DIC related to APL (3 cases, No. 1-3), AML (No. 4), gastric cancer (No. 5), prostate cancer (No. 6), progressive systemic sclerosis (No. 7), and mitral stenosis & insufficiency (No. 8), were described.Most of them showed, more or less, remarkable hemorrhagic diathesis.In the terminal stage of Case No. 1, 2, 4 and 7, shock, oliguria and renal failure that might be due to DIC were observed in clinical and some laboratory findings. FDP and thrombocytopenia were demonstrable in all.Fibrinogen was reduced in most of them, however, in cases already complicated with some infections when the diagnosis of DIC was made, it revealed higher level than in the other.All cases were intravenously treated with heparin from 6, 000 to 20, 000U/day. In case No. 2, t-AMCHA was used because of negative paracoagulation test and few data suggesting DIC, and in case No. 1, 5, the same was done because of no improvement of hemorrhagic diathesis.It was impressed that in Case No. 1 t-AMCHA was effective and Case No. 6 recovered dramatically by heparin.However, it may be suggested that the effect of treatments on DIC might be affected by the improvement of each basic diseases, as they recovered simultaneously from each basic ones.Case No. 8 showed no change in clinical and hematological findings with or without therapy. In addition, from echocardiogram, thrombus, which was found in left atrium, might be a cause of DIC findings.Six cases (No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7) ended lethally and autopsy was done in all.In three cases (No. 2, 3 and 7) of them, microthrombi were pathologically demonstrable in some tissues.As microthrombi are indispensable to pathological diagnosis of DIC, it was just identified in above three cases.From 1966 to 1975, microthrombi were observed in all of 23 DIC cases which were examined in our department of pathology.In comparison to it, less microthrombi were seen in this presentation. This discrepancy between two papers may depend on intensity of fibrinogenolysis and/or fibrinolysis, effects of treatments, degree of postmorten changes and tissue staining methods.As heparin was used in all cases, it may be suggested that it's use is related to one of the causes of decreased detection rate of microthrombi.It has been reported by some authors that DIC may not be always based on primary coagulation-secondary fibrinolysis, because sometimes antiplasmin therapy may be effective in DIC.As the mechanism of DIC has not been completely recognized at present, it may be suggested that “Defibrination Syndrome” may be prefered to DIC.
Read full abstract