Abstract Objectives Ejaculatory disorders (EjD) are the most prevalent sexual concerns for men and cover a spectrum of issues, including premature, delayed, anhedonic ejaculation, and anejaculation, all of which impact a man’s sexual well-being and quality of life. Understanding specific ejaculatory patterns can aid in better diagnosing and managing these disorders. The present study aimed to identify distinct orgasmic profiles in a non-clinical sample of adult males by utilizing latent profile analysis (LPA). This approach allows for a nuanced classification of individuals based on their sexological outcomes, shedding light on diverse orgasmic behaviors that extend beyond traditional diagnostic categories. Methods A sample of 1364 Italian male adults, aged 18 to 65, participated in this study. They completed a comprehensive battery of questionnaires, including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), and the Orgasmometer, designed to assess various aspects of sexual function and satisfaction. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to classify participants into distinct profiles based on four key variables: premature ejaculation (PEDT), intercourse satisfaction (IIEF), perceived orgasmic intensity (Orgasmometer), and ejaculatory frequency (self-reported). Predictors of latent profile membership were also explored to assess the psychometric features associated with each group. Results LPA revealed four distinct profiles: “Delayed” (N = 189, 13.9%), “Premature” (N = 105, 7.7%), “Normal” (N = 914, 67.0%), and “Anhedonic” (N = 156, 11.4%). The “Delayed” group displayed low frequency, low satisfaction, low PEDT, and medium orgasmic intensity. The “Premature” group showed high frequency, medium satisfaction, high PEDT, and medium intensity. The “Normal” group was characterized by high frequency, high satisfaction, low PEDT, and high intensity. Finally, the “Anhedonic” group exhibited high frequency, low satisfaction, low PEDT, and low orgasmic intensity. Conclusions Identifying and characterizing distinct ejaculatory profiles offers critical insights into the variability of orgasmic experiences in men. These findings highlight the complexity of EjD and suggest that future research should focus on developing more tailored diagnostic tools and interventions. Addressing the diversity of orgasmic and ejaculatory patterns can improve clinical approaches to EjD management. Conflicts of Interest None.
Read full abstract