Distant Metastasis-free Survival Research Articles

Long-term outcomes and prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the head and neck: a cohort from a single institution

BackgroundNeuroendocrine neoplasm is a rare cancer of head and neck. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine neoplasm of head and neck treated at a single institution.MethodsBetween Nov 2000 and Nov 2021, ninety-three patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck treated at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial treatments included chemotherapy (induction, adjuvant, or concurrent) combined with radiotherapy in 40 patients (C + RT group), surgery followed by post-operative RT in 34 (S + RT group), and surgery plus salvage therapy in 19 patients (S + Sa group).ResultsThe median follow-up time was 64.5 months. 5-year overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival free rate (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS) were 64.5%, 51.6%, 66.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. For stage I–II, the 5-year LRRFS for patients’ treatment regimen with or without radiotherapy (C + RT and S + RT groups versus S + Sa group) was 75.0% versus 12.7% (p = 0.015) while for stage III–IV, the 5-year LRRFS was 77.8% versus 50.0% (p = 0.006). The 5-year DMFS values for patients with or without systemic therapy (C + RT group versus S + RT or S + Sa) were 71.2% and 51.5% (p = 0.075). 44 patients (47.3%) experienced treatment failure and distant metastasis was the main failure pattern.ConclusionsRadiotherapy improved local–regional control and played an important role in the management of HNNENs. The optimal treatment regimen for HNNENs remains the combination of local and systemic treatments.

Comprehensive analysis of stereotactic Radiosurgery outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The influence of immunotherapy and prognostic factors

IntroductionBreast cancer stands as the second most common solid tumors with a propensity for brain metastasis. Among metastatic breast cancer cases, the brain metastasis incidence ranges from 10 % to 30 %, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displaying a heightened risk and poorer prognosis. SRS has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for brain metastases; however, data on its outcomes specifically in pure triple-negative subtype remain scarce. MethodWe retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all brain metastasis (BM) TNBC patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate local control (LC), distant brain metastasis free survival (DBMFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in TNBC patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases while identifying potential prognostic factors. ResultForty-three patients with TNBC and brain metastases treated with SRS between January 2017 and 2023 were included. The study found rates of LC (99 % at 1 year) and DBMFS (76 % at 1 year) after SRS, with brain metastasis count (p = 0,003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0,001) being significant predictors of DBMFS. The median OS following SRS was 19.5 months, with neurological deficit (p = 0.003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0.019) identified as significant predictors of OS. ConclusionSRS demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of local control and distant brain metastasis-free survival in TNBC. Neurological deficit and systemic treatment significantly influence overall survival, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI surveillance based on these factors.

PET/CT based transformer model for multi-outcome prediction in oropharyngeal cancer

Background and purposeTo optimize our previously proposed TransRP, a model integrating CNN (convolutional neural network) and ViT (Vision Transformer) designed for recurrence-free survival prediction in oropharyngeal cancer and to extend its application to the prediction of multiple clinical outcomes, including locoregional control (LRC), Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Materials and MethodsData was collected from 400 patients (300 for training and 100 for testing) diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) who underwent (chemo)radiotherapy at University Medical Center Groningen. Each patient’s data comprised pre-treatment PET/CT scans, clinical parameters, and clinical outcome endpoints, namely LRC, DMFS and OS. The prediction performance of TransRP was compared with CNNs when inputting image data only. Additionally, three distinct methods (m1-3) of incorporating clinical predictors into TransRP training and one method (m4) that uses TransRP prediction as one parameter in a clinical Cox model were compared. ResultsTransRP achieved higher test C-index values of 0.61, 0.84 and 0.70 than CNNs for LRC, DMFS and OS, respectively. Furthermore, when incorporating TransRP’s prediction into a clinical Cox model (m4), a higher C-index of 0.77 for OS was obtained. Compared with a clinical routine risk stratification model of OS, our model, using clinical variables, radiomics and TransRP prediction as predictors, achieved larger separations of survival curves between low, intermediate and high risk groups. ConclusionTransRP outperformed CNN models for all endpoints. Combining clinical data and TransRP prediction in a Cox model achieved better OS prediction.

