Discontinuation Of Omalizumab Research Articles

Clinical factors as predictors of the development of severe recurrence of chronic spontaneous urticaria after completion of omalizumab therapy

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects about 1% of population, and its prevalence is increasing. The disease occurs in both children and adults, with predominance among women. At least two possible causes of CSU have been identified, two autoimmune endotypes, with different types of autoantibodies associated with activation of skin mast cells. In clinical practice, patients with CSU receive therapy accordance the clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of Russia for treatment of urticaria, according to the doctor’s algorithm of actions. In patients with CSU, symptoms are difficult to relieve due to special mechanisms of development this variant of disease. In recent years, specific markers, including clinical and laboratory parameters, have been described that can predict response to treatment patients with CSU. In clinical practice, we encounter difficulties in managing these patients. One of these is recurrence of urticaria symptoms after cessation of omalizumab treatment, which negatively affects compliance of patients and its psycho-emotional background. A retrospective analysis of 14 patients with CSU with resumption symptoms after completion of omalizumab treatment was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups: 1 group – 10 patients that symptoms began controlled with antihistamines (go to 1st therapy stage); and 2 group – 4 patients who need re-prescription of omalizumab (stay on 3rd treatment stage). The duration of CSU, activity according to UAS7, combination with development of angioedema, presence of concomitant allergic and autoimmune pathologies, level of CRP, total IgE, and presence of TPO antibodies were analyzed. There was no tendency relapses severity CSU after omalizumab discontinuation with age, gender, duration of the disease, presence of concomitant allergic diseases and drug hypersensitivity. In patients with high disease activity was tendency toward more severe relapses of CSU. The search and study of predictors response to treatment of CSC remains actual task. Further research to identify predictors of response to treatment and relapses severity help identify groups of patients for early transition to more effective treatment methods, which optimize and personalize management of patients with CSU.

Multinational Drug Survival Study of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria and Potential Predictors for Discontinuation

Treating patients with chronic urticaria using omalizumab has been shown to be safe and effective in randomized clinical trials. Multinational studies on long-term omalizumab performance in chronic urticaria in clinical practice settings are lacking, especially on drug survival. Drug survival, which refers to the length of time that patients are treated with a specific drug, is a comprehensive outcome covering effectiveness, safety, and patient and physician preferences. Furthermore, little is known about the reasons and potential predictors for omalizumab discontinuation. To investigate omalizumab drug survival as well as reasons and potential predictors for discontinuation in a large, diverse population. This international multicenter cohort study was conducted at 14 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence in 10 countries, including all patients with chronic urticaria from these centers who were ever treated with omalizumab. Drug survival analysis was performed to assess time to discontinuation. Patient characteristics and treatment protocols were investigated by Cox regression analysis to identify potential predictors for omalizumab discontinuation. In 2325 patients with chronic urticaria who started omalizumab between June 2009 and July 2022, the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 42 (6) years, and 1650 participants (71%) were female. Overall omalizumab survival rates decreased from 76% to 39% after 1 to 7 years, respectively (median survival time, 3.3 [95 % CI, 2.9-4.0] years), primarily due to discontinuation from well-controlled disease in 576 patients (65%). Ineffectiveness and adverse effects were reasons for discontinuation in a far smaller proportion of patients, totaling 164 patients (18%) and 31 patients (4%), respectively. Fast treatment response was associated with higher rates of omalizumab discontinuation due to well-controlled disease (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.75]), and disease duration of more than 2 years was associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to well-controlled disease (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.98]). Immunosuppressive cotreatment at the start of omalizumab and autoimmune disease was associated with a higher risk for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.12-2.42]). The presence of spontaneous wheals (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.93]) and access to higher dosages (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.27-0.58) were both associated with a lower risk for discontinuation of omalizumab due to ineffectiveness. This multinational omalizumab drug survival cohort study demonstrated that treatment of chronic urticaria with omalizumab in a clinical setting is effective and safe, and well-controlled disease is the main reason for treatment discontinuation. These findings on omalizumab drug survival rates and reasons and potential predictors for discontinuation may guide patients and physicians in clinical decision-making and expectation management. These results may call for the identification of biomarkers for chronic urticaria remission in complete responders to omalizumab treatment.

