Difference In Distant Disease-free Survival Research Articles

Survival in Cytologically Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Nodal Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Simple SummaryIt is unknown whether patients with cytologically proven axillary node-positive breast cancer, who achieve axillary pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a comparable prognosis to patients with axillary pathological node-negative disease (pN-) without NAC. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the clinical impact of axillary pCR after NAC on survival and to compare survival outcomes between breast cancer patients with axillary pCR, and those with axillary pN- without NAC, using propensity score matching to adjust for baseline characteristics other than nodal status. Axillary pCR after NAC was associated with improved prognosis in patients with axillary node-positive disease, and patients with axillary pCR and matched pairs with axillary pN- without NAC had comparable outcomes.Background: It is unknown whether patients with cytologically proven axillary node-positive breast cancer who achieve axillary pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have comparable prognosis to patients with axillary pathological node-negative disease (pN-) without NAC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with cytologically proven axillary node-positive disease who received NAC and those with axillary pN- without NAC for control between January 2007 and December 2012. We compared outcomes according to response in the axilla to NAC and between patients with axillary pCR and matched pairs with axillary pN- without NAC using propensity scores. Results: We included 596 patients with node-positive breast cancer who received NAC. The median follow-up period was 64 months. Patients with axillary pCR showed significantly better distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with residual axillary disease (both p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in DDFS and OS between patients with axillary pCR and matched pairs with axillary pN- without NAC. Conclusion: Axillary pCR was associated with improved prognosis. Patients with axillary pCR and matched pairs with axillary pN- without NAC had comparable outcomes. This information will be useful when considering the intensity of follow-up and adjuvant therapy.

Impact of molecular subtypes on the prediction of distant recurrence in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer upon five years of endocrine therapy

BackgroundCurrent evidence suggests that patients with Luminal A early breast cancer can skip chemotherapy or extended endocrine therapy, but immunohistochemistry-based biomarker analysis for St Gallen subtyping may not be reproducible. We asked whether RT-qPCR can be used instead to address this clinical question.MethodsRNA was extracted from tumor material derived from ER+/HER2- patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment for low-risk cancers and was semi-quantified by RT-qPCR with the MammaTyper®. St Gallen subtypes were based on the mRNA expression of ERBB2/HER2, ESR1/ER, PGR/PR and MKI67/Ki67 after dichotomizing at predefined cut-offs. Differences in distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were assessed by Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox regression.ResultsWith a median follow up of 7.8 years, there were ten events in the group of 195 Luminal A-like tumors (5.1%) and 18 events in the remaining 127 tumors (14.1%), consisting mostly of Luminal B-like cases (N = 119). Luminal A-like had significantly better DDFS over the entire follow-up period (HR 0.35, 95% CIs 0.16–0.76, p = 0.0078) with a trend towards reduced probability of recurrences also in the late phase (> 5 years) (HR 0.20, p = 0.052). The survival advantage spanning the entire follow-up period persisted in the pN0 or pN0-N1 subgroups or after correcting for clinicopathological parameters. MKI67 alone significantly predicted for worse DDFS (HR 2.62, 95% CIs 1.24–5.56, p = 0.0088).ConclusionsSt Gallen Luminal A-like tumors identified by RT-qPCR display markedly low rates of distant recurrence at ten years follow-up. Patients with such tumors could be spared chemotherapy due to the obviously unfavourable benefit/toxicity ratio.

Comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant to adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of early-stage HER2 negative breast cancer: A population-based analysis.

e12100 Background: The use of neoadjuvant treatment has increased over the past decade due to its ability to assess tumour sensitivity to systemic treatment in vivo, and to downstage women for increased breast conserving surgery. Recent studies have stratified patients with residual disease to receive additional treatment, which has resulted in meaningful improvements in survival. However, meta-analysis data suggest similar long-term outcomes for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in historical randomized trials. The comparative efficacy in a real-world setting utilizing modern chemotherapy regimens is unknown. Methods: A retrospective review of the BC Cancer Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit (BCOU) was performed to identify patients with stage I-III HER-2 negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy at the BC Cancer Agency from 2005-2010. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). A matched analysis (age, stage, subtype) for patients treated with NACT vs ACT (matched 1:3) was then performed using a propensity scoring method to compare distant disease-free survival (DDFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). No patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for residual disease after NACT. Results: A total of 656 patients met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 164 NACT and 492 ACT cases. Median age was 49 years (37-68) in the NACT group vs 49 (37-65) in the ACT group (p = 0.71). The majority had stage 3 disease, 64% in both groups (p = 1.0). Most were hormone receptor positive (HR+), 67.1% vs 70.7% in the NACT vs ACT groups, respectively (p = 0.41). 5-year DDFS was 75% with NACT (95%CI 67, 82) and 77% with ACT (95%CI 72, 81), p = 0.87. 5-year OS for patients treated with NACT was 77% (95%CI 71, 84) and 80% (95%CI 75, 85) for patients treated with ACT, p = 0.33. 5-year BCSS was 80% with NACT (95% CI 70, 86) and 82% (95%CI 77, 86) with ACT, p = 0.75. Multivariate analysis for tumour size, nodal involvement and subtype are ongoing. Conclusions: The use of NACT compared to ACT in a population-based setting did not result in significant differences in DDFS, OS or BCSS. Acknowledging the comparative efficacy of these approaches will be informative to determine if the addition of subsequent adjuvant treatment for patients with residual disease after NACT will lead to differential benefits in a population-based setting.

Abstract P4-14-12: Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy

Abstract Background:Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for up to 15% of all breast cancers and is clinically and biologically distinct from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Despite that, women with early stage ILC are often treated similarly to IDC. However, several retrospective studies suggest that patients (pts) with ILC may not derive survival benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy relative to pts with IDC. The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of pts with ILC treated with chemotherapy with those who received endocrine monotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review of pts with ILC or pleomorphic lobular carcinoma treated at the Ohio State University James Cancer Center from 2004-2014 was performed. Clinico-pathologic characteristics, treatment summary and clinical outcomes were collected. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to the first distant metastases or death and overall survival (OS) was the time from diagnosis to death or last known follow up. DDFS and OS curves were created using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate univariate and multi variable hazard ratios (HR) for OS and DDFS. Results: We identified 379 pts with early stage ILC (stage I: 43% (162/379), stage II: 34% (127/379), stage III: 22% (84/379), unknown: 1% (6/379)). The majority of pts were post-menopausal (79%), Caucasian (92%) and ER+/PR+ (87%) and HER2 negative (96%). One hundred seventy six pts (46%) received chemotherapy and 189 (50%) pts received endocrine therapy alone. Pts who received chemotherapy had stage II or III disease, positive lymph nodes and grade 2 or 3 tumors; while pts who received endocrine monotherapy had stage I disease, negative lymph nodes and grade 1 or 2 tumors. We found a 51% decrease in chemotherapy (from 63% to 31%) and an increase in endocrine monotherapy use (from 34% to 65%) between 2004-2010 and 2011-2014. One hundred thirty two pts were evaluated with Oncotype DX, of which 76% (100/132) were node negative with the majority having a low recurrence score (low: 64%; intermediate: 33%; high: 3%). The use of Oncotype DX increased from 21.1% in 2004-2010 to 47.9% in 2011-2014. We found that 112 of 149 pts with at least 5 years follow up (75.2%) successfully completed five or more years of endocrine therapy. Univariate cox models showed worse DDFS HRs for type of therapy and node status (HR: 2.36, p=0.005, HR: 4.16, p&amp;lt;0.001, respectively). However, the HR for therapy was no longer significant when adjusting for age, grade, and nodal involvement (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.56 – 2.52, p=0.646). Nodal involvement remained significant (HR= 3.56, 95% CI: 1.64-7.70, p=0.001) after adjusting for therapy, age and grade. No significant difference in OS was found between endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy (p=0.426, log-rank test). Conclusion: We found no difference in DDFS between endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy after adjusting for age, grade, and nodal involvement in pts with early stage ILC. This supports the hypothesis that ILC may not derive a significant benefit from the addition of chemotherapy. We need more prospective clinical trials considering histology to better understand how best to treat ILC. Citation Format: Williams N, Liu J, Stephens J, Palettas M, Boutrid H, Sardesai S, Reinbolt R, Stover D, VanDeusen J, Noonan A, Wesolowski R, Lustberg M, Ramaswamy B. Outcomes in hormone receptor positive, invasive lobular cancer in the era of endocrine monotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-12.

