Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Inhibitor Research Articles

Development of a Pharmacokinetic Model to Optimize the Dosage Regimen of TS-1, a Combination Preparation of Tegafur, Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium

TS-1 is a combination preparation of tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with gimeracil, a potent inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which mediates the inactivation of 5-FU. UFT is a combination preparation of tegafur with uracil, which also inhibits DPD, though less potently; UFT has a higher content of tegafur than that in TS-1. We aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model to describe the kinetics of tegafur and 5-FU after the administration of TS-1 and UFT. We developed a model incorporating the inhibition of DPD by gimeracil and uracil, and fitted the model to the observed kinetics of tegafur and 5-FU after the administration of TS-1 and UFT. Then, we simulated the plasma 5-FU profiles in patients with renal dysfunction and those after replacement of TS-1 with UFT and compared them with the observed profiles. The developed model could appropriately describe the plasma concentration profiles of 5-FU and tegafur after the administration of TS-1 in patients with normal and impaired renal function. The developed model may be useful to optimize the dosage regimen of TS-1 under various clinical conditions.

Expression of chemoresistance-related proteins in α-fetoprotein-producing adenocarcinoma of the digestive organs

alpha-fetoprotein-producing adenocarcinoma of the digestive organs (APAD) is known to show a poor prognosis. To clarify the characteristics of chemoresistance in APAD, three proteins of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy association [dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS)] and one protein of cisplatin association [metallothionein (MT)] were immunohistochemically evaluated. Tissue samples were taken from 12 AFP-positive gastric cancers and 94 AFP-negative gastric cancers. Four AFP-positive cancer xenografts (one colonic, two pancreatic, and one biliary tract) and 17 AFP-negative cancer xenografts were also examined. In gastric cancers, high expression of TP was observed in 30% of AFP-negative tumors but in none of AFP-positive tumors (p=0.03). High expression of MT was found in 30% of AFP-negative tumors but in only one of the AFP-positive tumors. The TP-low and MT-low phenotype was noted in 92% of AFP-positive tumors and in 46% of AFP-negative tumors (p=0.004). None of the AFP-positive cancer xenografts revealed high TP expression and only one showed high MT expression. In the cellular level, TP and MT were scarcely co-expressed with AFP in either gastric cancer or xenograft series, using double immunostaining and serial sectioning techniques. There were no significant differences in the expression of DPD and TS between AFP-positive group and -negative group. However, DPD was frequently co-expressed with AFP in poorly differentiated medullary areas of the AFP-positive gastric cancers. The data presented herein suggest that APAD should be sensitive to cisplatin, but resistant to capecitabine and 5'-deoxyfluorouridine, fluoropyrimidines which are converted to 5-fluorouracil by TP. S-1, a fluoropyrimidine containing a strong DPD inhibitor, may be effective for AFP-positive gastric cancers with poorly differentiated medullary growth pattern.

A phase II study of S-1 in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: The S-1 Cooperative Study Group (Prostate Cancer) study

14650 Background: S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine antitumor drug that combines three pharmacological agents: tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil;gimeracil, an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; and potassium oxonate, which reduces gastrointestinal toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Methods: To be eligible patients (pts) had to have given informed consent, an age of <80 years, elevations of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) on three consecutive occasions despite effective hormonal therapy and antiandrogen withdrawal for at least 4 weeks, adequate organ function, a PS of 0–2, and a life expectancy of ≥3 months. S-1 was given orally at 40 mg/m2 b.i.d. for 28 consecutive days followed by a 14-day rest period. This 42-day cycle was repeated until confirmation of disease progression. Results: 32 pts were enrolled at 15 institutions. Their median age was 73 years (55 to 79). The median number of courses administered was 2.5 (1 to 11). On the basis of the change in the PSA level, 3 pts had a complete response (CR, <4 ng/ml), and 4 had a partial response (PR, ≥50% decrease), yielding a response rate of 21%. There was no change (NC) in 15 pts, and progressive disease (PD) in 10 pts. The median time to PSA progression was 71 days (95% CI: 44 to 161) overall, 234 days (152 to 435+) in the CR+PR group, and 157 days in the CR+PR+NC group. Grade 3 major toxicity comprised anorexia (3 pts) and anemia (2 pts). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: S-1 is active and well tolerated as a single agent in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Effectiveness and safety will be confirmed in subsequent large-scale phase II studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

