Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score Research Articles

Retear rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year after repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears augmented with a bioinductive collagen implant: a prospective multicenter study.

BackgroundBiologic technologies can potentially augment existing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to improve retear rates and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healing rates and clinical outcomes of full-thickness rotator cuff repairs augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant.MethodsIn this prospective multicenter study, investigators enrolled 115 patients (mean age, 60.4 years) with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There were 66 (57.4%) medium (1-3 cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) large (3-5 cm) tears. Eligible patients consisted of those ≥21 years of age with chronic shoulder pain lasting longer than 3 months and unresponsive to conservative therapy. Patients underwent single- or double-row repair augmented with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. At the baseline, 3 months, and 1 year, magnetic resonance imaging was performed and patients were assessed for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The primary failure end point was retear, classified as any new full-thickness defect observed on magnetic resonance imaging.ResultsThere were 13 retears (11.3%) at 3 months, with an additional 6 (19 total [16.5%]) found at 1 year. In large tears, double-row repair had a significantly lower rate of retear at 3 months (P = .0004) and 1 year (P = .0001) compared with single-row repair. ASES and CMS scores significantly improved between the baseline and 1 year for medium and large tears. At 1 year, the minimally clinically important difference for ASES and CMS was met by 91.7% (95% CI: 84.9-96.1) and 86.4% (95% CI: 78.2-92.4) of patients, respectively. Patients without retear and those <65 years of age had significantly better CMS scores at 1 year when compared with those with retear and those ≥65 years (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes based on treatment of the biceps tendon. Of 9 reported reoperations in the operative shoulder, only 2 were considered potentially related to the collagen implant.ConclusionInterim results from this prospective study indicate a favorable rate of retear relative to the literature and improvement in clinical function at 1 year after adjunctive treatment with the study implant augmenting standard arthroscopic repair techniques.

Clinical effect of using MultiLoc® nails to treat four-part proximal humeral fractures.

ObjectiveThis study was performed to evaluate the clinical effect of MultiLoc® nails (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) on the treatment of four-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs).MethodsFrom January 2014 to January 2018, 32 patients with four-part PHFs were treated with intramedullary MultiLoc® nails in our hospital. The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative X-ray findings, and fracture healing status were recorded and analyzed. At the end of follow-up, the clinical outcome was evaluated based on the visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant–Murley score (CMS), and occurrence of any complications.ResultsAmong all patients, the average operation time was 124.5 minutes (range, 91–152 minutes), the average amount of bleeding was 90 mL (range, 55–150 mL), and the fracture healing rate was 100%. At the end of follow-up, the mean VAS score was 1.6 ± 0.4, mean ASES score was 84.4 ± 6.3, and mean CMS was 70.3 ± 6.1; no serious complications had occurred; and the patients exhibited good recovery of shoulder function.ConclusionsMultiLoc nails® can be applied to the treatment of four-part PHFs. This surgical fixation method has no obvious complications and helps to restore shoulder function.

Direct repair of chronic pectoralis major tears in active duty military patients

ObjectiveTo express the significance and report the clinical outcomes of active duty military patients who underwent direct pectoralis major repairs in a chronic setting. MethodsRetrospective review of data collected on 16 active duty military patients who underwent direct repair of a chronic pectoralis major tear. Pre-operative and post-operative evaluations (minimum 2 year follow up; mean, 53.46 months; range, 24–88 months) included range of motion, Bak classification, visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. ResultsUsing a Bak classification, 94% (15/16) of patients were reported with good or excellent results. Mean VAS score improved from 7.08 ± 1.66 to 0.54 ± 1.20 (p < 0.0001). Mean SANE score improved from 42.31 ± 19.96 to 94.62 ± 5.94 (p < 0.0001). The average Quick DASH score increased from 55.42 ± 15.34 to 7.30 ± 6.39 (p < 0.0001). The average ASES score increased from 48.71 ± 13.80 to 94.62 ± 7.63 (p < 0.0001). There was no loss of motion after surgery in forward flexion, external rotation or internal rotation. The average internal rotation muscle power increased from 4.15 ± 0.48 to 4.92 ± 0.28 (p < 0.0001). Complications6.25% (1/16) patients developed a keloid scar, tender to direct pressure post-operatively. 94% (15/16) of patients returned to their pre-operative level of recreational and military job activity. ConclusionMilitary patients who underwent direct repair of a chronic pectoralis major tear had excellent clinical outcomes, low risk of complications, and a high return to pre-operative level of recreational and military job activity. Level of evidenceCase Series; IV.

