Disease Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with sintilimab and lenvatinib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) challenging due to unfulfilled clinical requirements.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sintilimab and lenvatinib in the treatment of uHCC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with uHCC who were treated with a combination of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib between May 2019 and December 2021 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Systemic treatment was started 1 week after TACE was performed. Sintilimab was administered intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every three weeks, and lenvatinib was given orally at dosages of 8 mg or 12 mg daily, contingent upon the weight of the patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as per the mRECIST. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs).ResultsA total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 9 patients were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B (BCLC-B), 23 patients were classified as BCLC-C, 14 patients diagnosed with portal vein tumors, and 12 patients were diagnosed with extra hepatic metastases. The ORR and DCR were 75% and 90.6% respectively, with 4 patients exhibiting (12.5%) complete response, 20 patients exhibiting (62.5%) partial response, 5 patients exhibiting (15.6%) stable disease, and 3 patients exhibiting (9.4%) progressive disease. With a median follow-up time of 19.6 months, the median PFS was 9.9 months, and the median OS was 33.3 months. A total of 31 patients experienced different degrees of tr-AEs, of which 2 were grade 3 tr-AEs.ConclusionThe combination therapy of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of uHCC with manageable tr-AEs.

Histologic spectrum and outcome of Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a single center experience and a survey of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA) cohort.

While high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) serves as an essential pathogen and an important prognostic and predictive biomarker for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, it occurs at low frequency (2.2-6%) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). To date, the pathologic features of HPV-associated OCSCC (HPV( +)-OCSCC) have been sparsely reported and its prognosis is not well-defined. We herein described detailed clinicopathologic features and outcomes of a retrospective series of 27 HPV( +)-OCSCC, including 13 from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and 14 from The Cancer Genomic Atlas program (TCGA). The frequency of HPV positivity in OCSCC was 0.7% in MSKCC cohort and 4.9% in TCGA cohort. Although HPV( +)-OCSCC was predominantly non-keratinizing (in 81%) with various degree of maturation, its histologic spectrum was expanded to include keratinizing subtype (19%), adenosquamous carcinoma (7%), and papillary architecture (subtype, 7%). HPV( +)-OCSCC predominantly affected male patients (male:female ratio = 12.5:1) and (ex) smokers (77%). It might occur in mandibular mucosa, floor of mouth, tongue, retromolar trigone, buccal mucosa, maxillary mucosa, or hard palate. In oral cavity, positivity of HPV by RNA in situ hybridization was required, and p16 immunohistochemistry alone was insufficient to confirm the HPV + status. The positive predictive value of p16 immunopositivity in detecting HPV infection was 68%. HPV-positivity did not appear to affect outcomes, including disease specific survival and progression free survival in OCSCC.

Efficacy and safety of PARPis combined with an ICIs for advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis.

Although the intervention for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved and survival time has increased, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) and PARP inhibitors (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors, PARPis) is still controversial. Previous studies revealed that the combined use of ICIs and PARPis led to increased antitumor activity. However, most of these combined regimens are nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with PARPis in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. The results including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs), were subjected to further analysis. Four studies involving 110 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The combined ORR and DCR were 23.6% and 53.6%, respectively; while the ORR and DCR of BRCAmut patients were 38.1% and 71.4%, respectively. The median PFS of the patients was 4.29 months. As for safety, the most common AEs were nausea (49.0%), anemia (44.3%) and fatigue (40.6%). Most of them were grade 1 or 2, and the incidence of adverse events ≥ III was obviously low. Except for anemia, the incidence of AEs ≥ III was < 10%. This meta-analysis revealed that the combination of ICIs and PARPis has good efficacy and safety for advanced or metastatic TNBC patients.