613 POSTER Randomized phase III trial in locally advanced rectal cancer: preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral uracil and tegafur/leucovorin versus intravenous fluorouracil/leucovorin

Most chemotherapy regimens in colorectal cancer treatment are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin or capecitabine-based. Cardiotoxicity is a less common but potentially lethal complication of 5-FU or capecitabine treatment, and some physicians might be unfamiliar with treatment alternatives. Rechallenging should be avoided because it carries a high risk of recurrence of the cardiac symptoms and prophylactic treatment is not always protective. Possible alternative treatment options to be considered are to replace the oral capecitabine or intravenous 5-FU by a 5-FU bolus regimen, by uracil-tegafur or tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, both oral fluoropyrimidines combining a 5-FU prodrug with a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor, or by raltitrexed, a thymidilate synthase inhibitor whose metabolism is independent of DPD. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer and fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity can be treated with other non-fluoropyrimidine related chemotherapy, either as a single agent, combined, or in combination with biological agents. In this report we discuss the different alternative treatment options.

222 PUBLICATION Hepatic arterial injection with 5-fluorouracil and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor for the metastatic liver tumor in rabbits

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).Overweight/obese children with NAFLD (n = 76; median age, 13 years; IQR, 11.1-15.2 years) were eligible to participate in the study. The diagnosis of NAFLD was based on elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to ≥30% of the upper limit of normal (ULN) and liver hyperechogenicity on ultrasound. Patients were randomized to receive omega-3 fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid, 450-1300 mg/day) or placebo (omega-6 sunflower oil). The primary outcome was the number of patients who demonstrated decreased ALT activity by ≥0.3 times the ULN. Secondary outcomes included alterations in liver function tests, liver hyperechogenicity, insulin resistance, and other metabolic markers after 6 months of intervention.Out of 76 enrolled patients, 64 completed the trial and were analyzed. After 6 months, we found no significant differences between the omega-3 and placebo groups in the number of patients with decreased ALT by ≥0.3 times the ULN (24 vs 23) or in median (IQR) ALT activity (48.5 [31-62] U/L vs 39 [27-55] U/L), liver hyperechogenicity, insulin resistance, or serum lipid levels. However, patients in the omega-3 group had lower levels of aspartate aminotransferase (28 [25-36] U/L vs 39 [27-55] U/L; P = .04) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (26 [17.5-36.5] U/L vs 35 [22-52] U/L; P = .04), and significantly higher levels of adiponectin.Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation did not increase the number of patients with decreased ALT levels and it did not affect liver steatosis on ultrasound, but it improved aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels in children with NAFLD compared with placebo.Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01547910.

The role of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in resistance to 5-fluorouracil in human lung cancer cells

The expressions of thymidylate synthase (TS) and intracellular metabolic enzymes have been reported to be associated with the sensitivity and/or resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, since the role of these enzymes in the mechanism of resistance to 5-FU has not been fully examined in lung cancer, in the present study we measured the expression levels of TS, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) genes in lung cancer cell lines by real-time PCR, and the sensitivity to 5-FU using the MTS assay. The expression of DPD was significantly correlated with the concentration of 5-FU for 50% cell survival in 15 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (p<0.05), but the expressions of TS, TP, and OPRT were not. Treatment with 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, an inhibitor of DPD, altered the sensitivity to 5-FU in DPD-expressing RERF-LC-MT cells, indicating that modulation of DPD activity could increase the 5-FU sensitivity in lung cancer. In contrast, TS expression was dramatically higher in a 5-FU-resistant small-cell lung cancer cell line than in the parent cell line, whereas the expressions of DPD, TP, and OPRT genes were not markedly different. In order to examine the effect of other cytotoxic agents on TS and DPD expression, we compared the expressions of both genes between cisplatin-, paclitaxel-, gemcitabine-, or 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin-resistant lung cancer cells and their respective parent cells, but found no differences between any pair of resistant subline and the corresponding parent cell line. Our results indicate that degradation of 5-FU due to DPD is an important determinant in 5-FU sensitivity, while induction of TS contributes to acquired resistance against 5-FU in lung cancer. Therefore, the expression levels of TS and DPD genes may be useful indicators of 5-FU activity in lung cancer.