Clinical results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a comparison between nonporous stems versus trabecular metal stems.

BackgroundThis study compared the clinical results for nonporous stems vs. trabecular metal (TM) stems used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for comminuted proximal humeral fractures (CPHFs) in elderly patients.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 41 shoulders (39 women) of patients with CPHF aged >70 years who underwent RSA were investigated. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. A total of 15 shoulders were treated with Grammont-style RSA using nonporous stems (the G-RSA group), and 26 shoulders were treated with RSA combining TM stems (the FR-RSA group). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant score, shoulder joint range of motion (ROM), and radiographic findings were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsASES scores and Constant scores were significantly higher in the FR-RSA group than in the G-RSA group. External rotation at the side in the FR-RSA group was significantly higher than that in the G-RSA group. In the FR-RSA and G-RSA groups, the union rates at the greater tuberosity (GT) were 88.5% and 46.7%, respectively, and scapular notching rates were 20% and 7.7%, respectively. Based on a subanalysis, the age was lower, body mass index was higher, and ASES scores, Constant scores, and external rotation ROM were higher in the GT union group than in the GT nonunion group.ConclusionGT bone union rates were high, and external rotation ROM of the shoulder joint were more improved for RSA using TM stems than those for RSA using nonporous stems in elderly patients with CPHF.

How periarticular corticosteroid injections impact the integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

IntroductionMultimodal analgesic (MMA) injections combined with corticosteroids have recently been shown to be effective for managing pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. HypothesisThe goal of this study was to analyze the effects of corticosteroid injections on the integrity of tendon repairs using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis was that MMA injections combined with corticosteroids have no deleterious effects on functional outcomes and tendon healing 1 year after surgical rotator cuff repair. MethodsThis was a prospective, double-blind study of 50 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair who were randomized into two groups. The study group (n=25) received a periarticular injection of a mixture of ropivacaine, morphine and methylprednisolone at the end of the procedure. The control group (n=25) received a placebo injection. The clinical outcomes were the pain level and complications, while the functional outcomes consisted of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The structural integrity of the operated tendons was analyzed on MRI at a mean follow-up of 15.1±1.3 months for the study group and 15.2±1.1 for the control group (p=0.848). ResultsPain on a visual analog scale was significantly reduced in both groups after the surgery. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between groups at the final follow-up visit (p=0.803). Compared to the preoperative values, the CMS, ASES and SST significantly improved in both groups after surgery but were not significantly different between groups at the final assessment (p=0.801, 0.869 and 0.769, respectively). MRI revealed supraspinatus tendon retears in 16% of patients in the study group and 36% in the control group (p=0.107). There were no infections in the study group as of the final assessment. Advanced age (p=0.049), diabetes (p<0.01) and posterior extension of the tear (p=0.039) negatively impact healing. Corticosteroid injection did not negatively impact healing (p=0.197). ConclusionThis study shows that MMA injection combined with corticosteroids does not alter the tendon healing, clinical outcomes, or functional outcomes 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. It remains a safe and effective analgesia method during rotator cuff repair surgery. Level of evidenceII, low-powered placebo-controlled, randomized study.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early Outcomes, Pitfalls, and Challenges.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the early outcomes and risk factors of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsA retrospective study was performed on RA patients who had undergone RSA between January 2016 and January 2018. Preoperative glenohumeral joint damage was evaluated according to two radiographic classification systems. The severity of joint damage was estimated using Larsen's method, while the Levigne‐Franceschi method was used to assess the type of destruction. Further, we recorded intra‐ and postoperative complications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of shoulder pain while shoulder function was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. In addition, patients' subjective outcome and range of shoulder motion were recorded. Radiographs were taken and examined during the follow‐up period. Paired t‐test was used to determine the difference in measurement data between preoperative and the last follow‐up. VAS was analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test.ResultsA total of 14 patients with 14 shoulders were included. All the patients were female with an average age of 60.29 years (range, 49–71 years) at the time of surgery and an average RA disease duration of 24.57 years (range, 5–40 years). Seven of the 14 patients had a history of joint surgery related to RA. Meanwhile, 11 of the 14 shoulders showed glenoid bone defect, and eccentric reaming was performed intraoperatively to avoid base plate malposition. The mean follow‐up period for the 14 patients was 2.76 years (range, 2–4 years). The mean VAS decreased from a value of 5.71 ± 1.10 preoperatively to 1.36 ± 0.61 postoperatively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, the ASES score showed an increase from 33.93 ± 6.89 to 76.67 ± 5.23 (P < 0.001). An increase in active forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction from 85.71° ± 17.61°, 77.14° ± 19.43°, and 17.14° ± 10.97° to 126.43° ± 5.23°, 106.42° ± 11.72°, and 38.57° ± 14.57°, respectively, was observed (P < 0.001). Subjective outcome assessment showed that 13 of the 14 patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the operation, while one patient was uncertain due to co‐existing ipsilateral elbow lesion. Notably, one patient acquired a humeral periprosthetic fracture during the operation. In this study, no major complications such as periprosthetic joint infection and dislocation or implant loosening were observed. Further, no patients underwent revision for any reason at the end of the follow‐up.ConclusionsRSA could achieve good early outcomes without high complication rates in patients with RA. Glenoid bone defects and adjacent joints involvement were common in this patient group, which might increase the risk of surgery and affect postoperative satisfaction.

