Dose Of Remifentanil Research Articles

Nalbuphine analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy during the perioperative period.

This study sought to investigate the analgesic effects of nalbuphine on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy during the perioperative period, as well as its effects on inflammatory cytokines. We selected 92 patients with early lung cancer who were admitted to Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital between January 2016 and December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into control and observation groups (n=46 each). All patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, with those in the observation group receiving intravenous nalbuphine hydrochloride prior to induction (the control group received saline). Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and anesthetic dosages were compared between groups. The analgesic effects during the perioperative period were compared using a visual analogue scale. The adverse effects of anesthetics (nausea, vomiting, dizziness and drowsiness) were compared between the two groups. Finally, serum inflammatory cytokine [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10] levels were measured using ELISA at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (p>0.05). However, dosages of propofol and remifentanil used were lower in the observation group than in the control group (p<0.05), and the effective rate of postoperative analgesia in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p<0.05). The degree of postoperative pain in both groups were lower than preoperative rates (p<0.05), while the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.05). Finally, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 levels were significantly lower in the observation group relative to the control group at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation (p<0.05). Therefore, nalbuphine has a significant analgesic effect during thoracoscopic lobectomy. The application of nalbuphine can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, reduce postoperative inflammatory responses, and promote rapid patient recovery, thus demonstrating the clinical value of nalbuphine.

The choice between surgical scrubbing and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia: A prospective study.

Background : Day surgery is increasing, and safe and effective logistics are sought. One part of the in-theatre logistics commonly discussed is whether surgical scrub and sterile covering should be done before or after induction of anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of surgical scrub and sterile covering before vs. after the induction of anaesthesia in male patients scheduled for open hernia repair. Methods : This is a prospective randomised study. Sixty ASA 1-3 patients scheduled for open hernia repair were randomised to surgical scrub and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia; group "awake" and "anaesthetised". Need for vasoactive medication during anaesthesia was primary study objective. Duration of anaesthesia and surgery, theatre time, recovery room stay and time to discharge, patients and theatre nurses experiences and willingness to have the same logistics on further potential surgeries, by a questionnaire provided before discharge was also assessed. Results : The duration of anaesthesia was shorter and doses of propofol and remifentanil were reduced by 10 and 13%, respectively, in the awake group. We found still no difference in the need for vasoactive medication during anaesthesia Time in recovery area was significantly reduced in the awake group 39 (SD 15) vs. 48 SD 16) (p<0.05), but time to discharge was not different. There was further no difference in the patients' assessment of quality of care, and only one patient in the awake group would prefer to be anaesthetised on a future procedure. All nurses found pre-anaesthesia scrubbing acceptable as routine. Conclusion : Surgical scrub and sterile covering before the induction of anaesthesia can be done safely and without jeopardising patients' quality of care and possibly improve perioperative logistics. Further studies are warranted assessing impact of awake scrubbing and sterile covering on quality and efficacy of perioperative care.

Validation of Innovative Techniques for Monitoring Nociception during General Anesthesia: A Clinical Study Using Tetanic and Intracutaneous Electrical Stimulation.

This study compares the analgesic indices Analgesia Nociception Index (heart rate variability), Surgical Pleth Index (photoplethysmography), and pupillary dilatation, to heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index, with regard to diagnostic accuracy and prediction probability for nociceptive response. The primary endpoint was the correlation between Δ values and the remifentanil dose administered. We anesthetized 38 patients with propofol and increasing doses of remifentanil and applied standardized tetanic and intracutaneous electrical painful stimulations on each analgesic level. Baseline and Δ values of the Analgesia Nociception Index, the Surgical Pleth Index, pupillary dilatation, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index and their relation to remifentanil doses were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves, prediction probability (PK), and mixed-model analysis. Under propofol sedation, sensitivity and specificity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (PK = 0.98), the Surgical Pleth Index (PK = 0.87), and pupillary dilatation (PK = 0.98) for detecting both painful stimulations were high compared to heart rate (PK = 0.74), mean arterial pressure (PK = 0.75), and bispectral index (PK = 0.55). Baseline values had limited prediction probability toward the nociceptive response (Analgesia Nociception Index: PK = 0.7; Surgical Pleth Index: PK = 0.63; pupillary dilatation: PK = 0.67; and bispectral index: PK = 0.67). The remifentanil dose had an effect (P < 0.001) on all parameters except for bispectral index (P = 0.216). The Analgesia Nociception Index, the Surgical Pleth Index, and pupillary dilatation are superior in detecting painful stimulations compared to heart rate and mean arterial pressure but had limited predictive value. These effects are attenuated by increasing dosages of remifentanil. Our data confirm that bispectral index is not a marker of analgesia.