Phase I trial of Orzel (UFT plus leucovorin), cisplatin, and radiotherapy in the treatment of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

Fluorinated pyrimidines have been established as radiosensitizers in the combined modality therapy of esophageal cancer. UFT, an oral combination of a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug (uracil) and a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor (ftorafur), may provide improvement in the ease of administration with equal efficacy. This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT, leucovorin, and cisplatin when given with radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (Days 1 and 22) and UFT with leucovorin orally on Days 1-35. UFT was escalated in 50-mg/m(2) increments, starting at 200 mg/m(2)/d. Radiotherapy consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions. Patients underwent resection 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. Ten patients with resectable esophageal cancer were enrolled. Of the 7 patients entered at dose level 1, 1 developed a dose-limiting toxicity of nausea. All 3 patients entered at dose level 2 developed dose-limiting toxicity. The maximal tolerated dose for UFT was the starting level, 200 mg/m(2)/d. Of the 10 patients enrolled, 8 underwent esophagectomy and 2 developed progressive disease and did not undergo surgery. The disease of 6 of the 8 patients was downstaged at surgery. The recommended UFT dose for Phase II studies is 200 mg/m(2)/d given orally in two divided doses when given with leucovorin, cisplatin, and radiotherapy.

Role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine against non-small cell lung cancer—in correlation with the tumoral expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and its derivatives have been used worldwide for the treatment of several malignancies in solid organs. The effectiveness of these drugs is well proven in gastrointestinal malignancy, and has been reported upon the inverse correlation with the tumoral expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). However, the significance of DPD expression in 5-FU based chemotherapy has not been well investigated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined enzymatic activities and immunohistochemical expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and DPD in 84 cases of NSCLC. In vitro sensitivity for 5-FU was tested in 53 cases of them to evaluate these predictive values for effectiveness of 5-FU. Efficacy of 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), potent DPD inhibitor, was also examined in 27 cases of them. There was a reversal correlation between protein expression of DPD and sensitivity to 5-FU (r = -0.65; p < 0.001). Six (33.3%) of 18 cases with strong expression of DPD showed 10% or more increment of the anti-tumor effect by adding CDHP to 5-FU. DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidine and examination of the tumoral expression of DPD might be a promising chemotherapeutic strategy in NSCLC.

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PLASMA [2-13C]URACIL CONCENTRATIONS, BREATH13CO2EXPIRATION, AND DIHYDROPYRIMIDINE DEHYDROGENASE (DPD) ACTIVITY IN THE LIVER IN NORMAL AND DPD-DEFICIENT DOGS

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the first enzyme in the sequential metabolism of pyrimidine, regulates blood concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and is deeply involved in its toxicity. This study was designed to examine the effects of a DPD inhibitor on blood concentrations of [2-(13)C]uracil ([(13)C]uracil) and (13)CO(2) concentration (Delta(13)C) expired in breath after oral or intravenous administration of [(13)C]uracil to DPD-suppressed dogs prepared by pretreatment with 5-(trans-2-bromovinyl)uracil (BVU), a DPD inhibitor. Area under the curve (AUC(t)) of [(13) C]uracil after oral administration at 20 micromol/kg to dogs pretreated with BVU at 2, 5, and 40 mmol/kg were 37-, 88- and 120-fold higher than those of the control dogs, respectively. In contrast, breath AUC(t) values of Delta(13)C were reduced to 0.88-, 0.47- and 0.13-fold the control values, respectively. Upon intravenous administration of [(13)C]uracil at 20 micromol/kg to dogs pretreated with BVU at 0.5, 2, and 40 micromol/kg, blood AUC(t) values of [(13)C]uracil were 1.4-, 4.2-, and 13-fold higher than those of the control group, respectively, whereas breath AUC(t) values were reduced to 1.0-, 0.83-, and 0.07-fold the respective control values. DPD activities in the liver cytosol of dogs pretreated with BVU at 0.5, 2, 5, and 40 micromol/kg were decreased to 0.71-, 0.12-, 0.06-, and 0.04-fold those of the control dogs, respectively. These findings demonstrate that breath output (Delta(13)C) is a good marker of hepatic DPD activity in vivo.