A Multicenter Retrospective Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Comparing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and the Latarjet Procedure.

Background:Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the Latarjet procedure are surgical techniques commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability. There is no consensus among shoulder surgeons regarding the indications for choosing one over the other.Purpose:To compare the results of the Latarjet procedure with those of ABR for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Data on all patients who were treated surgically for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively collected at 4 medical centers. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. Data were retrieved from medical charts, and patients were interviewed to assess their level of satisfaction (range, 0-100), functional outcomes (using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; the Subjective Shoulder Value; and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score), and quality of life (using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]). Information on return to sports activities and postoperative level of activity compared with that of the preinjury state, complications, reoperations, and recurrent instability were recorded and evaluated.Results:A total of 242 patients were included. The Latarjet procedure was performed in 27 shoulders, and ABR was performed in 215 shoulders. Patients in the ABR group had significantly higher rates of redislocation (18.5%; P = .05) and subluxation (21.4%; P = .43) but a lower rate of self-reported apprehension (43.0%; P = .05) compared with patients in the Latarjet group (3.7%, 14.8%, and 63.0%, respectively). There were 5 patients in the ABR group who underwent reoperation with the Latarjet procedure because of recurrent instability. The functional scores in the Latarjet group were better than those in the ABR group. The SF-12 physical score was significantly better in the Latarjet group than in the ABR group (98.1 vs 93.9, respectively; P = .01). Patient satisfaction and subjective scores were similar in both groups.Conclusion:These results support recently published data on the Latarjet procedure that showed its superiority over ABR in midterm stability (dislocations or subluxations). The contribution of self-reported apprehension to the broad definition of stability is not clear, and apprehension rates were not correlated with satisfaction scores or the recurrence of dislocation or subluxation.

Arthroscopic repair of partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions by conversion to full-thickness tears through a small incision

PurposeTo assess the clinical efficacy of converting partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions to full-thickness tears through a small local incision of the bursal-side supraspinatus tendon followed by repair. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 41 patients with Ellman grade 3 PASTA lesions and an average age of (54.7 ± 11.4) years from March 2013 to July 2017. Patients without regular conservative treatment and concomitant with other shoulder pathologies or previous shoulder surgery were excluded from the study. The tears were confirmed via arthroscopy, and a polydioxanone suture was placed to indicate the position of each tear. A small incision of approximately 6 mm was made using a plasma scalpel on the bursal-side supraspinatus tendon around the positioned suture to convert the partial tear into a full-thickness tear. The torn rotator cuff was sutured through the full thickness using a suture passer after inserting a 4.5-mm double-loaded suture anchor. Data were analyzed using a paired Student’s t-test with statistical significance defined as p <0.05. ResultsAt the final follow-up of 2 years, the pain-free shoulder joint range of motion and visual analog scale score were significantly improved compared to those before surgery (p < 0.001). The postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score was (90.6 ± 6.2), which was significantly higher than the preoperative score of (47.9 ± 8.3) (p < 0.001). The University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale score increased from (14.7 ± 4.1) prior to surgery to (32.6 ± 3.4) points after surgery (p < 0.001). No patient had joint stiffness. ConclusionThis modified tear completion repair, by conversion to full-thickness tears through a small incision, has less damage to the supraspinatus tendon on the side of the bursa compared to traditional tear completion repair in the treatment of PASTA lesions. This surgical method is a simple and effective treatment that can effectively alleviate pain and improve shoulder joint function.

