In this study, the experimental design of response surface methodology was used to explore the interaction between spraying parameters to obtain an optimized process to reduce the porosity of the coating, and to prepare an excellent chromium oxide coating. The order of the single parameter affecting porosity is as follows: power > main gas > spraying distance > carrier gas flow. This study found that the spraying process with the lowest porosity of the chromium oxide coating is as follows: power of 625 W, stand-off distance of 105 mm, primary gas of 42.5 lpm, carrier gas flow of 5 lpm, and feed powder delivery rate of 35 g/min. The EDS results show that the Cr and O elements in the coating with the lowest porosity are uniformly distributed, while for the coating with the highest porosity, the elements are unevenly distributed to a certain extent, which is caused by the unevenness of the structure caused by the structure defects. The corrosion current density of chromium oxide coating VI (low porosity) is 4.34 × 10⁻⁶ A, whereas that of chromium oxide coating IV (high porosity) is 1.862 × 10⁻⁵ A. On the coating with the highest porosity, the corrosion activity is dominant, while the minimum porosity of coating is the smallest.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
3011 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Design Of Response Surface Methodology
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
2985 Search results
Sort by Recency