Lack of contribution of dihydrofluorouracil and α-fluoro-β-alanine to the cytotoxicity of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine on human keratinocytes

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a very active oral fluoropyrimidine (colon and breast cancers) whose clinical use is complicated by the presence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). This cutaneous toxicity is less frequently encountered with other oral fluoropyrimidines containing a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor. The HFS is thus attributed to the presence of the main 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolites, dihydrofluorouracil (5-FUH2) and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), but without strong pharmacological arguments. The aim of the present study was to closely examine this latter hypothesis. Capecitabine generates 5'-deoxyflourouridine (5'-DFUR) which is transformed into 5-FU at the cellular target site through the intermediary of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). The cytotoxic effects (MTT test, 4-day exposure) of 5'-DFUR, 5-FU, 5-FUH2 and FBAL were tested against the spontaneously immortalized human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) and the human cancer colon cell line WiDr as a control. Mean IC50s on HaCaT and WiDr were, respectively, 1.3 and 10 microM for 5'-DFUR, 0.2 and 3.3 microM for 5-FU, 13.4 and 560 microM for 5-FUH2, and greater than 650 and 6500 microM for FBAL. The respective 5'-DFUR IC50s values were not different when cells were exposed to 5'-DFUR alone or in combination with 5-FU, 5-FUH2 and FBAL in both cell lines, the relative proportion of each drug reflecting known pharmacokinetic data for capecitabine (5'-DFUR 12.4%, 5-FUH2 6.4%, 5-FU 1.2% and FBAL 80%). This latter finding demonstrates the relative lack of significant cytotoxic activity of 5-FUH2 and FBAL on human keratinocytes. TP activity was particularly high in HaCaT cells and DPD activity was very low in both cell lines. These data strongly suggest that the presence of 5-FU metabolites does not play a major role in the HFS generated by capecitabine and that it can probably be attributed to particularly high TP activity in keratinocytes. This observation may have important clinical consequences such as a possible local pharmacological inhibition of TP for controlling HFS.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Fluoropyrimidine S-1 on a Once-Daily-for-28-Day Schedule in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1, which consists of a mixture of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug (tegafur), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor [5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP)], and an inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase [potassium oxonate (oxonic acid)], was developed to increase the feasibility and therapeutic index of 5-FU administered orally. The principal objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of administering S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule every 5 weeks, determine the maximum tolerated dose, characterize the pharmacokinetics of S-1, and seek evidence of anticancer activity. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of S-1 on a once-daily oral schedule for 28 days every 5 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose in which fewer than two of the first six new patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the tegafur, CDHP, and oxonic acid constituents were characterized. Twenty patients were treated with 72 courses of S-1 at three dose levels ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2)/day. Diarrhea, which was often associated with abdominal discomfort and cramping, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of S-1 on this protracted schedule. Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, fatigue, and cutaneous effects were also observed but were rarely severe. Myelosuppression was modest and uncommon. A partial response and a 49% reduction in tumor size were observed in patients with fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma. The pharmacokinetic data suggested potent inhibition of 5-FU clearance by CHDP, with resultant 5-FU exposure at least 10-fold higher than that reported from equitoxic doses of tegafur modulated by uracil in the oral fluoropyrimidine UFT. The recommended dose for Phase II studies of S-1 administered once daily for 28 consecutive days every 5 weeks is 50 mg/m(2)/day. The pharmacokinetic data indicate substantial modulation of 5-FU clearance by CDHP. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, the predictable toxicity profile of S-1, and the low incidence of severe adverse effects at the recommended Phase II dose, evaluations of S-1 on this schedule are warranted in malignancies that are sensitive to the fluoropyrimidines.

