Double-row Repair Research Articles

Rotator Cuff Repair With a Novel Interpositional Allograft Augmentation

Background: Nearly half a million rotator cuff repairs are performed annually in the United States. Rotator cuff healing occurs at the interface between the tendon and greater tuberosity, known as the enthesis. Given that a significant number of rotator cuff tears do not heal following surgical repair, multiple adjunctive strategies have been devised to improve the structural integrity of the repaired construct. Recently, a biphasic, demineralized allograft bone implant has been developed to improve enthesis healing. Indications: Relative indications for use of tissue augmentation include greater tuberosity osteopenia, revision rotator cuff surgery, attenuated rotator cuff tissue quality, and massive rotator cuff tears. Relative contraindications include a history of infection and recent immunosuppression. Technique Description: Following preparation of the footprint with an arthroscopic burr, two triple-loaded PEEK suture anchors were placed along the medial aspect of the greater tuberosity. Sutures were then passed through the rotator cuff tendon in a horizontal mattress configuration, and each pair of suture limbs were tied along the medial row. To aid in arthroscopic passage, the biphasic graft is folded longitudinally and clamped with a curved hemostat. The graft is loaded into an arthroscopic cannula and both are delivered simultaneously through a lateral arthroscopic portal. Two 18-gauge spinal needles are placed percutaneously to fix the allograft in the desired position. Subsequently, double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair with standard techniques is done, which provides sufficient stability to the graft. Discussion: In a series of 192 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a similar bioinductive collagen implant, patients demonstrated significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year postoperatively. Moreover, a meta analysis published in 2022 demonstrated a significantly reduced retear rate among patch-augmented rotator cuff repairs as compared to isolated rotator cuff repairs. Conclusion: Tissue augmentation can be performed efficiently and reproducibly to promote biologic healing of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. The specific biphasic cancellous allograft presented in this video may be a viable treatment adjunct in the setting of deficient greater tuberosity bone stock, revision cases, or impaired native enthesis healing; however, further research is needed to assess clinical outcomes associated with its use. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

Comparison of suture-bridge and independent double-row techniques for medium to massive posterosuperior cuff tears: a two-year retrospective study

BackgroundTransosseous-equivalent suture-bridge (TOE-SB) and independent double-row (IDR) repair techniques were developed to treat rotator cuff tears. The study was designed to prove that both TOE-SB and IDR techniques provided comparable clinical results and retear rate for medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, while the surgical time and number of suture anchor used were less in the IDR group.Study designLevel of evidence: level III, Retrospective comparative study.MethodsPatients with medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears receiving arthroscopic TOE-SB and IDR between November 2016 to October 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were confirmed to have grade ≤ 2 fatty infiltration in the muscles of the torn tendons. Revision, concomitant subscapularis tear, acromiohumeral distance < 7 mm, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, partial repair, incomplete repair, partial thickness, or irreparable posterosuperior cuff tear were excluded. Surgical time, number of suture anchor used for the surgery, pre-operative, and post-operative clinical scores such as Constant-Murley score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) were compared. The retear rates between groups were evaluated by ultrasound.ResultsThirty-five IDR and thirty-five TOE-SB repairs were enrolled. The IDR technique required much fewer anchors than TOE-SB did to complete the cuff repair. The mean operation time in IDR and TOE-SB group were 86(18.23), and 114(18.7) (min), respectively (P < 0.01). The mean number of anchors used to complete the cuff repair was 2(0.17) in IDR and 3(0.61) in TOE-SB (P < 0.01). The Constant-Murley score improved from 34.9 ± 6.6 to 80.6 ± 9.4 in the IDR group, and 37.4 ± 6 to 81.9 ± 4.6 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001). SSV improved from 24.6 ± 9.6 to 79.3 ± 10.6 in the IDR, and 27.9 ± 9 to 82.9 ± 6.9 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001). VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.6 to 1.5 ± 0.7 in the IDR, and 8 ± 0.5 to 1.3 ± 0.6 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001) at final follow-up. No significant difference was found between the retear rates (14.3% in the IDR vs. 17.1% in the TOE-SB, respectively) in the 2-year follow-up.ConclusionsBoth IDR and TOE-SB group provided comparable clinical results and retear rates for medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. The surgical time and number of anchors used were less in the IDR group than in the TOE-SB group.

