Two rhododendron cultivars, ‘Pohjola's Daughter’ and ‘Helsinki University’, were grown at +15 and +24°C, each combined with a photoperiod of 14 h (short day, SD) or 20 h (long day, LD). After a 112‐day growing season, they were subjected to a hardening regime of fortnightly decreasing temperature (+9, +5, +1 and −2°C) and a 12‐h photoperiod, except that part of the plants grown in LD had LD also at +9 and +5°C. At −2°C, all plants were in darkness. Controlled freezing tests of the leaves were performed before each change in temperature. The injury was evaluated visually and by electrolyte leakage (EL) tests. The observations on the visual assessment were analysed with logit models, and the EL data with non‐linear sigmoid functions. The visually scored 50% damage (VD50) correlated better with the EL tests than 10 or 90% damage. Photoperiod and temperature during the growing season affected the cold hardiness of both cultivars, but they differed in their responses. ‘Pohjola's Daughter’ benefited from SD as well as from high temperature, while ‘Helsinki University’ attained better hardiness at a cool growing season temperature and was less sensitive to photoperiod.
Read full abstract