Differences In Oncologic Outcomes Research Articles

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast: A retrospective single center study

BackgroundRadiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare malignancy with poor survival. Optimal treatment strategies remain uncertain due to a lack of data, and vary between surgery alone and a combination of surgery with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and/or re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of taxane based NACT. MethodsIn this retrospective single center study, all patients with RAAS of the breast treated between 1994 and 2024 are included. Since 2018, NACT is considered a treatment option for this patient population in our institute. The difference in oncological outcomes of patients with and without NACT were compared. ResultsThirty-five women were included. Thirteen (37 %) received NACT of which five (39 %) also had neoadjuvant re-irradiation with hyperthermia. Eleven patients (85 %) received paclitaxel, the other two (15 %) had doxorubicine/docetaxel. Complete pathological response was found in 69 % (n = 9). Median follow up was 41 months (range 24–56) for patients with NACT and 44 (range 20–108) for patients without NACT. In the NACT group, only one patient developed a recurrence after 6.5 years. Patients with NACT had improved oncological outcomes compared to patients without NACT in terms of 3-year local recurrence free survival (100% vs. 63.9 %, p = 0.14), distant metastasis free survival (100 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.005), and overall survival (100% vs. 56.1 %, p = 0.016). ConclusionIn this study, neoadjuvant taxanes for RAAS of the breast leads to improved distant metastasis free survival and overal survival in patients treated with NACT compared to no NACT

Oncological outcomes and risk factors for recurrence of mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: A 15-year experience at a tertiary center.

The most common subtype of borderline ovarian tumors in Asia is mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (mBOTs). Intraoperative distinction from mucinous carcinoma can be difficult. Despite the indolent behavior of mBOTs, recurrence or metastases may occur. The objectives of this study were to determine the oncological outcomes of mBOTs and the risk factors for their recurrence. This retrospective study enrolled patients with mBOTs treated or referred to our institution between January 2005 and December 2019. Histological reviews of the recurrent cases (primary and recurrent or metastatic tumors) were performed. Patients with other tumor subtypes, pseudomyxoma peritonei, or no in-house operation were excluded. Two hundred thirty-two patients were diagnosed with mBOTs. The median follow-up was 52 months. Six patients (2.58%) had tumor recurrence or metastasis. The risk factors for recurrence were a ruptured tumor, residual tumor after an operation, high serum CA19-9 level, and stage of the disease. The recurrence rates of fertility-sparing and radical surgery were not significantly different. Detailed surgical staging, intraepithelial carcinoma, and microinvasion were also not associated with disease recurrence. mBOTs have an excellent prognosis. Currently, fertility-sparing surgery is the standard treatment, showing no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared to radical surgery. Patients with risk factors should be closely monitored.

Moderately hypofractionated prostate-only versus whole-pelvis radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective real-world single-center cohort study

BackgroundThe benefit of prophylactic whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) in prostate cancer has been debated for decades, with evidence based mainly on conventional fractionation targeting pelvic nodes. AimThis retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the impact of adding moderately hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy to prostate-only irradiation (PORT) on prognosis, toxicity, and quality of life in real-world settings. Materials and methodsPatients with high-risk and conventionally staged prostate cancer (cT1-3N0M0) treated with moderately hypofractionated WPRT or PORT, using external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy, at Örebro University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were identified. Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards. Toxicity and quality of life measures were also analysed. ResultsAmong 516 patients (227 PORT, 289 WPRT), 5-year BFFS rates were 77 % (PORT) and 74 % (WPRT), adjusted HR=1.50 (95 % CI=0.88–2.55). No significant differences were found in MFS, PCSS, or OS in main analyses. WPRT was associated with a higher risk of acute grade ≥ 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities whereas no differences in late toxicities or quality of life between PORT and WPRT were observed. ConclusionWe found no significant differences in oncological outcomes or quality of life when comparing moderately hypofractionated PORT to WPRT. Some differences in toxicity patterns were observed. Despite caveats related to study design, our findings support the need for further research on WPRT’s impact on treatment-related and patient-reported outcomes.