A novel fully automatic segmentation and counting system for metastatic lymph nodes on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging: Evaluation and prognostic implications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundThe number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) is crucial for the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but manual counting is laborious. This study aims to explore the feasibility and prognostic value of automatic MLNs segmentation and counting. MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 980 newly diagnosed patients in the primary cohort and 224 patients from two external cohorts. We utilized the nnUnet model for automatic MLNs segmentation on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. MLNs counting methods, including manual delineation-assisted counting (MDAC) and fully automatic lymph node counting system (AMLNC), were compared with manual evaluation (Gold standard). ResultsIn the internal validation group, the MLNs segmentation results showed acceptable agreement with manual delineation, with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.771. The consistency among three counting methods was as follows 0.778 (Gold vs. AMLNC), 0.638 (Gold vs. MDAC), and 0.739 (AMLNC vs. MDAC). MLNs numbers were categorized into three-category variable (1–4, 5–9, > 9) and two-category variable (<4, ≥ 4) based on the gold standard and AMLNC. These categorical variables demonstrated acceptable discriminating abilities for 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free, and distant metastasis-free survival. Compared with base prediction model, the model incorporating two-category AMLNC-counting numbers showed improved C-indexes for 5-year OS prediction (0.658 vs. 0.675, P = 0.045). All results have been successfully validated in the external cohort. ConclusionsThe AMLNC system offers a time- and labor-saving approach for fully automatic MLNs segmentation and counting in NPC. MLNs counting using AMLNC demonstrated non-inferior performance in survival discrimination compared to manual detection.

Adjuvant BRAF/MEK versus anti-PD-1 in BRAF-mutant melanoma: Propensity score–matched recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival analysis.

9573 Background: Adjuvant BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) and immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 have become the standard of care for resected high-risk stage III and IV melanoma, but a head-to-head comparison is lacking. In our earlier study, we compared adjuvant BRAF/MEKi and anti-PD-1 in a nationwide cohort in the Netherlands. However, the follow-up was too limited for overall survival (OS) analysis. We present an updated analysis including OS with extended follow-up. Methods: We included all resected high-risk stage III melanoma patients treated with first-line adjuvant BRAF/MEKi and anti-PD-1 from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry from 2018-2023. We performed a propensity score matched outcome analysis of 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and OS. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity rates and discontinuation rates due to toxicity were described. Results: In total, 225 BRAF/MEKi-treated patients and 729 anti-PD-1-treated patients were included. BRAF/MEKi-treated patients had lower disease stages (16.4% versus 10.2% stage IIIA disease; p=0.01) and more comorbidities (76.0% versus 63.8%; p&lt;0.01) than anti-PD-1-treated patients. Median follow-up duration was 20.9 months. Two similar groups of 213 patients each were created by propensity score matching. Before matching, RFS and DMFS were significantly shorter in the anti-PD-1 treated patients, OS was not (Table). After matching, the 1- and 2-year RFS, DMFS and OS rates were not significantly different (Table). Toxicity data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Our results suggest no significant differences in outcomes between adjuvant BRAF/MEKi and anti-PD-1 treatment in stage III melanoma.[Table: see text]

Phase II multi-center study of adjuvant nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in patients with high-risk uveal melanoma (HCRN MEL17-309).

9509 Background: High-risk uveal melanomas (UM) recur distantly in over 50% by 3 years (median distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS) 32 months). No effective treatment currently exists to reduce the risk of metastatic disease and patients (pts) with metastasis have a very poor prognosis with few therapeutic options. The combination of Nivolumab/Ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) has shown limited efficacy in pts with metastatic UM. However, preclinical data suggest differential biology between local vs metastatic UM. We performed a prospective multi-center phase II study of adjuvant Nivo/Ipi in pts high-risk UM patients to compare DMFS to a cohort of UM with the same tumor characteristics. Methods: This investigator-initiated study enrolled pts with high-risk UM, defined as a predicted 3-year distant relapse-free survival (DMFS) of approximately 50% (based on gene expression profiling (GEP) (DecisionDx-UM) class 2 with tumor largest basal diameter (LBD) of 12mm or higher). Pts received Nivo 240mg iv every 2 weeks and Ipi 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 48 weeks. The target sample size was 50 evaluable pts. The primary endpoint was 3-year DMFS. Secondary endpoints were median DMFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicity (AE). In addition, a propensity score method (double robust estimate in R adjusted curves) is used to estimate the average DMFS and compare the nonrandomized treatment (tx) and the control patients. 119 pts from the Cooperative Ocular Oncology Group (COOG) database were defined as high risk, matched for tumor characteristics (GEP class 2, LBD≧12mm) and were used as a control cohort. Results: Fifty-two pts were enrolled and 50 were treated from 12/18/2018-9/29/2021. As of 11/6/2023, with a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year DMFS rate vs COOG control, was 69.1% vs 45.1% (two-sided p = 0.012) without any adjustment; and 70.4% vs 43.4% (two-sided p = 0.018) with the propensity score method. The median DMFS was not reached (NR) in the tx cohort vs 33.8 months. There was a reduction in the risk of distant recurrence with Nivo/Ipi vs control cohort (RR 0.52, 95%CI, 0.309-0.888). Median OS has not been reached with only 7 deaths from UM in the tx cohort so far. Grade ≥3 any-cause AE occurred in 27 pts (54%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related (TR) AE occurred in 48%. 22 pts (44%) discontinued the treatment due to toxicity. One pt died due to immune-related myocarditis. Conclusions: This phase II study of adjuvant Nivo/Ipi resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in 3-year DMFS of 70.4% vs 43.4% in control for pts with high-risk UM from the COOG database matched for tumor characteristics. Further investigation of this regimen as adjuvant therapy of high-risk UM is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03528408 .