Effect of Trastuzumab among HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients that Achieved Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: We sought to investigate the incremental benefit of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: The data of HER2-positive invasive breast cancer patients treated with NACT and achieving pCR were obtained from the institutional database. Patients were categorized according to trastuzumab administration. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank estimates were used to test the association between trastuzumab administration and survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were used to obtain hazard ratios. Results: Of 223 patients, 83 (37.2%) were treated with NACT without trastuzumab and 140 (62.8%) were treated with NACT plus trastuzumab for 1 year. After a median follow-up of 67 months, the trastuzumab group showed improved relapse-free survival compared with the no-trastuzumab group (95.7 vs. 87.8%, hazard ratio = 0.31, p = 0.028). No significant difference in distant disease-free survival or overall survival was observed (p = 0.250 and 0.432, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified endocrine therapy and trastuzumab administration to be associated with decreased risk of relapse (p = 0.018 and 0.030, respectively). Conclusion: The administration of trastuzumab should be considered standard treatment for HER2-positive patients who have achieved pCR after NACT alone.

Inverse correlation between Ki67 expression as a continuous variable and outcomes in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer.

Few studies to date have investigated the prognostic significance of Ki67 expression as a continuous variable in breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Ki67 expression as a dichotomous or continuous variable on outcomes in estrogen receptor (ER)+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer. Survival analysis was performed to estimate the likelihood of distant recurrence and death in retrospective data from 794 patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. We assessed the relationship between outcomes and two Ki67 cutoffs, 14% and 20%, and the Ki67 labeling index as a continuous variable. In univariate analysis, T stage, lymph node involvement, histological grade, progesterone receptor status, and Ki67 expression at the two cutoffs and as a continuous variable were identified as significant prognostic factors for distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). There were no statistical differences in DDFS and OS between women with Ki67 expression of <14% and 14-<20%. Multivariate analysis showed that Ki67 expression ≥20% was an independent prognostic indicator for DDFS. Regarding the risk of distant metastasis, the 20% cutoff was more reliable than 14%. We also found that Ki67 expression as a continuous variable was an independent prognostic factor for DDFS and OS in multivariate analyses. High Ki67 expression is associated with a survival disadvantage in patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer, indicating that these patients might have a higher risk of recurrence after primary treatment and might therefore benefit from individualized treatment.

Abstract P2-11-11: Role of postmastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A study from the Japanese breast cancer registry

