Directional Microphone Modes Research Articles

Speech perception in noise and sound localization using different microphone modes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate if a directional microphone mode improves speech perception in noise and sound localization in experienced pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users. Methods15 bilaterally implanted children were included in the analysis. Speech perception in 4 noise conditions (S0N0, S0N90, S0N-90, S0N180) and sound localization were measured when using the OPUS 2 audio processor (omnidirectional mode) and the SONNET audio processor (omnidirectional and natural mode). ResultsSpeech perception in all 4 noise conditions was better with the SONNET natural mode than with the omnidirectional mode of either SONNET or OPUS 2. The root-mean-square error of the sound localization test was smaller with the natural mode of SONNET than with the omnidirectional mode of either SONNET or OPUS 2. The performance of the audio processors in the omnidirectional mode did not differ significantly except in the S0N0 condition of the speech perception test. ConclusionThe natural microphone mode of the SONNET audio processor improved speech perception in noise and sound localization in bilaterally implanted children.

Perceived sound quality of different signal processing algorithms by cochlear implant listeners in real-world acoustic environments

Well-documented benefits of noise-reduction technologies in laboratories do not always yield a significant difference in real-world acoustic environments. Many possible reasons were proposed and studied to address this discrepancy. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of different noise reduction strategies for cochlear implants in real-world acoustic environments. Sixteen listeners were fit with hearing aid preprocessors with electrical outputs and cochlear implant speech processors receiving the electrical inputs. The preprocessors were programmed to 1) no noise reduction: omnidirectional microphone (OMNI), 2) moderate noise reduction: a combination of omnidirectional and adaptive directional microphone modes with modulation-based noise reduction (TRI+NR); and 3) maximum noise reduction: adaptive directional microphone in all frequency channels with NR (ADM+NR). Listeners listened to sentences in a noisy café, a noisy restaurant, and a quiet hotel lobby. They were instructed to rate the overall sound quality preference, ease of listening, speech intelligibility, and listening comfort of sentences using a paired-comparison categorical rating paradigm. Results indicate cochlear implant listeners had no microphone preference in quiet but they preferred adaptive directional microphones in noisy environments. The paired-comparison categorical rating paradigm is a viable means to evaluate the benefits of signal processing strategies in real-world acoustic environments.

A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients

To evaluate whether speech recognition in noise differs according to whether a wireless remote microphone is connected to just the cochlear implant (CI) or to both the CI and to the hearing aid (HA) in bimodal CI users. The second aim was to evaluate the additional benefit of the directional microphone mode compared with the omnidirectional microphone mode of the wireless microphone. This prospective study measured Speech Recognition Thresholds (SRT) in babble noise in a ‘within-subjects repeated measures design’ for different listening conditions. Eighteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal CI users. No difference in speech recognition in noise in the bimodal listening condition was found between the wireless microphone connected to the CI only and to both the CI and the HA. An improvement of 4.1 dB was found for switching from the omnidirectional microphone mode to the directional mode in the CI only condition. The use of a wireless microphone improved speech recognition in noise for bimodal CI users. The use of the directional microphone mode led to a substantial additional improvement of speech perception in noise for situations with one target signal.

Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study.

Objective:Demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the light-driven contact hearing aid to support FDA clearance.Study Design:A single-arm, open-label investigational-device clinical trial.Setting:Two private-practice and one hospital-based ENT clinics.Patients:Forty-three subjects (86 ears) with mild-to-severe bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment.Intervention:Bilateral amplification delivered via a light-driven contact hearing aid comprising a Tympanic Lens (Lens) with a customized platform to directly drive the umbo and a behind-the-ear sound processor (Processor) that encodes sound into light pulses to wirelessly deliver signal and power to the Lens.Main Outcome Measures:The primary safety endpoint was a determination of “no change” (PTA4 < 10 dB) in residual unaided hearing at the 120-day measurement interval. The primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in word recognition using NU-6 at the 30-day measurement interval over the baseline unaided case. Secondary efficacy endpoints included functional gain from 2 to 10 kHz and speech-in-noise improvement over the baseline unaided case using both omnidirectional and directional microphones.Results:The results for the 86 ears in the study determined a mean change of −0.40 dB in PTA4, indicating no change in residual hearing (p < 0.0001). There were no serious device- or procedure-related adverse events, or unanticipated adverse events. Word recognition aided with the Earlens improved significantly (p < 0.0001) over the unaided performance, by 35% rationalized arcsine units on average. Mean functional gain was 31 dB across 2 to 10 kHz. The average speech-recognition threshold improvement over the unaided case for the Hearing in Noise Test was 0.75 dB (p = 0.028) and 3.14 dB (p < 0.0001) for the omnidirectional and directional microphone modes, respectively.Conclusion:The safety and effectiveness data supported a de novo 510(k) submission that received clearance from the FDA.

Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor.

