Dual Mobility Cup Research Articles

Total hip arthroplasty with exclusive use of dual-mobility cup after failure of internal fixation in trochanteric fracture

IntroductionFailure of internal fixation in trochanteric fracture (or extracapsular proximal femoral fracture: PFF) is a serious complication often requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). THA after PPF incurs a higher risk of complications than in intracapsular fracture due to frequent impact on local anatomy, notably with risk of implant dislocation. Recent studies demonstrated a protective effect of dual-mobility (DM) cups against instability in these cases but in a population mixing failure of internal fixation in intra- and extracapsular fractures. We therefore conducted a retrospective study focusing on fixation failure in PFF: 1) to assess surgical complications and notably dislocation rate using DM cups, and 2) to analyse the characteristics of the initial fixation and assess conformity with established standards. HypothesisDM cups exert a protective effect in PFF fixation failure at high risk of instability. Materials and methodsA single-centre retrospective study included 40 cases over a 10-year period: 30 women, 10 men; mean age, 77 years [range, 31–91 years]. All THAs used DM cups. Approaches were transgluteal in 24 cases, posterior in 15 and anterolateral in one. Clinical assessment comprised of: pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HSS), and Postel Merle-d’Aubigné score (PMA). The rate of surgical complications (periprosthetic fracture, infection, non-union, dislocation) was assessed and the primary fixation quality was analysed for fracture complexity and conformity to standards. ResultsAt a mean 54 months’ follow-up [range, 24–122 months], the post-THA complications rate was 22% (9/40), although with no cases of implant dislocation. Pre- to postoperative comparison found significant improvements on VAS (7.9±1.6 versus 1.35±1.5, respectively), HHS (20±11.8 versus 78±12.3) and PMA (4.7±2.9 versus 14.6±2.1) (p<0.0001), but non-significant change in Parker-Palmer score (5.5±2 and 4.8±1.9) (p=0.4). Fracture instability rate was 77% and 85% (31 and 34/40) on the AO and Evans-Jensen classifications respectively. Analysis of primary fixation found non-conformity with reduction standards in 68% of cases (27/40): most frequently, cervical screw centering defect (58%, 23/40) and reduction defect (28%, 11/40). The non-conformity rate was 44% (4/9) in AO stable fracture and 74% (23/31) in unstable fracture. ConclusionThe study hypothesis was confirmed, with no dislocations in this high-risk population. This can be attributed to exclusive use of DM cups, which should be systematic in high-risk contexts. The study confirmed the importance of primary fixation quality, although a risk of failure remains, even in stable fractures. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective study.

Cementation of a Dual Mobility Cup Into an Existing Well-Fixed Metal Shell: A Reliable Option to Manage Wear-Related Recurrent Dislocation in Patients With High Surgical Risk

BackgroundDuring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the “double-socket” technique has been proposed as a straightforward solution in order to reduce the overall perioperative morbidity in patients with high surgical risk. However, the option of cementing a dual mobility cup into an existing well-fixed metal shell was sparsely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcome of a “double-socket” technique performed with a cemented dual mobility cup in revision THA for late instability. MethodsTwenty-eight revision THAs (28 patients) were performed for wear-related recurrent dislocation using a “double-socket” technique with a cemented dual mobility cup and retrospectively reviewed. The age at revision averaged 82 years (range 74-93). According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, 12 patients (43%) were ASA II and 16 patients (57%) were ASA III before revision. ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range 2-5), the mean preoperative to postoperative functional outcome improved significantly (P < .01). The mean operative time was 107 minutes (range 75-140). The mean intraoperative bleeding was 200 mL (range 110-420). No postoperative complication, reoperation, or re-revision was reported. Importantly, no dislocation, dissociation of the cemented dual mobility cup construct, or aseptic loosening of the retained metal shell was observed. ConclusionThe “double-socket” technique with a dual mobility cup cemented into an existing well-fixed and well-positioned metal shell ensured a straightforward and blood-sparing revision technique that was efficient to restore stability and provide a secure acetabular construct in frail patients with high surgical risk and/or older than their natural life expectancy.

Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis

BackgroundImpingement is a leading cause for instability resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impingement can be prosthetic, bony, or soft tissue. The purpose of this study is to investigate, using a virtual simulation, whether bony or prosthetic impingement presents first in well-positioned THAs. MethodsTwenty-three patients requiring THA were planned for a ceramic-on-poly cementless construct using dynamic planning software. Cups were orientated at 45° inclination and 25° anteversion when standing. Femoral components and neck lengths were positioned to reproduce native anteversion and match contralateral leg length and offset. The type and location of impingement was then recorded with recreation of anterior and posterior impingement during standard and extreme ranges of motion (ROM). ResultsIn standard ROM, flexion produced both prosthetic and bony impingement and extension resulted in prosthetic impingement in models with lipped liners. In extreme ROM, anterior impingement was 78% bony in 32-mm articulations, and 88% bony in 36-mm articulations. Posterior impingement was 65% prosthetic in 32-mm articulations, and 55% prosthetic in 36-mm articulations. Dual mobility cups showed the greatest risk of posterior prosthetic impingement in hyperextension (74%). ConclusionIn standard ROM, both bony and prosthetic impingement occurred in flexion, while prosthetic impingement occurred in extension in models with lipped liners. In hyperextension, prosthetic impingement was more common than bony impingement, and was exclusively the cause of impingement when a lip was used. In flexion, impingement was primarily bony with the use of a 36-mm head. The risk of posterior prosthetic impingement was greatest with dual mobility cups. Level of Evidence3.

The Lefèvre retentive cup compared with the dual mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision for dislocation.

Limiting the risk of dislocation is one of the main aims of both dual mobility and Lefèvre retentive cups. However, these devices have never been compared. The goal of our study was to compare these devices in total hip arthroplasty revisions for instability. The judgement criterion was non-recurrence of dislocation in a follow-up period of eight years. This retrospective case-control study compared two continuous paired series of total hip arthroplasty revisions for instability. These series included 63 patients and 159 patients with implantation of a Lefèvre retentive cup and a dual mobility cup, respectively. The success rate at eight years (i.e., no recurrence) was 91 ± 0.05% and 95 ± 0.02% in the Lefèvre retentive cup and dual mobility groups, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). It seems that the Lefèvre retentive cup provides comparable outcomes with the dual mobility cup in the total hip arthroplasty revisions for instability, avoiding recurrence in long term.

Hat-Trick: On a Case of Hip Replacement Complicated by Dislocation and Infection and Periprosthetic Fracture

Case Presentation: A 79-year-old man with several general medical comorbidities referred to our orthopaedic Unit with dislocation, infection and periprosthetic fracture of a long-stem hip hemiarthroplasty. Results: A one-stage revision was performed using a dual mobility cup and a standard modular-neck stem, both fixed with antibiotic-loaded cement. Conclusion: Hip replacement is a common treatment for femoral neck fractures in the elderly population with a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients. Local complications can lead to poor outcomes. The simultaneous presence of dislocation, infection and periprosthetic fracture is a challenge of treatment for the surgeon and the frailty of the patients get this scenario even worse. Every attempt must be driven toward a safe and time-preserving “single-shot” procedure.

Utility of CT-based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty for a patient with severe posterior pelvic tilt-case report-

BackgroundHip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemi-arthroplasty is a rare but serious complication. Dislocation may be prevented by appropriate positioning of the cup angle of inclination and anteversion.Case presentationThis report describes a 66-year-old woman who underwent revision THA using a computer tomography (CT)-based navigation system to treat an anterior dislocation after hemi-arthroplasty due to a severe posterior pelvic tilt. At initial presentation, her sagittal pelvic tilt angle, measured as anterior pelvic plane (APP) in the supine position, was 38 degrees posterior to the coronal plane. Owing to the posterior pelvic tilt, revision THA was performed using CT-based navigation, while dual mobility was utilized to reduce the risk of re-dislocation. Postoperatively, her sagittal pelvic tilt angle showed further progression over time, with an APP of 66 degrees posterior to the coronal plane in the standing position 3 years after revision THA. Simulation with the Zed Hip system showed that the risk of implant-to-implant impingement was much higher posteriorly than anteriorly. Gait analysis demonstrated hyperextension of the hip joint while walking, although hip joint function required for daily activity was maintained.ConclusionsPreoperative planning of implant orientation, based on posterior progression of pelvic tilt and accurate placement of components, is important to prevent dislocation in patients with severe posterior pelvic tilt. A dual mobility cup may also improve hip function in these patients.