Favorable clinical course after discontinuation of omalizumab treatment in patients with allergic severe asthma: A real-world clinical practice

The success rate of omalizumab discontinuation is 50–75.5%. However, such data are scarce in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the clinical progression following the cessation of long-term omalizumab treatment (>5 years) in severe allergic asthma patients who have achieved super-responder status, defined as being off any oral maintenance corticosteroids without experiencing exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids for >1 year. Six (28.6%) among 21 patients recommenced after a median period of 5.5 (4.3–12.5) months later due to exacerbated asthma control, resulting in improved asthma management for all patients. The rates of patients who successfully remained off omalizumab treatment for 1 and 2 years were 72.4% and 65.8%, respectively. Specific IgE levels after discontinuing omalizumab treatment significantly decreased compared to those at initiating this treatment in 10 patients who successfully remained off this treatment. Therefore, discontinuing omalizumab treatment may be considered for patients continuing treatment beyond 5 years and achieving super-responder status.

Solar Urticaria: An Ambispective Study in a Long-term Follow-up Cohort with Emphasis on Therapeutic Predictors and Outcomes.

Solar urticaria is a rare photodermatosis with several unknown pathogenic, clinical and therapeutic aspects. This study analysed the clinical and therapeutic features of a long-term follow-up solar urticaria cohort, with a focus on omalizumab management and outcomes, and characterized omalizumab response with the use of the high-affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor (FcεRI) and the Urticaria Control Test. An observational, unicentric, ambispective study was conducted from 2007 to 2023. Solar urticaria was diagnosed in 41 patients with a median follow-up of 60 months. Thirteen patients were prescribed omalizumab, with a median treatment time of 48 months. A significant decrease in FcεRI baseline levels and subsequent median increase in Urticaria Control Test was evidenced after omalizumab prescription in all patients. Drug survival at 48 months was at 88.9%. Omalizumab stepping-down protocol led to sustained omalizumab discontinuation in only 1 patient. Median basal Urticaria Control Test was lower (p < 0.01) in patients who were prescribed omalizumab and in patients without remission. This study contributes to our knowledge of omalizumab outcomes in real-life clinical practice and highlights the pathogenic importance of IgE-mediated pathways in solar urticaria, where FcεRI emerges as a possible biomarker of omalizumab response.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU): Real-Life Experience in Dose/Interval Adjustments and Treatment Discontinuation.

Data on real-life experience with omalizumab dose/interval adjustments are still limited, as well as on omalizumab discontinuation. To evaluate efficacy and safety of omalizumab dose/interval adjustment in a Portuguese cohort of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to characterize those who discontinued omalizumab. A retrospective study of patients who started omalizumab for CSU at a Portuguese Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) was conducted between 2009 and 2021. Response criteria were based on a weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) <7 points (partial: UAS7 7-15 points; nonresponders: UAS7 >15 points) and minimal important difference >10 points. A total of 138 patients were enrolled in the study; 83% of them were women, and the median age was 49 years (interquartile range: 40-58 years). On 300 mg q4 weeks, 96 (70%) patients were responders, 29 (21%) partial responders, and 13 (9%) nonresponders. After dose/interval adjustments (up to 600 mg q2 weeks), 108 (78%) were responders, 27 (20%) partial responders, and 3 (2%) nonresponders. No adverse events were reported. Updosing was more frequent in patients with angioedema, body mass index >30 kg/m2, positive basophil activation test, and autologous serum test. A total of 71 (51%) patients lengthened interval, presenting higher median pre-omalizumab D-dimer (0.2 vs 0 mcg/mL, P= .038) and C-reactive protein (0.3 vs 0.1 mg/dL, P= .030) values than those with a standard dose. In total, 37 patients (27%) stopped omalizumab, but 14 (38%) of them needed retreatment on average 11 months after discontinuation. Patients with angioedema and a longer omalizumab duration had higher chance of relapse. Omalizumab dose and/or interval adjustment is effective and safe and should be implemented in partial/nonresponders for response improvement and in responders for further discontinuation. A protocol for regimen adjustments is proposed.