The choice between surgical scrubbing and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia: A prospective study

Background: Day surgery is increasing, and safe and effective logistics are sought. One part of the in-theatre logistics commonly discussed is whether surgical scrub and sterile covering should be done before or after induction of anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of surgical scrub and sterile covering before vs. after the induction of anaesthesia in male patients scheduled for open hernia repair. Methods: This is a prospective randomised study. Sixty ASA 1-3 patients scheduled for open hernia repair were randomised to surgical scrub and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia; group “awake” and “anaesthetised”. Need for vasoactive medication during anaesthesia was primary study objective. Duration of anaesthesia and surgery, theatre time, recovery room stay and time to discharge, patients and theatre nurses experiences and willingness to have the same logistics on further potential surgeries, by a questionnaire provided before discharge was also assessed. Results: The duration of anaesthesia was shorter and doses of propofol and remifentanil were reduced by 10 and 13%, respectively, in the awake group. We found still no difference in the need for vasoactive medication during anaesthesia Time in recovery area was significantly reduced in the awake group 39 (SD 15) vs. 48 SD 16) (p<0.05), but time to discharge was not different. There was further no difference in the patients’ assessment of quality of care, and only one patient in the awake group would prefer to be anaesthetised on a future procedure. All nurses found pre-anaesthesia scrubbing acceptable as routine. Conclusion: Surgical scrub and sterile covering before the induction of anaesthesia can be done safely and without jeopardising patients’ quality of care and possibly improve perioperative logistics. Further studies are warranted assessing impact of awake scrubbing and sterile covering on quality and efficacy of perioperative care.

The selection of optimal dosage of remifentanil under the guidance of bispectral index in painless gastroscopy

Objective To investigate the optimal dose of remifentanil combined with propofol in painless gastroscopy. Methods Aged 20-60 years old, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, 300 cases of patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly divided into three groups (n=100), group R1 (remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg), group R2 (remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg), group R3 (remifentanil 1.0 μg/kg). The values of BIS, MAP, HR, SpO2 were recorded in the time of pre-anesthesia (T0), gastroscope placement (T1) and gastroscope exit (T2), and other data were recorded including propofol dosage, assisted respiration, intraoperative body movement, gastroscopy time, recovery time, intraoperative awareness, nausea and vomiting, dizziness and time of departure from the hospital etc. Results There were no significant differences in the values of BIS, MAP, SpO2 among the three groups at T0, T1 and T2 (P>0.05). SpO2 of group R1[(96.9±2.1)%] and group R2 [(96.2±2.9)%] were higher than values of group R3 [(92.1±5.5)%]. At T1, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was no significant difference among the three groups of patients at intraoperative awareness, gastroscopy time, nausea and vomiting (P>0.05). Conclusions This study suggests that 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil assisted appropriate propofol is the most suitable solution for gastroscopy. Key words: Gastroscopy; Bispectral index; Remifentanil; Propofol

Remifentanil effects on respiratory drive and timing during pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist

We assessed the effects of varying doses of remifentanil on respiratory drive and timing in patients receiving Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA). Four incrementing remifentanil doses were randomly administered to thirteen intubated patients (0.03, 0.05, 0.08, and 0.1μg·Kg−1·min−1) during both PSV and NAVA. We measured the patient's (Ti/Ttotneu) and ventilator (Ti/Ttotmec) duty cycle, the Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EAdi), the inspiratory (Delaytrinsp) and expiratory (Delaytrexp) trigger delays and the Asynchrony Index (AI).Increasing doses of remifentanil did not modify EAdi, regardless the ventilatory mode. In comparison to baseline, remifentanil infusion >0.05μg/Kg−1/min−1 produced a significant reduction of Ti/Ttotneu and Ti/Ttotmec, by prolonging the expiratory time. Delaytrinsp and Delaytrexp were significantly shorter in NAVA, respect to PSV. AI was not influenced by the different doses of remifentanil, but it was significantly lower during NAVA, compared to PSV. In conclusion remifentanil did not affect the respiratory drive, but only respiratory timing, without differences between modes.