Abstract Background: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to be beneficial in node-positive breast cancer patients. However, the role of PMRT for patients receiving modern neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy for breast cancer patients treated with NAC and mastectomy in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry. Methods: Patients who received NAC and mastectomy for cT1-4 cN0-2 M0 breast cancer were included in this analysis. We assessed locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared them between the groups with and without PMRT by nodal status after NAC; ypN0, ypN1, and ypN2-3. We also performed multivariable cox regression analysis to evaluate the association of radiotherapy and these outcomes adjusting for baseline patient and cancer characteristics. Results: Of the 145,530 patients registered from 2004 to 2009, we identified 3,226 patients who met our inclusion criteria with the 5-year follow-up information including 1,299 ypN0, 1,036 ypN1, and 879 ypN2-3 cases. PMRT was performed in 185 patients (14.2%) with ypN0, 265 patients (25.6%) with ypN1, and 543 patients (61.8%) with ypN2-3. There was no difference in LRR, DDFS, and OS between the groups with and without radiotherapy for ypN1 patients who received NAC (P=0.72, P=0.29, and P=0.36, respectively). For patients with ypN2-3 breast cancer, radiotherapy significantly improved LRR (P&amp;lt;0.001), DDFS (P=0.01), and OS (P&amp;lt;0.001) on univariate analysis. No difference in LRR, DDFS, and OS was observed for ypN0 patients (P=0.81, P=0.15, and P=0.05, respectively). In multivariable analysis, the use of radiotherapy was independently associated with improved LRR [hazard ratio (HR): 0.608, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.452–0.818, P=0.001] and OS [HR: 0.685, 95% CI: 0.531–0.885, P=0.004] for ypN2-3 patients. Effect of PMRT on locoregional recurrence by the ypN subgroupsypN subgroupHazard ratio95%CI Low95%CI HighP valueypN00.8550.4581.5960.623ypN10.8320.5491.2620.387ypN2-30.6080.4520.8180.001 Effect of PMRT on overall survival by the ypN subgroupsypN subgroupHazard ratio95%CI Low95%CI HighP valueypN01.3250.8412.0870.224ypN10.8800.5991.2930.514ypN2-30.6850.5310.8850.004 Radiotherapy was not associated with OS among patients with ypN0 [HR: 1.325, 95% CI: 0.841–2.087, P=0.224] and ypN1 [HR: 0.880, 95% CI: 0.599–1.293, P=0.514]. There was no significant difference in DDFS with the addition of radiotherapy for all ypN subgroups. Conclusions: The results from this nationwide database study of breast cancer patients following modern NAC showed that PMRT did not improve survival for patients with ypN1 and ypN0. Radiotherapy might be only beneficial for ypN2-3 breast cancer patients who received NAC and mastectomy in the modern era. Randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the use of PMRT for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Miyashita M, Niikura N, Kumamaru H, Miyata H, Ishida T, Kinoshita T, Tsuda H, Nakamura S, Tokuda Y. Role of postmastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A study from the Japanese breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-11.

PTis and pT1a Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Is Associated with Good Prognosis after Salvage Surgery

Objectives: Patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery have a poor prognosis. There is little information regarding the prognostic impact of the tumor size in patients with IBTR. Methods: A total of 143 patients who had histologically confirmed IBTR without distant metastases and who underwent salvage surgery between 1989 and 2013 in our hospital were included. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was calculated according to the invasive tumor size of IBTR. The median follow-up period was 4.6 years. Results: Patients with pT1b or more advanced IBTR have a high (≥20%) 5-year distant recurrence risk. There were significant differences in DDFS between patients with pTis or pT1a and those with pT1b or a more advanced stage (5-year DDFS: 94.4 vs. 70.1%, respectively, p value = 0.006). This significance remained after adjusting for other clinicopathological factors (p value = 0.04). Conclusion: Patients with pTis or pT1a IBTR have a good prognosis after salvage surgery for IBTR, and the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy could be considered. Further research and validation studies are needed.

Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Experience in a Single Institution over a 10-Year Period.

BackgroundPathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been associated with favorable clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. However, the possibility that the prognostic significance of pCR differs among various definitions has not been established. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the pathologic response after NAC in 353 breast cancer patients and compared the prognoses after applying the following different definitions of pCR: ypT0/is, ypT0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0 ypN0. ResultspCR was significantly associated with improved distant disease-free survival (DDFS) regardless of the definition (ypT0/is, p = .002; ypT0, p = .008; ypT0/is ypN0, p < .001; ypT0 ypN0, p = .003). Presence of tumor deposits of any size in the lymph nodes (LNs; ypN ≥ 0(i+)) was associated with worse DDFS (ypT0 ypN0 vs ypT0 ypN ≥ 0(i+), p = .036 and ypT0/is ypN0 vs ypT0/is ypN ≥ 0(i+), p = .015), and presence of isolated tumor cells was associated with decreased overall survival (OS; ypT0/is ypN0 vs ypT0/is ypN0(i+), p = .013). Residual ductal carcinoma in situ regardless of LN status showed no significant difference in DDFS or OS (DDFS: ypT0 vs ypTis, p = .373 and ypT0 ypN0 vs ypTis ypN0, p = .462; OS: ypT0 vs ypTis, p = .441 and ypT0 ypN0 vs ypTis ypN0, p = .758). In subsequent analysis using ypT0/is ypN0, pCR was associated with improved DDFS and OS in triple-negative tumors (p < .001 and p = .003, respectively). ConclusionsBased on our study results, the prognosis and rate of pCR differ according to the definition of pCR and ypT0/is ypN0 might be considered a more preferable definition of pCR.

Abstract P5-08-30: Androgen receptor in early breast cancer: Distribution and prognostic value

Abstract Purpose: Androgen receptor (AR) status in breast cancer has received renewed interest over the last years especially in triple-negative disease (TNBC), but the prognostic value is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and prognostic value of AR in early breast cancer patients with or without adjuvant endocrine treatment. Patients and methods: AR was assessed on tissue microarray with the AR 441 antibody (Thermo Scientific) on a cohort consisting of 471 patients derived from two clinical studies: (1) 208 premenopausal node-negative patients of which 87% had received no adjuvant medical treatment and (2) 263 estrogen receptor (ER)+ and ER-, node-positive and –negative patients treated with 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Nuclear AR was divided in 5 groups: 0-1%, 2-10%, 11-50%, 51-75%, and 76-100% positive cells, scored as 0-4. Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by study, was used to model the impact of the prognostic factors on distant disease-free survival (DDFS), both using trend tests and a cut-off for positivity set at &amp;gt;10%, and log-rank tests to compare survival in different strata. Due to non-proportional hazards, the analysis was restricted to the first 5 years after diagnosis, a time period during which 95 patients developed distant recurrences. Results: 76% of all patients were AR+, and 89%, 48%, and 23% of the ER+, ER-, and TNBC, respectively. Positive associations were observed between AR, ER and progesterone receptor status (PgR), negative associations with Ki67, and histological grade, but no associations with tumour size, age or Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2). In univariable analysis, when divided into 5 groups, AR was a prognostic factor for DDFS with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.86 per step in fraction score (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.76-0.98, p=0.018), as was HER2, age, size, grade, node-status, PgR, and ER status. In the Kaplan-Meier curves for each study, a similar but weaker trend was found (log-rank test for trend p=0.14 and 0.057 for cohort 1 and 2, respectively). With a cut-off at 10%, a similar HR was found (HR=0.67, 95% CI:0.43-1.05, p=0.078). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for grade, tumour size, HER2, ER, node-status, and age, AR did not retain independent prognostic value (HR 1.04 95% CI:0.88-1.23, p=0.66). In the TNBC patients there were no significant differences in DDFS in the AR+ vs AR-patients, possibly due to few events and a small population (n=20/75). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that AR is a weak prognostic factor for recurrence in a cohort consisting of node-negative premenopausal patients without endocrine treatment and patients who have received adjuvant endocrine treatment. There was however no independent value in multivariable analyses. It is noteworthy that there were 23% AR positive TNBC patients, for whom there is currently no available targeted treatment. There are several ongoing studies with AR-targeted treatment in the metastatic setting, which if proven effective, may be transferred to studies in the adjuvant setting with the goal of improving long-term prognosis for TNBC. Taken together, AR may be clinically helpful for prognostic considerations and for selection of adjuvant treatment. Citation Format: Werner-Hartman L, Folkesson E, Nodin B, Malmström P, Fernö M, Nimeus E, Klintman M. Androgen receptor in early breast cancer: Distribution and prognostic value. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-30.