Ten-year outcomes of targeted axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

600 Background: When pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), identifying traces of the previous lesion becomes challenging which makes accurate surgery difficult. We conducted targeted axillary surgery (TAS) in node-positive breast cancer after NAC, which involves accurately targeting the lymph nodes where metastasis occurred and performing surgery using a less extensive method. The 10-year outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients with cT1-3N1-2 breast cancer who received NAC from 2012 to 2017. In this cohort, 78 patients underwent TAS only, and 157 underwent conventional ALND, including 31 patients who initially received TAS followed by additional ALND. Oncologic results, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were assessed over a 10-year follow-up period. Survival outcomes for all patients and each subtype were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Results: The TAS group had significantly more postmenopausal patients (p=0.022), and the most common type of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma [TAS: 75 (96.2%); ALND: 157 (100.0%)]. There was no statistical difference in the T stage and the number of lymph nodes suspected of metastasis at diagnosis (p=0.062, 0.985). Mastectomy was performed in 60.3% of patients in the TAS group and 93.0% in the ALND group (p&lt;0.001), and 68 (87.2%) of the TAS group and 41 (26.1%) of the ALND group received additional axillary radiotherapy (p=0.019). There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between the TAS and ALND groups in all patients (LRFS, p=0.673; DMFS, p=0.729; OS, p=0.396) and based on subtypes, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the HR-positive breast cancer group, the TAS and ALND groups showed very similar trends (LRFS, p=0.954; DMFS, p=0.993; OS, p=0.617). In HER2-positive breast cancer, although not statistically significant, the survival outcomes were better in the TAS group than in the ALND group (LRFS, p=0.967; DMFS, p=0.999; OS, p=0.423). However, the OS in the TAS group for TNBC was lower than that in the ALND group, though not significantly (LRFS, p=0.411; DMFS, p=0.697; OS, p=0.210). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TAS is comparable to ALND in terms of 10-year oncological outcomes across different types of node-positive breast cancer, suggesting its potential as a viable alternative. However, further research focusing on patient quality of life and postoperative complications is essential to establish TAS as a superior surgical option to ALND.

Neoadjuvant pazopanib with radiation therapy in patients with localized sarcoma: Experience from a sarcoma center.

e23555 Background: Tissue oxygenation is critical to the success of radiation therapy (RT) in any tumor type. However, tumor vasculature is abnormally structured and dysfunctional. Anti-angiogenic molecules have been shown to stabilize the intratumoral vascular structures and improve tissue oxygenation, which may aid in the success of RT. Pazopanib (PAZO) is a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor. Here, we report the pathologic outcome and clinical correlates of concurrent use of neoadjuvant PAZO and RT in our cohort of patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods: This is a retrospective, single institution study of patients diagnosed with localized STS between January 2019 and October 2023. Patients who received concurrent PAZO and pre-operative external beam RT (50 Gy in 25 fractions) were included. Patients with metastatic disease, unplanned resections, and those requiring excisional biopsy/curettage for diagnosis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of major pathologic response (mPR) defined by &gt; 90% necrosis on surgical pathology specimen. The secondary endpoint was local relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local and distant relapse rate (RR) at 6 months. All-grade toxicities from PAZO were recorded. Results: Ten patients with a median age of 51 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 34-76) were included. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was the most common histologic subtype (50% patients). Median follow up was 24.2 months (IQR: 11-36). Six patients tolerated the maximum dose of PAZO until RT completion (800mg PO daily). The dose of PAZO was reduced in 4 patients due to grade 3 GI toxicity and HTN. Nine patients stayed on PAZO until RT completion. The median time to surgery after RT was 42 days (IQR: 37-77). The median largest tumor dimension prior to RT was 11.65 cm (IQR: 3.8 to 18), and 10.6 cm (IQR: 5.4 to 19.7) after RT completion. Nine of 10 patients had R0 resection, and 7 (70%) had mPR. Three of 7 (43%) patients had complete necrosis. All patients with R0 resection have no local recurrence after a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR: 11-36). Median local RFS was 20 months (IQR: 5-32), and DMFS was 6 months (IQR: 1-32). The local RR at 6 months was 10%, and the distant RR at 6 months was 30%. No correlation was observed between mPR and DMFS. Conclusions: Historically, neoadjuvant RT alone induces a mPR in ~30% of patients with localized STS. In our cohort, neoadjuvant PAZO with RT achieved an mPR in 70% of patients. Although dose reduction and grade 3 toxicity were noted in the majority of patients, these were reversible after stopping PAZO. There was no correlation between mPR and DMFS. However, a short course of PAZO with RT may help achieve R0 margins, which is the strongest predictor of better local RFS. A randomized trial is warranted to help understand the true impact of neoadjuvant PAZO with RT.

