Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level Research Articles

Arsenic in drinking water poses a threat to public health world-wide. In March 2001, the EPA revised the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water downward from 50 µg/L to 10 µg/L and required all U.S. small community water systems (CWSs) and non-community water systems (NCWSs) to comply by 23 January 2006. Much of the financial burden associated with complying with and maintaining this new drinking water MCL was shouldered by local community governments. For example, the Walker River Paiute Tribe operated a CWS on the Walker River Paiute Indian Reservation that needed upgrading to meet the new arsenic MCL. In collaboration with the Walker River Paiute Tribe, we conducted a study to assess whether reducing the arsenic concentration in drinking water to meet the new MCL reduced the arsenic body burden in local community members who drank the water. Installing a drinking water treatment to remove arsenic dramatically reduced both the drinking water concentrations (to below the current EPA MCL of 10 µg/L) and the community members’ urinary concentrations of total As, AsIII, and AsV within a week of its full implementation. Additional assistance to small water systems to sustain new drinking water treatments may be warranted.

Managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) inwater resourcesrequires a basin-scale approach. Predicted environmental concentrations(PEC) and stream-vulnerability scores for PFAS were determined forthe Potomac River watershed in the eastern United States. Approximately15% of stream reaches contained municipal and/or industrial wastewatertreatment plant (WWTP) discharges that are presumptive PFAS sources,comprising from <1 to >90% of streamflow. Mean annual PEC, basedon the summed concentrations of eight PFAS detected in WWTP effluents(ΣPFASPEC), for all stream reaches in the watershedwas 3.8 ng L–1, and stream reaches impacted by WWTPhad perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)PEC of 0.39 and 0.14 ng L–1. For locations wheremeasured-environmental concentrations (MEC) were determined, municipaland industrial WWTP contributed 7.8% (0 to 65%) of the total annualstreamflow and MEC were greater than PEC in 99% of the samples, indicatingadditional potential PFAS sources. The mean ΣPFASPEC was 9.1 ng L–1 compared to a mean sum of PFASMEC of 34 ng L–1. Under mean-August low-flow, 17%and 9.4% of the water-supply intakes had maximum PFOA and PFOS PECexceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels.

ABSTRACTPer‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination is a critical worldwide issue due to their widespread industrial use and persistence in the environment. PFAS treatment technologies are being applied to address the challenges associated with these substances. Selection of the appropriate treatment technology requires the assessment of many variables before full‐scale implementation. Factors such as cost, effectiveness, availability, and expected treatment duration are commonly considered; however, it is important to also consider the environmental footprint, which is the impact on the environment from the energy and materials used in implementing the treatment technology itself. The low PFAS treatment levels promulgated thus far, such as US Environmental Protection Agency drinking water Maximum Contaminant Levels of 4 ng/L for perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid, as well as future low cleanup standards for other compounds and impacted media, will require long‐term remedial actions. Understanding the environmental impacts for PFAS treatment technologies can provide additional insights to be considered during the remedy selection. The authors conducted a comparison study of a wide range of PFAS treatment technology types for both liquids and solids, operating under limited but realistic hypothetical scenarios. The results present the approximate expected greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of each technology type and scenario, compared to one another for the treatment of two key target compounds: perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The liquid treatment technology types considered in this evaluation include technologies that concentrate or separate PFAS from the liquid media (such as ion exchange, granular activated carbon, and foam fractionation), technologies that destroy PFAS (such as supercritical water oxidation and electrochemical oxidation), and landfill disposal via solidification. In practice, remedial solutions for a given site might include both a concentration/separation step and a destruction step. These combinations were not evaluated in this comparison. The solids treatment technologies considered included thermal desorption, soil washing, soil stabilization, and excavation and disposal at a landfill. The factors included in each scenario were material production, material and equipment transportation, equipment and energy use, and material disposal, as these were considered to be the largest contributors to GHG emissions.

Oxidative stress and genotoxicity in 1,4-dioxane liver toxicity as evidenced in a mouse model of glutathione deficiency

Environmental impacts of reclaimed asphalt pavement on leaching of metals into groundwater