Treatment Patterns of Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma Treated by Pulmonologists in Spain

Introduction and objectivesThe use of monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapies is becoming the new standard of care for severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA). Even though patients may qualify for one or more of these targeted treatments, based on different clinical criteria, a global vision of mAb prescription management in a large sample of hospitals is not well characterised in Spain.The objective was to give a global vision of mAb prescription management in a large sample of hospitals in Spain. Materials and methodsWe used an aggregate data survey method to interview pulmonology specialists in a large sample of Spanish centres (90). The following treatment-related information was obtained on patients treated with mAbs: specific mAbs prescribed, treatment interruption, switch and restart and the reasons for these treatment changes. ResultsmAb prescription was more frequent in females (13.3% females vs 7.4% males; p<0.001). There were no differences in prevalence by hospital complexity level. In contrast, there were differences by geographical area. Omalizumab was the most prescribed mAb (6.2%), followed by mepolizumab (2.9%). Discontinuation of Omalizumab (due to a lack of effectivity) and switches from this mAb to mepolizumab were more frequent. Very few restarts to the first treatment were observed after a switch from ≥2mAbs. ConclusionsOmalizumab appeared as the most prescribed mAb in SUA but was also the most withdrawn; a specific and objective characterisation of patients with SUA, along with asthma phenotyping, and together with further evaluation of safety and effectiveness profiles, will lead to future progress in the management of SUA with mAbs.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Recurrence of Omalizumab Use in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Chronic Inducible Urticaria

Introduction: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin condition that can be divided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). Omalizumab is one treatment option for CU, but currently there are limited clinical studies of omalizumab’s efficacy for treating CU in Chinese patients. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment for CU patients in a Chinese patient population. Specifically, we aimed to compare the differential efficacy of omalizumab for CSU and CIndU patients and predict risk factors for recurrence. Methods: We completed a retrospective clinical data review of 130 CU patients who received omalizumab treatment from August 2020 to May 2022, with a maximum follow-up period of 18 months. Results: A total of 108 CSU patients and 22 CIndU patients were included in the study. After treatment with omalizumab, the response rate in the CSU group was higher than that in the CIndU group (93.5% vs. 68.2%), and CSU patients accounted for a higher proportion of responders and early responders (responders: 87.1% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001; early responders: 95.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001). Nonresponders had lower total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels (75.0 vs. 167.5 IU/mL, p = 0.046) and a relatively shorter duration of treatment (1.0 vs. 3.0 months, p = 0.009) compared to responders. Early responders had shorter disease duration (1.0 vs. 3.0 years, p = 0.028), higher baseline UCT (4.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.034), lower baseline DLQI (18.0 vs. 18.5, p = 0.026), and shorter total treatment time (2.0 vs. 4.0 months, p < 0.001) compared to late responders. All adverse events reported during treatment were mild. Seventy-four patients with CU discontinued the drug after achieving complete disease control, of which 26 (35.1%) relapsed for 2.0 months (interquartile range: 1.0–3.0 months). Compared with nonrelapsed patients, relapsed patients often had other allergic diseases (42.3% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.029), higher basal levels of total IgE (263.0 vs. 140.0 IU/mL, p = 0.033), and longer disease duration (4.2 vs. 1.0 years, p = 0.002). Relapsed patients could still achieve good disease control after restarting omalizumab therapy. Conclusion: Omalizumab was effective and safe for CSU and CIndU patients. Patients with CSU responded more quickly to omalizumab and showed a relatively better treatment effect. However, there was a possibility of relapse after discontinuation of omalizumab after complete control of CU, and in these cases, restarting omalizumab treatment after relapse was effective.

Delayed‐type hypersensitivity gastrointestinal symptoms induced by food oral immunotherapy and efficiently treated by dupilumab: A case report

Delayed‐type hypersensitivity gastrointestinal symptoms induced by food oral immunotherapy and efficiently treated by dupilumab: A case report

Predictive factors of recurrence after omalizumab cessation in the elderly with urticaria: A real-life study.