Neutrophil/Lymphocyte and Platelet/lymphocyte Ratios as Predictors of Patient Response to Bevacizumab in Iraqi Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background: Global clinical trials have shown that bevacizumab, along with chemotherapy, is beneficial for people with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Nevertheless, there isn't a useful biomarker to predict its effectiveness. Objectives: The study's goal was to analyze and evaluate the practical pretreatment biomarker in people with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to predict bevacizumab efficacy. Methods: This study, which is retrospective, includes 157 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received bevacizumab in association with chemotherapy from three centers in Iraq. The study looked at how clinical data and biomarkers relate to disease control (DC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). It also looked at how well they could predict these outcomes. The cutoff values of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were examined with ROC analysis. Results: For all patients, the median follow-up duration was 12 months. The PLR, NLR and median alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values were considerably lower in disease-control (DC) patients than in non-DC patients. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) baseline level significantly correlated with shorter OS, while the ALP baseline level did not significantly correlate with shorter PFS. Among the clinical data, only multiple organ metastases showed a strong correlation with a shorter PFS and OS. Conclusions: A low pretreatment N/L ratio and P/L ratio might be good predictors of bevacizumab efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients, and it could be clinically useful for choosing responders.

Treatment of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Retrospective, Real-Life Analysis in a Tertiary Center in Germany.

Background: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is an inflammatory cicatricial alopecia characterized by an irreversible destruction of the hair follicle resulting in its permeant destruction. The clinical presentation of LPP is a progressive patchy scarring alopecia. A variety of systemic agents is used to treat LPP with varying success. The aim of this retrospective, real-life analysis was to evaluate the treatment of hydroxychloroquine for LPP. Method: In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed 110 patients with LPP and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) who received treatment over a 12-month period from March 2014 to March 2021 at the Department of Dermatology, University of Mainz Medical Center. Patient records were analyzed for response to treatment, co-morbidities, disease progression-free survival (DPFS), and safety. Clinical parameters associated with treatment response were determined with Cox regression modelling and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 77 of 110 patients were treated with a systemic agent. There was a clear association between LPP and the occurrence of Hashimoto thyroiditis. Topical treatment with corticosteroids did not improve clinical symptoms in the majority of patients (15 out of 101). In 71% of patients treated with systemic cyclosporine A and 62% of patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, we observed a significant resolution of the inflammatory process, which correlated with a robust durable clinical response (p < 0.001). Toxicity was observed in 17% (n = 9) of patients receiving systemic treatment with hydroxychloroquine and correlated with the duration of systemic treatment (p < 0.001). Treatment discontinuation was associated with a flare-up of clinical symptoms (29%), which required the re-initiation of second-line therapy in 13 out of 51 patients. Overall, the initiation of second-line treatment, either hydroxychloroquine or Cyclosporine A (CsA), yielded positive results, especially in the patient cohort treated with hydroxychloroquine (overall response rate, ORR = 100%), who showed disease progression during CsA or retinoids. Conclusions: Our results from this contemporary cohort of patients with LPP and FFA indicate that hydroxychloroquine and cyclosporine are effective systemic agents in decreasing clinical symptoms. However, our data also show that the discontinuation of treatment is often associated with the exacerbation of clinical symptoms. Response rates to second-line treatment were especially favorable in the patient cohort with hydroxychloroquine.

Prognostic value of type of prior TKI in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab.

Aim: To define the prognostic significance of first-line TKI in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.Materials and methods: A total of 571mRCC patients who received ≥second line nivolumab were included in this subanalysis. The correlation between prior TKI (sunitinib vs. pazopanib) and overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were investigated. Additionally, the impact of TKI choice according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score was examined.Results: There was no significant difference between sunitinib and pazopanib groups in terms of mPFS, mOS, overall response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, no difference between sunitinib and pazopanib was found according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score.Conclusion: There is no conclusive evidence favoring pazopanib or sunitinib treatment before initiating nivolumab therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib or Lenvatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Failure of First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (hereinafter, atezolizumab-bevacizumab) is the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC, the optimal second-line regimen remains unknown. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with advanced HCC that progressed under atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before November 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), comparing patients who received sorafenib versus lenvatinib. Seven studies involving 387 patients were included. The pooled ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS for sorafenib and lenvatinib together were 26% (95% CI: 14-43%), 63% (95% CI: 47-77%), 11.45 months (95% CI: 7.12-15.77, I2 = 92%, p < 0.01), and 3.78 months (95% CI: 2.34-5.23, I2 = 67%, p = 0.02), respectively. Although lenvatinib users had a longer median OS (12.42 vs. 10.75 months) and PFS (5.15 vs. 2.58 months) than sorafenib users, the pooled ORR, DCR, median OS, and PFS for these medications were comparable. Additionally, the distributions of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 adverse events for sorafenib and lenvatinib were comparable to those for these two medications when used as first-line therapies. Sorafenib or lenvatinib can provide effective treatment with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC after disease progression under atezolizumab-bevacizumab.