In situ bioremediation practices that include subsurface addition of fermentable electron donors to stimulate reductive dechlorination by anaerobic bacteria have become widely employed to combat chlorinated solvent contamination in groundwater. At a contaminated site located near Baton Rouge, Louisiana (USA), toluene was transiently observed in groundwater at concentrations that sometimes far exceeded the US drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1 mg/L after a fermentable substrate (agricultural feed grade cane molasses) was injected into the subsurface with the intent of providing electron donors for reductive dechlorination. Here, we present data that demonstrate that indigenous microorganisms can biologically produce toluene by converting phenylacetic acid, phenylalanine, phenyllactate, and phenylpyruvate to toluene. When grown in defined medium with phenylacetic acid at concentrations ≤350 mg/L, the molar ratio between toluene accumulated and phenylacetic acid supplied was highly correlated ( R2 ≥ 0.96) with a toluene yield exceeding 0.9:1. Experiments conducted using 13C labeled compounds (phenylacetic acid-2-13C and l-phenylalanine-3-13C) resulted in production of toluene-α-13C, confirming that toluene was synthesized from these precursors by two independently developed enrichment cultures. Results presented here suggest that monitoring of aromatic hydrocarbons is warranted during enhanced bioremediation activities where electron donors are introduced to stimulate anaerobic biotransformation of chlorinated solvents.

Drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCL) are established by the U.S. EPA to protect human health. Since 1975, U.S. public water suppliers have reported MCL violations to the national Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). This study assessed temporal and geographic trends for violations of the 10 mg nitrate-N L-1 MCL in the conterminous U.S. We found that the proportion of systems in violation for nitrate significantly increased from 0.28% to 0.42% of all systems between 1994 and 2009 and then decreased to 0.32% by 2016. The number of people served by systems in violation decreased from 1.5 million in 1997 to 200 000 in 2014. Periodic spikes in people served were often driven by just one large system in violation. On average, Nebraska and Delaware had the greatest proportion of systems in violation (2.7% and 2.4%, respectively), while Ohio and California had the greatest average annual number of people served by systems in violation (278 374 and 139 149 people, respectively). Even though surface water systems that serve more people have been improving over time, groundwater systems in violation and average duration of violations are increasing, indicating persistent nitrate problems in drinking water.

Large amounts of farmland have been converted from traditional cereal cropping to intensive vegetable cropping in China, creating environmental risks. Previous studies utilized several methods of estimating nitrate accumulation in soil and leaching to groundwater under intensive vegetable cultivation, such as comparing intensive cropping to non-intensive cropping, or investigating the seasonal dynamics of soil nitrates in the short term, such as 1 or 2 years. This study tried to utilize a different method, considering the effects of total nitrogen (N) input during the whole vegetable cropping phase (up to 9 years) after conversion from traditional cereal cropping on soil and groundwater. A large-scale investigation was performed in the study area. Vegetable, soil, and groundwater samples were collected from 22 fields. Results showed that soil nitrate was significantly correlated with total N input from chemical fertilizer during the whole vegetable cropping phase, and groundwater nitrate was significantly correlated with soil nitrate. Nitrate concentration in 45 % of wells exceeded the drinking water maximum contaminant level, 10 mg L−1. These results suggest that soil nitrate accumulation in the area resulted from long-term application of large amounts of N chemical fertilizer, and not from manure. Furthermore, high irrigation levels caused the accumulated nitrate in soil to leach into the groundwater, resulting in nitrate contamination of the groundwater.

Analysis of trace neptunium in the vicinity of underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site

The impact of recent advances in research on arsenic cancer risk assessment

Concerns have arisen among the public regarding the potential for drinking-water contamination from the migration of methane gas and hazardous chemicals associated with hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. However, little attention has been paid to the potential for groundwater contamination resulting from surface spills from storage and production facilities at active well sites. We performed a search for publically available data regarding groundwater contamination from spills at U.S. drilling sites. The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) database was selected for further analysis because it was the most detailed. The majority of spills were in Weld County, Colorado, which has the highest density of wells that used hydraulic fracturing for completion, many producing both methane gas and crude oil. We analyzed publically available data reported by operators to the COGCC regarding surface spills that impacted groundwater. From July 2010 to July 2011, we noted 77 reported surface spills impacting the groundwater in Weld County, which resulted in surface spills associated with less than 0.5% of the active wells. The reported data included groundwater samples that were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) components of crude oil. For groundwater samples taken both within the spill excavation area and on the first reported date of sampling, the BTEX measurements exceeded National Drinking Water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) in 90, 30, 12, and 8% of the samples, respectively. However, actions taken to remediate the spills were effective at reducing BTEX levels, with at least 84% of the spills reportedly achieving remediation as of May 2012. Our analysis demonstrates that surface spills are an important route of potential groundwater contamination from hydraulic fracturing activities and should be a focus of programs to protect groundwater. Implications: While benzene can occur naturally in groundwater sources, spills and migration of chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing activities have recently been thought to be a main source of benzene contamination in groundwater. However, there is little scientific literature to support that claim. Therefore, we accessed a publically available database and tracked the number of reported surface spills with potential groundwater impact over a 1-year period. Although the number of surface spills was minimal, our analysis provides scientific evidence that benzene can contaminate groundwater sources following surface spills at active well sites. Supplemental Materials: Supplemental materials are available for this paper. Go to the publisher's online edition of the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association for an illustration of the average concentration of each BTEX chemical from pooled sample measurements, and various metrics from all 77 spills analyzed in this study.