Background: There are no well-defined data that help predict the recurrence risk of urticaria after omalizumab cessation in elderly patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab and to determine the possible predictive factors for recurrence after omalizumab cessation in the elderly with CSU. Methods: A total of 193 patients with CSU treated with omalizumab were included and divided into two groups according to age: group 1, ages 18-64 years (n = 127), and group 2, ages ≥ 65 years (n = 66). Demographics, clinical features, immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti-TPO), serum total IgE were analyzed. The IgG anti-TPO/total IgE ratio was calculated. Pretreatment 7-day urticaria activity scores, medication scores, and urticaria control test results were compared with those after treatment periods. Adverse effects were also evaluated. Results: The most common adverse effect of omalizumab treatment was injection-site reactions (4.7%) in both groups. Omalizumab was ceased after 24 weeks in 40.9% and in 73.1% in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p < 0.001). CSU recurred after omalizumab discontinuation in 9 and 15 patients in group 1 and in group 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The median baseline IgG anti-TPO was higher in patients with recurrent CSU in group 2 than in those in group 1 (p = 0.002). In group 2, the cutoff values of IgG anti-TPO and the IgG anti-TPO/total IgE ratio were 54.83 IU/mL and 0.45 for recurrence, respectively. Conclusion: Omalizumab is effective and safe in elderly patients with CSU. The serum baseline IgG anti-TPO level and the IgG anti-TPO/total IgE ratio could serve as predictors of recurrence in CSU after omalizumab cessation in elderly patients.

Discontinuing Omalizumab Treatment in Super-Responder Patients with Allergic Severe Asthma: Can the Baseline Total IgE Level Be Used as a Biological Marker to Decide Discontinuing Omalizumab Treatment?

Background: Although there are many studies presenting the efficacy of omalizumab in severe asthma, the data about the optimal treatment duration are still debated. Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical effects of omalizumab discontinuation after 5 years of treatment in patients with omalizumab super-responders, the persistence of response and to compare the features of patients, whose symptoms are still well controlled and those who relapsed and re-treated with omalizumab. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data of 100 adult patients diagnosed with allergic severe asthma and treated with omalizumab between 2008 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, functional, and laboratory parameters of the patients who were re-treated with omalizumab and those who did not need to be re-treated were compared. Results: There were 14 super-responder patients, who were treated with omalizumab for 5 years, and the treatment was discontinued then. Omalizumab was not restarted in 9 patients (64%) and was restarted in 5 (36%) patients. No significant difference was presented between these two groups in terms of demographic, clinical, functional, and laboratory parameters. The baseline total IgE levels of patients, who were re-treated with omalizumab, was found to be higher than those who were not, but this difference was not statistically significant (440 [229–864] IU/mL vs. 164 [85–293] IU/mL; p = 0.053, respectively). Conclusion: One of 3 patients was re-treated with omalizumab due to loss of asthma control after discontinuation of the treatment. Therefore, omalizumab’s immunomodulatory effect may seem to persist in a majority of cases after discontinuation. Also, higher baseline total IgE levels might help to predict the cases that need re-treatment after discontinuation.

Long-term outcome of omalizumab-assisted desensitisation to cow's milk and eggs in patients refractory to conventional oral immunotherapy: real-life study.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach to cow's milk and egg allergies, but reactions are frequent and some patients cannot be desensitized. To evaluate long-term OIT outcomes with omalizumab (OMZ) in paediatric patients with severe egg and/or milk allergies. This retrospective real-life study analysed findings in children with Immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy to cow's milk and/or hen eggs refractory to conventional OIT, who underwent OIT with OMZ in our department between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. In all, 41 patients were included (median age: 7 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 5.5-9.5); 26/41 (63.4%) underwent OIT for milk, 8/41 (19.5%) for egg and 7/41 (17.1%) for both. The median time between initiation of OMZ and OIT was 27 weeks (IQR: 22-33). Forty (97.56%) patients reached the maintenance phase (200 mL of cow's milk and 30 mL of raw egg or 1 cooked egg) in a median time of 27 weeks (IQR: 18-37). The median total time with OMZ was 117 weeks (IQR: 88-144). During the OMZ period, 2.44% (1/41) of patients presented anaphylaxis. After discontinuation of OMZ, 29.3% (12/41) presented anaphylaxis, 50% of them had a poor adherence to daily ingestion. One patient (2.44%) was diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis after 2 years of discontinuation of OMZ. Currently, after a median time of 9 years (IQR: 7-10) since the initiation of OMZ, 75.6% (31/41) are desensitized (27/31 without OMZ). Omalizumab allows desensitisation of children with severe allergies to cow's milk and/or egg without developing severe reactions while receiving this treatment. However, discontinuation of OMZ leads to severe allergic reactions, and hence must be monitored carefully.

Omalizumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering skin disease. Current treatment strategies are limited by their efficacy and/or side effect profile and the need for safer and effective alternatives is undeniable. We aimed to conduct a systematic review focusing on the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in BP patients. Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for English and French articles published from inception to July 1, 2021, using search terms "omalizumab" OR "Xolair" OR "IGE025" OR "olizumab" AND "bullous pemphigoid." Screening and data extraction was performed by two raters independently. The primary outcome was complete response (CR), and secondary outcomes were partial response (PR), flare-ups, adverse events/vital status. In total, 22 articles were included, with a total of 56 patients. All patients had a refractory BP with mean disease duration of 13.5 ± 20.2 months (Standard Deviation (SD)) and failed 3.1 ± 1.6 therapies and many remained corticosteroids dependent. Overall, 87.5% of patients responded to treatment (55.4% CR and 32.1% PR), 7.1% discontinued the protocol and only 5.4% were non responders. A third of patients were able to discontinue all other therapies and most others were able to discontinue or taper systemic corticosteroids to <10 mg daily. Flare-ups occurred in 57.7% of patients upon discontinuation of omalizumab and/or steroid tapering, most patients recaptured response thereafter. Omalizumab was well tolerated by most patients. Omalizumab appears to be a promising treatment for BP with a good response rate and safety profile. However, several limitations were identified in current literature, and highlight the need for randomized controlled trials of omalizumab in BP.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) frequently remains uncontrolled despite maximal medical therapy and sinonasal surgery, presenting several unmet needs and challenges. Omalizumab previously demonstrated efficacy in CRSwNP in duplicate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (POLYP 1, POLYP 2). This open-label extension evaluated the continued efficacy, safety, and durability of response of omalizumab in adults with CRSwNP who completed POLYP 1 or 2. After 24 weeks of omalizumab or placebo in POLYP 1 and 2, patients (n= 249) received open-label omalizumab plus background nasal mometasone therapy for 28 weeks and were subsequently followed for 24 weeks after omalizumab discontinuation. Efficacy end points assessed change from baseline for the coprimary end points, Nasal Polyp Score and Nasal Congestion Score, and the secondary end points of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Total Nasal Symptom Score and its components, and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores. Safety objectives included incidence of adverse events and adverse events leading to omalizumab discontinuation. Patients who continued omalizumab experienced further improvements across coprimary end points and secondary end points through 52 weeks. Patients who switched from placebo to omalizumab experienced favorable responses across end points through week 52 that were similar to POLYP 1 and 2 at week 24. After omalizumab discontinuation, scores gradually worsened over the 24-week follow-up, but remained improved from pretreatment levels for both groups. The safety profile was similar to previous reports. The efficacy and safety profile from this study supports extended omalizumab treatment up to 1 year for CRSwNP with inadequate response to nasal corticosteroids.

Oral immunotherapy in severe cow's milk allergic patients treated with omalizumab: Real life survey from a Spanish registry.

Oral immunotherapy is a frequent treatment for the management of food allergies, but adverse events (AE) are common. This study assessed the outcome of cow's milk oral immunotherapy (MOIT) in severe cow`s milk-allergic patients treated with omalizumab in a real-life setting. OmaBASE was a national, multicenter, open, and observational registry that collected clinical, immunologic, and treatment from patients with food allergy receiving omalizumab. Data derived from 58 patients aged 10.3years (IQR 6.3-13.2) and median milk-specific IgE 100kUA /L at the start of omalizumab treatment. Most had experienced anaphylaxis by accidental exposures (70.7%) and had asthma (81.0%). Omalizumab in monotherapy induced tolerance to ≥6000mg of cow's milk protein (CMP) to 34.8% of patients tested by oral food challenge. Omalizumab combined with MOIT conferred desensitization to ≥6000mg of CMP to 83.0% of patients. Omalizumab withdrawal triggered more AE (P=.013) and anaphylaxis (P=.001) than no discontinuation. Anaphylaxis was observed in 36.4% of patients who discontinued omalizumab, and more in those with sudden (50.0%) rather than progressive (12.5%) discontinuation. At database closure, 40.5% of patients who had completed follow-up tolerated CMP without omalizumab (7.2% 1500-4500mg; 33.3% ≥6000mg). Milk oral immunotherapy initiated under omalizumab allows the desensitization of subjects with severe cow's milk allergy even after omalizumab discontinuation. However, discontinuation of omalizumab can lead to severe AE and should be carefully monitored.

