Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma Research Articles

External Pelvic and Vaginal Irradiation versus Vaginal Irradiation Alone as Postoperative Therapy in Women with Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Results of a National Cancer Database Analysis

External Pelvic and Vaginal Irradiation versus Vaginal Irradiation Alone as Postoperative Therapy in Women with Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Results of a National Cancer Database Analysis

Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Does Surgical Approach Impact Survival?

Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Does Surgical Approach Impact Survival?

Early stage uterine serous carcinoma: Does surgical approach impact survival?

Early stage uterine serous carcinoma: Does surgical approach impact survival?

Characterization of precursor lesions in the endometrium and fallopian tube epithelium of early-stage uterine serous carcinoma.

To determine if selected cases of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) arise from tubal rather than endometrial epithelium. Bilateral fallopian tubes from 38 women with pure USC were entirely submitted for histopathologic examination using the protocol Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria (SEE-FIM). Non-neoplastic endometrium was extensively sampled. Immunohistochemistry for p53 was performed on all paraffin blocks of fallopian tube and non-neoplastic endometrium. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) was present in 22 cases (58%). Endometrial p53 foci were identified in 3 patients. There were 11 cases (29%) with fallopian tube involvement; 9 of 11 had tubal wall invasion or lymphatic involvement without serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and were, therefore, classified as metastatic from the endometrium. STIC was identified in 3 patients (8%). There were 3 cases with tubal p53 foci in non-neoplastic epithelium. EIC was present in 58% of patients, further supporting EIC as a precursor lesion to USC. STIC was present in 8%, suggesting that the fallopian tube may in fact represent the primary lesion in a minority of patients with USC. This finding may account for the early multifocal disease distribution observed in these patients.

The Importance of Surgical Staging in Women With Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Experience in a Single Institution Reveals a Survival Benefit

ObjectiveTo assess the appropriate extent of surgical staging in women with clinically early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). MethodsWe conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of all women with USC between 2007 and 2012. Treatment practices, outcomes, and factors affecting survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. ResultsEighty-four patients were identified, 76 of whom were included in the analysis. Preoperative pathology correctly identified USC in 73.3% of cases. Surgical stage distribution was 44.7% stage I, 7.9% stage II, 31.6% stage III, and 15.8% stage IV. Women thought to have early stage disease preoperatively encompassed 84.2% (64) of the cohort. Fifty-two (81.3%) of these women with clinically early stage disease had complete surgical staging. Thirty-four (53.1%) were determined to have surgical stage I, and the remaining 30 (46.9%) had occult advanced stage disease. Median follow-up was 43.2 months. Univariate analysis found a significant increase in progression-free survival and overall survival for women with clinically early stage disease with positive lymphovascular space invasion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively), positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.022 and P = 0.04, respectively), early stage (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively), and elevated serum CA125 at diagnosis (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, early stage (hazard ratio [HR] 9.87; 95% CI 2.79 to 34.92, P < 0.001) and complete surgical staging (HR 2.96; 95% CI 1.05 to 8.37, P = 0.040) were associated with prolonged progression-free survival, while overall survival was not affected by complete surgical staging (HR 1.92; 95% CI 0.64 to 5.76, P = 0.79). ConclusionComplete surgical staging prolongs the progression-free survival of women with clinical early-stage uterine serous cancer. Although this does not extend to overall survival, this enables patients to have an improved quality of life with a longer interval without the burden of disease.

Estrogen receptor expression as a useful clinical prognosticator in early-stage uterine serous carcinoma

Estrogen receptor expression as a useful clinical prognosticator in early-stage uterine serous carcinoma

Recurrence and survival outcomes following adjuvant therapy for early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC).

e16556 Background: The choice of adjuvant therapy for early-stage USC remains controversial. The objective of this study was to estimate the recurrence rates of patients with surgically resected early-stage USC stratified by observation alone or adjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of women with surgically-staged stage IA-II USC followed at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 2000 and December 2011. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. We estimated the cumulative incidence of disease recurrence, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a function of adjuvant therapy received. Adjuvant therapy groups listed in the Table. Results: 80 patients included in study. 58 patients had stage IA, 14 had stage IB, and 8 had stage II disease. Mean age was 66.4 years. Median follow-up for all patients was 4.83 years (range: 0.02 – 18.16). Cumulative incidence of recurrence for the whole group was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.10 – 0.28) which was reached at 3.96 years and remained at this rate until rising to 0.23 (95% CI: 0.12 – 0.36) at 11.12 years. Adjuvant treatment was not significantly associated with decreased risk of recurrence (Table). RFS at 5 years for the whole population was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 – 0.80) and OS at 5 years was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63 – 0.85). Adjuvant treatment was not significantly associated with RFS or OS. In a subset of stage IA patients, 4 of 27 patients in the observation or cuff alone group recurred compared with 1 of 16 patients in the chemotherapy +/- cuff group (HR 0.48, CI: 0.05 – 4.27, p=0.511). Conclusions: In this study, there were no observed differences between observation and adjuvant treatment modalities in recurrence rates or survival outcomes for patients with early-stage USC. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy may reduce risk for recurrence in stage IA patients, but further study is needed. [Table: see text]

Gene Expression Profiles in Stage I Uterine Serous Carcinoma in Comparison to Grade 3 and Grade 1 Stage I Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries. Clinical studies have shown that early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has outcomes similar to early stage high grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G3) than to early stage low grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC-G1). However, little is known about the origin of these different clinical outcomes. This study applied the whole genome expression profiling to explore the expression difference of stage I USC (n = 11) relative to stage I EAC-G3 (n = 11) and stage I EAC-G1 (n = 11), respectively.Methodology/Principal FindingWe found that the expression difference between USC and EAC-G3, as measured by the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), is consistently less than that found between USC and EAC-G1. Pathway enrichment analyses suggested that DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G3 are enriched for genes involved in signaling transduction, while DEGs specific to USC vs. EAC-G1 are enriched for genes involved in cell cycle. Gene expression differences for selected DEGs are confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR with a high validation rate.ConclusionThis data, although preliminary, indicates that stage I USC is genetically similar to stage I EAC-G3 compared to stage I EAC-G1. DEGs identified from this study might provide an insight in to the potential mechanisms that influence the clinical outcome differences between endometrial cancer subtypes. They might also have potential prognostic and therapeutic impacts on patients diagnosed with uterine cancer.