The choice between surgical scrubbing and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia: A prospective study

Background: Day surgery is increasing, and safe and effective logistics are sought. One part of the in-theatre logistics commonly discussed is whether surgical scrub and sterile covering should be done before or after induction of anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of surgical scrub and sterile covering before vs. after the induction of anaesthesia in male patients scheduled for open hernia repair. Methods: This is a prospective randomised study. Sixty ASA 1-3 patients scheduled for open hernia repair were randomised to surgical scrub and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia; group "awake" and group "anaesthetised", respectively. Patients and theatre nurses were asked about their experiences and willingness to have the same logistics on further potential surgeries, through a survey provided before post-surgery. Duration of anaesthesia, surgery, theatre time, recovery room stay and time to discharge was studied. Results: There was no difference in the patients' assessment of quality of care, and only one patient in the awake group would prefer to be anaesthetised on a future procedure. All nurses found pre-anaesthesia scrubbing acceptable as routine. The duration of anaesthesia was shorter and doses of propofol and remifentanil were reduced by 10 and 13%, respectively, in the awake group. Time in recovery area was significantly reduced in the awake group (p<0.05), but time to discharge was not different. Conclusion: Surgical scrub and sterile covering before the induction of anaesthesia can be done safely and without jeopardising patients' quality of care.

Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on preventing emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for cleft palate repair surgery.

The aim of the present study was to observe whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with sufentanil decreased emergence agitation (EA) in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for cleft palate repair surgery. Children undergoing elective cleft palate repair surgery were randomly allocated into the DEX + sufentanil group (group DS; n=50) and the normal saline + fentanyl group (group SF; n=50). Patients in group DS were treated with 0.5 µg/kg DEX prior to induction of anesthesia, whereas patients in group SF received an equal volume of normal saline. Sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg) was administered to induce anesthesia, and 30 min before the end of surgery for patients in group DS. Fentanyl (2 µg/kg) was administered at the same time point for patients in group SF. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), duration of surgery and anesthesia, and the dosage of remifentanil were assessed. EA score, Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score and the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) score were documented every 15 min in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The number of cases requiring fentanyl (1 µg/kg) and the recovery profile data were analyzed. Compared with group DS (P<0.05) and the baseline (P<0.05), HR and MAP were significantly increased in group SF immediately following tracheal intubation and extubation. Mean values of maximum EA, PAED and CHIPPS scores were significantly reduced in group DS compared with group SF at 0 (P<0.01), 15 (P<0.05), and 30 min (P<0.05) after arrival at PACU. The incidence of EA in group SF was significantly increased compared with group DS (P<0.05). The dosage of remifentanil during the surgery and the number of cases requiring fentanyl (1 µg/kg) in group DS were significantly decreased compared with group SF (P<0.05). The findings of the present study suggested that DEX combined with sufentanil was able to effectively decrease the incidence of EA in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for cleft palate repair surgery.

Effects of preconditioning of electro-acupuncture on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly

Electro-acupuncture is a burgeoning treatment using the needle inserting into the body acupoints and the low-frequency pulse current being electrified by an electric acupuncture machine. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of preconditioning of electro-acupuncture on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly.Ninety patients scheduled spine surgery were randomly assigned into 2 groups using a random number table: control group (group C) and electro-acupuncture group (group EA). In group EA, electro-acupuncture was applied on Baihui, Dazhui, and Zusanli acupoints 30 minutes before anesthesia. At 0 minute before treatment of electro-acupuncture, 1 hour after skin incision and surgery completed (T1–3), blood samples were taken for detection of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and S100β by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The total dose of remifentanil and propofol during surgery were recorded. Mini-Mental State Examination was applied to evaluate the cognitive function of patients at 1 day before surgery and 7th and 30th day after surgery.The results showed that compared with group C, score of MMSE increased after surgery, the serum concentration of IL-6, IL-10, and S100β decreased at 1 hour after skin incision, and surgery completed in group EA. Moreover, the total dose of remifentanil and propofol reduced during surgery in group EA.The present study suggests that preconditioning of electro-acupuncture could improve the postoperative cognitive function, and the reduction of inflammatory reaction and brain injury may be involved in the mechanism.