Comparative pharmacology of oral fluoropyrimidines: a focus on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacomodulation.

The main purpose of the present review article was to shed light on the different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrugs by underlining their respective pharmacological features in terms of metabolic activation, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition, pharmacokinetic profile and biomodulation ability. Oral fluoropyrimidines differ particularly as concerns their pharmacokinetic profile and especially in the delivery of circulating 5-FU. More clinical studies need to be performed incorporating tumour predictive markers during oral fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. The new possibilities are to achieve pharmacomodulation of oral fluoropyrimidines, notably for UFT and capecitabine, that open up the prospect of establishing significant novel treatment protocols based on drug combinations.

Bioactivation of capecitabine in human liver: involvement of the cytosolic enzyme on 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine formation.

Capecitabine, an anticancer prodrug, is thought to be biotransformed into active 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by three enzymes. After oral administration, capecitabine is first metabolized to 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) by carboxylesterase (CES), then 5'-DFCR is converted to 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) by cytidine deaminase. 5'-DFUR is activated to 5-FU by thymidine phosphorylase. Although high activities of drug metabolizing enzymes are expressed in human liver, the involvement of the liver in capecitabine metabolism is not fully understood. In this study, the metabolism of capecitabine in human liver was investigated in vitro. 5'-DFCR, 5'-DFUR, and 5-FU formation from capecitabine were investigated in human liver S9, microsomes, and cytosol in the presence of the inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine. 5'-DFCR, 5'-DFUR, and 5-FU were formed from capecitabine in cytosol and in the combination of microsomes and cytosol. Only 5'-DFCR formation was detected in microsomes. The apparent K(m) and V(max) values of 5-FU formation catalyzed by cytosol alone and in combination with microsomes were 8.1 mM and 106.5 pmol/min/mg protein, and 4.0 mM and 64.0 pmol/min/mg protein, respectively. The interindividual variability in 5'-DFCR formation in microsomes and cytosol among 14 human liver samples was 8.3- and 12.3-fold, respectively. Capecitabine seems to be metabolized to 5-FU in human liver. 5'-DFCR formation was exhibited in cytosol with large interindividual variability, although CES is located in microsomes in human liver. In the present study, it has been clarified that the cytosolic enzyme would be important in 5'-DFCR formation, as is CES.

Plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and F-beta-alanine following oral administration of S-1, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, as compared with protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral S-1, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, were compared with those of protracted venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In all, 10 patients with gastric cancer received PVI of 5-FU at a dose of 250 mg m−2 day−1 for 5 days. After a washout period of 9 days, the patients received two divided doses daily for 28 days. S-1 was administered orally at about 0900 and 1900 hours. The daily dose of S-1 in terms of tegafur was 80 mg day−1 in patients with a body surface area (BSA) of <1.25 m2, 100 mg day−1 in those with a BSA of ⩾1.25 m2 to <1.5 m2, and 120 mg day−1 in those with a BSA of ⩾1.5 m2. Plasma concentrations of 5-FU and F-β-alanine (FBAL) were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis, and the plasma uracil concentration was monitored as a surrogate marker of DPD inhibition (pharmacodynamic analysis) in the same patients on days 1–5 of PVI of 5-FU and on days 1–5 of oral S-1. The area under the curve (AUC0–10 h) of 5-FU on day 5 was 728±113 ng h ml−1 for PVI of 5-FU and 1364±374 ng h ml−1 for S-1. The median 5-FU PVI : S-1 ratio of the AUC0–10 h of 5-FU was 1.9. The AUC0–10 h of FBAL on day 5 of PVI of 5-FU was 9465±3225 ng h ml−1, AUC0–10 h, as compared with 1725±605 ng h ml−1 on day 5 of S-1 treatment. The AUC0–10 h of uracil on day 5 was 252±60 ng h ml−1 with PVI of 5-FU and 12 582±3060 ng h ml−1 with S-1. The AUC0–10 h of FBAL was markedly lower and plasma uracil concentrations were significantly higher for S-1 than for PVI of 5-FU, clearly demonstrating the effect of DPD inhibition.

