This paper explores the minimum energy that would be required to provide all energy-using services currently used the U.S. office building sector if they were all provided by thermodynamically ideal devices that do not violate physical law. Data from the U.S. DOE and the General Services Administration were used to identify office building workspace services, equipment, occupancy and schedules. Internal building loads were estimated after identifying or conservatively approximating the thermodynamically ideal power required for each service. The average thermodynamically ideal office building in the U.S. would use 2.2 kWh/m2-yr or less, which represents 1.0% of the current average end-use consumption in the sector. Such a large gap between the thermodynamic limit and today’s practice is related to the fact that the energy performance of all the internal gain producing equipment in buildings is far from ideal along with the HVAC equipment and envelope components. Ideal office buildings would use 69.7% of their energy for cooking and related domestic water heating and cooling; illumination accounts for a smaller portion, consuming 17.5%, while office equipment and cooling would use 6.9% and 5.9% of the total consumption, respectively. Dramatic reductions come from the elimination of heating energy and air distribution energy brought about by ideal adiabatic building envelopes and frictionless air distribution. Cooling energy is virtually eliminated by the combination of greatly reduced cooling loads and ideal Carnot equipment. But the thermodynamically ideal office equipment would use two orders of magnitude less energy than today as well.
Read full abstract