Prognosis of locoregional recurrence after early breast cancer with immediate breast reconstruction.

e12595 Background: Several studies have shown no difference in the prognosis of breast cancer patients who underwent total mastectomy (MT) with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), which is now a standard surgical technique in the treatment of breast cancer. While some studies have reported a poor prognosis for locoregional recurrence (LRR) following breast cancer surgery, the prognosis of LRR without simultaneous distant metastasis after IBR is not known. We conducted a multi-facility retrospective observational study to investigate the prognosis of breast cancer patients with LRR after IBR. Methods: Of the 4,726 primary breast cancer patients for whom IBR was performed at 12 Japanese medical facilities between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, MT or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) was performed in 3,295 patients. LRR was observed in 87 of these patients, 17 of whom had distant metastasis (n=13) or metastasis to the supraclavicular or internal mammary lymph nodes (n=4) before LRR was excluded. The measured outcomes were IBR-LRR-related prognostic factors, five-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and five-year overall survival (OS). The statistical analyses employed Kaplan–Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The median observation period was 39.3 months and the median age at which IBR was performed was 44 years. There were 61 cases (87.1%) of invasive cancer. Sixty-one cases (87.1%) were ER-positive, 54 (77.1%) were PR-positive, and 13 (19.7%) were HER2-positive. Fifteen cases (21.4%) had pathological lymph node metastasis (pN), 60 cases (85.7%) underwent implant reconstruction, 33 cases (47.1%) had a disease-free interval ≤ 36 months, 9 cases (12.9%) had regional lymph node recurrence (RR), and 65 cases (92.9%) underwent surgical resection to treat LRR. The five-year DMFS after LRR was 92.4%, and the five-year OS was 91.2%. The relationship between DMFS and clinical pathology factors was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences for pN (HR 10.634, 95% CI 1.102–102.616, P=0.041) and RR (HR 9.960, 95% CI 1.400–70.862, P=0.022), and multivariate analysis indicated that RR was the only independent prognostic factor for DMFS (HR 7.834, 95% CI 1.085–56.587, P=0.041) (Table 1). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) (HR 130.676, 95% CI 1.552–412.278, P=0.023) and RR (HR 8.181, 95% CI 1.106–60.503, P=0.043), and multivariate analysis indicated that both PMRT (HR 61.281, 95% CI 2.540–1478.426, P=0.010) and RR (HR 15.687, 95% CI 1.354–181.772, P=0.028) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: This is the first study to report the prognosis of breast cancer patients with LRR after IBR. Although these patients have a favorable prognosis overall, our results indicate that RR may be a significant factor for poor prognosis.

INTerpath-001: Pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) versus pembrolizumab with placebo for adjuvant treatment of high-risk stage II-IV melanoma.

TPS9616 Background: The anti−PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-C and stage III melanoma by AJCC 8th ed, following complete resection. Adjuvant pembrolizumab has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma, but many patients experience disease recurrence. In the randomized phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study, the individualized neoantigen therapy V940 showed improved RFS and DMFS when used in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with stage III or IV melanoma. INTerpath-001 (NCT05933577) is a double-blind phase 3 randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab plus V940 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage II-IV melanoma. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with surgically resected stage IIB or IIC (pathologic or clinical), III, or IV cutaneous melanoma per AJCC 8th ed and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are ineligible if they have received any prior systemic therapy and if more than 13 weeks has elapsed between last surgical resection and first dose of pembrolizumab. Patients with ocular or mucosal melanoma and past or current in-transit metastases or satellitosis are excluded. All patients must provide a blood sample and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sample for sequencing. Patients will be stratified by risk (IIB, IIC, IIIA, and IIIB vs IIIC/D and IV) and age (&lt;65 years vs ≥65 years). Approximately 1089 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg plus V940 1 mg or pembrolizumab 400 mg with placebo. Pembrolizumab will be administered intravenously every 6 weeks and v940 or placebo will be administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue for up to 9 doses or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary end point is RFS by investigator review. Secondary end points are DMFS by investigator review, overall survival, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with the Efron method of handling ties. Between-treatment differences will be evaluated using a stratified log-rank test. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05933577 .

Long-term follow up for adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma: Final results of the COMBI-AD study.