Augmentation of the antitumor activity of capecitabine by a tumor selective dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, RO0094889.

Capecitabine is an orally available fluoropyrimidine and is finally converted to 5-FU selectively in tumor tissues. In our study, we examined whether the antitumor activity of capecitabine is directly affected by a modulation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The modulations were carried out by the overexpression of DPD in tumor cells and by tumor selective DPD inhibition. The DPD-overexpressing cells were obtained by transfection of human DPD cDNA into HCT116 human colorectal cancer cells. The HCT116 cells bearing DPD cDNA expressed about 13 times higher DPD activities than the parental HCT116 cells, and they became significantly less susceptible to capecitabine than the parental cells when transplanted into nude mice. Administration of RO0094889 that is converted to a DPD inhibitor 5-vinyluracil selectively in tumor tissues restored the antitumor activity of capecitabine against the tumor of the HCT116 cells carrying DPD cDNA and various tumors expressing DPD. As compared to 5-ethynyluracil or 5-vinyluracil, which inhibited DPD not only in tumor tissues but also in other non-cancerous tissues, the effective dose range of RO0094889 in augmenting the efficacy of capecitabine was much broader. These results indicate that the antitumor activity of capecitabine is directly affected by DPD activities in tumor tissues and therefore, the combination of capecitabine and a tumor selective DPD inhibitor, RO0094889, will be beneficial to patients who have tumors with high levels of DPD.

Increased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in breast cancer.

Although studies have focused on modulating the bioavailability of 5-FU through inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to improve efficacy of the drug, activity of this enzyme in breast cancer has not been thoroughly examined. We measured DPD activity in primary and metastatic lesions and benign breast tumors to evaluate the clinical significance of this enzyme in the treatment of breast cancer. DPD activity was measured by catalytic assay and compared in 100 primary tumors (95 invasive carcinomas, 5 intraductal carcinomas), 26 uninvolved adjacent breast tissue specimens, 6 metastatic sites, and 7 intraductal papillomas. The enzyme level in the carcinomas was 4-fold that of adjacent uninvolved breast tissues (101 vs 23 pmol/min/mg protein, P < 0.001). Enzyme activity in intraductal papilloma (120 pmol/min/mg protein) was comparable to that in invasive carcinoma. There were no significant differences in DPD activity related to clinicopathologic features, but a tendency toward increased DPD activity was observed in progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer (P = 0.09). There was marginal correlation in enzyme activity between primary and metastatic lesions (P = 0.07). DPD activity is substantially upregulated in breast cancer tissue and is higher than that reported previously. The clinical implications of DPD inhibitors in patients being treated for breast cancer with oral fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy should be further investigated.

Design and synthesis of the tumor-activated prodrug of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor, RO0094889 for combination therapy with capecitabine

A series of tumor-activated prodrugs of the inhibitors of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme catabolizing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU: 4g), has been designed and synthesized. RO0094889 ( 11c) is a prodrug of 5-vinyluracil ( 4c), a known DPD inhibitor, and was designed to generate 4c selectively in tumor tissues by sequential conversion of 11c by three enzymes: esterase, cytidine deaminase and thymidine phosphorylase, the latter two of which are known to be highly expressed in various tumor tissues. When capecitabine ( 1), a tumor-activated prodrug of 5-FU, was co-administered orally with 11c, 5-FU in tumor tissues was significantly increased with only a slight increase of 5-FU in plasma as compared with oral capecitabine alone.

