Dose-addition Analysis Research Articles

Effects of serotonin (5-HT)1A and 5-HT2A receptor agonists on schedule-controlled responding in rats: drug combination studies

Indirect-acting serotonin (5-HT) receptor agonists (e.g., selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors [SSRI]) stimulate multiple 5-HT receptors, although the role of particular receptors as well as interaction(s) among different receptors in the therapeutic effects of SSRIs is not fully understood. Relatively few studies have systematically examined direct-acting agonists in combination. This study examined the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin hydrochloride (8-OH-DPAT; 0.01-10.0 mg/kg) and 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl-4-fluoro-4-([(5-methyl-6-methylamino-pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-methyl)-piperidin-1-yl-methanone (F13714; 0.01-1.0 mg/kg) and the 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM; 0.32-10.0 mg/kg) and dipropyltryptamine (DPT; 1.0-32.0 mg/kg), alone and in combination, in rats responding under a fixed ratio schedule of food presentation. When administered alone, each drug decreased the rate of responding in a dose-related manner with the potency order being F13714 > 8-OH-DPAT > DOM > DPT. WAY100635 (5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist; 0.01-0.1 mg/kg) attenuated the rate-decreasing effects of 8-OH-DPAT and F13714 while MDL100907 (5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist; 0.01-0.1 mg/kg) attenuated the rate-decreasing effects of DOM and DPT. Dose addition analysis showed that the interaction between 8-OH-DPAT and F13714, as well as the interaction between DOM and DPT, was additive. In contrast, the interaction between 8-OH-DPAT and DOM, as well as the interaction between F13714 and DOM, was infra-additive. This study shows that for some dose combinations, agonist actions at one 5-HT receptor subtype attenuate agonist actions at another 5-HT receptor subtype; thus, the combined neuropharmacological actions and therapeutic effects of indirect-acting agonists are not likely to be adequately characterized by examining in isolation activity at particular 5-HT receptor subtypes.

Selective enhancement of fentanyl-induced antinociception by the delta agonist SNC162 but not by ketamine in rhesus monkeys: Further evidence supportive of delta agonists as candidate adjuncts to mu opioid analgesics

Mu-opioid receptor agonists such as fentanyl are effective analgesics, but their clinical use is limited by untoward effects. Adjunct medications may improve the effectiveness and/or safety of opioid analgesics. This study compared interactions between fentanyl and either the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine or the delta-opioid receptor agonist SNC162 [(+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-(3-phenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] in two behavioral assays in rhesus monkeys. An assay of thermal nociception evaluated tail-withdrawal latencies from water heated to 50 and 54 °C. An assay of schedule-controlled responding evaluated response rates maintained under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food presentation. Effects of each drug alone and of three mixtures of ketamine + fentanyl (22:1, 65:1, 195:1 ketamine/fentanyl) or SNC162 + fentanyl (59:1, 176:1, 528:1 SNC162/fentanyl) were evaluated in each assay. All drugs and mixtures dose-dependently decreased rates of food-maintained responding, and drug proportions in the mixtures were based on relative potencies in this assay. Ketamine and SNC162 were inactive in the assay of thermal antinociception, but fentanyl and all mixtures produced dose-dependent antinociception. Drug interactions were evaluated using dose-addition and dose-ratio analysis. Dose-addition analysis revealed that interactions for all ketamine/fentanyl mixtures were additive in both assays. SNC162/fentanyl interactions were usually additive, but one mixture (176:1) produced synergistic antinociception at 50 °C. Dose-ratio analysis indicated that ketamine failed to improve the relative potency of fentanyl to produce antinociception vs. rate suppression, whereas two SNC162/fentanyl mixtures (59:1 and 176:1) increased the relative potency of fentanyl to produce antinociception. These results suggest that delta agonists may produce more selective enhancement than ketamine of mu agonist-induced antinociception.