Inlay hemiarthroplasty of the humeral head for nontraumatic osteonecrosis

BackgroundOsteonecrosis of the humeral head often occurs in younger individuals and presents a difficult clinical situation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing inlay hemiarthroplasty for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head. We hypothesized that patients would achieve a meaningful clinical improvement. MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 9 patients undergoing inlay hemiarthroplasty for humeral head osteonecrosis was conducted. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and range of motion measurements were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for any evidence of component loosening or glenoid wear. The primary outcome was achievement of substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ASES. ResultsPostoperatively at a mean of 7.2 years the ASES improved from 35 to 73 (p = 0.011), the SST improved from 2 to 6 (p = 0.038), and the VAS for pain decreased from 7 to 3 (p = 0.009). Forward elevation increased from 96° to 138° (p = 0.012) and external rotation increased from 13° to 63° (p = 0.007). SCB for ASES was seen in 7 out of the 9 patients (78%). Asymptomatic mild or moderate glenoid wear was seen in 4/9 (44%) of patients. One patient (11%) developed symptomatic glenoid wear necessitating conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty. ConclusionInlay hemiarthroplasty offers a viable solution to osteonecrosis of the humeral head.Level of Evidence: Level IV; Treatment Study

Comparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundThe latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular techniques in breast reconstruction. Although numerous studies have not shown functional impairment of the shoulder after surgery, other studies have reported significant functional impairment, especially after extended LD flap reconstruction. The present study compared functional deficit and shoulder movement between extended LD and LD flap reconstruction. Materials and methodsBetween December 2015 and May 2018, this study enrolled 31 patients undergoing LD flap reconstruction. Data on patient demographics, operative details, morbidities, and degree of shoulder movement were collected. Outcomes were compared between the extended LD and LD flap groups. ResultsTwenty-one women and 10 women underwent LD flap and extended LD flap reconstruction, respectively. The median patient age was 43 years. No demographic data differed between groups. Seroma, especially around the back incision, was the most common complication (90.5% in the LD flap and 90% in the extended LD group). Five patients in the LD flap group and one patient in the extended LD flap group showed decreased shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 6 months post-operation. Only one patient in the LD flap group showed impairment based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES). The results did not differ significantly between groups; however, the LD flap group showed faster functional recovery. ConclusionLD flap reconstruction can be performed with a very low impact on shoulder function. We observed a slightly decreased ROM for both LD flap techniques, with no impact on functional outcome.

Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Operative Shoulder Outcomes.

Background:Few studies have investigated the relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and legacy patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements.Purpose:To compare patient-reported outcomes from the PROMIS physical function (PF) and upper extremity (UE) platforms against one another and against legacy PRO measurements to assess the potential strengths and weaknesses of the National Institutes of Health PROMIS initiative and expand on the use of PRO measurements in clinical orthopaedic practice.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All English-language studies published between 2017 and 2019 using PROMIS to evaluate patients for shoulder surgery were analyzed. PROs were compared based on survey administered and the shoulder condition being investigated. Study quality was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score.Results:We included 9 studies (5 studies were level 2; 3 studies were level 3; 1 study was level 4) encompassing a total of 1130 patients (60.2% male; mean age, 52.6 ± 16.5 years; mean BMI, 29.8 ± 2.8 kg/m2). Of these, 6 studies administered the PROMIS PF, and 6 studies administered the PROMIS UE. The strongest correlation was between PROMIS PF computer adaptive test and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Global Health (SF-36 GH) (r = 0.75). The highest overall correlation with the PROMIS UE was found with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score (r = 0.70). The lowest correlations were found between PROMIS PF and the Marx Shoulder Activity Scale (r = 0.08) and the PROMIS UE and the Marx Shoulder Activity Scale (r = 0.18).Conclusion:From available data, the PROMIS PF and PROMIS UE were most closely correlated with outcomes measured by the SF-36 GH. The PROMIS UE alone was most correlated with ASES Shoulder Score. Thus, either PROMIS PF or UE may provide a possible alternative to legacy PRO measurements but with a lower overall number of questions and higher generalizability. Future research should compare the time and question burden of the various PROMIS platforms with a more consistent evaluation of standard PRO measurements.