Exploratory phase I study of HF1K16 for the treatment of patients with refractory/recurrent advanced glioma.

TPS32 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary and aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults. Almost all patients with glioblastoma eventually have disease relapse and the median overall survival (OS) remains at only 30 weeks for those recurrent GBM patients. However, very few therapies had been approved over the past two decades, emphasizing the need for novel treatments. It is now wildly acknowledged that the immune microenvironment in brain offers adequate opportunities to implement immunotherapy for the treatment. Since most recurrent tumors had previously been exposed to the genotoxic stress of irradiation and/or chemotherapy, it is predicted to resulted in a higher mutational load and more immunogenic. However, The limited success of T cell immunomodulatory approach for advanced glioma has prompted a deeper understanding of the brain tumor and the immune microenvironment. GBM tumors are well-appreciated to be a immunosuppressive and a hallmark of GBM immunosuppression is the appearance of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) at higher levels. Our preliminary data suggests that HF1K16, a liposome ATRA (all trans retinoic acid) suspension, is capable of relieving immune suppression induced by MDSCs. Further, we recently completed a phase I dose escalation study which showed that HF1K16 is safe, well-tolerated with preliminary efficacy in brain tumor. Thus, we hypothesized that HF1K16 may reverse GBM-associated immune suppression and leading to an increase in TILs and improved survival. Methods: This is an advanced glioma-specific expansion arm for adult patients with prior confirmed brain tumor and failed standard treatment. We plan to enroll 20~30 evaluable patients. Key eligibility criteria include candidates age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60 with and at least one measurable lesion. The primary endpoint is determination of overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints include longitudinal assessment of the peripheral immune response by changes in MDSC and T cell subsets and numbers. HF1K16 infusions were administered in 21-day cycles (q.o.d days 1-14). Prior to and during treatment, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected and analyzed with flow cytometry to monitor the changes in myeloid cell phenotype and T cell composition. The recruitment of patients is anticipated completed in 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05388487 .

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine combination therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly malignant tumor, with limited therapy regimens and short response duration. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine as the first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC. In this phase 2, nonrandomized,prospective study, eligible patients received camrelizumab (200mg, d1, Q3W), apatinib (250mg, qd, d1-d21, Q3W), and capecitabine (1000mg/m², bid, d1-d14, Q3W) until trial discontinued. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. From July 2019 to April 2023, we enrolled a total of 28 patients, of whom 14 patients were in thefirst-line treatment setting and 14 patients were in the second-line setting. At the data cutoff (April 30, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 18.03 months. Eight of 28patients reached objective response (ORR: 28.57%), with an ORR of 50% and 7.1% for first-line and second-line treatment patients (P = .033). The median PFS was 6.30 months and the median OS was 12.80 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 (32.14%) patients, including elevated transaminase, thrombocytopenia, etc. No serious treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. In this trial, the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine showed promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC, especially in thefirst-line setting. NCT04720131.

