In 1982, Judith Allen argued that colonial women’s economic dependence on the male breadwinner was both ‘the precondition for family violence and the reason for its continuation’. Although the economic constraints of coverture were seemingly eroded with the intermittent passage of Married Women’s Property Acts throughout the Australian colonies, women’s economic dependence in marriage was not only maintained, but endorsed. This article historicises economic violence in turn-of-the-century Australia. I connect and compare feminist concerns about women’s economic dependence in marriage expressed in colonial women’s writings to wives’ divorce petitions and the masculine marital behaviours they framed as ‘cruelty’. Significantly, I demonstrate how financial abuse in marriage persisted, and in some cases was exacerbated following the passage of Married Women’s Property Acts, with both colonial women’s fiction and divorce petitions revealing how the economic foundations of marriage continued to render wives vulnerable to desertion, neglect, exploitation, extortion and violence.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
720 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Economic Violence
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
699 Search results
Sort by Recency