To evaluate the speech intelligibility in noise with a new cochlear implant (CI) processor that uses a pinna effect imitating directional microphone system. Prospective experimental study. Tertiary referral center. Ten experienced, unilateral CI recipients with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss.Intervention: All participants performed speech in noise tests with the Opus 2 processor (omnidirectional microphone mode only) and the newer Sonnet processor (omnidirectional and directional microphone mode). The speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise was measured in four spatial settings. The test sentences were always presented from the front. The noise was arriving either from the front (S0N0), the ipsilateral side of the CI (S0NIL), the contralateral side of the CI (S0NCL), or the back (S0N180). The directional mode improved the SRTs by 3.6 dB (p < 0.01), 2.2 dB (p < 0.01), and 1.3 dB (p < 0.05) in the S0N180, S0NIL, and S0NCL situations, when compared with the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode. There was no statistically significant difference in the S0N0 situation. No differences between the Opus 2 and the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode were observed. Speech intelligibility with the Sonnet system was statistically different to speech recognition with the Opus 2 system suggesting that CI users might profit from the pinna effect imitating directionality mode in noisy environments.

Efficacy of a Reverse Cardioid Directional Microphone

Directional microphones have been shown to improve a listener's ability to communicate in noise by improving the signal to noise ratio. However, their efficacy may be questioned in situations where the listener needs to understand speech originating from the back. The goal of the study was to examine the performance of a directional microphone mode that has an automatic reverse cardioid polar pattern. A single-blinded, factorial repeated-measures design was used to study the effect of microphone modes (reverse cardioid, omnidirectional, and front hypercardioid) and stimulus azimuths (front and back) on three outcome variables (aided thresholds, nonsense syllable identification in quiet, and sentence recognition in noise). Twenty adults with a mild-to-severe bilaterally symmetrical (±5 dB) sensorineural hearing loss participated. Audibility in quiet was evaluated by obtaining aided sound field thresholds and speech identification at an input level of 50 dB SPL presented at 0 and 180° azimuths. In addition, speech understanding in noise was also assessed with the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) sentences presented at both azimuths (0 and 180°) with a diffuse noise. Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to examine the effects of microphone mode (omnidirectional, front hypercardioid, reverse cardioid) and stimulus azimuth (0°, 180°) on aided thresholds, nonsense syllable identification, and HINT performance. Results with the reverse cardioid directional microphone in both quiet conditions were similar to the omnidirectional microphone. The results of the reverse cardioid microphone in noise were significantly better than the omnidirectional microphone and front hypercardioid microphone when speech was presented from the back (p < 0.001). These results support the possible benefits of a reverse cardioid directional microphone when used in specific listening situations.

Microphone Directionality, Pre-Emphasis Filter, and Wind Noise in Cochlear Implants

Wind noise can be a nuisance or a debilitating masker for cochlear implant users in outdoor environments. Previous studies indicated that wind noise at the microphone/hearing aid output had high levels of low-frequency energy and the amount of noise generated is related to the microphone directionality. Currently, cochlear implants only offer either directional microphones or omnidirectional microphones for users at-large. As all cochlear implants utilize pre-emphasis filters to reduce low-frequency energy before the signal is encoded, effective wind noise reduction algorithms for hearing aids might not be applicable for cochlear implants. The purposes of this study were to investigate the effect of microphone directionality on speech recognition and perceived sound quality of cochlear implant users in wind noise and to derive effective wind noise reduction strategies for cochlear implants. A repeated-measure design was used to examine the effects of spectral and temporal masking created by wind noise recorded through directional and omnidirectional microphones and the effects of pre-emphasis filters on cochlear implant performance. A digital hearing aid was programmed to have linear amplification and relatively flat in-situ frequency responses for the directional and omnidirectional modes. The hearing aid output was then recorded from 0 to 360° at flow velocities of 4.5 and 13.5 m/sec in a quiet wind tunnel. Sixteen postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant listeners who reported to be able to communicate on the phone with friends and family without text messages participated in the study. Cochlear implant users listened to speech in wind noise recorded at locations that the directional and omnidirectional microphones yielded the lowest noise levels. Cochlear implant listeners repeated the sentences and rated the sound quality of the testing materials. Spectral and temporal characteristics of flow noise, as well as speech and/or noise characteristics before and after the pre-emphasis filter, were analyzed. Correlation coefficients between speech recognition scores and crest factors of wind noise before and after pre-emphasis filtering were also calculated. Listeners obtained higher scores using the omnidirectional than the directional microphone mode at 13.5 m/sec, but they obtained similar speech recognition scores for the two microphone modes at 4.5 m/sec. Higher correlation coefficients were obtained between speech recognition scores and crest factors of wind noise after pre-emphasis filtering rather than before filtering. Cochlear implant users would benefit from both directional and omnidirectional microphones to reduce far-field background noise and near-field wind noise. Automatic microphone switching algorithms can be more effective if the incoming signal were analyzed after pre-emphasis filters for microphone switching decisions.

Low-frequency gain compensation in directional hearing aids.

Hearing aids currently available on the market with both omnidirectional and directional microphone modes often have reduced amplification in the low frequencies when in directional microphone mode due to better phase matching. The effects of this low-frequency gain reduction for individuals with hearing loss in the low frequencies was of primary interest. Changes in sound quality for quiet listening environments following gain compensation in the low frequencies was of secondary interest. Thirty participants were fit with bilateral in-the-ear hearing aids, which were programmed in three ways while in directional microphone mode: no-gain compensation, adaptive-gain compensation, and full-gain compensation. All participants were tested with speech in noise tasks. Participants also made sound quality judgments based on monaural recordings made from the hearing aid. Results support a need for gain compensation for individuals with low-frequency hearing loss of greater than 40 dB HL.