Remifentanil Tolerance and Hyperalgesia

Summary The unique pharmacology of remifentanil makes it a popular intra-operative analgesic. Short-acting opioids like remifentanil have been associated with acute opioid tolerance and/or opioid-induced hyperalgesia, two phenomena which have different mechanisms and are pharmacologically distinct. Clinical studies show heterogeneity of remifentanil infusion regimens, durations of infusion, maintenance of anaesthesia, cumulative dose of remifentanil and pain measures, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the incidence of acute tolerance or hyperalgesia. However, it appears that intra-operative remifentanil infusion rates of above 0.25 μg.kg−1.min−1 are associated with higher postoperative opioid consumption, suggesting tolerance. Infusion rates greater than 0.2 μg.kg−1.min−1 are characterised by lower mechanical/pressure/cold/pain thresholds, which suggests hyperalgesia. The use of concurrent multimodal analgesia, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, may be an effective preventive strategy. The clinical significance and long-term consequences of these entities is still uncertain.

Disposition of Remifentanil in Obesity: A New Pharmacokinetic Model Incorporating the Influence of Body Mass.

The influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of remifentanil is incompletely understood. The aim of the current investigation was to develop a new population PK model for remifentanil that would adequately characterize the influence of body weight (among other covariates, e.g., age) on the disposition of remifentanil in the general adult population. We hypothesized that age and various indices of body mass would be important covariates in the new model. Nine previously published data sets containing 4,455 blood concentration measurements from 229 subjects were merged. A new PK model was built using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Satisfactory model performance was assessed graphically and numerically; an internal, boot-strapping validation procedure was performed to determine the CIs of the model. Body weight, fat-free body mass, and age (but not body mass index) exhibited significant covariate effects on certain three-compartment model parameters. Visual and numerical assessments of model performance were satisfactory. The bootstrap procedure showed satisfactory CIs on all of the model parameters. A new model estimated from a large, diverse data set provides the PK foundation for remifentanil dosing calculations in adult obese and elderly patients. It is suitable for use in target-controlled infusion systems and pharmacologic simulation.

Preliminary investigation of preoperative pregabalin and total intravenous anesthesia doses: a randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveTo determine the efficacy of 2 different doses (150-300mg) of preoperative pregabalin on propofol and remifentanil doses for total intravenous anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DesignProspective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. SettingTraining and research hospital. PatientsForty-eight adult, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 patients. InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive orally 1hour before surgery, a placebo group (group 1), pregabalin 150mg (group 2), or pregabalin 300mg (group 3). MeasurementsIn the operating room, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, SpO2, bispectral index, and body temperature were recorded just before anesthesia induction; 1 and 5minutes after induction; and at minutes 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 of the surgery. Required propofol and remifentanil doses to obtain bispectral index value less than 60 were also recorded. Main ResultsThe remifentanil doses used in the pregabalin groups at minutes 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 and propofol doses at minutes 15, 20, 25, and 30 were statistically significantly lower in comparison to the placebo group. ConclusionThe observations provide preliminary evidence that preoperative pregabalin may decrease anesthetic agent requirement in total intravenous anesthesia patients.

Preference for an Opioid/Benzodiazepine Mixture over an Opioid Alone Using a Concurrent Choice Procedure in Rhesus Monkeys.

Increased abuse of opioids is contributing to an escalation in overdose deaths. Benzodiazepines are frequently abused with opioids, possibly because they increase the potency and/or effectiveness of opioids to produce reinforcing effects. This study used a concurrent-choice procedure to determine whether monkeys would choose to self-administer a mixture of the opioid remifentanil and the benzodiazepine midazolam over remifentanil alone. Initially, three monkeys could respond on one lever for saline and on a second lever for either remifentanil alone or midazolam alone. Thereafter, monkeys chose between a dose of remifentanil (0.32 µg/kg/infusion) that did not change and a dose of remifentanil that varied across sessions; for some sessions, midazolam was combined with varying doses of remifentanil. All monkeys received more infusions of remifentanil (0.0032-0.32 µg/kg/infusion) than saline, whereas only two monkeys responded more for midazolam than for saline. When 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil was available on one lever and a dose of remifentanil that varied across sessions (0.1-1 µg/kg/infusion) was available on the other lever, monkeys chose the larger dose. Combining 3.2 µg/kg/infusion midazolam with 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil increased responding for the mixture over 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil alone, although monkeys chose remifentanil alone over mixtures containing smaller doses of remifentanil. When 10 µg/kg/infusion midazolam was combined with 0.1 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil, monkeys chose the mixture over 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil alone. Thus, monkeys prefer some opioid/benzodiazepine mixtures to larger doses of the opioid alone, suggesting that opioid/benzodiazepine coabuse might be due to increased potency (and possibly effectiveness) of opioids to produce reinforcing effects.