Application and evaluation of minimally invasive surgical treatment options for early endometrial cancer.

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques have gained popularity, and endometrial cancer (EC) remains a significant health problem among women. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) therapy options for early endometrial cancer will be evaluated for their effectiveness and safety is the aim of this paper. We also investigate the differences in oncologic outcomes between MIS and open surgery (OS) for individuals with early-stage EC. The patient was diagnosed with early-stage EC and treated with laparoscopic surgery and was the focus of a retrospective analysis. 162 patients with early EC were analyzed, with diagnoses occurring between 2002 and 2022. The patients were fragmented into two groups, one for OS and another for laparoscopic procedures. The total tumor excision and recurrence rates were identical across the two methods, indicating similar oncologic results. Rates of complications were likewise comparable across the two groups. The quality of life ratings of patients with robotic-assisted surgery was higher than those with laparoscopic surgery. Sixty-two (62.2%) of the 162 patients in this research had OS, whereas Fifty-six (57.8%) had MIS. The probability of recurrence of EC from stages III to IV was significanitly higher in women who had OS. Minimally invasive procedures were shown to be effective in treating early-stage EC, and while these findings provide support for their usage, larger multicenter randomized controlled studies are required to verify these results and further examine possible long-term advantages. Patients with early-stage EC, regardless of histologic type, had superior survival rates with MIS compared to OS.

No difference in oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with ESRD with unilateral and bilateral UTUC receiving radical nephroureterectomy

Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of developing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to high recurrence rate of UTUC in contralateral kidney and ureter, and high risk of complications related to surgery and anesthesia, whether it’s necessary to remove both kineys and ureters at one time remains in debate. We utilized Taiwanese UTUC Registry Database to valuate the difference of oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with ESRD with unilateral and bilateral UTUC receiving surgical resection. Patients with ESRD and UTUC were divided into three groups, unilateral UTUC, previous history of unilateral UTUC with metachronous contralateral UTUC, and concurrent bilatetral UTUC. Oncological outcomes, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stays were investiaged. We found that there is no diffence of oncological outcomes including overall survival, cancer specific survival, disease free survival and bladder recurrence free survival between these three groups. Complication rate and length of hospital stay are similar. Adverse oncological features such as advanced tumor stage, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margin would negatively affect oncological outcomes.

The role of central neck dissection and adjuvant treatment in pT4aN0 laryngeal carcinoma treated with open partial horizontal laryngectomy.

The study aimed to identify parameters that could predict oncological and functional outcomes in patients with pT4aN0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) who underwent open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL). The role of paratracheal neck dissection (PTND) was analyzed as the primary outcome. Additionally, the study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent postoperative radio/chemotherapy (PORT/PORCT) with those who refused or did not adhere to adjuvant treatments. Twenty-nine OPHL patients whose pathological exam was consistent with pT4aN0-x disease were enrolled and their clinical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The study analyzed oncological outcomes, such as local, regional, and distant recurrence rates (RR), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Additionally, functional results were analyzed, including decannulation rate, hospitalization time, and postoperative complication rate. The study revealed and overall recurrence rate of 27%. The final rates for OS and DSS were 68% and 79%, respectively. Based on the univariate analysis the PTND was significantly associated with longer DFS. No significant differences inoncological outcomes were observed between pT4a patients who underwent adjuvant radio/radiochemotherapy and those who did not, in terms of RR, DFS, DSS or OS. However, adjuvant treatment was found to significantly increase decannulation time. In a properly super-selected subgroup of patients with pT4aN0 LSCC, OPHL may beconsidered as a conservative surgical option even without adjuvant treatment. However, for optimal oncological outcomes, it is strongly recommended to consider a central compartment dissection in cases of hypoglottic and anterior extra-laryngeal tumor extension.

Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate affect the outcomes in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy?

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is one of the surgical options for treating enlarged prostates with lower urinary symptoms (LUTS). In this older group of patients, concomitant prostate cancer is not uncommon. However, the fibrosis and distortion of the prostate anatomy by prior TURP can potentially hinder surgical efficacy at robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aim to evaluate functional, and oncologic outcomes of RARP in patients with and without previous TURP. 231 men with previous TURP underwent RARP (TURP group). These men were propensity score matched using clinicopathological characteristics to men without previous TURP who underwent RARP (Control group). Perioperative and postoperative variables were analysed for significant differences in outcomes between groups. Variables analysed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins (PSM) rates, cancer status, biochemical recurrence (BCR), potency, and continence rates. Patients in the TURP group showed no statistically significant differences in operative safety measures including median EBL, operative time, catheter time, hospitalization time or postoperative complications. No significant difference between the groups in terms of potency rates and continence rates. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes, including PSM rates (15% vs 18%, P = 0.3) and BCR. In RARP after TURP there is often noticeable distortion of the surgical anatomy. For an experienced team the procedure is safe and provides similar oncologic control and functional outcomes to RARP in patients without previous TURP.

Audiological Outcomes of Weekly vs. Triweekly Cisplatin in Head and Neck Cancer with Cochlear-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Cisplatin, one of the most ototoxic anti-neoplastic agents, causes permanent hearing loss in up to 90% of patients. We assessed ototoxicity rates and prospectively collected audiologic outcomes of patients receiving low-dose or high-dose cisplatin with concurrent cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving definitive or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were analyzed. Cisplatin was administered either in low doses weekly (40 mg/m2) for up to seven doses or in high doses triweekly (100 mg/m2) for up to three doses. Cochlear-sparing IMRT was delivered in all cases. Audiologic data were prospectively collected before, during, and after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was a hearing change grade of ≥3 after CRT completion. Of the 96 HNSCC patients evaluated, 69 received weekly cisplatin and 58 received definitive CRT. Of patients receiving weekly cisplatin, 13% developed ≥G3 ototoxicity vs. 56% of patients who received triweekly cisplatin (p < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the cisplatin dose schedule remained significant (OR: 8.4, 95%CI: 2.8-27.8, p < 0.001) for risk of severe irreversible ototoxicity. Triweekly cisplatin CRT significantly increased the ≥G3 severe irreversible ototoxicity risk compared to low-dose weekly cisplatin, irrespective of the cumulative cisplatin dose, even with the use of cochlear-sparing IMRT. No significant difference in oncologic outcomes was observed between the two schedules.

Robotic versus open surgery for thyroidectomy and modified radical neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma with clinical lateral neck node metastasis (cN1b): Effectiveness and safety, oncological outcomes and long-term quality of life.

