SESSION TITLE: Monday Abstract Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/21/2019 02:30 PM - 03:15 PM PURPOSE: Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staging has become standard of care in many centers throughout the world. Sampling starting from contralateral (N3) to ipsilateral (N1) nodes is a well-accepted strategy. Sampling ipsilateral hilar nodes offers an advantage over mediastinoscopy which can be particularly important for non-surgical candidates. However, it is unclear whether sampling of the contralateral hilar nodes with EBUS-TBNA is of any benefit. METHODS: Records from the Cleveland Clinic bronchoscopy registry were reviewed. All patients with a final diagnosis of NSCLC who underwent EBUS staging between January 2016 and December 2017 were selected. All procedures during which contralateral hilar nodes were sampled were included. It is our center’s practice to routinely sample these nodes if at least 5 mm in short axis on EBUS or suspicious for malignancy based on CT, PET-CT or EBUS imaging findings. Individuals who were considered to have M1 (stage 4) disease by any means were excluded. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: 270 patients met inclusion criteria. 145 with a right lung cancer had left hilar lymph node sampling (both stations 10L and 11L in 2, station 10L alone in 1, and the remaining 142 had sampling of station 11L only). 125 patients with a left lung lesion had right hilar sampling (stations 10R, 11s and 11i in 3, stations 10R and 11s in 5, stations 10R and 11i in 2, stations 11s and 11i in 14, station 10R alone in 5, station 11s alone in 89 and 11i alone in 7). Of the 270 patients, 42 had positive contralateral hilar nodes by PET and/or CT and all were sampled. Malignancy was identified on EBUS-TBNA in 6 contralateral hilar lymph nodes (2.2%), of which 4 (9.5%) had positive PET and/or CT. Two (0.9%) of the negative PET and CT turned out to have malignant disease and both were adenocarcinomas. Two of the malignancy findings, however, were not related to the primary contralateral lesion (one synchronous small-cell carcinoma and one small lymphocytic lymphoma). If these latter patients were to be excluded from the NSCLC analysis, the actual prevalence of contralateral hilar disease would be 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study assessing the prevalence of malignancy found on routine contralateral hilar lymph node sampling by EBUS-TBNA. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results may bring into question the actual benefit of sampling such sites, especially among patients in which PET and CT fail to demonstrate any evidence of contralateral hilar malignant involvement. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Francisco Almeida, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Carlos Aravena Leon, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Lucas Rathunde, source=Web Response
Read full abstract