Effects of arthroscopic pancapsular release for proximal humeral fractures treated with intramedullary nailing: a retrospective study

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures are one of the most common fractures in adults. Some patients treated operatively have restriction in range of motion (ROM) after surgery. This study aimed to evaluate arthroscopic pancapsular release in patients with severe stiffness after treatment with intramedullary nailing for proximal humeral fractures.MethodsThis study included 12 patients (7 women and 5 men) who underwent arthroscopic pancapsular release in the beach-chair position between May 2015 and February 2018. Intraoperative findings were recorded, and ordinary (with scapulothoracic motion) and true (without scapulothoracic motion) glenohumeral ROMs were measured with a goniometer. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Shoulder Rating Scale score of the University of California, Los Angeles scoring system, and Constant score were compared before and after the release. The Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze data.ResultsThe average age of the patients was 65.1 years (standard deviation, 9.5 years), and the mean follow-up period after the release was 30.6 months (standard deviation, 11.7 months). All ROMs on the affected side after surgery were significantly greater than those before surgery in all directions. However, ROMs in forward flexion, lateral elevation, and external rotation with the arm at the side and at 90° of forward flexion on the affected side postoperatively were significantly lower than those on the unaffected side. All scores were significantly greater after surgery than before surgery.ConclusionArthroscopic pancapsular release is effective for patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

All arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation is efficient for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are associated with a high rate of non-union or malunion due to impaired coracoclavicular ligament stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically assisted indirect osteosynthesis for type II distal clavicle fractures using a cortical suture button device. Seventeen patients Neer type II fractures of the distal clavicle were treated surgically using cortical suture button fixation between 2012 and 2017. The clinical and radiological results were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant-Murley score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Anatomic reduction and bone healing were achieved in all patients at the final follow-up. The median age of the patients was 31years (range 19-57). The mean follow-up was 25.9months (range 14-64). The average delay before surgery was 2days (range 1-4). At the final follow-up, the mean ASES, Constant-Murley score and VAS score were 92.6 ± 3.2 (range 84.9-96.6), 96.2 ± 2.4 (range 92-100) and 0.47 ± 0.51 (range 0-1), respectively. All patients were able to resume work as well as sport activities. The postoperative complications included two coracoid process fractures, and none of the patients required additional surgery related to the index procedure. All arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures would provide sufficient stability and union with satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. This arthroscopic fixation technique would be more efficient than other osteosynthesis methods because it is a minimally invasive surgery with a low complication rate. III.

Surgical treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a matched-pair analysis of angular-stable plating vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty

To date, there is a lack of consensus regarding the type of surgical treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in elderly patients, especially between joint preservation and joint replacement techniques. We matched 60 patients (aged 73.2 ± 6.4 years) with complex PHFs in terms of sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, who underwent locking-plate open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (2011-2017). Postoperative range of motion and functional outcome were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant-Murley score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at a mean follow-up of 49 months (ORIF group) and 38 months (RSA group). Complications and unplanned revision surgery were recorded, and all radiographs were analyzed. ORIF resulted in numerically, although not statistically significantly, greater mean shoulder motion vs. RSA. Significantly better outcome was reported for the Oxford Shoulder Score (P = .034) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .026) in the ORIF group, although no significant differences were observed in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Constant-Murley score. The complication rate (30% vs. 10%) and revision rate (20% vs. 3%) were significantly higher in the ORIF group (P = .028), with patients who had complications or required revision having worse functional results. Favorable results are achievable through both angular-stable plating and RSA. Although ORIF may be associated with a superior functional outcome, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference, RSA was linked to significantly fewer complications and revisions.