e18069 Background: Open thyroidectomy (TT) with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) is used for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with clinical lateral neck node metastasis (cN1b). robotic surgery for TT with MRND is being carried out and some studies have confirmed its efficacy. However, such studies are limited by indicators and samples. The study aimed to compare robotic TT with MRND with open surgery in patients with cN1b PTC in efficacy, safety, oncological outcomes and quality of life. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 2027 patients receiving MRND between January 2016 and December 2021 were enrolled. After exclusion, 1153 PTC patients met the inclusion criteria, in which 168 (14.57%) underwent robotic surgery and 985 (85.43%) underwent open surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:2 ratio was performed to minimize bias. We compared the efficacy, safety and oncological outcomes before and after PSM, we also evaluated the quality of life of patients after PSM. Results: Before and after PSM, the number of central lymph nodes ( p&lt;0.001) and lateral cervical lymph nodes(p&lt;0.001),and the number of positive lateral cervical lymph nodes(before PSM p=0.037, after PSM, p=0.018 ) in the robotic group were lower than those open group. RAI-avid lesion in postoperative 131 RAI scan showed no difference between two groups and showed similar complication rates before or after PSM, including chyle leakage, infection, and permanent hypoparathyroidism. Because the rate of parathyroid misresection and the number of transplanted parathyroid glands were improved, robotic was superior to open group in preventing transient hypoparathyroidism. The patients were followed up for mean 50.57 months in the robotic group and 51.78 months in the open group. There was no difference between two groups in recurrence rate (before PSM: 5/168 [2.98%] vs 32/985 [3.25%], p&gt;0.99; after PSM: 5/168 [2.98%] vs 15/336 [4.46%], p=0.572) and distant metastasis rate (before PSM: 1/168 [0.60%] vs 3/985 [0.30%], p&gt;0.99; after PSM: 1/168 [0.60%] vs 1/336 [0.30%], p&gt;0.99). We conducted a quality of life survey in 504 patients after PSM and collected 317 copies, of which 316 were valid. Compared with the open group, the robotic group had similar performance in health-related quality of life(HR-QOL) and the QOL issues specific to thyroid cancer, including subjective voice, dysphagia, neck and shoulder disability. The scores of scar showed a significant difference in the appearance and psychosocial impact of scars between two groups (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Robotic surgery can provide more meticulous operation to reduce postoperative complications and better quality of life, especially scars, there is no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between two groups.

Long-term oncologic outcome of breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer with BRCA 1/2 mutation (ON-BRCA II, KoREa-BSG 06).

552 Background: Among patients with sporadic breast cancer, it is well known that prognoses are similar following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy. However, previous data assessing oncologic outcomes between BCS and mastectomy in patients with BRCA mutation are limited and inconsistent. Thus, this study aims to compare the oncologic outcomes including locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence (DR), and overall survival (OS) among this population. Methods: Patients with BRCA mutation and index breast cancer who underwent BCS or mastectomy between January 2008 and December 2015 were retrospectively screened from 13 institutions. We included patients aged from 20-80 with invasive breast cancer (pT1-3 N0-3). Patients with de novo metastasis were excluded. To minimize selection bias from retrospective nature, the propensity score matching (PSM) with Greedy nearest neighbor method was performed for covariates including age, molecular subtype, and tumor stage. Results: A total of 553 patients with BRCA mutation were identified. Among them, 367 (66.2%) patients received BCS and 186 (33.8%) were treated with mastectomy. After 1:1 PSM, there was no significant differences in age, molecular subtype, tumor size, nodal status, and histologic tumor grade between patients undergoing BCS versus mastectomy. At 8.3 years of median follow up, LRR, DR, and OS rates did not differ between groups (all p &gt; 0.05). On multivariate analysis, type of breast surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy) was not significantly associated with the oncologic outcomes after adjusting covariates including age, molecular subtype, tumor stage, and histologic grade (all p &gt; 0.05). Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis in matched patients based on tumor size, LN metastasis, HG, and subtype. In all subgroup, the type of breast surgery was not a significant risk factor influencing disease recurrence. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there was no difference in oncologic outcomes among BRCA mutation carriers who underwent BCS or mastectomy. Breast conservation with close surveillance is a reasonable treatment option for BRCA mutation carriers. Further studies combined with prospectively collected data are warranted to validate our findings.

Ten-year outcomes of targeted axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