Double Row Fixation is More Costly and Does Not Have Clinical Benefit Over Single Anchor for Insertional Achilles Tendon Surgery

Surgical repair of insertional Achilles tendinosis is indicated in the face of failed conservative measures. Several methods for this repair have been described, and the optimal method is not universally agreed upon. In addition, the cost of medical care is important, and should be considered when determining the surgical repair for each patient. The purpose of this study is to compare implant costs between a single anchor or 4 anchor, double row repair, and evaluate associated outcomes. A retrospective comparative trial was performed for this purpose. The entire study encompassed 110 patients, 78 with a single anchor repair, and 32 with a double row repair. The average implant cost of the single anchor repair was $391.18 ± $272.10 and the double row repair was $1811.2 9 ± $169.47, p < .001. The groups did not have a statistically significant difference in complications (9% with single anchor vs 6.3% with double row, p=1.0) or revisions 6.4% with single anchor vs 3.1% with double row, p=.67). The only difference in demographics between the groups was that the single anchor group had a higher percentage of female patients (p=.04). While the double row repair has been shown to have favorable biomechanical results, the present study did not show a benefit in complications or revisions and was a more costly repair technique. Surgeons should take these findings in consideration when choosing the repair technique when surgery is indicated.

Advanced Subscapularis Repair Techniques

The subscapularis muscle plays an essential role in full, pain-free shoulder function. Injuries to the subscapularis tendon exist on a spectrum of severity. In the evaluation of the injured and/or painful shoulder, careful scrutiny of the subscapularis tendon on advanced shoulder imaging in all planes facilitates detection of subscapularis pathology. Specific surgical techniques of subscapularis tendon repair, including arthroscopic and open approaches, are tailored to tear size, pattern, retraction, tissue quality and concomitant pathologies. Smaller, upper border tears of the subscapularis tendon may be treated with a single-row repair construct while tears greater than 2cm are typically treated with a double-row repair. Surgical pearls include adequate debridement of the rotator interval, identification of the comma tissue in retracted tears, use of a lateral viewing portal during arthroscopic repair, and gentle decortication of the lesser tuberosity footprint. While unrecognized subscapularis tendon tears is associated with worse clinical outcomes in the setting of multi-tendon tears, further study is needed to identify additional strategies to improve rotator cuff tendon healing following surgical repair.

Effects of different positions on rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair under shoulder arthroscopy

ObjectiveShoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair is currently the main treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, and postoperative rehabilitation training is essential. However, pain and limitation of activity during the rehabilitation process will lead to poor results. Hence, identifying rehabilitation approaches is crucial. This study aimed to compare patient's rehabilitation outcomes and experience between rehabilitation in the supine position and in the standing position. MethodsThis prospective study included patients diagnosed with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent shoulder arthroscopic double-row rivet repair at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from March 2019 to September 2021. The patients were randomly assigned to the standing rehabilitation exercise group (group A) and the supine rehabilitation exercise group (group B). All patients were followed up for 6 months to record and compare the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, shoulder range of motion, and rehabilitation compliance. ResultsAltogether, 86 patients participated in the study, of whom 79 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Groups A and B had 39 and 40 patients, respectively. Before operation, the VAS score, forward flexion and extension angle, and abduction angle were comparable between groups A and B. After operation, the patients in groups A and B all experienced a significant improvement in the VAS score, forward flexion and extension angle, and abduction angle (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in group B had better VAS score (4.58 ± 0.87 vs. 5.21 ± 1.13, p = 0.0068; 2.15 ± 0.66 vs. 2.51 ± 0.51, p = 0.0078; 0.78 ± 0.86 vs. 1.33 ± 0.81, p = 0.0015), forward flexion and extension angle (109.30 ± 2.87 ° vs. 102.33 ± 3.74°, p = 0.0001; 109.53 ± 3.39° vs. 104.18 ± 2.76°, p = 0.0001; 125.22 ± 6.05° vs. 117.59 ± 2.27°, p = 0.0001), and abduction angle (91.78 ± 2.77° vs. 82.92 ± 2.12°, p = 0.0001; 91.62 ± 2.78° vs. 82.82 ± 1.45°, p = 0.0001; 109.48 ± 3.37° vs. 100.10 ± 2.94°, p = 0.0001) at 2 wk, 6 wk and 6 m postoperatively. ConclusionAfter 6 months of follow-up, the patients who performed rehabilitation exercises in the supine position achieved better rehabilitation outcomes than those who performed rehabilitation exercises while standing.