Self-administration of (+)-methamphetamine and (+)-pseudoephedrine, alone and combined, by rhesus monkeys

(+)-Methamphetamine (MA) is an illicit psychostimulant that can be synthesized from the nonprescription nasal decongestant, (+)-pseudoephedrine (PE). While MA is widely abused, PE appears to have little or no abuse liability in currently available formulations. However, PE produces centrally-mediated dopaminergic effects that are linked to the reinforcing effects of MA and other illicit psychostimulants and has been reported to function as a positive reinforcer in non-human primates. There has yet to be an assessment of the relative reinforcing effects of MA and PE. Therefore, the current study compared the reinforcing potency and strength of MA and PE, alone and combined, in four rhesus monkeys that were allowed to self-administer MA (0.003–0.3 mg/kg/inj), PE (0.1–3.0 mg/kg/inj), or combinations of the two under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. (+)-Methamphetamine functioned as a positive reinforcer in a dose-dependent manner. (+)-Pseudoephedrine also functioned as a positive reinforcer, but was less potent than MA. There were no differences in maximum injections between MA, PE, or any of the combinations of the two. Dose-addition analysis and the interaction index indicated that combinations of PE and MA were either additive or sub-additive in their reinforcing effects. These results suggest that, while MA is a more potent reinforcer than PE, the two drugs are comparable in terms of reinforcing strength. However, MA and PE do not appear to interact in a manner that enhances their relative reinforcing effects.

Attenuation of morphine antinociceptive tolerance by a CB1 receptor agonist and an NMDA receptor antagonist: Interactive effects

CB(1) cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor agonists and N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists attenuate the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance. The present study used dose-addition analysis to evaluate CB(1)/NMDA receptor interactions on this endpoint. Chronic morphine administration (5 days, 100 mg/kg, twice daily) resulted in a 2.8-fold rightward shift in the morphine dose-effect curve. Co-administration of either the CB(1) receptor agonist CP-55940 (5-(1,1-Dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]phenol; 0.32-1.0 mg/kg) or the NMDA receptor antagonist (-)-6-phosphonomethyl-deca-hydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (LY235959; 1.0-3.2 mg/kg) with morphine dose-dependently attenuated morphine tolerance. The relative potency of each drug alone was quantified using a defined level of effect (one-quarter log shift in the morphine dose-effect curve), resulting in equieffective doses of 0.42 mg/kg and 1.1 mg/kg for CP-55940 and LY235959, respectively. Subsequent experiments assessed CP-55940/LY235959 interactions using a fixed-proportion design. Co-administration of CP-55940/LY235959 mixtures (1:1, 1:3.2, or 1:10 CP-55940/LY235959) with morphine dose-dependently attenuated morphine tolerance. Isobolographic and dose-addition analysis were used to statistically compare the experimentally determined potency for each mixture (z(mix)) with predicted additive potency (z(add)). Mixtures of 1:1 and 1:3.2 CP-55940/LY235959 produced additive effects (z(add) = z(mix)), while the mixture of 1:10 CP-55940/LY235959 produced a supra-additive effect (z(add) > z(mix)). These results suggest that CP-55940 and LY235959 produce additive or supra-additive attenuation of morphine antinociceptive tolerance after repeated morphine administration, depending on their relative concentrations.

Role of delta opioid efficacy as a determinant of mu/delta opioid interactions in rhesus monkeys

Delta opioid agonists can selectively enhance the antinociceptive effects of mu opioid agonists without enhancing some other, potentially undesirable mu agonist effects. However, the degree of delta receptor efficacy required to produce this profile of interactions is unknown. To address this issue, the present study examined interactions produced by the mu agonist fentanyl and the intermediate-efficacy delta opioid MSF61 in rhesus monkeys. For comparison, interactions were also examined between fentanyl and the relatively high-efficacy delta agonist SNC243A and the delta antagonist naltrindole, which has negligible efficacy at delta receptors. Two different behavioral procedures were used: (a) a warm-water tail-withdrawal assay of thermal nociception, and (b) an assay of schedule-controlled responding for food reinforcement. Drug interactions within each procedure were evaluated using dose-addition analysis to compare experimental results with expected additivity. Drug interactions across procedures were evaluated using dose–ratio analysis to assess relative potencies to produce antinociception vs. response-rate suppression. As expected, dose-addition analysis found that fentanyl/SNC243A interactions were superadditive in the assay of antinociception but additive in the assay of schedule-controlled responding. Conversely, fentanyl/MSF61 interactions were generally additive in both procedures, and fentanyl/naltrindole interactions were additive or subadditive in both procedures. Dose–ratio analysis found that fentanyl alone produced antinociception and rate suppression with similar potencies. Some fentanyl/SNC243A mixtures produced antinociception with up to 4-fold greater potency than rate-suppression. However, fentanyl/MSF61 and fentanyl/naltrindole mixtures produced antinociception with lower potency than rate suppression. These results suggest that relatively high delta receptor efficacy is required for mu/delta antinociceptive synergy.