600 Background: When pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), identifying traces of the previous lesion becomes challenging which makes accurate surgery difficult. We conducted targeted axillary surgery (TAS) in node-positive breast cancer after NAC, which involves accurately targeting the lymph nodes where metastasis occurred and performing surgery using a less extensive method. The 10-year outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients with cT1-3N1-2 breast cancer who received NAC from 2012 to 2017. In this cohort, 78 patients underwent TAS only, and 157 underwent conventional ALND, including 31 patients who initially received TAS followed by additional ALND. Oncologic results, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were assessed over a 10-year follow-up period. Survival outcomes for all patients and each subtype were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Results: The TAS group had significantly more postmenopausal patients (p=0.022), and the most common type of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma [TAS: 75 (96.2%); ALND: 157 (100.0%)]. There was no statistical difference in the T stage and the number of lymph nodes suspected of metastasis at diagnosis (p=0.062, 0.985). Mastectomy was performed in 60.3% of patients in the TAS group and 93.0% in the ALND group (p&lt;0.001), and 68 (87.2%) of the TAS group and 41 (26.1%) of the ALND group received additional axillary radiotherapy (p=0.019). There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between the TAS and ALND groups in all patients (LRFS, p=0.673; DMFS, p=0.729; OS, p=0.396) and based on subtypes, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the HR-positive breast cancer group, the TAS and ALND groups showed very similar trends (LRFS, p=0.954; DMFS, p=0.993; OS, p=0.617). In HER2-positive breast cancer, although not statistically significant, the survival outcomes were better in the TAS group than in the ALND group (LRFS, p=0.967; DMFS, p=0.999; OS, p=0.423). However, the OS in the TAS group for TNBC was lower than that in the ALND group, though not significantly (LRFS, p=0.411; DMFS, p=0.697; OS, p=0.210). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TAS is comparable to ALND in terms of 10-year oncological outcomes across different types of node-positive breast cancer, suggesting its potential as a viable alternative. However, further research focusing on patient quality of life and postoperative complications is essential to establish TAS as a superior surgical option to ALND.

Abstract PO4-22-08: Ten-Year Oncologic Outcomes in T1-3N1 Breast Cancer After Targeted Axillary Sampling: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Background Targeted axillary sampling (TAS) is a new surgical concept for the assessment of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer that is hypothesized to be more effective at minimizing postoperative morbidities than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), provided the metastatic axillary lymph node can be accurately detected without missing data; however, the oncologic outcomes over long-term follow-up have not been sufficiently investigated. This was a retrospective analysis to evaluate the 10-year oncologic outcomes in T1-3N1 breast cancer after TAS. Methods Clinically, we defined TAS as removal of a bunch of ALNs located around SLNs and targeted LNs, but without full exposure of the axillary vein, long thoracic nerve and thoracodorsal nerve. Between 2008 and 2013, 230 female patients with cT1-3N1 breast cancer underwent breast and axillary surgery (ALND, n = 171; TAS, n = 59) at our institute. After TAS was applied, additional axillary radiotherapy was performed. Various postoperative complications, including postoperative seroma, lymphedema, and 10-year oncological outcomes, were evaluated and compared between the ALND and TAS groups. Results Although overall survival during the 10-year follow-up period was better in the TAS group, there was no statistically significant difference in oncologic outcomes, including locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival (p = 0.395, 0.818, and 0.555, respectively). Furthermore, the incidence of lymphedema on the ipsilateral arm was significantly higher in the ALND group (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions The 10-year oncological outcomes of TAS were not inferior to those of conventional ALND in T1-3N1 breast cancers; however, the incidence of lymphedema was significantly higher in the ALND group. Citation Format: Byeongju Kang, Jeeyeon Lee, Yee Soo Chae, Ho Yong PARK, Jin Hyang Jung. Ten-Year Oncologic Outcomes in T1-3N1 Breast Cancer After Targeted Axillary Sampling: A Retrospective Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-22-08.