Single-versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears: A prospective study

Single-versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears: A prospective study

Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair With Box Configuration

Background: Arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent (TOE) techniques may offer additional advantages, including a more efficient surgery with a self-reinforcing construct with equivalent clinical results to medial knotted TOE repair for rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Indications: An arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) using FiberTak RC anchors for medial row fixation with box configuration may be an appropriate construct for operatively indicated small-to-moderate full-thickness RCTs. Technique: Our modified technique uses TOE repair principles to address RCTs too small for traditional 4.75-mm anchors using medial row fixation and too large to apply a single medial to lateral anchor repair. The patient is placed in a beach chair position. In addition to standard anterior and posterior portals, a lower lateral working portal and a higher posterolateral viewing portal are made. Subsequent to supraspinatus footprint visualization/preparation, two 2.6-mm FiberTak RC anchors each loaded with 1 LabralTape and 1 FiberWire are placed medially. The 4 sets of sutures for one anchor are placed through the rotator cuff tendon together in 1 spot and the process is repeated for the second anchor. One FiberWire from each anchor is then tied extracorporeally and then a double pulley technique is used to compress the medial aspect of the repair at the footprint in a box configuration. Finally, 1 limb of LabralTape from each of the medial anchors along with the corresponding FiberWire is secured through 2 lateral-row 4.75-mm anchors anteriorly and posteriorly to restore the lateral footprint and secure the rotator cuff in TOE box configuration. This modified technique can provide anatomical compression of the rotator cuff tendon at the footprint with additional medial compression achieved by the box configuration while taking advantage of knotless fixation. Results: Postoperatively, a sling is worn for 4 weeks, passive range of motion (ROM) is initiated at 2 weeks, active ROM is begun at 6 weeks, and strengthening at 3 months. Patients may return to full unrestricted activities around 5 to 6 months. Discussion/Conclusion: A modified arthroscopic DR RCR with box configuration is an excellent treatment option for patients with small-to-moderate full-thickness RCT who fail conservative treatment. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations.

Single-row (SR) and double-row repair techniques have been described to treat rotator cuff tears. We present a novel surgical strategy of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair in which a locking-loop suture bridge (LLSB) is used. To compare the functional outcomes and repair integrity of LLSB technique to the SR technique for arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair of small to medium rotator cuff tears. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were 39 patients who underwent LLSB repair (LLSB group) and 44 patients who underwent SR suture anchor repair (SR group) from 2015 to 2018. We evaluated all patients preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Also, shoulder sonography was performed at 12 months postoperatively to evaluate repair integrity using the Sugaya classification system. The independent-sample t test was used to analyze functional outcomes (VAS, OSS, and ASES scores), and the Fisher exact test was used to analyze postoperative sonography results. Patients in both the LLSB and SR groups saw a significant improvement on all 3 outcome measures from preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively (P < .001 for all). However, when comparing scores between groups, only the scores at 3 months postoperatively differed significantly (VAS: P = .002; OSS: P < .001; ASES: P = .005). Shoulder sonography at 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant difference in repair integrity between the LLSB and SR groups (retear rate: 10.26% and 6.82%, respectively; P = .892). Better outcome scores were seen at 3-month follow-up in the LLSB group, with no difference in retear rates compared with the SR group at 12 months postoperatively. The LLSB technique was found to be a reliable technique for rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears.

High Acromial Slope and Low Acromiohumeral Distance Increase the Risk of Retear of the Supraspinatus Tendon After Repair.

High Acromial Slope and Low Acromiohumeral Distance Increase the Risk of Retear of the Supraspinatus Tendon After Repair.