9500 Background: Dabrafenib plus trametinib, a standard-of care adjuvant treatment for patients with BRAF-mutated AJCC-stage III melanoma, has significantly improved the primary endpoint, relapse-free survival (RFS). Further to published interim assessments, we present updated and final results for RFS, distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In the COMBI-AD phase 3 study, patients received dabrafenib (150 mg BD) plus trametinib (2 mg OD; n=438) or matching placebos (n=432). Treatment continued for up to 12 months or until disease relapse, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. OS, RFS, and DMFS were summarized using Kaplan–Meier estimates. OS was compared between study arms using stratified log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using Pike estimator. Safety data were summarized descriptively. Results: At final analysis, median duration of follow up was 100.0 months in the treatment arm and 82.5 months in the placebo arm. Median OS was not attained in the two arms (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.01; P=0.063). Consistent OS benefits were seen across most prespecified subgroups including patients with BRAFV600E mutation (n=397; HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.96). Estimated RFS (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.63) and DMFS (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.71) favored the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm. In both arms, patients received salvage immunotherapies (29% each) and targeted therapy (21% vs. 37% for treatment and placebo arms, respectively). Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Conclusions: COMBI-AD presents the longest follow-up data (over 10 years) in adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma in the modern era. OS was improved with dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with a 20% risk reduction for death. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Consistent with published results at 3 and 5 years, RFS and DMFS were more favorable in the treatment vs. placebo arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083 . [Table: see text]

The Number of Positive Lymph Nodes Instead of Extranodal Extension and Nodal Diameter is an Independent Predictor of Survival and Treatment Outcome of High-Grade Parotid Gland Carcinoma

BackgroundThere is emerging evidence that current 8th edition of the American Joint Committee staging system is not sensitive enough to predict parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) survival outcomes. PurposeThe present study aimed to analyze pathological nodal factors related to survival and treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients surgically treated with PGC. Study Design, Setting, SampleWe performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients surgically treated with PGC at the authors’ institution from January 1993 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed high-grade parotid gland malignancy on histopathology, first surgical treatment to the parotid cancer with neck dissection with curative intent at the study clinic and sufficient data for review. Exclusion criteria were previous treatment in another institution, low-grade carcinomas, cases where neck dissection was not performed, incurable local disease and distant metastases at the time of first diagnosis and patients lost to follow-up. Predictor variablePredictor variable comprised pathological nodal factors grouped as the number of cervical node metastases, extranodal extension (ENE, largest diameter of nodal metastasis and involvement of parotid lymph nodes. Main outcome variablesOutcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). OS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery to the last known hospital follow-up date, or the date of death found in the hospital records or social security data. DSS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery until the last known follow-up or death from PGC reported in the patient record. Patients who died from causes other than the disease being studied are not counted in this measurement. Treatment outcome was evaluated through occurrence of locoregional relapse of the disease or development of distant metastases. RFS was defined as the time from the date of biopsy or definitive surgery to the date of LRFS or DMFS reported in the patient record. Covariates.Covariates were composed of a set of heterogeneous variables grouped into the following categories: demographic, pathologic and clinical. Analyses.Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for each variable were calculated with univariate and multivariable Cox regression. Statistical significance was defined at p value of <.05. ResultsThe cohort of 112 patients included 62 males (55%) and 50 (45%) females. The mean age of the patients was 60.52±15.22 years. The median follow-up time was 59 months (3-221 months). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common tumor type with the incidence of 45%. Cumulative OS for the 5-and 10-year follow-up period was 75% and 61% respectively. Locoregional recurrences occurred with 27 (24%), distant metastases occurred with 25 (22%) and both were diagnosed with 5 patients (6%). The number of metastatic nodes was the most important nodal prognostic factor related to OS (p=0.02; HR = 2.67; CI = 0.03-6.35), DSS (p=0.011; HR = 2.55; CI = .61-6.83) and DMFS (p=0.005; HR = 2.85; CI = 0.12-4.76). Presence of pathological parotid nodes was associated with poorer RFS (p=0.015; HR = 3.45; CI = 0.25-6.02). Conclusion and relevanceNumber of metastatic lymph nodes, instead of extranodal extension and largest nodal diameter, was the contributing factor associated with survival and treatment outcomes of surgically treated patients with high-grade PGC. Since the main function of staging system is to predict outcomes, the significance of ENE and nodal dimension in salivary gland cancer staging system requires further clarification. Important finding in present study was that the presence of positive parotid lymph nodes was associated to locoregional treatment failure.

Identification of patients at high risk for relapse using the Merlin Assay (CP-GEP) in an independent cohort of 451 patients (pts) with stage I/II melanoma who did not undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy.