Eftilagimod Alpha (a Soluble LAG-3 Protein) Combined With Pembrolizumab in Second-Line Metastatic NSCLC Refractory to Anti–Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Based Therapy: Final Results from a Phase 2 Study

IntroductionEftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene-3 protein, triggers antigen-presenting cell and T-cell (CD4+/CD8+) activation and helps overcome resistance to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors. We assessed efti plus pembrolizumab in second-line anti–PD-(L)1-refractory metastatic patients with NSCLC. MethodsAfter confirmed progression on anti-PD-(L)1-based first-line therapy, patients received efti (30 mg subcutaneously every 2weeks for eight 3-week cycles and then every 3 weeks for up to 54 weeks) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 105 weeks). The primary end point was the objective response rate by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 for immune-based therapies. Secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and tolerability. Exploratory end points included tumor growth kinetics and predefined subgroup analyses. Programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score was assessed centrally. ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2021 using Simon’s two-stage design. Most patients (81.8%) had low/negative (<50%) PD-(L)1 tumor proportion score. First-line therapy was anti–PD-(L)1-based for all patients, combined with chemotherapy for 66.7%. The confirmed objective response rate and disease control rates were 8.3% and 33.3%. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months and the median OS was 9.9 months. Patients exhibiting high PD-(L)1 expression or acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors revealed superior response and survival outcomes, and OS was closely correlated with disease control. No treatment-emergent adverse event led to permanent discontinuation of study treatment. ConclusionsEfti plus pembrolizumab was well-tolerated and revealed signs of antitumor activity in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD-(L)1 inhibitors, warranting further investigation. Trial registration number: NCT03625323.

Preliminary clinical use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with unresectable ICC who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the First Affliated Hospital of Soochow University from October 2021 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. HAIC included gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin; this regimen was combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab within 3-7 days after its initial administration. Relevant laboratory examinations were performed before each cycle of HAIC, and enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed every 6-9 weeks. Tumor response to treatment was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse reactions of patients with ICC were statistically analyzed. Results: The objective response rate to HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab was 6/12; the disease control rate was 8/12; the median progression-free survival was 11.8 months; and the median overall survival was 14.2 months. Three patients had grade Ⅳ adverse reactions (increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase thrombocytopenia), while three patients had grade Ⅲ adverse reactions (increased total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase). The remaining patients had grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ adverse reactions. There were no serious complications related to interventional surgery. Conclusions: Use of HAIC (gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable ICC may be safe and feasible. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that this combination can improve the survival and prognosis of patients with ICC.

Efficacy and Safety of 125I Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Pelvic Recurrent Cervical Cancer Following Radiotherapy: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis of Chinese Patients.

The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 125I seed implantation in the treatment of pelvic recurrent cervical cancer following radiotherapy. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO. We looked up relevant studies in the databases of CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The endpoint measures include the objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. The meta-analysis included six studies and a total of 246 patients. The pooled ORR of tumor response was 63%, and the DCR was 87%. The median PFS was 9.09 months, and the median OS was 13.46 months. The incidence of adverse events of Grade ≥III was 6%. In conclusion, this meta-analysis confirmed that 125I seed implantation has a good local control rate and high safety in the treatment of pelvic recurrent cervical cancer following radiotherapy, and can be used as a remedial treatment for pelvic recurrent cervical cancer following radiotherapy to prolong the survival time of patients. PROSPERO: CRD42023423857.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in First-Line Treatment Methods for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Comparative Study of Chemotherapy, Targeted Therapy Combined With Chemotherapy, and Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor with limited effectiveness in its standard chemotherapy treatment. Targeted antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated potential as alternative treatments for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, there is insufficient comparative evidence available to determine the optimal first-line treatment option between ICIs plus chemotherapy and targeted antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy. This study is aimed at analyzing clinical data from ES-SCLC patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between June 2021 and June 2023. The study compared the efficacy and safety of three first-line treatment regimens: standard chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy, and immune combination therapy. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups: chemotherapy, immune combination therapy, and antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy. The study collected data on clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and adverse reactions. The analysis included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment safety. A total of 101 patients were included in the study, with 49 receiving chemotherapy alone, 19 receiving antiangiogenic therapy, and 33 receiving immune combination therapy. The ORRs were 78.9% for antiangiogenic therapy, 72.7% for immune combination therapy, and 42.9% for chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 8.0 months for antiangiogenic therapy, 7.8 months for immune combination therapy, and 5.2 months for chemotherapy alone. Both combination therapy groups demonstrated superior efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone. Targeted combined chemotherapy and immune combination chemotherapy showed superior efficacy as first-line treatments for ES-SCLC compared to chemotherapy alone, with manageable adverse reactions.