Rates of medial and lateral row failure and risk factors for Re-tear in arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair

A common postoperative complication after rotator cuff repair is re-tear requiring a secondary procedure. Double row and trans-osseous equivalent repair techniques have become increasingly popular in recent years, however repair failure remains a relatively common complication after primary rotator cuff repair. A retrospective observational study of 389 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair from February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities, and tear characteristics between patients who experienced re-tear and those who did not. Repair failures were confirmed by plain MRI or intraoperatively during repeat surgical treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients who experienced re-tear due to medial row failure was conducted. The overall re-tear rate was 8.2% (32 patients). Six patients (1.5%) experienced medial row failure, while 26 patients (6.7%) experienced lateral row failure. The average time to re-tear was 279.3 ± 291.2 days. On multivariate analysis, patients with Goutallier Classification ≥3 (OR: 4.274, p = 0.046) and 3 anchor repair (OR: 5.387, p = 0.027) were at significantly increased risk for any re-tear after controlling for other tear characteristics. No statistically significant independent risk factors for medial row failure were identified after controlling for confounding variables. Goutallier classification greater than 3 and a primary repair with 3 anchors are significant risk factors for re-tear after double row rotator cuff repair, however they are not associated with increased occurrence of medial row failure. Further evaluation of risk factors for medial row failure is required to avoid this rare but serious re-tear pattern.

Is biceps tenodesis necessary when performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 55 years?

In patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, tenotomy and tenodesis are the most performed surgical procedures for the biceps long head (BLH) pathologies. Controversy continues as to which surgical procedure provides better results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of tenotomy and tenodesis applied to the biceps long head in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In our study, the clinical results of 706 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tenotomy or tenodesis on the long biceps head were evaluated retrospectively. Rotator cuff repair patients were divided into two groups as single-row and double-row repair patients. The clinical results of patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis in single-row (n = 383) and double-row (n = 323) repair groups were compared. The clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis without distinction between double/single-row repair were also compared. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations of the patients were made with Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and visual pain scale (VAS). The presence of the Popeye sign in the arm, tenderness in the bicipital groove, and cramping in the biceps muscle in the postoperative period was evaluated and compared among groups. Preoperative and postoperative clinical results of the patients were compared within the groups. A total of 706 patients with a mean age of 61.78 ± 20.94years and a mean follow-up period of 29.15 ± 14.28months were evaluated. The mean age of the tenodesis group (58.13 ± 8.47) was significantly lower than the tenotomy group (61.52 ± 22.58) (p < 0.05). The mean CSS and VAS mean postoperatively in the tenotomy group (n = 587) were 76.84 ± 12.74 and 2.29 ± 2.78. The postoperative mean CSS and VAS in the tenodesis group (n = 119) were 77.56 ± 11.23 and 2.64 ± 2.70. There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative clinical scores of patients who underwent tenotomy and patients who underwent tenodesis (p > 0.05). There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity (p = 0.980). Bicipital groove tenderness and cramping in the biceps muscle were significantly higher in the tenodesis group (p < 0.001, < 0.001). Tenodesis was performed in 68, and tenotomy was performed in 315 out of 383 patients who underwent single-row rotator cuff repair. Tenodesis was performed in 51, and tenotomy was performed in 272 of 334 patients who underwent double-row rotator cuff repair. When singe versus double-row groups was compared, there was no significant difference in VAS, CSS, Popeye sing, bicipital groove tenderness, or biceps muscle cramping. When tenotomy versus tenodesis was compared within single- and double-row repair groups, there was no significant difference in VAS or CSS. There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity, but bicipital groove tenderness and muscle cramping were more in tenodesis groups regardless of the repair rows. The effect of tenodesis versus tenotomy for BHL pathologies in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was not significant for clinical scores, but bicipital groove tenderness and biceps muscle cramping were significantly higher in the tenodesis group.

Arthroscopic Double-Row Repair of Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Suture Bridge Technique Reinforced With Modified Mason–Allen and Simple Sutures

Rotator cuff (RC) tears represent one of the most common causes of pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. Numerous RC repair techniques have been reported. In this Technical Note, we introduce an arthroscopic double-row repair technique that combines a suture bridge construct with modified Mason–Allen and simple suture fixation to optimize load-sharing and compression of the RC to the footprint. The described technique is ideal for crescent-shaped and large reparable U-shaped posterosuperior RC tears.