9574 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for nodal assessment in staging cutaneous melanoma (CM) according to AJCC v8 guideline. 80-85% of pts are negative for nodal metastasis, but most pts who relapse or die from melanoma are initially diagnosed as ‘low risk’ early-stage. Previously we showed that the clinicopathological-gene expression profiling (CP-GEP) model is able to stratify SLNB negative pts for their risk of recurrence (1). Later we showed in a small cohort (n=80) that CP-GEP also has the potential to stratify pts who did not undergo SLNB in low and high-risk of recurrence (2). Here we investigate CP-GEP ability to stratify pts who did not undergo SLNB for their risk of recurrence in an expanded cohort. Methods: We analysedformalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor samples of 451 pts with stage I/II CM diagnosed between 2000-2017, included in the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry, who did not receive SLNB. Study hypothesis and protocol were prospectively formulated. Tumors were analyzed blinded to clinical outcome. The CP-GEP model used combines the expression of 8 genes ( SERPINE2, GDF15, ITGB3, CXCL8, LOXL4, TGFBR1, PLAT and MLANA) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction with age and Breslow thickness to obtain a binary output: CP-GEP Low- or High-Risk. Relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and Melanoma Specific Survival (MSS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: We included 451 pts (stage IA-IIC). 40% were females, median age was 63-year-old, median Breslow thickness was 0.5 mm, and the majority were not ulcerated (96%). An interim analysis was performed on samples from 159 pts and showed the following survival: 5-year RFS 85.8%; DMFS 94.1; MSS 95.7%. The median follow-up time of 57 months (RFS). CP-GEP identified 149 pts as Low-Risk and 10 pts as High-Risk. The 5-year RFS rate was 90.5% and 0% (HR 23.85; p &lt; 0.001), 5-year DMFS was 97.2% and 27% (HR 43.14; p &lt; 0.001), respectively for CP-GEP Low-Risk and High-Risk pts. The 5-year MSS was 99.1% for Low-Risk pts and 25.7% for High-Risk patients (HR 112.96; p &lt; 0.001), capturing 4 out of 5 melanoma specific deaths in the CP-GEP High-Risk group. The final survival analysis of the whole cohort will be presented at the congress. Conclusions: This study shows that CP-GEP has the potential to stratify pts with early-stage melanoma who did not undergo SLNB based on their risk of recurrence. Pts with CP-GEP Low-Risk have a good long-term survival. Contrary, pts with CP-GEP High-Risk have a high risk of recurrence. CP-GEP may have the potential to stratify pts beyond SLNB. 1. Amaral et al, ASCO 2022. 2. Amaral et al, EJC 2023.

Proton therapy re-irradiation outcomes and genomic landscape of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

IntroductionRe-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) is challenging. We describe clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for recurrent HNC, and report genomic alterations associated with patterns of failure. Materials & methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of rHNC patients treated with PT. Outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to assess multiple patient factors. Next-generation sequencing and genomic analyses were performed on available samples. ResultsEighty-nine patients treated with PBS-PT for rHNC with a median follow-up of 12 mo (0–71 mo) were included. The 1- and 2-y local control (LC) rates were 80.8 % (95 % CI: 70.8–90.8) and 66.2 % (95 % CI: 50.7–81.7), and 1- and 2-y distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 41.0 % (95 % CI: 30.0–52.0) and 26.3 % (95 % CI: 15.7–36.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 13 mo (95 % CI: 9.3–16.7). On UVA and MVA, smaller gross tumor volume (GTV) was associated with improved OS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), DMFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), and PFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.014). There were 35 late Gr3 + toxicity events (30.3 %). Patients with higher candidate gene-specific mutation burden (genes with [OR] > 2, P < 0.05) had inferior PFS. TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations were associated with inferior DMFS (OR > 2, P < 0.05). ConclusionsPBS-PT is effective at achieving LC for rHNC with favorable toxicity. Distant metastases are common, and associated with TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations. Inclusion of genomic alterations in the clinical decision process may be warranted.

Preliminary results from a multi-center phase Ib/II study of RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (Hope-03).

e16595 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC, a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, and tislelizumab, a PD-1 antibody, as a novel neoadjuvant treatment combination in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study design has been presented at 2022 ESMO Asia meeting. The preliminary results would be reported this time. Methods: This is a Ib/II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study (ChiECRCT20210564). 51 patients with pathological and imaging diagnosed cT2-4bN0-3M0-1a HER2 positive MIBC will be included. RC48-ADC is given every 2 weeks with a maximum dose of 120mg intravenously, and tislelizumab is given every three weeks at the dose of 200mg intravenously. Treatment efficacy will be performed by imaging and transurethral resection of tumors after the neoadjuvant treatment. Patients without disease progression will receive radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing therapies based on individual risk profiles and preferences. The primary endpoints are clinical complete remission rate (cCR, T0/Ta/Tis), pathological complete remission rate (pCR) and safety. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and quality of life. Results: Until now, 18 patients were included successfully, with 3 female patients and 15 male patients. And the median age was 64.47 years old. Of them, 7 patients were HER2(2+), and 11 patients were HER2(3+). The clinical stages were T2-4aN0-3M1a. Sixteen patients had the primary efficacy evaluation by now. After the neoadjuvant treatment, 7 patients were T0, 4 patients Tis, 2 patients partial response (PR), 2 patients stable disease (SD) and 1 patient suffered from progress of local disease. Hence the cCR rate was 68.75%, and the DCR was 90.91%. Fourteen patients chose radiotherapy as bladder-sparing therapy and no evidence of tumor in 6 patients who received treatment efficacy after radiotherapy. Two patients received radical cystectomy and pT3N0M0 was achieved for both. No patient died so far. For safety analysis, 4 patients suffered from immune-related adverse event, namely, grade 2 myositis, grade 1 elevated transaminase and grade 1 hyperthyroidism which led to treatment interruption of tislelizumab. And 10 patients experienced RC48-ADC related toxicities, including grade 1 elevated transaminase, grade 1 erythra and grade 1 paresthesia. No treatment related dose reduction happened. Conclusions: The novel neoadjuvant combination of RC48-ADC and tislelizumab showed promising down stage efficacy in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced MIBC and the toxicities were manageable, which would be verified by the final analysis. Clinical trial information: ChiECRCT20210564.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy: Final Results of a Multi-arm Phase I Trial (DESTROY-2)

