Desethylamodiaquine Research Articles

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of amodiaquine, chloroquine and their monodesethyl metabolites in biological samples

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of amodiaquine (AQ), desethylamodiaquine (DAQ), chloroquine (CQ) and desethylchloroquine (DCQ) in human whole blood, plasma and urine is reported. 4-(4-Dimethylamino-1-methylbutylamino)-7-chloroquinoline was used as internal standard. The drugs and the internal standard were extracted into di-isopropyl ether as bases and then re-extracted into an acidic aqueous phase with 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 4.0 for AQ samples and at pH 2.5 for CQ filter paper samples. A C 18 column was used and the mobile phase consisted of methanol–phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 3)–perchloric acid (250: 747.5:2.5, v/v). The absorbance of the drugs was monitored at 333 nm and no endogenous compound interfered at this wavelength. The limit of quantification in whole blood, plasma and urine was 100 n M for AQ and DAQ (sample size 100 μl) as well as for CQ and DCQ in blood samples dried on filter paper. For 1000 μl AQ and DAQ samples, the limit of quantification was 10 n M in all three biological fluids. The within-assay and between-assay coefficients of variations were always <10% at the limits of quantification. Plasma should be preferred for the determination of AQ and DAQ since use of whole blood may be associated with stability problems.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous amodiaquine.

Amodiaquine hydrochloride (3 mg base kg-1) was given by constant rate intravenous injection over 10 min to seven healthy adult male volunteers, and by constant rate infusion (10 mg base kg-1) over 4 h to 10 adult patients admitted to hospital with falciparum malaria. After intravenous injection in volunteers there was considerable variation in plasma concentration profiles between subjects; peak plasma concentrations ranged between 65 and 1921 ng ml-1. A biexponential equation was fitted to the plasma concentration time data and the following estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (geometric mean; range) were derived; lambda 1 = 24.4 (7.6-95.0) h-1, lambda 2 = 0.33 (0.12-0.79) h-1, V1:1.1 (0.3-3.6) 1 kg-1, Vss: 17.4 (2.3-95.9) 1 kg-1 and systemic clearance 13.0 (4.7-56.6) 1 kg-1 h-1. After intravenous infusion there was also considerable variability between patients with post-infusion plasma concentrations ranging between 82 and 836 ng ml-1. The plasma concentration-time profiles were biphasic with the following estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (geometric mean; range) alpha = 1.87 (0.60-8.52) h-1, beta = 0.069 (0.021-0.265) h-1, V1: 4.6 (0.5-29.3) 1 kg-1, Vss: 38.3 (3.7-127.9) 1 kg-1 and systemic clearance CL (1.6-17.3) 1 kg-1 h-1. There was no measurable long terminal elimination phase, and the principal metabolite desethyl amodiaquine was not detected in the plasma samples. There was no serious toxicity in either group. During intravenous injection there was a significant fall in systolic blood pressure in four subjects (mean fall 16 mm Hg) but there was no significant change in heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Failure to detect amodiaquine in the blood after oral administration.

Plasma and red blood cell concentrations of amodiaquine (AM) and its metabolite, desethylamodiaquine (DAM), were monitored at intervals up to 21 days after a single oral dose of 600 mg amodiaquine in five normal African subjects. Concentrations of AM and DAM were determined using a high performance liquid chromatography technique with a lower limit of sensitivity of 10 ng ml-1 for both compounds. AM was not detectable in plasma and red blood cell samples withdrawn from any of the subjects. DAM was detectable in both media. It appeared in the blood 0.5-1 h after administering AM, reached a peak in 1.5-2 h and subsequently declined slowly. We conclude that AM is rapidly converted to DAM and its blood concentration, compared with that of DAM, is very low if not negligible.