Prognosis after mastectomy versus repeat lumpectomy in patients with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A propensity score analysis

IntroductionMastectomy is the current standard surgical procedure for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). However, there is little evidence about the prognostic impact of the surgical procedure (mastectomy versus repeat lumpectomy) for IBTR. Patients and methodsA total of 271 consecutive patients who had histologically confirmed IBTR without distant metastases and underwent definitive surgery for IBTR between 1989 and 2008 were included from eight institutions in Japan. The impact of the surgical procedure for IBTR on distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using and multivariable proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching methods. ResultsOf the 271 patients, 149 patients (55%) underwent repeat lumpectomy and 122 patients (45%) underwent mastectomy after IBTR. The median follow-up period from definitive surgery for IBTR was 55 months. There was no difference in terms of DDFS and OS between repeat lumpectomy and mastectomy after IBTR, adjusted for various clinical and tumor characteristics. In addition, for the matched patient cohort, no difference in DDFS and OS was seen between the 2 groups. ConclusionIn our study, both multivariate analysis and the propensity score matching method demonstrated that there was no difference in terms of DDFS and OS between repeat lumpectomy and mastectomy after IBTR. Further studies are warranted (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000008136).

Breast Cancer Subtype and Distant Recurrence after Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

There is little information about the impact of breast cancer subtype on prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). One hundred eighty-five patients were classified according to breast cancer subtype, as approximated by estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67, of IBTR, and we evaluated whether breast cancer subtype was associated with distant recurrence after IBTR. There was a significant difference in distant disease-free survival (DDFS) after IBTR according to breast cancer subtype defined by a cutoff of the Ki-67 index of 20% (p=0.0074, log-rank test). The 5-year DDFS rates for patients with luminal A, luminal B, triple-negative, and HER2 types were 86.3, 57.1, 56.6, and 65.9%, respectively. In addition, breast cancer subtype was significantly associated with distant recurrence after IBTR on adjustment for various clinicopathologic factors (p=0.0027, Cox proportional hazards model). Our study suggests that breast cancer subtype based on immunohistochemical staining predicts the outcomes of patients with IBTR. Further analyses are needed (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000008136).

Abstract P2-13-02: Effect of aspirin (ASP) or celecoxib (CC) use on outcomes in postmenopausal breast cancer patients randomized to adjuvant exemestane or anastrozole: NCIC CTG MA.27