Types of Retears After Knot-tying and Knotless Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

In conventional double-row repair for rotator cuff tears, tying the medial row of anchor sutures can strangulate the tendon. The knotless medial row technique has been recommended to improve vascularity and reduce retear rates. The researchers divided the retear pattern into 2 categories: type 1 (failure at the tendon-bone interface) and type 2 (failure at the musculotendinous junction with healed footprint). To compare studies on knot-tying versus knotless double-row repair for rotator cuff tears according to retear type and clinical and radiological outcomes. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. A search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included were studies that directly compared the knot-tying and knotless double-row techniques and provided postoperative patient-reported outcomes and retear rates. The Methodology Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used for methodological quality assessment of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Included were 12 studies (n = 1411 shoulders); 1 study had level 1 evidence, 3 studies had level 2 evidence, and 8 studies had level 3 evidence. The MINORS score ranged from 15 to 19, indicating that the methodology was fair to good. There was no statistically significant difference in retear rate between techniques (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67-1.47; P = .96); however, more type 1 retears were seen in the knotless technique (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; P = .005), and more type 2 retears were seen in the knot-tying technique (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.70-5.83; P = .0003). Higher postoperative Constant scores were seen in the knot-tying technique (MD, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.03-2.53; P = .04); however, there were no significant differences between techniques regarding other postoperative outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall retear rates between the knotless and knot-tying techniques, and both techniques demonstrated similar clinical outcomes. However, type 2 retear rates were significantly greater after knot-tying repair, and type 1 retear rates were significantly greater after knotless repair.

Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair

Endoscopic gluteus medius repair is indicated after failed conservative management for debilitating peritrochanteric hip pain. In our experience, most of these surgeries are performed on women, 45 to 75 years old. Often for undersurface high-grade partial-thickness tears and some small full-thickness tears, a single-row repair technique is performed. For larger, full-thickness tears, a double-row repair is often performed. For minimal, superficial, partial-thickness tears with a longitudinal component of tearing through the gluteus medius tendon, a side-to-side repair is performed. Short-term follow-up shows significant improvements in hip outcome score for activities of daily living and in numeric rating scale.

Perianchor cyst formation in all-suture anchor after rotator cuff repair: an evaluation of anchor insertion angle.

Previous studies reported that micromotion after all-suture anchor implantation can lead to perianchor cyst formation (PCF), leading to risk of retear. Modifying anchor insertion angle (AIA) is known to be one of the various ways to increase anchor stability. However, there currently are few studies that assess the correlation between PCF, AIA, and retear. To find the correlation of PCF and the repaired rotator cuff integrity with AIA after arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge rotator cuff repair (RCR) using an all-suture anchor in the medial row. A total of 218 patients who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge RCR were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent RCR using all-suture anchors and polyether ketone anchors in the medial and lateral rows, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted 6 months after the surgery to evaluate PCF, AIA, and integrity of the repaired cuff. The all-suture anchor insertion angle in the medial row was measured with reference to the greater tuberosity to assess the relationship between the AIA and PCF. The correlations between PCF, AIA, and post-RCR integrity were evaluated including various demographic and radiologic factors. Perianchor cysts were formed in 93 patients (42.7%). Mediolateral tear size (2.1±1.2 cm vs. 1.7±0.9 cm, P=.034) and AIA (61.9°±15.2° vs. 68.4°±13.0°, P=.001) were significantly different between patient groups with and without perianchor cysts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that mediolateral tear size (odds ratio [OR] 1.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008-1.724; P=.043) and AIA (OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.947-0.988; P=.002) were independent risk factors for PCF. In addition, PCF was observed more frequently (69.6% vs. 32.1%, P<.001) and the AIA was lower (59.4°±13.7° vs. 67.8°±13.8°, P<.001) in the retear group than in the healed group. Perianchor cysts were formed in approximately 40% of patients who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture-bridge RCR using all-suture anchors. Low AIA and large mediolateral tear size were risk factors for PCF. Moreover, perianchor cyst and AIA were correlated with post-RCR integrity. Therefore, a high AIA must be carefully considered when all-suture anchors are inserted into the medial row when performing RCR.