A qualitative assessment of return to sport following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball players

BackgroundThe rate of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has been increasing at all levels of play. With excellent outcomes, primary UCL reconstruction has allowed many overhead athletes to return to their pre-injury sport. However, the subjective factors influencing this decision to return to sport have yet to be studied. The aim of this study is to understand the factors influencing an athlete's decision to return to pre-injury level of sport after primary UCL reconstruction. MethodsAn experienced interviewer conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews of patients aged 18–35 years who had undergone primary UCL reconstruction by one fellowship-trained, Major League Baseball (MLB) team orthopaedic surgeon. All subjects were throwing athletes prior to injury and had a minimum two-year follow-up without revisions. Qualitative analysis was then performed to derive codes, categories, and themes. Patients were surveyed to assess familiarity with UCL reconstruction as well as to obtain Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Overhead Athlete Shoulder and Elbow score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) highlighting current activity and function levels along with sport participation. ResultsTwenty-two athletes were interviewed to elucidate four predominant themes influencing their return to sport: trust in surgeon and care team, innate drive and optimism, misconceptions regarding post-operative athletic ability, and life priorities. A significant difference was noted between patients that returned and those that did not in the KJOC survey and for the statement that UCL reconstruction surgery would improve throwing ability relative to patients’ peak performance three years prior to the surgery. Athletes who did not return to sport cited lifestyle changes and age as limiting factors. ConclusionPatients' decision to return to their pre-injury level of sport after primary UCL reconstruction was based on trust in their care team's reputation, intrinsic personality traits, anecdotal evidence about post-operative outcomes, and lifestyle. This study emphasizes the importance for health care providers to educate patients toward realistic expectations upon return to sport. On a larger scale, this study illustrates the effects the media and anecdotal experiences of a growing population of players undergoing UCL reconstruction have had on the game of baseball and players' decisions to return to sport. Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Long-term Functional Outcomes of Nonoperatively Treated Highly Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fractures.

Historically, extra-articular scapular body fractures were treated nonsurgically, but displaced fractures of the glenoid neck can lead to dysfunction. Controversy exists regarding which extra-articular scapular fractures should be treated surgically; however, nonsurgical management of severely displaced scapular body fractures can result in satisfactory outcomes. Inclusion criteria for this study were medial or lateral displacement greater than 2 cm, angular deformity between fracture fragments greater than 45°, or glenopolar angle less than 22°. Functional outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were available for all patients. Range of motion (ROM), strength, other injuries, and complications also were recorded. Twelve patients (10 males, 2 females) with a mean age of 45.6 years (range, 29-57 years) underwent follow-up for a mean of 54.1 months (range, 28.2-74.4 months). At latest follow-up, mean DASH score was 8.9 (range, 0-35), mean SF-36 score was 72.2 (range, 57.3-96.1), and mean ASES score was 85.9 (range, 46.7-100). Mean ROM and strength expressed as a percentage of the contralateral side ranged from 88% to 99% and 70% to 93%, respectively. At longest follow-up, 10 patients reported excellent satisfaction with their treatment. There were no radiographic non-unions. One patient with concomitant clavicle and acromion fractures treated surgically had a postoperative infection requiring operative irrigation and debridement. None of the patients required or sought additional treatment. Nonoperative treatment of highly displaced scapular body fractures resulted in good patient satisfaction, satisfactory long-term functional outcomes, and only minor loss of motion and strength. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):e177-e181.].

Midshaft clavicle fracture following osteosynthesis with a hook plate: a retrospective case analysis.

The clavicle hook plate has been commonly used to treat distal clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations; however, midshaft clavicle fracture at the medial end of the hook plate remains an underestimated complication. We aimed to discover the risk factors for this complication and the influence of these risk factors on patients and to suggest preventive surgical techniques. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 150 patients with acute distal clavicle fractures or acute AC joint dislocations treated by internal fixation with a clavicle hook plate. The patient demographics, the occurrence of midshaft clavicle fracture at the medial end of the hook plate, and functional outcomes were analyzed. The functional outcomes were evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)Shoulder Score and grading of the Constant shoulder score after the hook plate was removed. In total, 17 patients had complicating midshaft clavicle fractures at the medial end of the hook plate. Elderly patients had a higher risk of developing this complication than young patients. The odds ratio was 4.4 (p < 0.05). The average ASES score and grading of Constant score of these patients were 74.1 and 16.3 points, respectively, which were significantly inferior to those of patients without complications (p < 0.001). The incidence of midshaft clavicle fractures following osteosynthesis with a clavicle hook plate was not negligible, especially in elderly patients. This complication may impair shoulder function and quality of life. Awareness of this complication and the risk factors for this complication reminds us to perform such operations with caution.

Arthroscopic partial repair with versus without biodegradable subacromial spacer for patients with massive rotator cuff tears: a case-control study.