Abstract 3813: Relationship between race/ethnicity and oncologic outcomes in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common form of cancer in men and accounts for ~35% and 24% of all new cancer diagnoses in Black and Hispanic men, respectively. Incidence rates of PC are higher and cancer is diagnosed at a younger age in Black compared to White men. The most frequently utilized primary treatment options are radical prostatectomy (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) or radiotherapy. Despite the success of primary treatments for localized PC, many patients (pts) will eventually develop biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Pts with BCR are at a higher risk of developing distant metastases and ultimately dying from PC. This targeted literature review aimed to assess the real-world (RW) relationship between race/ethnicity and BCR, and further identify any differences in oncologic outcomes (risk of metastases, PC-specific mortality, and overall survival). Methods: A targeted literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed, and the past 2 years of American Society of Clinical Oncology conference proceedings. Selected studies were limited to English-language articles focusing on BCR and race or ethnicity among US populations, published between 1/2010 and 7/2023. Results: Ten studies were selected after title and abstract review. Most studies had a White pt majority (83%-92%). Six studies reported no differences in BCR or oncologic outcomes when pts were stratified by race/ethnicity. Four studies reported a higher BCR risk for Black pts with low-risk PC after radical prostatectomy, but not for pts with high-risk PC. PSA and PSA doubling time (PSADT) were found to be strong predictors of oncologic outcomes. Conclusions: The FDA draft guidance on diversity plans recommends that clinical trials enroll an adequate number of participants from underrepresented racial and ethnic populations. This requires an understanding of the diversity of the population that will eventually use the treatment and of which race/ethnicity differences in outcomes should be expected and investigated. Based on this targeted review among pts with localized PC, most RW studies had a White pt majority, and the race distribution in these studies aligned with published census and epidemiology data. In addition, findings suggest that race/ethnicity differences were not pronounced among high-risk PC pts in the US when given equal access to care or treatment, and that oncologic outcomes and BCR risk were similar across Black, White, and Hispanic pt populations. Conversely, PSA and PSADT may be stronger prognostic markers for BCR and oncologic outcomes. Future clinical trials are needed to support these RW findings and should aim to actively enroll racial/ethnic minorities to identify potential differences in efficacy and safety, and to help advance the evidence base for pt PC management. Citation Format: Nasreen Khan, Vanessa Quintero, Clara Beck, Miryana Dimova-Dobreva, Binita Patel. Relationship between race/ethnicity and oncologic outcomes in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3813.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional open proctectomy for locally advanced colon cancer.

Locally advanced colon cancer is considered a relative contraindication for minimally invasive proctectomy (MIP), and minimally invasive versus conventional open proctectomy (COP) for locally advanced colon cancer has not been studied. We have searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science for articles on minimally invasive (robotic and laparoscopic) and COP. We calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol for this review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023407029). There are 10132 participants including 21 articles. Compared with COP, patients who underwent MIP had less operation time (SMD 0.48; CI 0.32 to 0.65; I2 = 0%, P = .000), estimated blood loss (MD -1.23; CI -1.90 to -0.56; I2 = 95%, P < .0001), the median time to semi-liquid diet (SMD -0.43; CI -0.70 to -0.15; I2 = 0%, P = .002), time to the first flatus (SMD -0.97; CI -1.30 to -0.63; I2 = 7%, P < .0001), intraoperative blood transfusion (RR 0.33; CI 0.24 to 0.46; I2 = 0%, P < .0001) in perioperative outcomes. Compared with COP, patients who underwent MIP had fewer overall complications (RR 0.85; CI 0.73 to 0.98; I2 = 22.4%, P = .023), postoperative complications (RR 0.79; CI 0.69 to 0.90; I2 = 0%, P = .001), and urinary retention (RR 0.63; CI 0.44 to 0.90; I2 = 0%, P = .011) in perioperative outcomes. This study comprehensively and systematically evaluated the difference between the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive and open treatment of locally advanced colon cancer through meta-analysis. Minimally invasive proctectomy is better than COP in postoperative and perioperative outcomes. However, there is no difference in oncological outcomes. This also provides an evidence-based reference for clinical practice. Of course, multi-center RCT research is also needed to draw more scientific and rigorous conclusions in the future.

Robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis based on 15 years and 18,805 patients.