Significance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in renal cell carcinoma

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the rate-limiting enzyme in the pathway of uracil and thymine catabolism. DPD is also the principal enzyme involved in the degradation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an anticancer chemotherapeutic agent that is used clinically to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Little is known about the significance of DPD activity in human cancers. We investigated the activity of DPD in 68 RCC and the relationship between DPD activity and the sensitivity to 5-FU. The levels of DPD activity in RCC and normal kidney samples were determined by the 5-FU degradation assay. The sensitivity to 5-FU was assessed by the microculture tetrazolium dye assay. The activity of DPD was approximately 2-fold higher in normal kidney compared with RCC. DPD activity in Stage I/II RCC was approximately 2-fold higher than that in Stage III/IV RCC. The levels of DPD activity in Grade 1 and Grade 2 RCC were 3 and 2-fold higher, respectively, than that in the Grade 3 cancers. There was an inverse correlation between DPD activity in RCC cells and their sensitivity to 5-FU. Furthermore, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), a potent DPD inhibitor, enhanced the sensitivity to 5-FU. The current study is the first to demonstrate that the level of DPD activity was inversely correlated with both the progression of the disease and increased grade of RCC, and that DPD activity was inversely associated with the sensitivity of RCC to 5-FU, which was enhanced by a DPD inhibitor. These results suggest that a low DPD activity may be associated with the malignant potential of RCC. In addition, it may be possible to overcome 5-FU resistance by using DPD inhibitors in the treatment protocols of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for RCC.

The role of oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: prospects and future directions.

In the last 50 years, 5-fluorouracil-based therapy has been the mainstay of adjuvant and palliative treatment for colorectal cancer but response rates and median survival have been dismal despite the introduction of thymidylate synthase modulators such as leucovorin. Recently, new therapeutic approaches have been introduced. These include oral 5-fluorouracil analogues, pure thymidylate synthase inhibitors, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitors, and agents with mechanism of action unrelated to thymidylate synthase such as irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and oxaliplatin, the only platinum derivative with significant activity in colorectal cancer. Current treatment strategies involve combination therapies because this approach is the most effective. For instance, responses observed with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil indicate synergy between the two agents and the combination of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan has shown high activity both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Additionally, it is likely that future therapeutic management of advanced colorectal cancer may include combination therapy of one of the new oral 5-fluorouracil analogues, because of the convenient oral regimens. The identification of colorectal cancer-specific prognostic factors will undoubtedly influence treatment decisions. For instance, patients overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor and p53 with thymidylate synthase have a worse prognosis. To target these biomarkers, antibodies such as cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, and angiogenesis inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced and are undergoing clinical evaluation. Over the last 5 years the armamentarium to fight colorectal cancer has increased significantly, giving more hope for effective disease management.

The role of oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Prospects and future directions

In the last 50 years, 5-fluorouracil‐ based therapy has been the mainstay of adjuvant and palliative treatment for colorectal cancer but response rates and median survival have been dismal despite the introduction of thymidylate synthase modulators such as leucovorin. Recently, new therapeutic approaches have been introduced. These include oral 5-fluorouracil analogues, pure thymidylate synthase inhibitors, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitors, and agents with mechanism of action unrelated to thymidylate synthase such as irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and oxaliplatin, the only platinum derivative with significant activity in colorectal cancer. Current treatment strategies involve combination therapies because this approach is the most effective. For instance, responses observed with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil indicate synergy between the two agents and the combination of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan has shown high activity both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Additionally, it is likely that future therapeutic management of advanced colorectal cancer may include combination therapy of one of the new oral 5-fluorouracil analogues, because of the convenient oral regimens. The identification of colorectal cancer-specific prognostic factors will undoubtedly influence treatment decisions. For instance, patients overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor and p53 with thymidylate synthase have a worse prognosis. To target these biomarkers, antibodies such as cetuximab, an anti-EGFR antibody, and angiogenesis inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced and are undergoing clinical evaluation. Over the last 5 years the armamentarium to fight colorectal cancer has increased significantly, giving more hope for effective disease management.