To investigate whether arthroscopic partial repair with the additional use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer would be proven better treatmentfor irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) compared to single arthroscopic partial repair. A matched-pairs case-control study of 32 patients suffering from irreparable MRCT who underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with (Group B: 16 patients) or without (Group A: 16 patients) InSpace Balloon (ISB®; Orthospace, Caesarea, Israel) implantation was conducted. For the clinical and functional assessment of the patients, the visual analog scale, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Range of Motion (RoM), and patients' satisfaction were obtained. The two groups were matched in all baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n.s.). All mean final quantitative postoperative clinical and functional scores of group A (partial repair and ISB) and group B (single partial repair), as well as active RoM, were significantly improved (t test) in comparison with the mean preoperative values (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to the two success rate criteria (ASES minimal clinically important difference or MCID > 17, Constant score MCID > 10.4), as well as pain relief and RoM 12months after surgery. Arthroscopic partial repair, either with or without ISB implantation, resulted in significantly improved clinical and functional short-term outcomes for the treatment of MRCT. Patients who were treated with combined partial repair and ISB implantation had a potential propensity toward better functional outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to the single-partial-repair-treated group. However, given that these differences were not significant, we feel that further studies are required to clarify the potential therapeutic value of ISB implantation in the treatment of irreparable MRCT. Level III. German Clinical Trials Register (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). ID number: DRKS00014725. Date of registration: 07/05/2018.

Establishing User Error on the Patient-Reported Component of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score.

Background:The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire developed to facilitate communication among international investigators and to allow comparison of outcomes for patients with shoulder disabilities. Although this PRO measure has been deemed easy to read and understand, patients may make mistakes when completing the questionnaire.Purpose:To evaluate the frequency of potential mistakes made by patients completing the ASES score.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was performed for 600 ASES questionnaires completed by patients upon their first visit to 1 of 2 clinic locations (Australian vs Canadian site). Two categories of potential errors were predefined, and then differences in error rates were compared based on demographics (age, sex, and location). To determine whether these methods were reliable, an independent, third reviewer evaluated a subset of questionnaires separately. The interrater reliability was evaluated through use of the Cohen kappa.Results:The mean patient age was 49.9 years, and 63% of patients were male. The Cohen kappa was high for both evaluation methods used, at 0.831 and 0.918. On average, 17.9% of patients made at least 1 potential mistake, while an additional 10.4% of patients corrected their own mistakes. No differences in total error rate were found based on baseline demographics. Canadians and Australians had similar rates of error.Conclusion:To ensure the accuracy of the ASES score, this questionnaire should be double checked, as potential mistakes are too frequently made. This attentiveness will ensure that the ASES score remains a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to be used for further shoulder research.

Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstruction for Posterior Shoulder Instability Is Successful in Adolescent Athletes.

Posterior shoulder instability is an increasingly common pathology recognized in athletes. Adolescent athletes are especially at risk for this condition due to the widespread participation in numerous sports, including both overhead throwing and collision activities. Little data are available regarding surgical outcomes in these athletes with only a single small case series (N=25) currently published. In total, 68 athletes (82 shoulders) with unidirectional posterior shoulder instability were treated with arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral reconstruction and underwent an evaluation at a mean of 36 months postoperatively. The average age for our cohort was 17.2 years (range, 14 to 19 y), with 66 males (80%) and 16 females (20%). A total of 55 athletes (67%) participated in contact sports and 32 athletes (39%) participated in overhead throwing. Thirty athletes (37%) participated in multiple sports. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes data were retrospectively reviewed, and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, subjective stability score, strength, range of motion, and return-to-play status. Intraoperative findings and methods of fixation were also recorded. Mean ASES score improved from 48.6 to 85.7 (P<0.001) after surgery. There were also significant improvements in stability, pain, and functional scores after surgery. Contact, throwing, and multisport athletes all showed similar scores at preoperative and follow-up timepoints, and no differences were noted between these athlete groups for any patient-reported outcome measure. Female athletes tended to have significantly lower preoperative and postoperative ASES scores, specifically within the pain domain when compared with males. With regard to the method of internal fixation, patients who underwent capsulolabral plications with suture anchors showed a trend toward greater improvement in ASES scores which did not reach statistical significance. Overall, 89% of athletes were able to return to competition, with 71% returning to their preinjury level of play. In total, 8.5% of athletes failed their initial surgical procedure with continued pain or instability that required revision surgery. Arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction is a reliable treatment for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability in an adolescent population, and does well for athletes involved in a variety of sporting activities. Level IV-case series.