different even after adjusting for the date of stopping clopidogrel pre-CABG. Chart audit showed bleeding as a significant contributor to cause of deaths, was no different in either cohort. After multivariable regression analysis, clopidogrel or the duration it was stopped pre-CABG, were not predictors of outcomes (death, MI, stroke or chest reopening for bleeding). Significant independent predictors of the primary endpoint included pre-op renal dysfunction, peripheral vascular disease and pre-op hemoglobin. CONCLUSION : Clopidogrel, or the time it was stopped prior to CABG, was not a risk factor for in-hospital death, massive bleeding, or other poor early outcomes in patients undergoing urgent CABG. Practice measures such as the use of antifibrinolytic agents may ameliorate the adverse effects of clopidogrel.

Clinical Benefit of Enoxaparin in Patients With High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST Elevations in Clinical Practice

In randomized clinical trials, low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin has been shown to decrease ischemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) without ST elevations who are treated conservatively. Enoxaparin has been shown to be equally effective as unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with an early invasive approach. Little is known about the use and efficacy of enoxaparin in unselected patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs in clinical practice. In a retrospective analysis of the prospective ACOS registry, we compared the outcome of patients who were >60 years of age with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina with ST-segment changes who were treated with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. In total, 4,806 patients (55%) with non-ST-elevation ACS fulfilled our inclusion criteria for this analysis; 1,178 (25%) were treated with enoxaparin and 3,628 (75%) with unfractionated heparin. There were no differences between groups in baseline characteristics. We observed a significant decrease in the combined end point of death or nonfatal reinfarction with enoxaparin in the entire study group (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.70) and in subgroups treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 1,333, odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.80), coronary artery bypass grafting during the index hospitalization (n = 270, odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 2.42), or conservatively (n = 3,203, odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.81). There was no significant increase in severe bleeding complications with enoxaparin (5.2% vs 4.5%). In conclusion, in clinical practice, in unselected high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs who are treated conservatively or with early percutaneous coronary intervention, early treatment with enoxaparin is associated with a significant decrease in the combined end point of in-hospital death and reinfarction, without a significant increase in severe bleeding complications.

Embolic Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting: Is There a Difference Between Filter and Distal Occlusive Devices?

We sought to compare the efficacy of a filter embolic protection device (F-EPD) and a distal occlusive embolic protection device (DO-EPD) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). The embolic protection device (EPD) may lower the periprocedural rate of cerebral ischemic events during CAS. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the different types of EPD. We analyzed data from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. From July 1996 to July 2003, 1,734 patients were included in the prospective CAS Registry. Of these patients, 729 patients were treated with an EPD, 553 (75.9%) with F-EPD, and 176 (24.1%) with DO-EPD. Patients treated with DO-EPD were more likely to be treated for symptomatic stenosis (64.5% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.011). The carotid lesions in patients treated under DO-EPD seemed to be more complicated, as expressed by a higher proportion of ulcers (p = 0.035), severe calcification (p = 0.039), a longer lesion length (p = 0.025), and a higher pre-interventional grade of stenosis (p < 0.001). The median duration of the CAS intervention was 30 min in the DO-EPD group, compared with 48 min in the filter group (p < 0.001). No differences in clinical events rate between the two groups of protection devices were observed. Multivariate analysis on the occurrence of the combined end point of in-hospital death or stroke found no difference between filter- and DO-EPD (4 of 176 [2.3%] for DO-EPD vs. 10 of 551 [1.8%] for F-EPD; adjusted odds ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 4.44; p = 0.958). Filter EPD is the currently preferred method of EPD in clinical practice. Both F-EPD and DO-EPD seem to be equally effective during CAS.

History of Depression as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Decompensated Heart Failure

To evaluate the prevalence and impact of depression on the risk of in-hospital death or need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients admitted for decompensated heart failure. Observational single-center study. Coronary care unit and cardiac intermediate-care unit of a tertiary referral center. One hundred seventy-one patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure who were included in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Registry (ADHERE). The 34 patients with a history of depression had a higher likelihood of experiencing the combined end point of in-hospital death or CPR compared with the 137 patients without a history of depression (17.7% vs 6.6%, p<0.05). A history of depression (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.01-10.6, p<0.05) was still predictive of in-hospital death or CPR in a multivariate analysis after adjusting for predictors of the combined end point. This study suggests that a history of depression is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality or CPR in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure. Our results require confirmation in larger trials.

Does angina the week before protect against first myocardial infarction in elderly patients?

Mortality rates for coronary artery disease are greater in elderly patients. Although prodromal angina occurring shortly before an acute myocardial infarction (MI) has protective effects against ischemia, this effect has not been well documented in older patients. This study investigated whether angina 1 week before a first MI provides protection in this group of patients. A total of 290 consecutive elderly (>64 years old, n = 143) and adult patients (<65 years old, n = 147) with a first MI were examined to assess the effect of preceding angina on the short- and long-term prognosis. Elderly patients with a history of prodromal angina were less likely than those without angina to experience in-hospital death, heart failure, or the combined end point of in-hospital death and heart failure (6% vs 20.4%, p = 0.02; 10% vs 23.7%, p = 0.07; 14% vs 32.3%, p = 0.01, respectively). Left ventricular function was more frequently depressed (ejection fraction <40%) in elderly patients without (44.8%) than with (26%, p = 0.04) preinfarction angina, and the incidence of arrhythmias (complete heart block and ventricular fibrillation) was greater in the former group (16.1% vs 4%, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the presence of preinfarction angina was an independent predictor of in-hospital death and heart failure in older patients (odds ratio 0.28, p = 0.009). The occurrence of angina 1 week before a first MI may confer protection against in-hospital adverse outcomes, and may preserve left ventricular function in older patients.

Previous Angina Alters In-Hospital Outcome in TIMI 4

Ischemic preconditioning has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in experimental models, but its role in patients remains unclear. Angina before myocardial infarction reflects brief episodes of ischemia and may be a marker of preconditioning. As part of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 study, we performed an analysis on the effect of a history of previous angina on in-hospital outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy were enrolled into the study. Data were collected from case report forms regarding previous history of angina, in-hospital outcome and 6-week follow-up. Two hundred eighteen patients had a history of previous angina at any time before acute myocardial infarction, and 198 patients did not have previous angina. Patients with any previous history of angina were less likely than with those without angina to experience in-hospital death (3% versus 8%) (P = .03), severe congestive heart failure (CHF) or shock (1% versus 7%, P = .006), or the combined end point of in-hospital death, severe CHF, or shock (4% versus 12%, P = .004). Moreover, patients with any history of angina were more likely to have a smaller creatine kinase (CK)-determined infarct size (119 versus 154 CK integrated units; P = .01) and were less likely to have Q waves on their ECG (57% versus 69%; P = .01). In the subset of patients who experienced angina within the 48 hours before infarction (compared with those who did not), there was a trend toward less likely in-hospital death (3% versus 6%; P = .09), a lower incidence of severe CHF or shock (1% versus 6% P = .008), a lower combined end point of death, CHF, or shock (3% versus 10%; P = .006), smaller infarct size assessed by CK (115 versus 151 CK units; P = .03), and a trend toward fewer Q-wave infarcts. However, patients with a history of previous angina did have a trend toward more recurrent ischemic pain. Of importance is that the beneficial in-hospital effects of previous angina were not dependent on angiographically visible coronary collaterals. Previous angina confers a beneficial effect on in-hospital outcome after acute myocardial infarction. The reasons for this benefit are uncertain, but one potential mechanism for this observation may be ischemic preconditioning.