Effects of Atypical κ-Opioid Receptor Agonists on Intrathecal Morphine-Induced Itch and Analgesia in Primates

Itch/pruritus is the most common side effect associated with spinal administration of morphine given to humans for analgesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists with diverse chemical structures as antipruritics and to elucidate the receptor mechanism underlying the antipruritic effect in monkeys. In particular, previously proposed non-KOR-1 agonists, including nalfurafine [TRK-820, 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14 beta-dihydroxy-4,5 alpha-epoxy-6 beta-[N-methyl-trans-3-(3-furyl)acrylamido]morphinan], bremazocine [(+/-)-6-ethyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-3-[(1-hydroxycyclopropy)-methyl]-11,11-dimethyl-2,6-methano-3-benzazocin-8-ol], and GR 89696 [4-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)acetyl]-3-(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-1-piperazinecarboxylic acid methyl ester] were studied in various behavioral assays for measuring itch/scratching, analgesia, and respiratory depression. Systemic administration of nalfurafine (0.1-1 microg/kg), bremazocine (0.1-1 microg/kg), or GR 89696 (0.01-0.1 microg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated intrathecal morphine (0.03 mg)-induced scratching responses without affecting morphine antinociception. The combination of intrathecal morphine with these KOR agonists did not cause sedation. In addition, pretreatment with effective antiscratching doses of nalfurafine, bremazocine, or GR 89696 did not antagonize systemic morphine-induced antinociception and respiratory depression. The dose-addition analysis revealed that there is no subadditivity for nalfurafine in combination with morphine in the antinociceptive effect. Furthermore, the KOR antagonist study revealed that antiscratching effects of both nalfurafine and a prototypical KOR-1 agonist, U-50488H [trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide], could be blocked completely by a selective KOR antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (3 mg/kg). These findings suggest that the agonist action on KOR mainly contributes to the effectiveness of these atypical KOR agonists as antipruritics, and there is no evidence for KOR subtypes or mu-opioid antagonist action underlying the effects of these KOR agonists. This mechanism-based study further supports the clinical potential of KOR agonists as antipruritics under the context of spinal opioid analgesia.

Morphine in Combination with Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonists on Schedule‐Controlled Responding and Thermal Nociception

The present study examined the interactive effects of morphine in combination with metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor antagonists on schedule‐controlled responding and thermal nociception. Drug interaction data were examined with isobolographic and dose‐addition analysis. Morphine, the mGlu1 receptor antagonist JNJ16259685, the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP, and the mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 all decreased rates of schedule‐controlled responding. JNJ16259685/morphine, MPEP/morphine, and LY341495/morphine mixtures produced additive effects on this endpoint. Morphine also produced dose‐dependent antinociception in the assay of thermal nociception, whereas JNJ16259685, MPEP, and LY341495 failed to produce an effect. In this assay, JNJ16259685/morphine and LY341495/morphine mixtures produced supra‐additive effects, whereas MPEP/morphine mixtures produced additive effects. These results suggest that an mGlu1 and an mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist, but not an mGlu5 receptor antagonist, selectively enhances the antinociceptive effects of morphine. In addition, these data confirm that the behavioral effects of drug mixtures depend on the endpoint under study. Supported by grants R01‐DA02749 and T32‐DA07244.

Effects of a Cannabinoid1 Receptor Antagonist and Serotonin2C Receptor Agonist Alone and in Combination on Motivation for Palatable Food: A Dose-Addition Analysis Study in Mice