Pre-stereotactic radiosurgery neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts post-stereotactic radiosurgery survival of patients with brain metastases concurrently treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown clinical benefit for a wide range of cancer types. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reportedly correlates with survival time or progression-free survival in patients treated with ICIs. However, NLR has not yet been assessed in patients with brain metastases (BMs) receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) combined with concurrent ICIs. The authors investigated the predictive impact of NLR on the survival data of patients with BMs who received SRS with concurrent ICIs. The clinical records of patients who had undergone SRS with concurrent ICIs for BMs between January 2015 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. NLR was calculated using the data obtained from the last examination prior to SRS. The optimal NLR cutoff value was identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for time-to-event data (overall survival [OS] ≤ 18 months). OS and intracranial disease progression-free survival (IC-PFS) rates were compared between the two NLR groups. Of the 185 eligible patients included, 132 were male. The median (IQR) patient age was 69 (61-75) years. The primary cancers were lung, genitourinary, skin, breast, gastrointestinal, and others in 132, 23, 22, 2, 2, and 4 patients, respectively. The post-SRS median OS and IC-PFS times for the entire cohort were 18.4 (95% CI 14.0-23.1) months and 9.2 (95% CI 6.9-10.8) months, respectively. ROC curve analysis identified the optimal NLR cutoff value for 18-month OS to be 5.0 (area under the curve 0.64, Youden index 0.31). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with high NLR (> 5) had a significantly shorter OS (median survival time 10.9 months for 48 patients vs 22.2 months for 137 patients, HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.0, p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant difference in median IC-PFS was noted: 4.8 months with high NLR versus 10.7 months with low NLR (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.003). The authors found elevated pre-SRS NLR (> 5) to be associated with shorter OS and IC-PFS after SRS with concurrent ICIs for BMs. NLR is a simple, cost-effective, and widely accessible biomarker, which can thus be used for managing patients with BMs receiving SRS concurrently with ICIs. Further investigation in other large datasets is, however, required to validate these findings.

Efficacy of avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma with histologic subtype and divergent differentiation: a multicenter retrospective study conducted by the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu.

The subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC) has been known to possess morphological diversity for histologic subtype or divergent differentiation. However, the efficacy of avelumab against SUC remains unclear. Therefore, the effect of the treatment as well as the survival results of avelumab monotherapy were evaluated as a first-line therapeutic maintenance in patients with advanced SUC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu study population with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who underwent avelumab maintenance therapy without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and SUC were comparatively analyzed based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Out of 49 recorded patients, 38 and 11 had PUC and SUC, respectively. The most common subtype element was glandular differentiation (n=5), followed by squamous differentiation (n=3), micropapillary (n=1), and plasmacytoid subtypes (n=1). The SUC and PUC groups had comparable ORR (0% vs. 2.6%, P>0.99) and disease control rates (54.5% vs. 44.7%, P=0.73). These patient groups also showed no significant difference in PFS (median 3.9 vs. 3.1 months, P=0.33) or OS (median 16.7 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.47). The response of SUC and PUC to avelumab was comparable in patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer, indicating that avelumab maintenance therapy is also effective for SUC.

Depicting Biomarkers for HER2-Inhibitor Resistance: Implication for Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is highly expressed in a variety of cancers, including breast, lung, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its amplification is linked to poor clinical outcomes. At the genetic level, HER2 is encoded by the ERBB2 gene (v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2), which is frequently mutated or amplified in cancers, thus spurring extensive research into HER2 modulation and inhibition as viable anti-cancer strategies. An impressive body of FDA-approved drugs, including anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and HER2-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have demonstrated success in enhancing overall survival (OS) and disease progression-free survival (PFS). Yet, drug resistance remains a persistent challenge and raises the risks of metastatic potential and tumor relapse. Research into alternative therapeutic options for HER2+ breast cancer therefore proves critical for adapting to this ever-evolving landscape. This review highlights current HER2-targeted therapies, discusses predictive biomarkers for drug resistance, and introduces promising emergent therapies-especially combination therapies-that are aimed at overcoming drug resistance in the context of HER2+ breast cancer.