Remifentanil for Sedation of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.

To determine whether remifentanil would provide adequate sedation while allowing frequent and reproducible neurologic assessments in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during mechanical ventilation. Retrospective review. Tertiary care PICU. Thirty-eight patients over a 30-month period. Median age was 9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.25-12 years). The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 9 (IQR: 8-10). All patients were tracheally intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation. A continuous infusion of remifentanil was started at 0.1 μg/kg/min, and bolus doses of 0.25 to 1 μg/kg were administered every 3 to 5 minutes as needed to reach the desired sedation level. Infusions were stopped at least hourly to perform neurologic examinations. The median remifentanil dose was 0.25 μg/kg/min with an IQR of 0.1 and 0.6 μg/kg/min. The maximum dose for any patient in the cohort was 2 μg/kg/min. Median duration of therapy with remifentanil was 20 hours (IQR: 8-44 hours). Adequate sedation was achieved with sedation scores (State Behavioral Scale) meeting target levels with a median value of 100% of the time (IQR: 79%-100%). Neurologic examinations were able to be performed within a median of 9 minutes (IQR: 5-14 minutes) of pausing the infusion. No serious safety events occurred. In 68% of the patients, neurologic examinations remained reassuring during remifentanil infusion, and patients were extubated. The remaining patients were transitioned to traditional sedative agents for long-term management of their traumatic injuries once the neurologic status was deemed stable. This data suggest that remifentanil is a suitable sedative agent for use in children with TBI. It provides a rapid onset of sedation with recovery that permits reliable and reproducible clinical examination.

Induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil after bolus midazolam administration in Landrace/Large White swine

ObjectiveTo investigate an alternative combination for anaesthesia induction in swine. Study designRandomized, ‘blinded’ experimental study. AnimalsForty-five Landrace/Large White swine weighing 20.0±1.5 kg. MethodsPulse oximetry, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were measured after premedication with ketamine, midazolam and atropine as well as after intubation following induction with a fixed dose of 0.2 mg kg−1 midazolam combined with 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 μg kg−1 remifentanil (groups R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5, respectively). Intubation was evaluated using a numerical scoring system assessing jaw relaxation, resistance to the laryngoscope, vocal cord position, vocal cord movement and response to intubation. The time required to intubate and necessity for an additional midazolam dose were recorded. Baseline and post-intubation variables were compared with paired t tests, whereas for differences between the remifentanil groups the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was estimated. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to disentangle the effect of remifentanil dose and the additional midazolam. ResultsHigher dose of remifentanil was associated with better vocal cord position (p<0.001), better response to intubation (p<0.001), shorter time required for intubation (p=0.030) and less frequent necessity for additional administration of midazolam (p=0.004). In total, 39.5% of the animals required additional midazolam. In groups R1, R4 and R5, there were decreases in HRs (p=0.009, p=0.008 and p=0.032, respectively) between baseline and post-intubation phase; in groups R3 and R4, there were decreases in systolic blood pressure (p=0.040 and p=0.019, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, remifentanil dose was not associated with the observed changes in haemodynamic variables. One animal developed apnoea and four electrocardiographic anomalies; all resolved without pharmaceutical interventions. Conclusions and clinical relevanceA combination of 0.2 mg kg−1 midazolam with 4 or 5 μg kg−1 remifentanil may provide an alternative method of anaesthesia induction for swine.

Continuous postoperative infusion of remifentanil inhibits the stress responses to tracheal extubation of patients under general anesthesia.

PurposeThe study aimed to assess the combined effects of parecoxib with three different doses of remifentanil and its effect on the stress and cough responses following tracheal extubation under general anesthesia.MethodsA total of 120 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of I or II, undergoing selective thyroidectomy with total intravenous anesthesia (propofol-remifentanil) and tracheal intubation, were randomly allocated to be treated with an intravenous injection of parecoxib and a continuous infusion of remifentanil at 0.1 μg/kg/min (R1), 0.2 μg/kg/min (R2), 0.3 μg/kg/min (R3), or an isotonic saline injection (the control group). Hemodynamic vital signs, emergence time, extubation time, sedation-agitation scale (SAS) score, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, occurrence of coughing, and side effects were recorded before surgery and during the peri-extubation period. The vital signs included blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (R), and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SPO2).ResultsBP, HR, the occurrence rate of coughing, and extubation awareness decreased with the dose of remifentanil, and the differences among the groups were significant (P < 0.05). Emergence and extubation time increased with the dose of remifentanil, and the differences among the groups were significant (P < 0.05). The occurrence rates of respiratory depression and bradycardia in group R3 were significantly higher than those in other groups (P < 0.05). SAS and VAS were lowest in group R3, and the differences among the groups were significant (P < 0.05). BP, HR, SAS, and VAS increased with time in the remifentanil groups.ConclusionThe combined use of parecoxib and a moderate dose of remifentanil can effectively suppress the stress and coughing responses during the peri-extubation period. The appropriate quantity of remifentanil was found to be 0.2 μg/kg/min, as this dosage caused no side effects.

