President Carter is being approached this month by a committee that includes Frank Press and OMB officials whose purpose it is to obtain support for further development of the huge energy‐yielding solar electric propulsion engine (SEP) so that this country can continue its plans for space exploration. The accompanying Figure 1 tells the story. The solid lines show the injected mass versus the available energy of the current IUS (inertial upper stage) engine to be used with shuttle. Only the ‘low‐energy’ missions can be accomplished, even with the most efficient combination of shuttle and IUS (the four‐stage IUS curve), but the major space objectives, including cometary missions and missions to the planets and asteroids, will require more energy than is available from conventional rockets. An article in a recent issue of Aviation Week states that OMB has, on its own, decided to withdraw funding of SEP (sometimes called the ‘ion engine’) development, a move that could greatly hinder further space exploration in the next decade. Unfortunately, the lead time required for these difficult and complicated missions ranges from years to a decade or more, and short‐sighted budgeting could cause the U.S. to lose its advantageous lead in space.
Read full abstract