Abstract Background Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) tests, first introduced in 1959, are now the mainstay of clinical laboratories. Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (KTPH) is a 795-bed acute care general hospital located in the north of Singapore. The Department of Laboratory Medicine has been using dengue LFIA test kits for the detection of dengue NS1 antigen, IgM antibodies and IgG antibodies. While kits are cost-effective, user-friendly and provide rapid results, there is subjectivity in reading and interpretation of results. Methods We conducted a survey to assess test reading and interpretation by medical laboratory staff. Six serum and plasma specimens were analysed using Bioline™ Dengue IgG/IgM WB test device. Test kits at the end-point of sample incubation were photographed in both well-lit and dim conditions. A survey questionnaire was prepared using an online form builder tool using the photographs. Staff were invited to participate in the survey. They were allowed to report the result as ‘Positive’, ‘Negative’ or ‘Equivocal’. Results A total of sixteen responses were received. Results were 100% concordant for all 6 specimens in both well-lit and dim conditions. For one case, under a well-lit condition, 15 staff reported the result as ‘Positive’ while one staff reported ‘Equivocal’. Most of the reported results for samples with no consensus is split between ‘Positive’ and ‘Equivocal’. Conclusions Dengue viruses of all 4 known serotypes are endemic in Singapore. Positive results are tracked on a national level to identify areas of high dengue infection for intensive environmental and vector control measures. Hence, accurate reporting and identification of patients with dengue infection is important. Our survey shows that lighting conditions do not affect the interpretation of LFIA results. Reading and interpretation of dengue LFIA test kits however, remain dependent on user interpretation and newer test kits with optical readers may be useful in mitigating this.
Read full abstract