Increased HbA1c Levels in Diabetics During the Postoperative 3-6 Months After Rotator Cuff Repair Correlated With Increased Retear Rates

To evaluate whether glycemic control affects the integrity of the repaired rotator cuff during the postoperative healing period after arthroscopic double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair (RCR) METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture bridge RCR at our institution between March 2016 and November 2019. We included the patients who evaluated for serum glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels within 1 month before and 3-6 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted 6 months after surgery to evaluate the integrity of the repaired cuff tendon. Patients were categorized into two groups based on comparison between preoperative and postoperative HbA1c values: Group I (increased postoperative HbA1c) and Group D (same or decreased postoperative HbA1c). The correlation between preoperative/postoperative HbA1c, HbA1c increase/same or decrease (during the healing period), and post-RCR integrity was evaluated, including various demographic and radiologic factors. A total of 103 patients were analyzed, group I was 47, and group D was 56, respectively. The retear rate of 51.1% (24/47) in Group I was significantly higher than 14.3% (8/56) in Group D (P < .001). HbA1c levels measured 3-6 months after surgery (mean: 6.9; 95% CI: 6.6-7.3 vs mean: 6.5; 95% CI: 6.3-6.7, P= .034), and the proportion of group I and group D were significantly different (75%/25% vs 32.4%/67.6%, P < .001) between the retear and healing groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified increased HbA1c as an independent risk factor for retear (odds ratio: 5.402; 95% CI: 2.072-14.086; P < .001). The glycemic control within 3-6 months after surgery when the healing process of the tendon was in progress had a significant effect on retear rate. In particular, the retear rate was higher when the HbA1c level increased at postoperative 3-6 months compared to before surgery. Retrospective case-control comparative study, Level III.

Three Medial All Suture Anchors Improves Contact Force Compared to Two Hard Body Anchors in a Biomechanical Two-Tendon Rotator Cuff Tear Model

PurposeTo biomechanically compare a knotless double-row construct with 3 medial all-suture (3AS) anchors with a standard 2 medial hard body (2HB) anchor construct.MethodsTwelve matched cadaveric shoulder specimens with a mean age of 57 years (range: 54-61 years) were randomized to receive a knotless double-row repair with either a 3AS or 2HB construct. In the 3AS construct, three 2.6-mm all-suture anchors were placed adjacent to the articular margin and secured laterally with two 4.75-mm knotless hard body anchors. In the 2HB construct, two 4.75-mm medial hard body anchors were placed medially, lateral fixation was identical to the 3AS construct. Creep, displacement, stiffness, and ultimate load were recorded for each sample. In addition, a SynDaver model was used to compare contact pressure between the 2 repair constructs.ResultsThere were no differences in cyclic displacement at 1, 30, and 100 cycles (P = .616, .497, .190, respectively), cyclic stiffness (.928), ultimate load (.445), or load to failure (P = .445) between the 2 constructs. The 3AS repair construct had improved contact pressure between tendon and bone when compared with the 2HB construct at loads of 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N (P = .01, .02, and .04, respectively).ConclusionsDisplacement and load to failure properties are similar between knotless constructs using either 2HB or 3AS for the medial row. However, contact force may improve with the use of 3 medial all-suture anchors.Clinical RelevanceAs all-suture anchors are smaller in size when compared with hard body anchors. For this reason, there is potential to place an additional all-suture medial anchor to improve contact force and potentially improve rotator cuff healing when compared with the use of hard body anchors.

Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Arthropathy.

Arthroplasty is not an optimal treatment for massive rotator cuff tears in patients who are active and without glenohumeral arthritis. Several surgical techniques have been developed for these patients, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with single-/double-row repair (with or without interval slides, margin convergence, graft augmentation), graft bridging, superior capsular reconstruction, tuberoplasty, and tendon transfers. Complete, tension-free, anatomic repair is ideal; however, tendon atrophy and retraction associated with massive tears often complicate repairs. All surgical treatments significantly increase patient-reported functional outcomes 1 year after intervention, with many treatments demonstrating improved mid-term and long-term outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e1-e12.].

Single Medial-Row Anchor With Biceps Tenodesis in a Transosseous Double-Row Construct for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

Massive rotator cuff tears are a common issue for patients and can be challenging to manage surgically. While the literature has shown that repair construct can affect the outcome of a rotator cuff repair, and the double-row repair is typically favored over the single-row repair for larger rotator cuff tears, the double-row repair also has some shortcomings. These shortcomings are related to the increased technical difficulty of the procedure, as well as increased costs due to the increased number of anchors used. Both of these factors also lead to an increase in the amount of time spent in the operating room as well. This study describes a surgical technique to help mitigate this shortcoming of the double-row repair by using a single medial-row anchor in our double-row construct for repair of a massive rotator cuff tear.