The cannabinoid and serotonin systems modulate feeding behavior in humans and laboratory animals. The present study assessed whether a cannabinoid (CB)(1) receptor antagonist and a serotonin (5-HT)(2C) receptor agonist alone and in combination attenuate motivation for the liquid nutritional drink Ensure as measured by a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement in male C57BL/6 mice. Pretreatment (15 min i.p.) with either the CB(1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride (SR141716) (SR; Rimonabant or Acomplia) or the 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) dose-dependently decreased the maximum ratio completed under the PR schedule (break point) in mice. ED(25) values for SR and mCPP to decrease break point were determined, and the relative potency of each drug alone was quantified. Fixed dose-ratio pairs of SR/mCPP based on their relative potency were then administered. Dose-addition analysis comparing the experimentally determined potency for SR/mCPP combinations with their predicted additive potency revealed that SR/mCPP combinations in 1:1 and 2:1 ratios based on relative potency produced significant synergistic attenuation of break point for Ensure. The ED(25) values for decreasing break point were consistently lower than ED(25) values for decreasing response rate, and synergistic effects of SR/mCPP combinations on break point were seen independent of synergistic effects on response rate. These results indicate that cannabinoid CB(1) and serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptors are involved in motivated feeding behavior in mice and that these compounds can synergistically modulate motivation for palatable food with the synergy dependent upon the ratio of SR/mCPP in the combination.

Morphine in Combination with Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonists on Schedule-Controlled Responding and Thermal Nociception

The present study examined the interactive effects of morphine in combination with metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor antagonists on schedule-controlled responding and thermal nociception. Drug interaction data were examined with isobolographic and dose-addition analysis. Morphine, the mGlu1 receptor antagonist JNJ16259685 [(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano-[2,3-b]quinolin-7-yl)-(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl)-methanone], the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP [2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride], and the mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 [(2S)-2-amino-2-[(1S,2S-2-carboxycycloprop-1-yl]-3-(xanth-9-yl) propanoic acid] all decreased rates of schedule-controlled responding. JNJ16259685/morphine, MPEP/morphine, and LY341495/morphine mixtures produced additive effects on this endpoint. Morphine also produced dose-dependent antinociception in the assay of thermal nociception, whereas JNJ16259685, MPEP, and LY341495 failed to produce an effect. In this assay, JNJ16259685 and LY341495 potentiated the antinociceptive effects of morphine, whereas MPEP/morphine mixtures produced additive effects. These results suggest that an mGlu1 and an mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist, but not an mGlu5 receptor antagonist, selectively enhance the antinociceptive effects of morphine. In addition, these data confirm that the behavioral effects of drug mixtures depend on the endpoint under study.

Effects of a CB1 receptor antagonist and 5‐HT2C receptor agonist alone and in combination on motivation for palatable food: a dose‐addition analysis study in mice

The cannabinoid and serotonin systems modulate feeding behavior in humans and laboratory animals. The present study assessed whether a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist and a serotonin 5-HT2C receptor agonist alone and in combination attenuate motivation for a food reinforcer as measured by a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement in mice. Pretreatment with either the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (SR; 0.3– 30.0 mg/kg) or the 5-HT2C receptor agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP; 0.1 – 10.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated responding for the liquid nutritional drink Ensure® in male C57BL/6 mice. The relative potency of each drug alone was quantified and ED25s for SR and mCPP were determined to be 2.3 mg/kg and 0.30 mg/kg respectively. Fixed proportions of SR/mCPP mixtures in a 1:1 ratio based on their relative potencies were then administered and also dose-dependently attenuated responding for liquid Ensure®. Dose-addition analysis comparing the experimentally determined potency for SR/mCPP with the predicted additive potency revealed that SR/mCPP produced a significant synergistic attenuation of responding for Ensure®. These results support other findings that both the cannabinoid CB1 and serotonin 5-HT2C receptor systems are involved in feeding behavior and suggest that these receptor systems can synergistically modulate motivation for palatable food.

Interactions between an N-Methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist and Low-Efficacy Opioid Receptor Agonists in Assays of Schedule-Controlled Responding and Thermal Nociception

A growing body of literature has implicated N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor mechanisms in the acute antinociceptive effects of morphine; however, the nature of this interaction has not been thoroughly quantified. Moreover, it is not clear whether NMDA/morphine interactions extend to less efficacious opioids. Therefore, the present study examined the effects of morphine and various low-efficacy opioid agonists in combination with the NMDA antagonist (-)-6-phosphonomethyl-deca-hydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (LY235959) in two different assays: schedule-controlled responding and thermal nociception. Data were examined with dose-addition analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the drug interactions. LY235959 and the opioid agonists morphine, buprenorphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine all decreased rates of schedule-controlled responding. LY235959/morphine and LY235959/buprenorphine mixtures produced additive or subadditive effects in this assay, whereas LY235959/butorphanol and LY235959/nalbuphine mixtures produced additive or supra-additive effects, depending on the relative proportions of each drug in mixture. Morphine, buprenorphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine also produced dose-dependent antinociception in the assay of thermal nociception, whereas LY235959 failed to produce an effect. In this assay, LY235959 potentiated the antinociceptive effects of morphine and each of the low-efficacy opioids tested. These results suggest that LY235959 may selectively increase the antinociceptive effects of morphine and some low-efficacy opioid receptor agonists without increasing their rate-altering effects. In addition, these data confirm that the behavioral effects of drug mixtures depend on the relative concentrations of the drugs in the mixture and on the endpoint under study.