Effect of intravenous infusion with lidocaine on rapid recovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Objective: To investigate the effect of intravenous infusion with lidocaine on rapid recovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial. From February to August 2016 in Affiliated Yiwu Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were involved and randomly divided into control group (n=30) and lidocaine group (n=30). Patients in lidocaine group received lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously before induction and followed by 2.0 mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) to the end of surgery. Patients in control group received equal volumes of saline intravenously. Anesthesia induction in both groups were given intravenous midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg, propofol 2.0 mg/kg and cisatracuium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 0.05-0.20 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1) and remifentanil 0.1-0.5 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1) for laryngeal mask airway which bispectral index (BIS) value maintained at 40-60. BIS, heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) were recorded before anesthesia induction, before and immediately after laryngeal mask implantation, intraoperative 30 min and anesthesia awake. Pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (VAS) at postoperation immediately, 30 min during postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time of PACU retention, postoperative ambulation, first intestine venting and discharge were recorded. The dosage of propofol and remifentanil, the frequency of sufentanil used, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using Simple Restoration Quality Score (QoR-9). Results: BIS values before and after laryngeal mask implantation in lidocaine group were 50.50±3.47 and 54.63±1.25 respectively, which was lower than those in control group(54.30±4.78, 55.80±2.33; t=3.542, 2.423, all P<0.05). The VAS score at postoperation immediately, PACU 30 min, postoperative 2, 6, 12 h in lidocaine group were 2.76±0.97, 2.37±0.93, 2.10±1.12, 1.76±0.97, 1.20±0.76 respectively, which was lower than those in control group (3.83±1.34, 3.27±1.26, 3.06±1.20, 2.63±0.88, 1.90±0.84; t=3.528, 3.154, 3.217, 3.603, 3.372, all P<0.05 ). The frequency of additional sufentanil at postoperation immediately and PACU 30 min in lidocaine group was 5(17%), 3(10%), which were less than those in control group(12(40%), 9(30%); χ(2)=4.022, 3.950, all P<0.05). The dosage of propofol and remifentanil in lidocaine group were (4.33±0.75) mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) and (9.00±1.66) μg·kg(-1)·h(-1) respectively, which were less than those in control group ((5.20±1.39) mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) and (10.43±2.20) μg·kg(-1)·h(-1;) t= 2.982, 2.842, all P<0.05). The time of PACU retention, postoperative ambulation and first intestine venting were (39.90 ± 8.06) min, (11.93±1.68) h and (10.16±1.05) h respectively in lidocaine group, which were shorter than those in control group ((48.23±10.04) min, (13.16±1.58) h and (11.13±1.30) h; t=3.514, 2.931, 3.156, all P<0.05). The QoR-9 score in lidocaine group was 15.60±1.07, which was higher than that in control group(14.73±0.74, t=-3.649, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting and the discharge time between two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine can effectively reduce the dosages of propofol and remifentanil, postoperative early VAS score, postoperative ambulation time and first intestine venting time which could improve the satisfaction of patients.

The effect of monitoringanesthetic depth on the intraoperative anesthetic dose and postoperative recovery of gerontal patients after general anesthesia

