To the Editor: In reaction to clinical practice article by Steven D. Rauch (1) in the August 21 issue of the New England Journal on sudden deafness and the following correspondence in Otology Neurotology on intratympanic treatment of this disease, we would like to comment on the use of a dexamethasone 3-day pulse therapy as studied by Westerlaken et al. (2) in comparison to a 7-day prednisolone taper in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial as mentioned on page 836 by Rauch (1). Rauch comments rightly on the possible severe side effects of corticosteroid treatment, including elevated blood sugar levels, elevated blood pressure, mood change, sleep disturbances, flushing, gastritis, and weight gain. As we implemented the 3-day dexamethasone pulse therapy treatment in our hospital after the study by Westerlaken, a former colleague of ours, we would like to stress the importance of utter care in following the exclusion criteria, like diabetes mellitus, cardiac history, hypertension, pregnancy, stomach ulcer, renal failure, use of oral anticoagulant or corticosteroids, and Cushing syndrome. We have experienced patients with raising blood pressures, mood disturbances, sleep disturbances, and flushes and observed that this seems to be more often the case in the 3-day dexamethasone treatment than in the prednisolone taper therapy. Also, 1 patient treated with the 3-day dexamethasone course developed a myocardial infarction while his previously existing diabetes mellitus derailed, without regaining the lost hearing. Obviously, that is too high a price to be paid, especially for a disease from which 45 to 65% show spontaneous improvement (3,4). Perhaps because of his preexisting (well-regulated) diabetes mellitus, our patient should not have started the treatment in the first place; however, only badly regulated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is one of our exclusion criteria for this type of treatment. We would like to urge physicians to take the severe risks of oral dexamethasone pulse therapy and prednisolone taper therapy seriously and refrain from prescribing this treatment to the group of patients known with exclusion criteria as previously mentioned. A hopeful but expensive alternative could be the intratympanic corticosteroid treatments that are currently being studied and discussed (5,6). However, also doing nothing might be an interesting type of treatment, although difficult for physicians; as the Cochrane Review of Wei pointed out, the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss remains unproven (3). Rolien H. Free, M.D., Ph.D.* Noor D. Smale, M.D.* Emile de Kleine, Ph.D.† Bernard F. A. M. van der Laan, M.D., Ph.D.* *Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and †University Audiological Center Groningen University Hospital Groningen The Netherlands
Read full abstract