Potentiation of morphine antinociception by pentobarbital in female vs. male rats

It has been shown previously that female rats are more sensitive than males to barbiturate anesthesia, whereas males may be more sensitive than females to opioid antinociception. The aim of the present study was to determine whether enhancement of morphine antinociception by pentobarbital, previously demonstrated in male animals and humans, occurs similarly in females. Pentobarbital (50 mg/kg i.p.) produced longer-lasting anesthetic effects (loss of muscle tone, righting reflex) in gonadally intact female rats than in males, but greater antinociceptive effects in males at some time points post-injection. There were no significant sex differences in morphine-induced anesthesia or antinociception; however, 50 mg/kg pentobarbital produced greater leftward shifts in the morphine antinociceptive dose–effect curve in gonadally intact females than males, whether pentobarbital was administered 30 vs. 120 min before morphine (times at which there were no sex differences vs. sex differences, respectively, in pentobarbital’s effects when administered alone). Dose-addition analysis confirmed that pentobarbital enhancement of morphine antinociception was supra-additive in both sexes; morphine also significantly enhanced pentobarbital-induced anesthesia in both sexes. In gonadectomized males, testosterone did not significantly alter pentobarbital enhancement of morphine antinociception; in contrast, in gonadectomized females, estradiol significantly attenuated the drug interaction. Estradiol did not significantly alter the effects of pentobarbital alone or morphine alone, indicating that the attenuation of the pentobarbital’s potentiation of morphine antinociception in estradiol-treated rats is specific to the drug interaction. These results suggest that barbiturate potentiation of opioid antinociception may be greater in females – particularly those in low ovarian hormone states – than in males.

Interactions between the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin in a drug-vs-food choice procedure in rhesus monkeys: a dose-addition analysis

Concurrent abuse of cocaine and heroin is a common form of polydrug abuse, but the interactions between the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin are poorly understood. Dose-addition analysis is a tool for the quantitative assessment of drug interactions, but this analysis has not been applied to evaluation of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin. To evaluate interactions between the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin using dose-addition analysis. Rhesus monkeys were trained under a concurrent-choice schedule of food delivery (1 gm pellets) and drug injections (cocaine or heroin, 0-0.1 mg kg(-1) injection(-1)). Full dose-effect curves were determined for cocaine alone and heroin alone. Subsequently, full dose-effect curves were determined for three fixed-proportion mixtures of cocaine and heroin (fixed proportions of 1:3.2, 1:1 and 3.2:1 cocaine/heroin). Dose-addition analysis was used to assess whether cocaine/heroin interactions were super-additive, additive, or sub-additive. Cocaine, heroin, and all cocaine/heroin mixtures maintained dose-dependent and monotonic increases in drug choice and dose-dependent decreases in response rates. Choice dose-effect curves for cocaine/heroin mixtures were shifted to the left of dose-effect curves for cocaine or heroin alone, and dose-addition analysis indicated that cocaine/heroin interactions on drug choice were sub-additive or additive. Cocaine/heroin interactions on response-rate measures were also sub-additive or additive. These results confirm that mixtures of cocaine and heroin produce reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys; however, cocaine/heroin interactions were only or sub-additive or additive. Thus, these results do not support the hypothesis that simultaneously delivered cocaine and heroin produces super-additive reinforcing effects.

Opioid interactions in rhesus monkeys: effects of delta + mu and delta + kappa agonists on schedule-controlled responding and thermal nociception.

Agonists at delta, mu, and kappa opioid receptors produce interacting effects in rodents and nonhuman primates. To further evaluate the determinants of these interactions, this study examined the effects of mixtures of delta + mu and delta + kappa agonists in rhesus monkeys (n = 4-5) using two behavioral procedures, an assay of schedule-controlled responding for food reinforcement and an assay of thermal nociception. Results were analyzed using dose-addition analysis. In the assay of schedule-controlled responding, the delta agonist (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxy-benzyl]-N,N-diethyl-benzamide (SNC80); the mu agonists methadone, fentanyl, morphine, and nalbuphine; and the kappa agonists (5alpha,7alpha,8beta)-(-)-N-methyl-N-(7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro(4,5)dec-8-yl) benzeneacetamide (U69,593) and bremazocine all dose dependently decreased rates of food-maintained responding when administered alone. Fixed ratio mixtures of SNC80 + mu agonists produced additive or subadditive effects, whereas SNC80 + kappa agonist mixtures produced only additive effects. In the assay of thermal nociception, SNC80 produced no measurable effects when administered alone, whereas mu and kappa agonists produced dose-dependent antinociception. SNC80 + mu agonist mixtures produced superadditive effects manifested as leftward shifts in mu agonist dose-effect curves. This synergism was antagonized by the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole, suggesting that SNC80-induced enhancement of mu agonist antinociception was delta receptor-mediated. SNC80 did not enhance the antinociceptive effects of the highly selective kappa agonist U69,593, and it produced only a marginal enhancement of antinociception produced by the less selective kappa agonist bremazocine. These results suggest that delta agonists may selectively enhance the antinociceptive effects of mu agonists in rhesus monkeys. These results also confirm that opioid agonist interactions may depend on the receptor selectivity and relative doses of the agonists and on the experimental endpoint.

Isobolographic Assessment of the Interaction Between Adriamycin and Photodynamic Therapy With Meso-Chlorin E6 Monoethylene Diamine in Human Epithelial Overian Carcinoma (OVCAR-3) In Vitro

Considering the differing mechanisms of cytotoxicity produced by adriamycin and the photosensitizer meso-chlorin e6 monoethylene diamine (Mce6) with light, the interaction of these agents in combination on human ovarian epithelial carcinoma (OVCAR-3 in vitro) was evaluated by dose and effect addition isobole analysis. Mitochondrial respiration via the 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2 yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide cleavage assay (MTT) and reproductive capacity via the tritiated thymidine incorporation assay (TI) were assessed 72 and 144 hours after exposure to adriamycin, Mce6, and light (650 nm), and to their combinations, in OVCAR-3 cells grown in vitro (20,000 cells per well). In the majority of assays, reproductive capacity was more sensitive to the drug(s) than was mitochondrial respiration (2-10x). Dose-addition isobole analysis showed synergy for the combination of 50% median effective dose (ED50) adriamycin with 50% ED50 Mce6/light in all assays (all P < or = .027). Antagonism was noted with the combination 25% ED50 adriamycin with 75% ED50 Mce6/light. Additivity and synergy were the predominant interactions for 75% ED50 adriamycin with 25% ED50 Mce6/light by dose-addition isobole analyses. Effect-addition isoboles showed a predominance of synergy, particularly for the combination 50% ED50 adriamycin with 50% ED50 Mce6/light. Synergy and additivity are the primary in vitro interactions for the combination of adriamycin and Mce6/light in the dosage range tested. Reproductive capacity is more sensitive to these agents than is mitochondrial respiration.

Approaches to the study of drug interactions in behavioral pharmacology

This paper discusses some of the approaches which have been used for analyzing drug interactions with an emphasis on applications for behavioral pharmacology. Two broad categories of drug interactions are defined: heterergic, when only one of the drugs is active in the behavioral measure employed, and homergic, when both of the interacting drugs have similar action. Two distinct models are presented for homergic drug interactions. The effect-addition model predicts that the combined action of two drugs is equal to the arithmetic sum of the individual effects. This is referred to as effect-additive and deviations from the predicted effects are described accordingly. The dose-addition model takes both dose and effect into account, and thus has a sounder theoretical basis. Leftward shifts in the dose-effect curves are described as equal to (dose-additive), or greater than (supra-additive) or less than (infra-additive) predicted on the basis of the relative potencies of the interacting drugs. Isobolographic methods facilitate data reduction and allow a graphic depiction of dose-addition analysis. A survey of the literature utilizing isobolographic techniques is presented.