Objective To explore the effect of anesthetic depth regulated by A-line ARX-index (AAI) and BIS on the intraoperative anesthetic dose and postoperative recovery of gerontal patients suffering total knee replacement surgery under general anesthesia. Methods Sixty old patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery, aged 65-75 y, weighing 45-85 kg, ASA physical statusⅠor Ⅱwere divided into group AAI, group BIS and group contract (group CON)(n=20) using the random digits table method. At 1 d before and 1, 3, 5, 7 d after operation, cognitive function was assessed by mini-mental state examination(MMSE) and the scores were recorded. The total drug dosage during general anesthesia, the recovery time extubation time, the observer assessment of sedation(OAA/S) scale and VAS were also recorded. Results Compared with group CON[propofol(810±17) mg, remifentanil(1.26±0.07) mg], both the propofol dosage[group AAI(450±19), group BIS(500±18) mg] and the remifentanil dosage[group AAI(0.78±0.07) mg, group BIS(0.80±0.08) mg] were less(P 0.05). There was no significant differences among three groups in the MMSE scores at 1 d before and 1, 3, 5, 7 d after operation(P>0.05). Conclusions Application of anesthetic depth monitoring can reduce the dosage of anesthetic, shorten the awakening time and extubation time, while has no significant effect on the MMSE. Key words: A-line ARX-index; Bispectral index; Anesthetic depth; Gerontisml; Total knee replacement; Postoperative cognitive dysfunction

Remifentanil for procedural sedation: a systematic review of the literature

ObjectiveWe sought to determine the performance characteristics of remifentanil as an agent of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for adult and paediatric patients undergoing procedures similar to those executed in...

The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: A retrospective dose-finding trial.

Flexible bronchoscopy is more and more used for diagnosis and management of various pulmonary diseases in pediatrics. As poor coordination of children, the procedure is usually performed under general anesthesia with spontaneous or controlled ventilation to increase children and bronchoscopists’ safety and comfort. Previous studies have reported that dexmedetomidine (DEX) could be safely and effectively used for flexible bronchoscopy in both adulate and children. However, there is no trial to evaluate the dose-finding of safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DEX-RF) in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy.The objective of this study is to evaluate the dose-finding of safety and efficacy of DEX-RF in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy.One hundred thirty-five children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with DEX-RF were divided into 3 groups: Group DR1 (n = 47, DEX infusion at 0.5 μg·kg–1 for 10 minutes, then adjusted to 0.5–0.7 μg kg–1 h–1; RF infusion at 0.5 μg kg–1 for 2 minutes, then adjusted to 0.05–0.2 μg kg–1 min–1), Group DR2 (n = 43, DEX infusion at 1 μg kg–1 for 10 minutes, then adjusted to 0.5–0.7 μg kg–1 h–1; RF infusion at 1 μg kg–1 for 2 minutes, then adjusted to 0.05–0.2 μg kg–1 min–1), Group DR3 (n = 45, DEX infusion at 1.5 μg kg–1 for 10 minutes, then adjusted to 0.5–0.7 μg kg–1 h–1; RF infusion at 1 μg kg–1 for 2 minutes, then adjusted to 0.05–0.2 μg kg–1 min–1). Ramsay sedation scale of the 3 groups was maintained 3. Anesthesia onset time, total number of intraoperative children movements, hemodynamics (heart rate, arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate), total cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, the amount of midazolam and lidocaine, time to first dose of rescue midazolam and lidocaine, postoperative recovery time, adverse events, bronchoscopist satisfaction score were recorded.Anesthesia onset time was significantly shorter in DR3 group (14.23 ± 5.45 vs 14.45 ± 5.12 vs 11.13 ± 4.51 minutes, respectively, of DR1, DR2, DR3, P = 0.003). Additionally, the perioperative hemodynamic profile was more stable in group DR3 than that in the other 2 groups. Total number of children movements during flexible bronchoscopy was higher in DR1 group than the other 2 groups (46.81% 22/47 vs 34.88% 15/43 vs 17.78% 8/45, respectively, of DR1, DR2, DR3, P = 0.012). Total doses of rescue midazolam and lidocaine were significantly higher in DR1 and DR2 groups than that of DR3 group (P = 0.000). The time to first dose of rescue midazolam and lidocaine was significantly longer in DR3 group than DR1 and DR2 groups (P = 0.000). Total cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine was more in DR2 and DR3 groups (P = 0.000), while the amount of remifentanil was more in DR1 and DR2 groups (P = 0.000). The time to recovery for discharge from the PACU was significantly shorter in DR1 group compared with the other 2 groups (P = 0.000). Results from bronchoscopist satisfaction score showed significantly higher in DR2 and DR3 groups than that of DR1 group (P = 0.025). There were significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of the overall incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, hypoxemia, and cough (P < 0.05).Though it required longer recovery time, high dose of DEX-RF, which provided better stable hemodynamic profiles and bronchoscopist satisfaction score, less amount of rescue scheme, and children movements, could be safely and efficacy used in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy.