In Western society, with the gradual transition from the patriarchal family to the contemporary nuclear one (both parents work and contacts with the extended family are limited), fatherhood has been increasingly linked to more expectations and responsibilities in childcare and family life (Quilici, 2010; Biehle and Mickelson, 2012; Crespi and Ruspini, 2015). At biological level, neural plasticity and hormonal changes that occur in men may also increase the risk of psychological distress during the transition to parenthood (Poromaa et al., 2017; Baldoni, 2020). Research has clearly demonstrated that during the perinatal period the emotional states of mothers and fathers influence each other showing a significant correlation between paternal and maternal perinatal depressive disorders (Baldoni and Ceccarelli, 2010; Paulson and Bazemore, 2010; Musser et al., 2013). Thus, in the last decades there has been an increased interest in men's perinatal mental health (Baldoni, 2010; Garfield, 2015; Gutierrez-Galve et al., 2015; Field, 2018). In this scenario, Paternal Perinatal Depression (PPND) is considered a specific condition that affects many fathers between pregnancy and the first year after childbirth. PPND is associated with maternal depression (Baldoni et al., 2009; Paulson et al., 2016) and adverse outcomes in children and adolescents, including externalizing and internalizing symptoms (Ramchandani and Psychogiou, 2009; Baldoni, 2016; Sweeney and MacBeth, 2016). Specifically, a longitudinal study on 12,884 fathers has confirmed the influence of PPND on the psychophysical development of children evaluated from birth to 7 years of life (Ramchandani et al., 2005, 2008), with an increase, more significant in males, in emotional and behavioral control problems at 21 and 42 months and childhood psychiatric disorders and oppositional behaviors at 7 years. Other studies (Baldoni et al., 2009, 2011) conducted with the CARE-Index (Crittenden, 1979–2007) documented the influence of depression and poor paternal sensitivity on the psychomotor development of infants (assessed with the Bailey scales). Two recent metanalyses showed a PPND prevalence in the word ranging from 10.4% (Paulson and Bazemore, 2010) to 8.4% (Cameron et al., 2016) and longitudinal studies found that pregnancy is the most sensitive period for the onset of symptoms in both men and women (Madsen and Juhl, 2007; Figueiredo and Conde, 2011). Therefore, the term Paternal Perinatal Depression (PPND) is gradually replacing Paternal Post-partum/Post-natal Depression (PPD), to consider and identify the possible onset of depressive symptoms in fathers since the prenatal period (Baldoni, 2010; Cameron et al., 2016; Bruno et al., 2020). Although these terms are commonly used in research, these diagnoses are not even mentioned in the current DSM-5. The manual only specifies the criteria for a major depressive episode “with peripartum onset” referring to the mother only, which is defined as the most recent episode occurring during pregnancy as well as in the 4 weeks following delivery. Anyhow, fathers are not usually the focus of the prevention and screening of perinatal affective disorders, and PPND remains underestimated and undertreated compared to maternal depression. A possible explanation is that men tend to show a less clear clinical picture than women do and thus the use of screening questionnaires developed for mothers may be not appropriate. Given that perinatal depression risks and psychological responses differ significantly based on gender (Habib, 2012), it would be useful to rethink perinatal psychological disorders considering the wide array of paternal affective symptoms and the limitations of current tools developed to assess maternal depression. Hence, the aim of this opinion article is to emphasize the need to consider male-specific responses to perinatal distress following an integrative and gender-based perspective. Secondly, we have commented on the limits of research on PPND based on current self-reported measurements.
Read full abstract