AimsTo present the final results of a phase I trial on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in different extracranial sites. Materials and methodsThe DESTROY-2 trial, planned as a prospective dose escalation study in oligometastatic (one to five lesions) cancer patients relied on the delivery of a single high dose of radiation utilizing high-precision technology. The primary study endpoint was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS-VMAT. The secondary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. All patients consecutively observed at our radiotherapy unit matching the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, other), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level. ResultsTwo hundred twenty seven lesions in 164 consecutive patients (male/female: 97/67, median age: 68 years; range: 29–92) were treated. The main primary tumors were: prostate cancer (60 patients), colorectal cancer (47 patients), and breast cancer (39 patients). The maximum planned dose level was achieved in all study arms, and the MTD was not exceeded. 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were established as the single-fraction doses for treating lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively. The prescribed BED 2Gyα/β:10 to the planning target volume ranged from 26.4 Gy to 149.6 Gy. Twenty-seven patients (16.5%) experienced grade 1–2 and only one grade 3 acute toxicity, which was a pulmonary one. In terms of late toxicity, we registered only 5 toxicity>G2: a G3 gastro-intestinal one, three G3 bone toxicity, and a G3 laryngeal toxicity. The overall response was available for 199 lesions: 107 complete response (53.8%), 50 partial response (25.1%), and 31 stable disease (15.6%), leading to an overall response rate of 94.5%. Progression was registered only in 11 cases (5.5%). The overall response rate in each arm ranged from 88.6% to 96.4%. The overall two-year local control, distant metastasis free survival, disease free survival, and overall survival were 81.7%, 33.0%, 25.4%, and 78.7% respectively. ConclusionIn conclusion, the planned doses of 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were successfully administered as single-fractions for the treatment of lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively, in a prospective SRS dose-escalation trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were registered, and minimal acute and late toxicity were reported. New indications for SRS are currently being studied in oligoprogressive patients receiving targeted drugs or in combination with immunotherapy. The DESTROY-2 trial represents, in our opinion, a credible starting point for future modern radiosurgery trials.

Gene signature to predict hypophysitis in patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 in adjuvant setting.

e21562 Background: Adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment has shown to improve recurrence free survival and distant metastases free survival in melanoma patients from stage II to IV. Until now ,we have no data about overall survival of these patients nor biomarkers to select them to the best therapy , avoiding in this way severe and some times durable toxicities.Hypophysitis is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE) and in adjuvant setting may represent a chronic irAE that may affect quality of life , such as fertility in young people.There are no clinical factors able to predict hypophysitis due to adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: Gene profiling analysis was performed using NanoString IO360 panel from basal PBMCs of patients treated with anti-PD1 in adjuvant setting. Patient’s characteristics are reported in table1. ROC curves were used to determine the best cut off. Survival rates were evaluated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Eighty pts treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1were included in a retrospective analysis from December 2019 to September 2021. Among which 12 pts developed hyphosytis. Ten pts completed treatment regularly, while two were discontinued both at week 12 due to metastatic disease. A pts developed liver metastases, the other one liver, multiple lymph nodes and soft tissues metastases. Grade 2 hypophysitis was diagnosed as the only irAE in all pts (100%). Median time of onset was 3 months (9 pts ≤6 months and 7 pts ≤3 months). A specific gene signature for predicting the onset of hypophysitis has been identified and characterized with 4 genes: IFITM2,CTSS,DUSP1,HLA-B that are mainly involved in the activation of innate-like lymphocyte populations, such as natural killer (NK) cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and adaptive immune cells, such as T helper 1 (TH1) cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). High gene signature was mostly related to hypophysitis event than lower group (HR: 0.11 95%IC 0.03-0.39, p = 0,0007). Moreover, at data lock all pts who developed hypophysitis were censored with mean overall survival of 35.60 months, 95%CI 30,86-40, 41. Conclusions: A predictive gene signature of hypophysitis was found in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD1.Moreover, hypophysitis seems to correlate to better outcome. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib and inetetamab in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoPICD study): A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