Comparison of functional outcome of cemented total hip replacement versus cemented dual-mobility cup total hip replacement for the management of displaced femoral neck fractures in the active elderly patients.

Current guidelines recommend treating displaced femoral neck fractures with a total hip replacement in fit and active elderly patients. Dislocation remains the main complication. Dual-mobility cup (DMC) hip replacements maybe a solution to decrease dislocation, with the benefit of increasing stability, achieving better range of motion and functional outcomes. This is a prospective randomised controlled trial which included 62 patients with Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures. The mean age was 67.2 years. 30 males and 32 females were included, randomised and allocated to 2 treatment groups; a cemented DMC replacement group, or a cemented 32-mm head total hip replacement (THR). The posterior approach was used in all patients. Postoperative functional outcome was assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. The mean HHS for the DMC group at 4, 6 and 12 months were higher than mean HHS scores for the THR group (p < 0.001). The range of motion at 1 year was statistically better in the DMC group compared to the THR group (p < 0.001). The DMC showed a statistically better effect on the HRQoL measurements as compared to the THR group. There were no dislocations in both groups. DMC hip replacements provide better functional, patient reported outcomes, and range of motion than the conventional THR. Combined with its stability, DMC replacements are a useful solution in managing femoral neck fractures in active elderly patients.Trial serial number 020841 (IRB Number 00007555).

Letter to the editor on "Asymptomatic intraprosthetic dual mobility cup dislocation with increased metal ion levels".

Letter to the editor on "Asymptomatic intraprosthetic dual mobility cup dislocation with increased metal ion levels".

Use of dual mobility cups in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with prior lumbar spine fusion.

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with prior lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are a high-risk group for instability with reported incidence of dislocation as high as 8.3% using fixed bearing femoral heads. Purpose of this study was to determine risk of post-operative instability in patients undergoing primary THA with a history of prior LSF using dual mobility acetabular cups. This was a multicenter retrospective study with 93 patients undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup with a prior history of instrumented LSF. There were 56 females and 47 males with an average age of 66years (46-87) and average BMI of 30 with mean follow-up of 2.7years (range 12-124months). Surgical approach included posterior (63), direct lateral (15), anterior (11), and direct superior (4). Forty-four percent had one level lumbar fusion, 29% with two levels, and 15% with three or more levels fused. The primary outcome investigated was instability. There were no cases of instability or prosthetic joint infection in this group of patients with prior lumbar spine fusion undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup. There was one intra-operative periprosthetic femur fracture and one case of aseptic acetabular cup loosening. Patients undergoing THA with prior LSF are at increased risk for instability due to loss of normal spinopelvic relationship. The use of dual mobility cups in patients with prior LSF undergoing primary THA appears promising with no cases of instability in this high-risk group of patients.

Response to letter to the editor on "Asymptomatic intraprosthetic dual mobility cup dislocation with increased metal ion levels".

Response to letter to the editor on "Asymptomatic intraprosthetic dual mobility cup dislocation with increased metal ion levels".

Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up

Background and purpose — Elderly patients may benefit from a dislocation low-risk dual-mobility (DM) articulation in total hip arthroplasty, but the best cup fixation method is unknown. We compared cup migration for cemented and cementless DM cups using radiostereometry.Patients and methods — In a patient-blinded randomized trial, 60 patients (33 female) with osteoarthritis were allocated to cemented (n = 30) or cementless (n = 30) Avantage DM cup fixation. Criteria were age above 70 years, and T-score above –4. We investigated cup migration, periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) until 24 months postoperative follow-up.Results — At 24 months mean proximal cup migration was 0.11 mm (95% CI 0.00–0.23) for cemented cups and 0.09 mm (CI –0.09 to 0.28) for cementless cups. However, cementless cups generally migrated more than cemented cups at 12 and 24 months. Cemented cups had no measurable migration from 3 months’ follow-up, while cementless cups had not yet stabilized at 24 months in all rotations. Cementless cups showed statistically significantly more maximum total point motion (MTPM) at 12- and 24-month follow-up compared with cemented cups in patients with low systemic BMD (p = 0.01). Periprosthetic BMD changes did not statisticially significantly correlate to proximal migration in either cup fixation group (p > 0.05). PROMs improved similarly in both groups.Interpretation — Cemented cups were well fixed at 3 months. The cementless cups migrated more in patients with low BMD, showed an inconsistent pattern of migration, and migrated in different directions during the first and second year without tendency to stabilization. Cemented fixation of the Avantage DM cup seems safer in elderly patients

Direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: the "head-first" reduction technique: a technical note and early case series.

