All but two of the seventeen copies of the B text of Piers Plowman make some reference in their rubrics to the so-called Three Lives, Dowel, D ob et, and D ob es t. Although the frequency, distribution, and form of these rubrics differ considerably from copy to copy, their function is often the same: to number the passas consecutively and also to assign each to one of the Do sections, as in 'Passus x^sup us^ de visione et ii^sup us^ de dowel'. But in just two of the passas, B XV and XIX, several copies have headings that specify not one but two of the Do's. Since these are my main concern, I cite them here, with readings in square brackets taken from the marginal notes in L or M written by the original scribe as a guide for subsequent rubrication.1 In Passus XV:L: Passus xv^sup us^ finit dowel et incipit dobetM: Passus X^sup us^ ... de dowel et incipit dobet]Cr: Passus x^sup us^ finit de dowel et incipit dobetW Passus xv^sup us^ etc finit dowel et incipit dobetHm: Passus xv^sup us^ finis de do weel. Incipit hic de do bet.Y: Passus xv^sup us^ finit de do wel et incipit do betC: Passus xv^sup us^ de visione ultimus de do wel et primus de dobettBm: Passus xv^sup us^ de dowel Et incipit primus de dobetBo: Passus xv^sup us^ de dowel Et incipit primus de dobetCot: Passus xv^sup us^ de visione ultimus de do wel et primus de dobettSimilarly in Passus XIX, though in only three manuscripts here:L: Passus xix^sup us^ [et explicit dobet et incipit dob est]W Passus xix^sup us^ et explicit do bet et incipit dobestHm: Passus v^sup us^ et ultimus de do bet. Hic incipit passus i^sup us^ de do best.These 'split rubrics', as I shall call them, were evidently understood by scribes in two different ways. The more obvious way was to understand them, standing as they do between the end of one passus and the beginning of the next, as referring by their explicits to the preceding passus and by their incipits to that which is about to begin. It follows that XV would be devoted entirely to Dobet, on that interpretation, and XIX entirely to Dobest. Accordingly, four of the XV rubrics just cited (C, Bm, Bo, Cot) call that passus 'primus de dobet', to be joined in XVI by Hm ('Passus ii de do bet'). Thereafter Hm, along with Bm, Bo, and Cot (but not C), continues to number the Dobet passas thus, with XVII as third and so on, up to and including XIX, which is therefore called the fifth or last of that section. In Dobest, however, only Hm numbers passas in this way, calling XIX the first in that section and XX the second and last. MS R lacks the whole of Passus XIX and the beginning of XX, but at the end of XX R has 'Passus ii^sup us^ de do best'. Remarkably, L has the same heading (but in its guide only) also at the end of the poem, suggesting perhaps expectation of a further, twentyfirst passus. Agreement between L and R here may imply that this anomalous heading was present in the B archetype.A different interpretation of the split rubrics in XV and XIX is to suppose that these passas contain only parts of the two Do's specified there and therefore should not be counted in the tally of integral Do passus.2 So the first passus of Dobet would be XVI, and XX the first of Dobest. L and W are the only copies that follow this interpretation at all points. Thus, in them: XV 'Dowel ends and Dobet begins', XVI 'first of Dobet', XVII 'second of Dobet', XVIII 'third of Dobet', XIX 'Dobet ends and Dobest begins', XX 'first of Dobest'. Other copies, however, lend partial support to this scheme. Cr calls XVI 'primus de dobet', as does M in its marginal guide - though neither continues that numbering thereafter. In XX no fewer than eight copies agree with L and W in calling that passus 'primus de dobest': Cr, G, Y, C 2, C, Bm, Bo, and Cot. By excluding XV and XIX from its counts of Do passus, the LW scheme may be taken to imply that in each the new Do incepts only at some point within the passus, following the conclusion there of the old one. …
Read full abstract