e12627 Background: Inetetamab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, alters the Fc region amino acids, which induces ADCC stronger than trastuzumab. Pyrotinib is a small chemical inhibitor of pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase. The globally recommended first-line neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer is chemotherapy and two large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, which have unsatisfactory benefits for 50% of patients. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of targeted medicines, specifically inetetamab and pyrotinib, in conjunction with chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: The trial was structured as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study. 143 treatment-naive HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer patients were planned for the trial. Eligible patients will be administered six cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, including carboplatin (AUC=6mg/mL×min, ivgtt), doxorubicin (75mg/m2, ivgtt), inetetamab (initial loading dosage of 8mg/kg, maintenance dose of 6mg/kg), and pyrotinib (400mg/day, po). The surgery was conducted after the neoadjuvant phase, subsequent to a one-year course of targeted therapy with inetetamab and pyrotinib. The primary endpoint of the study is the total pathologic complete response (tpCR). The secondary endpoints include event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), neurologic disease-free survival (NDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A cohort of 70 patients was enrolled between Nov. 27, 2021 and Feb. 1, 2024. Most patients completed the six-cycle neoadjuvant therapy with inetetamab, pyrotinib, and chemotherapy. The pathological findings of 49 patients who had radical surgery revealed that 65.3% (32/49, 95% CI, 0.515-0.791) of them achieved tpCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0). The initial subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with negative hormone receptors, the rate of tpCR was 80.0% (24/30, 95% CI, 64.8-95.2). Moreover, hormone receptor was statistically determined to be an independent factor influencing the effectiveness of the new treatment regimen ( p=0.032). The prevailing grade 3 or more severe adverse events included anemia (12.8%), diarrhea (10.0%), leukopenia (4.2%), liver dysfunction (4.2%) and renal dysfunction (4.2%). As of now, no treatment-related deaths have been documented. Conclusions: The ongoing study is actively enrolling participants. Preliminary findings from the study indicate that the combination of neoadjuvant inetetamab and pyrotinib with chemotherapy has demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness and manageable side effects. This offers a promising alternative for patients with locally advanced breast cancer that is HER2-positive. Clinical trial information: NCT06234137 .

Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group).

The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors. The ROBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. High-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. A survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. After adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. Overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0.6), metastasis-free survival (P=0.5) and overall survival (P=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. At last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function. Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.

The phase 3 INTerpath-002 study design: Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab vs placebo plus pembrolizumab for resected early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS8116 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro; anti–PD-1) is indicated as adjuvant monotherapy following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients (pts) with stage IB (T2a ≥4 cm), II, or IIIA NSCLC (per AJCC v7). However, many pts experience disease recurrence, and have limited treatment options available. V940 (mRNA-4157) is a novel individualized neoantigen therapy that encodes up to 34 neoantigens that is specifically tailored and manufactured for each pt derived from their tumor. V940 as monotherapy and in combination with pembro has shown preliminary antitumor activity in the phase 1 KEYNOTE-603 study in several solid tumor types, including NSCLC. Additionally, in pts with completely resected, high-risk stage IIIB/C/D and IV cutaneous melanoma in the KEYNOTE-942 primary analysis, V940 plus pembro demonstrated significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.561 [95% CI, 0.309–1.017]; P = 0.0266) and distant metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.347 [95% CI, 0.145–0.828]; P = 0.0063) vs pembro alone. Here we present the design of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind INTerpath-002 study (NCT06077760) of adjuvant V940 plus pembro vs placebo plus pembro in pts with completely resected and chemotherapy-treated stage II–IIIB (N2) NSCLC (AJCC v8). Methods: Eligible pts aged ≥18 years with completely resected stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC (per AJCC v8.0) where EGFR-directed therapy is not indicated as primary therapy (ie, absence of sensitizing EGFR mutations e.g. DEL19 or L858R), who have received 1–4 doses of adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy, have ECOG PS 0 or 1, and have available tumor tissue for next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 testing will be enrolled. Pts must not have received previous neoadjuvant therapy for NSCLC and must not have received or be candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive V940 1 mg IM or placebo Q3W for up to 9 doses plus pembro 400 mg IV Q6W for up to 9 cycles or until disease recurrence, pt withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or an additional malignancy requiring treatment. Randomization will be stratified by histology (squamous vs nonsquamous), PD-L1 TPS ( &lt; 1% vs 1%–49% vs ≥50%), disease stage (II vs III), and geographic location (North America/Western Europe/Australia vs rest of world). The primary endpoint is disease-free survival per investigator review. Secondary endpoints include distant metastasis-free survival per investigator assessment, OS, lung cancer‒specific survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Tumor imaging will occur at baseline, every 12 wk until wk 48, every 24 wk through year 3, and every 48 wk thereafter. Enrollment began in October 2023 and is ongoing globally (NCT06077760). The abstract was originally presented and published in: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT281. Clinical trial information: NCT06077760 .