Abstract Background: ASP is hypothesized to decrease the risk of breast cancer (BRCA) and BRCA recurrences. Thus we performed an exploratory analysis of ASP and CC use within the NCIC CTG MA.27 adjuvant trial comparing exemestane (E;N=3789) to anastrozole (A; N=3787) with a factorial second randomization to CC or placebo (P). Neither A or E was superior in breast cancer outcomes. Baseline low-dose ASP use is an accepted surrogate of cardiovascular risk factors and was used as a stratification factor across all 4 arms. Randomization to CC-P was discontinued after 18 months (n = 1622) due to concerns of cardiac toxicity. Methods: Patients taking &amp;gt;81mg of ASP daily at baseline were ineligible for randomization and use of &amp;gt;81mg of ASP daily was not allowed. Women enrolled during CC randomization were included in the comparison of E and A, stratified by whether they had been randomized to CC [yes, no;N=1622] and concomitant low-dose ASP [≤81 mg/day (yes, no); N=2209]. Other stratification factors included: lymph-nodes (negative, positive, or unknown); prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes, no). The primary endpoint, event-free-survival (EFS), was defined as time from randomization to time of locoregional or distant disease recurrence, new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) defined as time from randomization to time of death from any cause and distant disease-free-survival (DDFS), defined as time from randomization to time of distant disease recurrence. Univariate (uni) assessment of CC and ASP use was assessed with stratified log-rank test, adjusting for lymph-node status and adjuvant chemotherapy and applied by intention-to-treat. Exploratory multivariate (multi) analyses (N = 1622) had forced inclusion of treatment and used step-wise forward stratified Cox modeling to examine the effects of CC, ASP use and baseline patient characteristics on outcomes; a factor was added with Wald test statistic p ≤ 0.05. Results: At median follow-up of 4.1 years, 186/1622 (11%) patients had an EFS event; 125 (8%) had died from any cause, and 80 (5%) had distant BRCA relapse. CC did not have significant uni association with outcomes: EFS p-value=0.92; OS p-value p = 0.56; DDFS p-value=0.55. ASP use was associated with worse EFS [p = 0.006, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.12–1.96)], worse OS [p = 0.0002, HR 1.87 (95% CI (1.35–2.61)], and non-significant difference in DDFS (p = 0.72). CC had no multi association with EFS, OS or DDFS. ASP use had no multi association with EFS and DDFS (p &amp;gt; 0.05). However, ASP use had multi prognostic association with worse OS [p = 0.01; HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.13–2.49)]. Conclusions: Users of either CC or low dose ASP had similar DDFS to non-users in MA.27. As expected, low-dose ASP users (with presumptive cardiovascular risk factors) had worse OS than non-users. Inadequate numbers of patients randomized to CC and lack of randomization to aspirin leaves inadequate evidence from MA.27 to determine whether anti-inflammatories influence breast cancer outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.

Value of adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes undergoing a modified radical mastectomy and systemic therapy

507 Background: Whether adjuvant radiation therapy should be utilized for patients (pts) with early stage breast cancer with up to 3 positive axillary lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy is controversial. This retrospective study was performed to determine if adjuvant radiation therapy had an impact on survival for this cohort of pts. Methods: 4240 pts with T1–2N0–1 breast cancers, diagnosed between 1980–2007, who underwent either mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy or segmental mastectomy with adjuvant radiation therapy were identified. All pts received systemic treatment. Women with &gt;3 positive axillary lymph nodes were excluded. Overall (OS) and distant disease free survival (DDFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meir product method. Cox proportional hazards were used to determine associations between OS/DDFS and type of surgery after controlling for pt and disease characteristics. Results: 1336 (18.8%) had T1N0 disease, 1114 (26.27%) had T2N0 disease, 989 (23.33%) had T1N1 disease and 801 (18.89%) had T2N1 disease. Median follow-up was 54 months.5- year DDFS among women who underwent mastectomy and segmental mastectomy was 81% (95% 78%-83%) and 86% (95% CI 84%-87%), respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). In the Cox analysis, pts who had mastectomy without radiation had a significantly increased risk of distant recurrence (HR= 1.39, 95% CI 1.14–1.70, p= 0.0013) than pts treated with segmental mastectomy and radiation. When looking at subgroups, no significant difference in DDFS was observed between the two groups in pts with lymph node negative disease. However, for pts with 1–3 positive lymph nodes, pts treated with mastectomy without radiation had significantly increased risk of distant recurrence compared to pts treated with segmental mastectomy with radiation (HR=1.614, 95% CI 1.198–2.177, p= 0.002). This difference was most pronounce in the subset of patients with T2N1 disease (HR= 1.794, 95% CI 1.220–2.637, p=0.003). Similar trends were observed for OS. Conclusions: This study provides provocative evidence for benefit of radiation therapy among pts with 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes who are treated with surgery and systemic therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Is the prognostic value of Ki-67 dependent on ER status and histological grade?.