Characteristics of patients with severe asthma who experienced treatment failure with omalizumab

BackgroundOmalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, has been widely used in many countries, including Japan. However, some patients do not respond to omalizumab, and the cause of treatment failure has not been fully elucidated. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of adult asthma patients who failed to achieve disease control with omalizumab in a real-world setting. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital between March 2009 and May 2016. The patient characteristics and factors for treatment failure with omalizumab were evaluated, as were treatment alternatives after discontinuation of omalizumab. ResultsIn total, 59 patients were included in this study. The omalizumab-ineffective group had a significantly higher number of patients with eosinophilic sinusitis (P = 0.001) and eosinophilic otitis media (P = 0.023) than the omalizumab-effective group. A multivariate analysis revealed that both eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (odds ratio: 23.4; P = 0.011) and eosinophilic otitis media (odds ratio: 6.71; P = 0.039) were associated with treatment failure with omalizumab. Most patients with eosinophilic comorbidities of the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) in the omalizumab-ineffective group received mepolizumab or benralizumab as alternative therapy, following which disease control was achieved. ConclusionEosinophilic comorbidities of the ENT may affect treatment failure with omalizumab in patients with severe asthma. Anti-interleukin-5 antibody or anti-interleukin-5Rα antibody rather than anti-IgE antibody should be considered as an additional therapy for patients with severe asthma who have eosinophilic comorbidities of the ENT.

Duration of chronic spontaneous urticaria remission after omalizumab discontinuation: A long-term observational study

Duration of chronic spontaneous urticaria remission after omalizumab discontinuation: A long-term observational study

Omalizumab treatment and outcomes in Chinese patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, chronic inducible urticaria, or both

BackgroundChronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin disorder, which can be further divided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). Omalizumab is effective and safe for difficult-to-treat CSU based on clinical trials. However, there are limited data comparing the therapeutic effect of omalizumab for patients with CSU, CIndU, and CSU plus CIndU. Meanwhile, there is still no reliable predictor for treatment response or relapse. Our study was conducted to collect real-world clinical data on omalizumab treatment in patients with CSU, CIndU, and both. MethodsThis was an observational, retrospective chart review of patients with CU initiating omalizumab treatment between February 2018 and May 2020 (maximum 28 months follow-up). ResultsA total of 138 patients were included, 87 with CSU alone, 33 with different forms of CIndU, and 18 with both. A total of 87.0% (n = 120/138) of the CU patients responded to omalizumab therapy, among which 65.2% (n = 90/138) of the patients showed complete response and 21.7% (n = 30/138) of the patients showed partial response. The therapeutic effect and speed of onset of effect for omalizumab were comparable among patients with CSU, CIndU, or both. Autologous serum skin test (ASST)-positive patients were more likely to show a slow response to omalizumab therapy (P = 0.043). Non-responders had lower baseline total IgE levels (35.0 vs 121.5 kU/L, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with low total IgE levels in non-responders was significantly higher than that of responders (61.1% vs. 14.5%, P < 0.001). Also, more non-responder patients had elevated thyroid autoantibodies than responders (50.0% vs. 23.0%, P = 0.041). The median ratio of serum IgG-anti-TPO to serum total IgE in non-responders was significantly higher compared with responders (1.22 vs. 0.09, P < 0.001). Non-responders also had shorter treatment periods (4.5 vs 6.0 months, P = 0.035) compared with responders. Two of 3 patients (67.4%, n = 29/43) experienced relapse after ceasing omalizumab therapy. These patients had longer disease durations (52.0 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.007) and higher baseline total IgE levels (179.9 vs. 72.5 kU/L, P = 0.020) than patients who did not relapse. We reinitiated omalizumab treatment for 10 relapsed patients, all of them reported a rapid response after the first injection within the first 4 weeks of retreatment. ConclusionOmalizumab is highly effective in patients with difficult-to-treat CSU, CIndU, or both. Responders tend to have unique immunological features and longer treatment periods. Patients with higher baseline total IgE levels and longer disease durations are more likely to experience rapid relapse after discontinuation of omalizumab.

Real-World Observational Study on the Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Allergic Asthma Patients Receiving Omalizumab in Canada.