It is anticipated that global climate change will adversely impact source water quality in many areas of the United States and will therefore, potentially, impact the design and operation of current and future water treatment systems. The USEPA has initiated an effort called the Water Resources Adaptation Program (WRAP) which is intended to develop tools and techniques that can assess the impact of global climate change on urban drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. A three step approach for assessing climate change impacts on water treatment operation and design is being persude in this effort. The first step is the stochastic characterization of source water quality, the second step is the application of the USEPA Water Treatment Plant model and the third step is the application of cost algorithms to provide a metric that can be used to assess the coat impact of climate change. A model has been validated using data collected from Cincinnati’s Richard Miller Water Treatment Plant for the USEPA Information Collection Rule (ICR) database. An analysis of the water treatment processes in response to assumed perturbations in raw water quality identified TOC, pH, and bromide as the three most important parameters affecting performance of the Miller WTP. The Miller Plant was simulated using the EPA WTP model to examine the impact of these parameters on selected regulated water quality parameters. Uncertainty in influent water quality was analyzed to estimate the risk of violating drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).Water quality changes in the Ohio River were projected for 2050 using Monte Carlo simulation and the WTP model was used to evaluate the effects of water quality changes on design and operation. Results indicate that the existing Miller WTP might not meet Safe Drinking Water Act MCL requirements for certain extreme future conditions. However, it was found that the risk of MCL violations under future conditions could be controlled by enhancing existing WTP design and operation or by process retrofitting and modification.

Highly selectively monitoring heavy and transition metal ions by a fluorescent sensor based on dipeptide

In this study, precipitation of Al(OH)3(am) was used to modify a sand filter medium by fluidized-bed pretreatment. A mixture of alum, sodium hydroxide, and tap water was applied to the filter bed in the last stage of the backwash cycle. The placement of Al(OH)3(am) in the filter pores was evaluated for both alum-treated raw water (contact filtration) and untreated raw water. The filter pretreated with Al(OH)3(am) achieved better than 99.98% removal of an untreated clay suspension, with a filter effluent turbidity below the detection limit of 0.01 NTU. Al(OH)3(am)-pretreated filters that were challenged with clay and humic acid achieved ≥99.8% turbidity removal efficiency for 14 h of operation in the contact filtration mode. Pretreatment with Al(OH)3(am) also enhanced turbidity removal efficiency (up to 99.8%) when the filter was challenged with clay and humic acid, even when the raw water was not coagulated. The aluminum concentration in the filter effluent of an Al(OH)3(am)-pretreated filter was below the EPA secondary drinking water maximum contaminant level (200 μg/L for aluminum) when the raw water pH was between 6 and 7; the pretreated filter had the best performance at pH 6.

Ratiometric and turn-on monitoring for heavy and transition metal ions in aqueous solution with a fluorescent peptide sensor

Abstract Radium activity measurements in water samples are encumbered by relatively large error bars, including for activity values near the regulatory drinking water maximum contaminant level of 5 pCi/L. The large error bars create uncertainty in the evaluation of temporal trends. This uncertainty is often the object of debate and disagreement in regulatory determinations, the design of remedial actions, and/or in litigation. The Mann‐Kendall nonparametric test is perhaps the most commonly used test for trend evaluation in environmental sciences. The test is simple and easy to apply by nonstatisticians and is recommended in several regulations and guidance documents. As typically applied, the Mann‐Kendall test does not consider the uncertainty related to error bars for individual data values. Ignoring this uncertainty can result in misleading conclusions on the presence or absence of trends. In this article, a procedure for trend analysis that accounts for error bars is described. For each data series analyzed, the procedure creates 1000 new data series by randomly assigning values that fall within the error bar around each data point. Trend analysis is then performed on the randomly created data series. The approach is applied to the evaluation of a radium data base containing analytical results from 137 locations (407 water samples) in Escambia County, Florida. The evaluation of the radium data base using the Mann‐Kendall test without accounting for the uncertainty reveals 10 significant trends at the 90% confidence level. Only two of these trends are supported by the data when the uncertainty from analytical error is accounted for.