Abstract Abstract #1076 Purpose: Histological grade, tumor size, age, hormone receptor, and HER2 are established prognostic indicators for distant recurrences in node negative breast cancer. However, the role of the proliferation marker Ki-67 as a prognostic factor is still under debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the additional prognostic value of Ki-67 in lymph node negative breast cancer.&amp;#x2028; Patients and methods: In 200 consecutive premenopausal women with lymph node negative breast cancer, Ki-67 was determined using the monoclonal MIB-1 antibody on tissue microarray. High Ki-67 proliferation index was defined as &amp;gt;20% positive tumor cells. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the impact of the prognostic factors on distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Due to non-proportional hazards, the analysis was restricted to the first 5 years after diagnosis, a time period during which 38 patients developed distant recurrences.&amp;#x2028; Results: Strong positive correlations were observed between Ki-67, histological grade, S-phase, and HER-2. In univariate analysis, Ki-67 was a prognostic factor for DDFS (HR 2.9 95%CI: 1.5-5.7, p=0.002), as well as HER2, histological grade, age and ER. Tumor size was not a significant factor. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 was an independent prognostic factor for DDFS (HR 2.3 95% CI: 1.0-5.0, p=0.044) together with HER2 and age, whereas tumor size and ER were not significant factors. Models including both Ki-67 and histological grade were not fitted due to colinearity. When stratifying for ER status Ki-67 was a significant prognostic factor in the ER positive group only (HR 5.1 95% CI: 2.0-13, p=0.001, univariate analysis) and significant interaction between the two markers was found (p=0.02). When stratifying for histological grade, Ki-67 could divide the patients with histological grade 2 (n=69; 10 distant recurrences) into two separate groups with significant difference in DDFS (HR 15 95% CI: 3.7-57, p=0.0001). This remained significant after adjustment for age and HER2 status. In histological grade 1 and 3, Ki-67 provided no additional prognostic information.&amp;#x2028; Conclusion: This study demonstrates that Ki-67 is an independent prognostic factor for premenopausal patients with lymph node negative breast cancer. It is noteworthy that Ki-67 adds prognostic information in ER positive patients, but not in ER negative, and in patients with histological grade 2, but not in patients with histological grade 1 and 3. Taken together, Ki-67 may be clinically helpful for prognostic considerations and for selection of adjuvant treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1076.

Synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancers: implications for patient management

Interest in the presence and management of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer has been reported since the early 1920s. The demonstration of multiple foci of breast cancer has been reported in 9-75% of breast cancer related specimens. The large difference in reported incidence is multifactorial and related to the definitions applied, mode of detection and pathological assessment. However, randomised clinical trials comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation over many years have shown no difference in distant disease-free survival or overall survival in patients with synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer compared with unifocal breast cancer. This review examines the current definitions, incidence, pathological assessment, staging and surgical options of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer.

Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer with breast conservation versus mastectomy

Purpose/Objective: Because there is little data with follow-up greater than 15 years on the outcomes of breast conservation versus mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, the results of a randomized, single-institution study were updated. Materials/Methods: After obtaining fully informed, written consent, 247 patients with clinical stage I and II breast cancer were enrolled on an institutionally reviewed protocol and randomly assigned to undergo either modified radical mastectomy (116) or lumpectomy (121), axillary dissection and radiation therapy. The 237 patients who underwent randomization have been followed for a median potential follow-up of 18.4 years. The primary end points were overall survival and disease-free survival. Results: At 18.4 years, the overall survival was 58 percent for patients assigned to mastectomy and 54 percent for patients assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (p=0.67). Disease-free survival at 18 years was 67 percent for the patients assigned to mastectomy and 63 percent for those assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation (p=0.64) after recurrences successfully salvaged by mastectomy were censored from analysis. A total of 27 of 121 women treated with breast conservation experienced an ipsilateral in-breast cancer event. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in distant disease-free survival which was 69 percent for mastectomy and 68 percent for breast conservation (p=0.82). Conclusions: With nearly 20 years follow-up, breast conservation with lumpectomy and radiation offers equivalent overall and disease-free survival to mastectomy. Ipsilateral in-breast cancer events were observed throughout the entire follow-up period for the breast conservation group.