Less invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) and dual mobility cup (DMC) are increasingly adopted in practice over the last decade. Their use aims to reduce, as much as possible, soft tissue dissection and dislocation rate. This study aims to present a novel surgical technique to reduce a DMC prosthesis during a DAA easily. A mildly modified version of the direct anterior approach is proposed. When leg lengths, stability, impingement, and tension have been checked, the trial stem is disassembled in situ, dislocated, and removed, leaving the space to exchange the trial double mobility head with the definitive one. When the definitive stem is inserted, the surgeon guides and helps the assistant to match the trunnion in the double mobility head. As soon as the components are matched, the traction is released, and the unit is impacted by an alternation of axial traction and release. Of 164 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (December 2016-May 2017) by a single surgeon, a double mobility cup through DAA and the "head-first" technique was performed in 26 patients (15.8%). The mean operative time was 130min (85-220min; SD 34.28). No significant complications occurred during the mean follow-up of 23.6months. Specific difficulties can be anticipated when pairing dual mobility cup and direct anterior approach. The "head-first" technique is a useful technique in reducing the possible difficulties related to the reduction of double mobility cup through a less invasive direct anterior approach.

Low dislocation rates achieved when using dual mobility cup hip implants for femur neck fractures

Background: Total hip replacements done for intracapsular neck of femur fractures (NOF) have a dislocation rate of up to 14%. This is seven times higher than in total hip arthroplasty (THA) done for osteoarthritis. Using a dual mobility cup (DMC) has been shown to be effective in addressing dislocation in elective THA. Our hypothesis is that the use of DMC in NOF will do the same. This study aims to determine the incidence proportion of dislocation of DMCs one year after surgery in patients who received THA for NOF and to compare it to dislocation rates as documented in existing studies. Methods: A retrospective study was done on 86 patients treated with DMC THA for an intracapsular NOF fracture from 2012 until 2016. A minimum one-year follow-up period was required for inclusion into the study. The number of dislocations at one year after surgery was noted. Results: Forty-one patients with a mean age of 60.7 years were included (26 females and 15 males). All patients were operated via the posterior approach. None of the patients had dislocated after one year. Conclusion: Low dislocation rates can be achieved using DMC THA in the management of intracapsular NOF fractures. Our one-year dislocation rate of 0% compares favourably to conventional THA and is comparable to similar DMC studies done outside of South Africa. Level of evidence: Level 4

Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

More than two decades after their clinical introduction, crosslinked polyethylenes (XLPE) have been widely adopted. Though concerns were initially raised regarding oxidation and brittleness, on a large scale, the first generation of XLPE continues to be highly effective 15 years after the surgery, even in a young and active population. Remelted XLPE might display lower wear rates than annealed XLPE. Second generation XLPEs, not only including sequentially irradiated and annealed but also associated with antioxidants, demonstrate encouraging short- to mid-term results. Registry data support clinical trial reports. Even in less favorable settings (lipped liners, dual mobility cups, revision surgery, hip resurfacing) results are promising. However, failures (fractures) have already been described. Therefore, a high level of surveillance remains crucial.

Dual mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty: tips and tricks.

Since its creation in 1974, the Dual Mobility Cup (DMC) has been gaining in popularity, especially in the past decade. This intensive use could lead to inappropriate use and consequently to an increased complication rate. Compliance with conceptual requirements and surgical techniques will prevent the occurrence of complications that can be wrongly attributed to implants. In this context, we feel that it is essential to share our tips and tricks as well as an overview and an explanation of common errors, based on more than 45 years of clinical and research experience. From basic principles, including indications, implant choice and implant compatibility, to surgical tips, in this article orthopedic surgeons will find a practical overview of DMC in order to use it safely and with confidence.

Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgeries in orthopedics. However, postoperative dislocation is one of the major complications. There are some patients with higher risk for dislocations. Dual mobility cup THA (DMC) may decrease the rate of dislocation and enhance functional outcome in those patients.Aim The aim was to retrospectively assess postoperative rate of dislocation and functional outcome in patients with preoperative risk factors for dislocation treated by DMC THA.Patients and methods A total of 26 DMC THAs were done for 25 patients with preoperative risk factors for dislocation. Functional outcome by Harris hip score and dislocation rates have been followed for a period of 12–48 months (mean: 31 months).Results There was 0% rate of dislocation till the last follow-up. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score, with good to excellent results in 74% of patients.Conclusion DMC THA is a good option for patients at risk for dislocations, with very low or no rate of dislocation, with good functional outcomes.

Primary total hip arthroplasty: mid-term outcomes of dual-mobility cups in patients at high risk of dislocation.

Dual-mobility cups (DMC) are currently used in patients having risk factors of instability. Most of the studies report the use of DMC in patients having a single high-risk variable. The aim of the study was to analyse a continuous series of patients treated with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and DMC with different high risk for dislocation. This is a retrospective study analysing the outcomes of primary THA with DMC in patients at high-risk of dislocation. The sample consisted of 215 patients having 1 of 3 aetiologies or risk factors: (1) young subjects (<55 years); (2) osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH); and (3) femoral neck fracture (FNF). With a mean follow-up duration of 70 ± 24.7 months, the findings showed the following: 2 patients had dislocated their hip following motor vehicle accidents; 1 patient had a traumatic femoral peri-prosthetic fracture; and 1 patient had an acute infection. No intra-prosthetic dislocation or aseptic loosening were encountered. No radiolucent lines were observed on the acetabular side. The mean modified Hip Harris Score was 96.6 ± 7.4%. Out of 186 patients, 170 (90.1%) would label their operated hip as a "forgotten hip". 78 out of the 84 patients (92.8%) who used to practice oriental sitting and/or ablution for prayers were able to return to their usual daily activities of extreme hip position and 74 out of the 84 patients (88%) described their operated hip as "a forgotten hip". No correlation was found between any of the studied variables. The findings of this series of patients at high risk of dislocation showed excellent clinical and radiological results with very few complications. The use of DMC seems to counteract the impact of some aetiologies/risk factors that could lead to higher instability. Most patients practising extreme hip positions resumed their usual practices.

CORR Insights®: Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?

CORR Insights®: Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?

反復性股関節脱臼症例に対する再置換術－Dual Mobility Cupの使用経験－

反復性股関節脱臼症例に対する再置換術－Dual Mobility Cupの使用経験－

Long-term outcomes of a dual-mobility cup and cementless triple-taper femoral stem combination in total hip replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe separate design concepts of dual-mobility cups and triple-taper femoral stems were developed to improve survivorship following total hip replacement (THR) by reducing instability/dislocation and enabling enhanced fixation. Successful outcomes at over two decades have been reported with earlier-generation devices based on these concepts. The current study aimed to provide the first long-term results with a unique pairing of later-generation dual-mobility cup and triple-taper cementless femoral stem after a decade of use in patients undergoing THR.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, records were reviewed for all subjects implanted with this dual-mobility cup/cementless femoral stem combination at three centers between 2002 and 2005. Any subject who had not already had follow-up visit beyond 10 years, was not previously revised, and still living were invited for a single follow-up visit consisting of Merle d’Aubgine Scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, and standard radiographs.ResultsThere were 244 THRs available for analysis. At a mean follow-up of 11.9 years, the Kaplan-Meier survivorship (endpoint: revision for any reason) was 99.1% (95% CI, 97.6–99.7) for the stem and 95.9% (95% CI, 93.1–97.6) for the cup. Merle d’Aubigne Scores were significantly improved from baseline and WOMAC scores were in the satisfactory range at the final follow-up. Radiographic analysis revealed no cases of stem subsidence, no cases of bone hypertrophy, 1 (0.4%) case of bone atrophy, and 3 (1.2%) cases of osteolysis around the stem. No subjects had radiolucent lines greater than 1 mm in any femoral Gruen zone. Evidence of cup migration was seen in 1 (0.4%) subject and 1 (0.4%) subject had evidence of osteolysis that was seen in Gruen zones I, II, IV, and V.ConclusionsThis combination of a later-generation dual-mobility cup and cementless triple-taper stem was associated with excellent survivorship and satisfactory functional outcomes at over 10 years follow-up.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02648152. Date of registration: January 6, 2016. Retrospectively registered.