To compare oncological, functional, and surgical outcomes of a large cohort of patients who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Data from 18,805 RPs performed with either the open or the robot-assisted approaches at a single tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed. The impact of surgical approach on biochemical recurrence-free survival, salvage radiotherapy-free survival, and metastasis-free survival was analyzed by log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis in a propensity score (PS)-based matched cohort. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes were assessed. One-week, 3-month, and 12-month continence rates and 12-month erectile function (EF) were analyzed. No statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes were found between ORP and RARP. A slight statistically significant difference in favor of RARP was noted in urinary continence at 3 months (RARP vs. ORP: 81% vs. 77%, p = 0.007) and 12 months (91% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.008), respectively. The rate of EF was statistically significantly higher (60%) after RARP than after ORP (45%, p < 0.001). Both RARP and ORP yielded similar oncological outcomes. RARP offered a slight advantage in terms of continence recovery, but its clinical significance may be less meaningful. RARP resulted in significantly improved postoperative EF, suggesting a potential influence of both surgical experience and minimally invasive approach.

Reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: an improvement of conventional minimal access breast surgery.

Our center proposes a new technique that effectively provides space to broaden the surgical field of view and overcomes the limitations of endoscopy-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) by changing the dissection sequence and combining it with air inflation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the new technique designated "reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-E-NSM) with subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR)" and the conventional E-NSM (C-E-NSM) with SBR. All patients undergoing E-NSM with SBR at our breast center between April 2017 and December 2022 were included in this study. The cohort was divided into the C-E-NSM group and the R-E-NSM group. The operation time, anesthesia time, medical cost, complications, cosmetic outcomes, and oncological safety were compared. Twenty-six and seventy-nine consecutive patients were included in the C-E-NSM and R-E-NSM groups, with average ages of 36.9 ± 7.0 years and 39.7 ± 8.4 years (P=0.128). Patients in the R-E-NSM group had significantly shorter operation time (204.6 ± 59.2 vs. 318.9 ± 75.5 minutes, p<0.001) and anesthesia time (279.4 ± 83.9 vs. 408.9 ± 87.4 minutes, p<0.001) and decreased medical costs [5063.4 (4439.6-6532.3) vs. 6404.2 (5152.5-7981.5), USD, p=0.001] and increase SCAR-Q scores (77.2 ± 17.1 vs. 68.8 ± 8.7, P=0.002) compared to the C-E-NSM group. Although trends increased in both the excellent rate of Ueda scores (53.8% vs. 42.3%, P = 0.144), excellent rate of Harris scores (44.0% vs. 63.1%, P=0.102), and decreased surgical complications (7.6% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.135) were observed in the R-E-NSM group, the differences were not significant. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the two groups. R-E-NSM improves cosmetic outcomes and efficiency of C-E-NSM, reduces medical costs, and has a trend of lower surgical complications while maintaining the safety of oncology. It is a safe and feasible option for oncological procedures that deserves to be promoted and widely adopted in practice.

Is minimal-accessed (endoscopic- or robotic-assisted) nipple-sparing mastectomy contraindicated for large breasts?

BackgroundIn the developmental stage of minimal-accessed nipple-sparing mastectomy (MA-NSM), selecting patients with small to medium-sized breasts was common for better cosmetic outcomes and oncological safety. However, the suitability of MA-NSM for large, ptotic breasts remained uncertain. This retrospective study aim to assess MA-NSM outcomes in patients with large breasts. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included patients receiving conventional NSM (C-NSM) and MA-NSM from January 2011 to September 2022, at a single institution. We analyzed perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes based on breast specimen size, classified as small (≤300 g), medium (>300–450 g), large (>450–600 g), and very large (>600 g). ResultsA total of 728 patients was enrolled. C-NSM was performed in 51% (371/728) of cases, while MA-NSM was done in 49% (357/728). The overall complication rate of MA-NSM was comparable to C-NSM (p = 0.573), but severe complications (Clavien-Dindo, CD III) was significantly reported more following C-NSM, regardless of breast size. During a median follow-up of 52 months, no significant difference in oncological outcomes was observed. Comparing MA-NSM and C-NSM outcomes in large-very large breasts (>450 g), MA-NSM demonstrated significantly less blood loss (p = 0.036) and lower incidence of severe complications (CD ≥ III) compared to C-NSM (p = 0.002). ConclusionMA-NSM is feasible for large breasts and offers benefits by reducing blood loss and decreasing the incidence of severe complications (CD ≥ III) in this patient group.