BackgroundOmalizumab is a treatment option for pediatric and adult patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma poorly controlled with standard inhaled therapies. Clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy of omalizumab. There is limited real-world evidence on the characteristics and treatment patterns of Canadian asthma patients receiving omalizumab.ObjectiveWe profiled Canadian omalizumab users to estimate time to omalizumab discontinuation and to assess changes in concurrent medication usage before, during, and after therapy.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that analyzed data from Canadian prescription claims databases. An algorithm was used to select naïve users of omalizumab with an inferred diagnosis of GINA 5-asthma who made a claim for omalizumab from February 1, 2007, to June 2, 2015. Demographic and baseline characteristics were assessed at index. Outcomes examined over the analysis period included (i) daily omalizumab dose per patient and per claim; (ii) omalizumab discontinuation (defined as ≥100-day gap in making omalizumab claims) and its potential predictors (ie, age, sex, province of residence, drug insurer; assessed by Cox Proportional Hazards Model); and (iii) for patients who discontinued omalizumab, changes in concurrent medication usage before, during, and 6 months after omalizumab usage.ResultsThe final study cohort consisted of 1160 patients (mean age: 45.8 ± 15.2 years; 64.7% female). During the first year of omalizumab therapy, 29.5% of patients discontinued treatment. The singular characteristic that predicted omalizumab discontinuation with statistical significance was age group (20‒34 years vs 12‒19 years; hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.11–2.76; P<0.05). There were significant reductions in the use of some concurrent inhaled and oral asthma medications during and/or after omalizumab use (P<0.05).ConclusionNearly one-third of patients who initiated omalizumab in Canada for refractory, moderate to severe allergic asthma discontinued treatment during the first year.

Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: a Focused Update in Omalizumab

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disease in the general population that causes significant effects on quality of life and a financial burden on the health care system. Guidelines are essential to assure patients are being managed appropriately, although given the rigor to develop these reviews they are not as up to date as cutting-edge scientific evidence. This review details the most recent phase II, III, and IV clinical trials that have been published since the development of the US practice parameters. Phase II, III, and IV clinical trials, ASTERIA I, POLARIS, X-ACT, MoA, and CTEND-CIU, demonstrate safety, long-term efficacy, and improvement in patient’s quality of life by decreasing disease-burdened days and severity of disease in comparison with placebo, as well as transcriptional level changes in gene expression with omalizumab use. Data is emerging regarding efficacy in inducible urticarias, predictors of response, and optimal methods for discontinuation of omalizumab. Optimal treatment of CSU should be based on recent practice parameters and guidelines. Recent evidence supports the use of omalizumab in antihistamine refractory urticaria patients, but the mechanism for its effect, identification of biomarkers to predict response to therapy, optimal duration, and adjustments in dosing all require additional investigation.

Omalizumab Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Asthma in the US Medicare Population

Asthma in older adults is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality; similarly, asthma can be severe enough among younger adults to warrant disability benefits. Reasons for poor outcomes in both groups of patients may include discontinuation and lack of adherence to controller therapies. To examine characteristics and treatment patterns of US Medicare patients initiating omalizumab for asthma, and factors associated with its discontinuation and adherence. A retrospective claims database analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with asthma initiating omalizumab treatment was carried out. The primary outcomes were omalizumab discontinuation (gap in use ≥90 days) and adherence (proportion of days covered ≥0.8) over a 12-month follow-up. Multivariable regressions were used to examine factors associated with omalizumab discontinuation and adherence. Of the 3058 Medicare patients initiating omalizumab for asthma (mean age, 62.7 years), 36.9% discontinued omalizumab and 60.6% were adherent. Discontinuation rates were 32.7% and 42.8%, and adherence rates were 65.4% and 53.9%, for disabled and older Medicare patients, respectively. Patients aged 65 to 69 years and 70 to 74 years had significantly lower odds of discontinuation (odds ratios [95% CI], 0.66 [0.46-0.93] and 0.62 [0.43-0.89], respectively) and higher odds of adherence than did patients aged 80 years or older. Compared with patients receiving low-income subsidy, patients not receiving low-income subsidy had lower odds of discontinuation (0.66 [0.52-0.83]) and higher odds of adherence (1.52 [1.20-1.93]). Greater numbers of preindex evaluation and management physician visits and comorbid rhinitis were associated with lower odds of discontinuation and higher odds of adherence. More than 60% of Medicare patients with asthma continued and were adherent to omalizumab over a 12-month follow-up. Patient age, low-income subsidy status, and the numbers of evaluation and management physician visits were among factors associated with treatment adherence and discontinuation.