The objective of this study was to evaluate chemical compositions of first flush and composite storm water runoff in four small, mixed land use watersheds in north-central Texas. The watersheds range from urban to rural, all discharging to a local lake providing aquatic habitat, recreation, flood control and drinking water. Automated devices near watershed outlets collected samples from seven storm events, from April 2001 to September 2003. Samples were analyzed for suspended solids, pesticides (diazinon, triazine and chlorpyrifos), nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), fecal coliforms and metals. Observed concentrations of most parameters were low relative to drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) and aquatic life criteria. Fecal coliforms and lead were detected in most samples, with highest lead concentrations in the most developed watershed, likely influenced by building material and automobile traffic. Pesticide concentrations were higher in an initial spring storm event following applications to control weeds and insects. Typical of urban runoff, most ammonia and phosphorus observations exceeded freshwater criteria for streams draining to lakes. Treated wastewater effluent accounted for the highest nitrogen and phosphorus observations. For most constituents, composite concentrations exceeded first flush concentrations, though differences were significant only for fecal coliforms.

Arsenic concentration variability in public water system wells in Minnesota, USA

The goal of this project was to gain a better understanding of atrazine occurrence in the United States by surveying drinking water utilities' sources and finished water for atrazine on a weekly basis for seven months. Atrazine is a contaminant of interest because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has found short-term atrazine exposure above the drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) to potentially cause heart, lung, and kidney congestion, low blood pressure, muscle spasms, weight loss, and damage to the adrenal glands. Long-term exposure to atrazine concentrations above the drinking water MCL has been linked to weight loss, cardiovascular damage, retinal and muscle degeneration, and cancer. This survey effort improved upon previously conducted atrazine surveys through intensive, high frequency sampling (participating plants sampled their raw and finished water on a weekly basis for approximately seven months). Such an intensive effort allowed the authors to gain a better understanding of short-term atrazine occurrence and its variability in drinking water sources. This information can benefit the drinking water industry by facilitating (1) better atrazine occurrence management (i.e., awareness when plants may be more susceptible to atrazine), (2) more efficient atrazine control (e.g., effective treatment alternatives and more effective response to atrazine occurrence), and (3) treatment cost reduction (e.g., efficient atrazine control can result in substantial cost savings). Forty-seven drinking watertreatment plants located primarily in the Midwestern United States participated in the survey and sampled their raw and finished water on a weekly basis from March through October. Samples were analyzed using the Abraxis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test kit. Confirmation samples for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes were analyzed using solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by gas chromatography mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS). Several important conclusions can be drawn from this study including (1) surface waters were confirmed to be more vulnerable to atrazine contamination than groundwater sources, (2) peak atrazine concentrations corresponded well to precipitation/runoff events, and (3) atrazine occurrence tended to be uniform geographically when compared by river drainage basins. In addition, this project confirmed that the Abraxis atrazine ELISA test kit tended to have a positive bias (i.e., the measured ELISA concentration was higher than the actual concentration) in most measured samples. Finished samples tended to have more of a positive bias than raw water samples. Therefore, this bias may limit the effectiveness for ELISA for regulatory monitoring. There are many other applications for ELISA, however, including frequent monitoring for early detections of atrazine concentration changes that might trigger conventional analysis by GC/MS or be used for activated carbon dosing or other treatment operating controls.

Due to the acute toxicity of As, mobilization of even a small fraction of As into surface and ground waters used as a source for drinking water represents a substantial risk to human health. Here we evaluate the mobilization of arsenite [As(III)] from the Fe‐(hydr)oxide mineral goethite (α‐FeOOH) through competitive displacement by silicic acid, a naturally occurring and ubiquitous inorganic ligand. The adsorption behaviors of silicic acid and As(III) on goethite were investigated at environmentally relevant pH (3–11). Single ion adsorption and zeta‐potential data were collected at silica concentrations characteristic of natural waters (3–30 mg L−1) and initial solution As(III) concentrations representative of high levels of contamination (3.75–7.5 mg L−1). Competitive adsorption scenarios with either Si or As(III) sorbed first to the goethite surface, followed by equilibration with the other sorbate, were also examined. No competitive displacement of either oxyanion was observed at total sorbate concentrations less than reactive surface site density, regardless of pH or addition scenario. However, at total sorbate concentrations greater than reactive surface site density, As(III) adsorption was reduced by 10 to 15% over the entire pH range regardless of addition scenario, resulting in aqueous concentrations well in excess of current (10 μg L−1) drinking water maximum contaminant levels. Surface complexation modeling of single ion adsorption and zeta‐potential data using the Charge Distribution Multisite Surface Complexation (CD‐MUSIC) model was used to calculate an appropriate set of surface adsorption equilibrium constants for As(III) and silicic acid adsorption, which was used to describe the competitive adsorption scenarios. Comparison of competitive adsorption data and CD‐MUSIC model predictions, at total sorbate concentration greater than reactive surface site density of goethite, suggest that silica is competitively displaced by As(III).