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: a retrospective analysis of 34 cases in Japan

Purpose Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) is a rare condition. This study aimed to investigate oncological outcomes of surgical intervention in patients with MMHN. Materials and methods The study included 34 patients with MMHN who underwent surgical resection as initial treatment at 10 institutions in Japan between July 2005 and June 2015. Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS), local control rate (LCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 48.7%, 53.4%, 32.4%, and 55.1%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, no independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS and DSS were found. Based on univariate analysis, the 5-year LCR was worse in patients with lesions in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses than in the oral cavity and pharynx. However, no differences in oncological outcomes were identified in relation to primary sites, and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and adjuvant systemic therapy did not contribute to improvements in the 5-year OS. Conclusions No independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS or DSS were identified. Regional or distant recurrences are often identified, regardless of local control with surgical resection. Difficult control of MMHN with conventional therapeutic strategies, such as surgical intervention, PORT, and systemic therapy, has been suggested.

Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Hypopharyngeal Cancer Using Different Surgical Modalities

Background and Objectives In the present study, we evaluated the treatment results of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) patients and analyzed the occurrence of secondary primary malignancies. Treatments were based on two different surgical modalities (conventional pharyngo-laryngectomy vs. transoral surgery). In addition, prognostic factors of the patients were evaluated.Subjects and Method We analyzed medical data of 232 patients diagnosed with HPSCC and underwent surgery at our hospital from January 2006 to December 2019.Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 67.2% for the stage I-II group and 64.9% for the stage III-IV group. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 78.2% for the stage I-II group and 54.5% for the stage III-IV group. N classification was significantly correlated with disease relapse and patient mortality. Patient age, sex, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, initial tumor stage, and early recurrence (within 6 months) were significantly associated with successful salvage treatment. The two surgical modalities did not yield different oncological outcomes. Secondary primary malignancies occurred most frequently in the esophagus, with no observed inferior survival rate in patients with second malignancies.Conclusion The 5-year survival rate for HPSCC patients who received surgical treatment was 78% for stage I-II and 54% for stage III-IV. While no difference in oncological outcome was observed based on surgical modality, the transoral surgery group showed better functional outcomes.

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Robotic distal pancreatectomy has increasingly been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open distal pancreatectomy, whilst the outcomes following robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are still uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of robotic RAMPS and open RAMPS for PDAC. The patients who underwent robotic RAMPS and open RAMPS for PDAC at our clinical centre between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. After a propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative and pathological outcomes in the both groups were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognosis factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of these patients. 318 cases were recorded in robotic and open groups. The robotic group showed advantages in operative time [205.00 (166.00, 240.00) min vs 235 (184.75, 270.00) min, P = 0.002], estimated blood loss [100 (50, 100) ml vs 300 (100, 400) ml, P < 0.001], delayed gastric emptying [0 vs 5.03%, P = 0.007] and postoperative hospital stay [7.00 (5.00, 10.00) days vs 11.00 (8.00, 14.00) days, P < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in rate of severe postoperative complications between the robotic group and the open group. Multivariable analysis showed that carbohydrate antigen 19-9, estimated blood loss, N stage, tumour differentiation, chemotherapy and vascular invasion were independent risk factors for OS and RFS of these patients. Robotic RAMPS was safe and had some advantages over open RAMPS for PDAC. There were no significantly differences in oncological outcomes and long-term survival rates between the robotic and open groups. Robotic RAMPS expanded the indications for minimally invasive surgeries for PDAC to a certain extent.