Clinical benefits of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Combination therapy has emerged as the focus of research for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In recent years, several studies have explored the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapies of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To conduct an updated meta-analysis verifying the clinical benefits and adverse effects of the triple combination therapy for unresectable HCC. All eligible cohort, non-randomized controlled, and randomized controlled trial studies from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedLine databases up to March 20, 2024 were screened for the present meta-analysis. The study endpoints included complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Stata 16/18 software was used for this meta-analysis, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 29 studies with 1754 patients were included. Among the patients who received the TACE therapy with TKIs and ICIs, the tumor response results revealed a pooled CR, ORR, and DCR of 14% [95%CI (0.11-0.18)], 61% [95%CI (0.55-0.66)], and 85% [95%CI (0.83-0.87)], respectively. In terms of the survival outcomes, the pooled median PFS and OS were 10.25 months [95%CI (9.31-11.18)] and 20.47 months [95%CI (18.98-21.97)], respectively. The pooled prevalence of all-grade AEs during the triple treatment was 90% [95%CI (0.84-0.94)] and that of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 32% [95%CI (0.24-0.42)]. The combination therapy of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs exhibits great clinical benefits for unresectable HCC in terms of tumor responses and survival outcomes without increasing the risk of severe AEs.

Sotorasib (960 mg or 240 mg) once daily in patients with previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC

BackgroundSotorasib 960 mg once daily is approved to treat KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib exhibits non-dose proportional pharmacokinetics and clinical responses at lower doses; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotorasib 960 mg and 240 mg. MethodsIn this phase 2, randomized, open-label study, adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC received sotorasib 960 mg or 240 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing. ResultsIn the 960 mg group (n = 104), ORR was 32.7 % and DCR was 86.5 %. In the 240 mg group (n = 105), ORR was 24.8 % and DCR was 81.9 %. Median PFS was 5.4 months (960 mg) and 5.6 months (240 mg). At a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (960 mg) and 11.7 months (240 mg). AUC0–24 h and Cmax were 1.3-fold numerically higher with the 960 mg dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥10 %) for 960 mg and 240 mg doses, respectively, were diarrhea (39.4 %; 31.7 %), nausea (23.1 %; 19.2 %), increased alanine aminotransaminase (14.4 %; 17.3 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (13.5 %; 13.5 %). ConclusionsPatients treated with sotorasib 960 mg once daily had numerically higher ORR and DCR, and longer DOR and OS, than patients treated with 240 mg in this descriptive analysis. TEAEs were manageable with label-directed dose modifications. Clinical trial registrationNCT03600883

Efficacy of immunotherapy in RET fusion-positive NSCLC: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThe Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene represents a rare driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurring in only 1 %–2 % of cases, with implications in targeted carcinogenesis. Despite the significant efficacy demonstrated by immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC with wild-type driver genes, its validation in RET fusion-positive patients is yet to be established. ObjectivesThis meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Data sourcesand Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted for further analysis. ResultsTen real-world evidence (RWE) studies involving 7145 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 24.0 % and 61.0 %, respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled median PFS and median OS were 4.17 months [95 % confidence interval (CI): 3.40–5.02) and 17.22 months (95 % CI: 11.58–23.91)], respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that immunotherapies plus chemotherapy were superior to single-immunotherapy in terms of ORR, DCR, and median PFS, which were 43 % (95 % CI: 31%–55 %) vs. 17 % (95 % CI: 11%–25 %), 74 % (95 % CI: 60%–84 %) vs. 45 % (95 % CI: 31%–59 %) and 6.69 months (95 % CI: 4.91–8.93) vs. 2.96 months (95 % CI: 2.25–3.78), respectively. ConclusionsTo date, RET fusions appear to be associated with poor response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy seems to offer greater clinical benefits than mono-immunotherapy.